Message boards :
Politics :
I hope that this cop gets to feel the full force of the law. #2
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · 23 · 24 · 25 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
Again, another false assertion, from a Believer. Typical of that type. Do you not see how this is exactly what you do to everyone else? At the end of your post you say this: Edit: Why do I continue to Post the Truth about Ideologues? The irony here is that you constantly and consistently tell everyone else on these fora that you are exposing the "truth" of their ideology, and how you are Atheistic toward "fanatical" belief systems, then you routinely do to everyone here that which you do yourself. You've put everyone here in a metaphorical box and claim they can't think their way outside of the box you've put them in, damned if your box or label is correct of anyone here; that fact doesn't seem to matter to you. Anyone you disagree with on principal alone gets labeled a religious fanatic of ideology. Will you, and others, of you type understand this? *sniff* *sniff* We really are getting so deep into irony that we're almost to hypocrisy. Will you, and others, of your type understand this? Answer: No. |
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
'Parroting' another is an Intelligent reply? After failing to engage you in other methods of discussion, I've resorted to showing you how you sound to see if I can at least get through to you using your own methods. If it is considered an unintelligent reply, then what does that say about you when you do it to everyone else? Believer's in a Secular Religion (Ideology). Are the same as God Believers. No, I don't disagree that some people believe in their opinions so much that any disagreement with them is met with the same fanaticism that religious believers respond with. What I disagree with is your assertion that everyone here are those fanatical believers. Again, anyone that you seem to disagree with gets put into a box that you won't let them out of, and you immediately start disregarding all their opinions and responses while assuming you know what their positions are. Again, you have your own ideology that others will disagree with from time to time. Would it be right of them to simply dismiss your opinions in the same way you dismiss theirs? Or would it be better to actually discuss the topic, give the person a chance to explain their position, and if you disagree, state why you disagree and provide your reasoning, and if applicable, your sources for your reasoning until the two sides either understand each other or agree to disagree. Wait? That almost sounds like civil discussion! |
Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30608 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 |
Wait? That almost sounds like civil discussion! That position isn't inside his hermetically sealed box, so there will be no understanding, only dismissal! |
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
'Parroting' another is an Intelligent reply? Great. So we have a starting point. Now how do we reconcile our differences without resorting to "you don't understand and your type never will"? I am willing to hear you out on why you label everyone here as 'believers', and I'm willing to consider your position and take it on as my own if you can provide a compelling enough argument. But, are you willing to do the same? Are you open-minded enough to listen to counterpoints and consider taking them on as your own if a compelling enough argument is made? |
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
'Parroting' another is an Intelligent reply? I will take your response as you're not open-minded enough to hear opposing views, and further any attempt at forcing a discussion from you is perceived by you as an "attack" against your ideology, and you respond with fanatical assertions accusing everyone else of being intellectually boring. Thank you. |
Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30608 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 |
I will take your response as you're not open-minded enough to hear opposing views, and further any attempt at forcing a discussion from you is perceived by you as an "attack" against your ideology, and you respond with fanatical assertions accusing everyone else of being intellectually boring. I concur with the diagnosis. |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
I will take your response as you're not open-minded enough to hear opposing views, and further any attempt at forcing a discussion from you is perceived by you as an "attack" against your ideology, and you respond with fanatical assertions accusing everyone else of being intellectually boring. Getting a proper intelligent discussion out of Clyde would be like trying to get milk from a bull. :-( Cheers. |
Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30608 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 |
I will take your response as you're not open-minded enough to hear opposing views, and further any attempt at forcing a discussion from you is perceived by you as an "attack" against your ideology, and you respond with fanatical assertions accusing everyone else of being intellectually boring. Unfortunately, there is milking the bull. |
betreger Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 11360 Credit: 29,581,041 RAC: 66 |
I will take your response as you're not open-minded enough to hear opposing views, and further any attempt at forcing a discussion from you is perceived by you as an "attack" against your ideology, and you respond with fanatical assertions accusing everyone else of being intellectually boring. LOL I fear Clyde would not like it. |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
I will take your response as you're not open-minded enough to hear opposing views, and further any attempt at forcing a discussion from you is perceived by you as an "attack" against your ideology, and you respond with fanatical assertions accusing everyone else of being intellectually boring. There is that, but would you put it in your coffee? :-O Cheers. |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
The same silly hollow words again Clyde? Just because you rearrange them doesn't give them anymore substance than before. Maybe we should just call you "Pete Repeat" because that's all you seem to be capable of. You really should consider conserving your energy because you are wasting it rattling that keyboard. ;-) Cheers. |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
Another waste of energy and space I see again. :-) Cheers. |
Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30608 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 |
Another waste of energy and space I see again. :-) I'm beginning to wonder if he would pass a Turing Test with his current responses. He beginning to sound a lot like Eliza. I am the psychotherapist. Please, describe your problems. |
betreger Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 11360 Credit: 29,581,041 RAC: 66 |
I'm beginning to wonder if he would pass a Turing Test with his current responses. He beginning to sound a lot like Eliza Gary a good call. Clyde does respond a lot like the old game, The legend of Zelda. |
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
I'm beginning to wonder if he would pass a Turing Test with his current responses. He beginning to sound a lot like Eliza. ROFL! |
Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30608 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 |
From where we left off .... Cheerio :) :) :) Priceless! |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
I'm beginning to wonder if he would pass a Turing Test with his current responses. He beginning to sound a lot like Eliza Yep, he really should've taken a job as a clown as a career with all the laughs he gives us wherever he posts (which no matter the subject, it's the same dribble and words coming out) and we can also see that he just can't help himself from making himself look like a bigger idiot. [edit] But he'll just keep coming back trying to justify his position by using the same stupid words again. :-( Cheers. |
Es99 Send message Joined: 23 Aug 05 Posts: 10874 Credit: 350,402 RAC: 0 |
This thread has gone way off topic. I would clean it up, but I don't have the time right now. How about we get back on topic? Black Women Speak Out About Experiences With Police Brutality Reality Internet Personality |
Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30608 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 |
This thread has gone way off topic. I would clean it up, but I don't have the time right now. How about we get back on topic? Been two days since the last post, perhaps we are just waiting for the inevitable news story of an official abusing his power? Black Women Speak Out About Experiences With Police BrutalityOne of my friends became really hostile. And there is surprise at what follows? |
Es99 Send message Joined: 23 Aug 05 Posts: 10874 Credit: 350,402 RAC: 0 |
This thread has gone way off topic. I would clean it up, but I don't have the time right now. How about we get back on topic? Not when you are living in a police state. Reality Internet Personality |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.