Clues to Cambrian Explosion may Make ET Life More Likely

Message boards : SETI@home Science : Clues to Cambrian Explosion may Make ET Life More Likely
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Michael Watson

Send message
Joined: 7 Feb 08
Posts: 937
Credit: 1,107,941
RAC: 1,415
Message 1601797 - Posted: 17 Nov 2014, 21:19:04 UTC
Last modified: 17 Nov 2014, 21:33:31 UTC

The earliest life on Earth, known as prokaryotes, was quite simple, and remained so for billions of years. The so-called Cambrian Explosion, about 600 million years ago, in which more complex forms of life quickly arose, came relatively late in the history of life on our planet.
It's been wondered what was behind this delay. It's even been argued on this basis that the transition from simple to complex forms of life is very improbable, and, so, that complex life is rare in the universe, at large.
Some new research finds that oxygen was very scarce, before the Cambrian, and that this may have delayed the beginnings of Eukaryotes, as more complex life is called. These more complex forms of life require a good deal of oxygen to flourish. It appears that they may have done so as soon as conditions allowed it. This seems to suggest that complex life may be common, throughout the universe.
It's believed that oxygen, slowly accumulated in Earth's atmosphere as a waste product of simpler life forms, and then, perhaps more rapidly, as the breakup of the supercontinents into smaller land masses, more like those we know today, released additional oxygen into the air. An article giving more details on this is linked, below:
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/darwins-dilemma-solved/story?id=26791766&singlePage=true
ID: 1601797 · Report as offensive
anniet
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 2 Feb 14
Posts: 6748
Credit: 1,084,731
RAC: 547
Message 1601951 - Posted: 18 Nov 2014, 2:49:59 UTC

Thank you Michael! :) VERY interesting... I wonder if anyone's told Brian Cox...? :)
ID: 1601951 · Report as offensive
Profile Chris SCrowdfunding Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 19 Nov 00
Posts: 40039
Credit: 34,787,185
RAC: 63,816
United Kingdom
Message 1602223 - Posted: 18 Nov 2014, 16:56:57 UTC

I think there was earlier stuff than prokaryotes called protocells.

Prokaryotes

Abiogenesis
ID: 1602223 · Report as offensive
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 1816
Credit: 862,912
RAC: 30
Message 1609032 - Posted: 4 Dec 2014, 10:10:30 UTC
Last modified: 4 Dec 2014, 10:11:00 UTC

So the Cambrian Explosion is then supposed to be have been an asteroid impact then?

Or was it rather something that took off her on earth instead?

Please explain this to me.
ID: 1609032 · Report as offensive
Profile William Rothamel
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 3335
Credit: 1,322,163
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1609118 - Posted: 4 Dec 2014, 15:25:39 UTC - in response to Message 1609032.  

Sufficient Oxygen to support higher life-form development took a long time to build up to the required level. Algae in the primordial oceans produced Oxygen as a byproduct of their "exhalations".
ID: 1609118 · Report as offensive

Message boards : SETI@home Science : Clues to Cambrian Explosion may Make ET Life More Likely


 
©2017 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.