Who has priority?

Message boards : Politics : Who has priority?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile Dimly Lit Lightbulb 😀
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 08
Posts: 15399
Credit: 7,423,413
RAC: 1
United Kingdom
Message 1601265 - Posted: 15 Nov 2014, 0:29:51 UTC

ID: 1601265 · Report as offensive
W-K 666 Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 19048
Credit: 40,757,560
RAC: 67
United Kingdom
Message 1601402 - Posted: 15 Nov 2014, 11:42:13 UTC

I'm with the wheelchair users on this, I recently witnessed two mothers with prams refuse to move, and then only used the bus for the first ½ mile of the journey. I know the wheelchair user lives at the other end of the bus route ~10 miles away. That again, is a once an hour bus route, and there are other bus routes, from the same bus station stand, that go past where the prams got off, they would have waited at the very most 12 minutes and usually much less.
ID: 1601402 · Report as offensive
W-K 666 Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 19048
Credit: 40,757,560
RAC: 67
United Kingdom
Message 1601425 - Posted: 15 Nov 2014, 15:12:03 UTC - in response to Message 1601420.  

I'm confused. As a person 'Across the Pond', asking the following questions:

If the Mother gives up her space, does she not have somewhere else to ride? Or does she now have to exit the bus, and wait 1 hour, with her baby(s) for another bus?

If she, after the Decision, has to move/exit, and refuses: What will be the Legal Consequences to her, and what then happens to her children?


That would be the mothers decision, she could collapse the pram and sit with baby on her lap, or leave the bus and wait for next one.

And you have to take into account that these places were made to carry wheelchairs not prams. I have seen notices on some bus's that make it clear that they are for wheelchair use only. Which implies that even if there wasn't a wheelchair on board the driver could still insist that prams do not use the space.
ID: 1601425 · Report as offensive
anniet
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Feb 14
Posts: 7105
Credit: 1,577,368
RAC: 75
Zambia
Message 1601441 - Posted: 15 Nov 2014, 16:51:05 UTC
Last modified: 15 Nov 2014, 17:06:22 UTC

I was never allowed entry to a bus unless my babies' pushchair was folded. Simple. I missed many a bus in awful weather whilst struggling to fold pram and rainhood and juggle baby and shopping. There also had to be sufficient storage room for the folded chair. No problem. (I developed many useful skills doing it :)) Manufacturers of the chairs knew that and designed them accordingly. Since parents have been allowed to swipe at everyone's ankles by barging through the bus using their baby's pram as a battering ram - manufacturers have built them harder to fold and like tanks.

I'm sorry - I'm definitely with wheelchair users on this one. Most don't have someone up to ten times larger than them with them to lift them out and carry them on board. I would worry about a blanket one-size fits all court ruling however. There will be exceptions - mums with twins or several closely-spaced children would struggle... and manufacturers of the armoured people mowers... I mean modern pushchairs... would need to go back to designing something more practical.

edit: as to Clyde's point - Someone who has already paid their fare should be given every opportunity to get to their destination - but if they are taking up space designated for a wheelchair and a passenger in one subsequently needs to board the bus, then the pushchair must be folded (a lot easier to do on a stationary bus with assistance) if at all possible. If a parent refuses to comply, then being asked to leave the bus is acceptable. If they cannot comply - then a judgement decision would be needed to be made by the driver... and er... well... good luck everyone...
ID: 1601441 · Report as offensive
Profile The Simonator
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Nov 04
Posts: 5700
Credit: 3,855,702
RAC: 50
United Kingdom
Message 1602096 - Posted: 18 Nov 2014, 10:26:01 UTC

Hmm, tough one!

My initial gut-feeling is to favour the wheelchair users, they have enough on their plate already without having to fret over space on a bus.

Also, the size of some prams is ridiculous. I've seen ones that i think i could get in, all 18 stone of me. Trying to get them onto a bus is just inconsiderate.

The bus companies could improve the situation by taking out a couple of seat rows, thus creating a larger space for wheelchairs and prams. It's quite rare that i've seen every seat on a bus taken so the remaining seated passengers could squeeze up quite easily.
And even if the space wasn't always filled with prams or wheelchairs, standing passengers can still use it, so it's unlikely to impact on the bus' carrying capacity or the operators profits (heaven forfend!).
Life on earth is the global equivalent of not storing things in the fridge.
ID: 1602096 · Report as offensive
Profile Wiggo
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Jan 00
Posts: 34744
Credit: 261,360,520
RAC: 489
Australia
Message 1602104 - Posted: 18 Nov 2014, 11:03:29 UTC

When I worked for Sydney Buses, people with prams or strollers had to have them folded up before entering any bus and they were never allowed to use the 2 wheelchair available spaces (these spaces had 3 swing down seats for other disability or elderly passengers to use if no wheelchairs were occupying them).

Cheers.
ID: 1602104 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Politics : Who has priority?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.