Message boards :
Number crunching :
Panic Mode On (89) Server Problems?
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 . . . 24 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
betreger Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 11361 Credit: 29,581,041 RAC: 66 |
It's gonna be a long time before we get fresh APs. We are paying now for the recent gluttony. |
TBar Send message Joined: 22 May 99 Posts: 5204 Credit: 840,779,836 RAC: 2,768 |
It's gonna be a long time before we get fresh APs. We are paying now for the recent gluttony. You can approximate by how many MB 'total channels to do:' there are. Right now it's at 431, which is pretty much on schedule for new data Tuesday. The recent frequent spurts seem to have been attempts to correct the splitter errors. My bet is new APs after the Tuesday outage, as usual. |
betreger Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 11361 Credit: 29,581,041 RAC: 66 |
You could be right, I hope so. |
David S Send message Joined: 4 Oct 99 Posts: 18352 Credit: 27,761,924 RAC: 12 |
Interesting stair-steps on the Crickets right now. David Sitting on my butt while others boldly go, Waiting for a message from a small furry creature from Alpha Centauri. |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14650 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Interesting stair-steps on the Crickets right now. Don't be fooled by the non-zero origin for the Y-axis - we're just back to the normal level of uploads. And nothing has failed over to inr-210. |
WezH Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 576 Credit: 67,033,957 RAC: 95 |
Interesting stair-steps on the Crickets right now. Yes, in Daily Graph. But when looking at Monthly Graph I see transfers are going back to "normal" and above it, no more AP frenzy??? Just my guess... "Please keep Your signature under four lines so Internet traffic doesn't go up too much" - In 1992 when I had my first e-mail address - |
HAL9000 Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6534 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57 |
Interesting stair-steps on the Crickets right now. If you look at the monthly graph you can see our "normal" AP frenzy traffic. Which is often about 200Mb. The past few weeks there was an uptick in the inbound, first small and then larger, and outbound even went up over 400Mb at one point. It looks odd even on the yearly graph. SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[ |
Fred J. Verster Send message Joined: 21 Apr 04 Posts: 3252 Credit: 31,903,643 RAC: 0 |
|
betreger Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 11361 Credit: 29,581,041 RAC: 66 |
If you are going to go down that road my guess it is a farm reporting in a batch mode. |
Speedy Send message Joined: 26 Jun 04 Posts: 1643 Credit: 12,921,799 RAC: 89 |
I would love to see one computer download gig worth of work. I wonder how long it would take to process a week on latest hardware running 24 7 |
HAL9000 Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6534 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57 |
I would love to see one computer download gig worth of work. I wonder how long it would take to process a week on latest hardware running 24 7 Do you want a GB of MB work or AP work. Because a machine doing CPU & GPU can have 1.6GB of AP very easily when they are being produced. For MB 1 GB would be around 2700. Which was about the size of the 10 day queue on my 24 core server before the limits & when we were on MB v6. SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[ |
ExchangeMan Send message Joined: 9 Jan 00 Posts: 115 Credit: 157,719,104 RAC: 0 |
I would love to see one computer download gig worth of work. I wonder how long it would take to process a week on latest hardware running 24 7 I download more than a gig worth of work regularly when APs are being split. A gig worth of APs is only 125 work units. I'll download 900 AP work units before splitting stops. I'll have them crunched in 2 to 3 days. The 100 CPU Astropulse units may take an extra day. |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13736 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
I would love to see one computer download gig worth of work. I wonder how long it would take to process a week on latest hardware running 24 7 And considering even a mid range video card can knock over 2 WUs at a time in less than 30min that take a CPU core over 3-4 hours to process, 1GB of work doesn't last very long if you have a couple (or more) highend video cards crunching away. Grant Darwin NT |
Speedy Send message Joined: 26 Jun 04 Posts: 1643 Credit: 12,921,799 RAC: 89 |
I would love to see one computer download gig worth of work. I wonder how long it would take to process a week on latest hardware running 24 7 Thank you all for your responses. I agree with you all in the fact that it is easy to download over a gig worth of work at a time. |
juan BFP Send message Joined: 16 Mar 07 Posts: 9786 Credit: 572,710,851 RAC: 3,799 |
My 2x690 hosts runs with up to 800 AP WU cache, so it´s about 3.2 GB of data which is enought for 4-6 days of work. |
betreger Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 11361 Credit: 29,581,041 RAC: 66 |
APs are being split, most odd for a Monday. |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
It seems like the scheduler has gone on the blink again, no work has been allocated here for an hour now. Cheers. |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13736 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
Hmm. About 40min ago I could report, but work requests would result in "Project has no tasks available" messages. For the last 10min it's been "Scheduler request failed: Couldn't connect to server" Something's stuck. Grant Darwin NT |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14650 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Hmm. I was seeing exactly the same, but something - maybe an automatic watchdog script, at this time of night - seems to have restarted things: I've just got through to report work, and even got one new task allocated (a shortie, of course). Task lists are also very slow to load on this website, and that new one isn't showing yet. Work to be done during the outrage, methinks. |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13736 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
Just had another look at my log- 3 min ago I was able to report, but still no work allocated. EDIT and those Scheduler responses are taking almost a minute. Usually it's 5 seconds or less. Grant Darwin NT |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.