Have We Been Interpreting Quantum Mechanics Wrong This Whole Time?


log in

Advanced search

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Have We Been Interpreting Quantum Mechanics Wrong This Whole Time?

Author Message
Profile cov_routeProject donor
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 13 Sep 12
Posts: 322
Credit: 8,015,799
RAC: 2,144
Canada
Message 1534645 - Posted: 2 Jul 2014, 1:01:55 UTC

This could be the beginning of something big...or a dead end. Whatever it is, it's interesting.

http://www.simonsfoundation.org/quanta/20140624-fluid-tests-hint-at-concrete-quantum-reality/

Profile Bob DeWoody
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 9 May 10
Posts: 1985
Credit: 584,120
RAC: 74
United States
Message 1534654 - Posted: 2 Jul 2014, 1:26:16 UTC

Information including a demonstration was on Beyond the wormhole several weeks ago concerning this phenomenon. Very curious.
____________
Bob DeWoody

My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events.

Profile William Rothamel
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 2740
Credit: 1,185,869
RAC: 59
United States
Message 1534811 - Posted: 2 Jul 2014, 9:48:34 UTC

Yes,

I always felt a little queasy swallowing quantum mechanics and the mystical properties that were ascribed to it. I can easily see how energy comes in discrete levels; but I felt that it was always a leap of faith for the Schrodinger cat type of silliness.

Profile ML1
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 8861
Credit: 5,279,943
RAC: 12,641
United Kingdom
Message 1534840 - Posted: 2 Jul 2014, 11:18:06 UTC - in response to Message 1534811.
Last modified: 2 Jul 2014, 11:20:18 UTC

Yes,

I always felt a little queasy swallowing quantum mechanics and the mystical properties that were ascribed to it. I can easily see how energy comes in discrete levels; but I felt that it was always a leap of faith for the Schrodinger cat type of silliness.

Quantum Mechanics is indeed a leap of faith. The idea was just 'dreamt up' and tested to see if it worked out. It worked out to give good results.

And it continues to prove to be the best description of that part of reality that we have.

It's certainly not the whole story, but it hasn't failed us yet.

That is our reality as we know it.


The Schrodinger cat experiment/question is as much philosophical as real or imaginary. If nothing knows of your existence, need you exist at all?


Keep searchin',
Martin
____________
See new freedom: Mageia4
Linux Voice See & try out your OS Freedom!
The Future is what We make IT (GPLv3)

Profile William Rothamel
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 2740
Credit: 1,185,869
RAC: 59
United States
Message 1534872 - Posted: 2 Jul 2014, 13:32:37 UTC - in response to Message 1534840.
Last modified: 2 Jul 2014, 13:33:12 UTC

Yes,

I suppose that its not for no reason why perhaps the leading Physics review is called "The Philosophical Journal"

Profile tullioProject donor
Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 04
Posts: 4196
Credit: 408,813
RAC: 35
Italy
Message 1534893 - Posted: 2 Jul 2014, 14:40:06 UTC

Here a recent discussion in "Nature"
Bell inequalities
Tullio
____________

Profile PJ
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 30 Jun 14
Posts: 118
Credit: 297,453
RAC: 446
United States
Message 1534896 - Posted: 2 Jul 2014, 14:48:51 UTC

Hmm, so the oil droplets I've observed bouncing around on surface when doing oil changes on various vehicles over the years are really an unintentional quantum observation? Always wondered how the surface tension allowed this to happen ;-)

Michael Watson
Send message
Joined: 7 Feb 08
Posts: 599
Credit: 234,822
RAC: 108
Message 1534910 - Posted: 2 Jul 2014, 15:27:30 UTC

Several quantum mechanical-like effect have be reproduced on a macroscopic scale, where they are apparently determined by classical physics. If this work can be confirmed and expanded, it seems possible that this way lies the long-sought unification of all the physical forces.

Glenn savill
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 99
Posts: 3546
Credit: 5,996,119
RAC: 11,038
Australia
Message 1535454 - Posted: 3 Jul 2014, 12:25:32 UTC

Wonder if this means we are not going to "beam me up scotty" in any time soon . Dang Einstein, said God doesn't gamble . No spooky interactions then , oh hang on maybe that means the opposite to what I said and we will be "beaming you up " soon , Paris to L.A in 1 sec ........Knowing where any particile is at any time means TELEPORTATION
____________



Profile PJ
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 30 Jun 14
Posts: 118
Credit: 297,453
RAC: 446
United States
Message 1535609 - Posted: 3 Jul 2014, 20:03:32 UTC

It takes longer than a second, you couldn't get the sound effect to operate faster LOL

Glenn savill
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 99
Posts: 3546
Credit: 5,996,119
RAC: 11,038
Australia
Message 1535715 - Posted: 3 Jul 2014, 23:32:48 UTC - in response to Message 1535609.

It takes longer than a second, you couldn't get the sound effect to operate faster LOL


Glad you liked that 1 heheheheheheh
____________


Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Have We Been Interpreting Quantum Mechanics Wrong This Whole Time?

Copyright © 2015 University of California