Corporations are people?

Message boards : Politics : Corporations are people?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · Next

AuthorMessage
Sirius B Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 24877
Credit: 3,081,182
RAC: 7
Ireland
Message 1547797 - Posted: 26 Jul 2014, 3:53:31 UTC - in response to Message 1547749.  

Please explain exactly what you mean.

Possibly he means bare foot and pregnate while walking 2 steps behind with her head bowed?


...and carrying all the shopping?

Unless there are land mines in the area, and then it is 30 paces in front.


oh... that could pose a bit of a dilemma... who'd carry the shopping?


...his mistress
ID: 1547797 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30608
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1547807 - Posted: 26 Jul 2014, 4:08:08 UTC - in response to Message 1547801.  

I don't think we are getting a reply.

I am sure we won't. At least one that answers the question. Which begs why he posted it? What though process could have been behind it?
ID: 1547807 · Report as offensive
Profile Es99
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Aug 05
Posts: 10874
Credit: 350,402
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 1547813 - Posted: 26 Jul 2014, 4:13:31 UTC - in response to Message 1547807.  
Last modified: 26 Jul 2014, 4:13:39 UTC

I don't think we are getting a reply.

I am sure we won't. At least one that answers the question. Which begs why he posted it? What though process could have been behind it?

I'd like to give him the benefit of the doubt and assume its sarcasm gone horribly, horribly wrong.
Reality Internet Personality
ID: 1547813 · Report as offensive
Profile betreger Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 11360
Credit: 29,581,041
RAC: 66
United States
Message 1547815 - Posted: 26 Jul 2014, 4:14:36 UTC - in response to Message 1547807.  

I don't think we are getting a reply.

I am sure we won't. At least one that answers the question. Which begs why he posted it? What though process could have been behind it?

Could it be Fruedian?
ID: 1547815 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30608
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1547831 - Posted: 26 Jul 2014, 4:29:06 UTC - in response to Message 1547813.  

I don't think we are getting a reply.

I am sure we won't. At least one that answers the question. Which begs why he posted it? What though process could have been behind it?

I'd like to give him the benefit of the doubt and assume its sarcasm gone horribly, horribly wrong.

Except he seems to do a lot of what could be described as fishing from a moving boat.
ID: 1547831 · Report as offensive
Sirius B Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 24877
Credit: 3,081,182
RAC: 7
Ireland
Message 1547833 - Posted: 26 Jul 2014, 4:31:13 UTC - in response to Message 1547831.  

In that case, someone had better tell him the boat's sinking :-)
ID: 1547833 · Report as offensive
Terror Australis
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 14 Feb 04
Posts: 1817
Credit: 262,693,308
RAC: 44
Australia
Message 1547864 - Posted: 26 Jul 2014, 6:06:37 UTC - in response to Message 1546868.  
Last modified: 26 Jul 2014, 6:10:41 UTC

Term limits only say the voters don't have the necessities to make an informed choice. The founding fathers knew this so they limited suffrage to white men freeholders. Bringing back the principals of the founders would go a long way to restoring the US of A to what it was meant to be.

Viewing this post, but not through the red haze of Uber political correctness.
Did anyone else think that maybe Batter Up was having a shot at the those who want to go back to a "literal interpretation" of the US constitution without considering just what that would actually mean ?

Google "Irony"

T.A.

Edited for clarity
ID: 1547864 · Report as offensive
anniet
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Feb 14
Posts: 7105
Credit: 1,577,368
RAC: 75
Zambia
Message 1547908 - Posted: 26 Jul 2014, 10:24:16 UTC - in response to Message 1547864.  
Last modified: 26 Jul 2014, 10:26:35 UTC

Term limits only say the voters don't have the necessities to make an informed choice. The founding fathers knew this so they limited suffrage to white men freeholders. Bringing back the principals of the founders would go a long way to restoring the US of A to what it was meant to be.

Viewing this post, but not through the red haze of Uber political correctness.
Did anyone else think that maybe Batter Up was having a shot at the those who want to go back to a "literal interpretation" of the US constitution without considering just what that would actually mean ?

Google "Irony"

T.A.

Edited for clarity


Oh yes... I think that occurred to all of us TA... :) we were just waiting for Batterup to confirm it... or deny it... or work out what he did mean... or you know... for him to get more controversial :)
ID: 1547908 · Report as offensive
Profile Wiggo
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Jan 00
Posts: 34744
Credit: 261,360,520
RAC: 489
Australia
Message 1547910 - Posted: 26 Jul 2014, 10:33:54 UTC

Well Batter Up was around for a few posts earlier, but he suddenly disappeared.

Cheers.
ID: 1547910 · Report as offensive
anniet
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Feb 14
Posts: 7105
Credit: 1,577,368
RAC: 75
Zambia
Message 1547940 - Posted: 26 Jul 2014, 11:44:11 UTC - in response to Message 1547910.  

Well Batter Up was around for a few posts earlier, but he suddenly disappeared.

Cheers.


Was it the Australian wine do you think Wiggo? :)
ID: 1547940 · Report as offensive
Profile Wiggo
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Jan 00
Posts: 34744
Credit: 261,360,520
RAC: 489
Australia
Message 1547954 - Posted: 26 Jul 2014, 12:31:07 UTC - in response to Message 1547940.  



Was it the Australian wine do you think Wiggo? :)

I really couldn't say Annie as I'm not a wine drinker.

Cheers.
ID: 1547954 · Report as offensive
Sirius B Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 24877
Credit: 3,081,182
RAC: 7
Ireland
Message 1547957 - Posted: 26 Jul 2014, 12:48:44 UTC - in response to Message 1547954.  



Was it the Australian wine do you think Wiggo? :)

I really couldn't say Annie as I'm not a wine drinker.

Cheers.


More than likely the "Skippy" brand. He does seem to hop around a lot.
ID: 1547957 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30608
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1548000 - Posted: 26 Jul 2014, 15:13:43 UTC - in response to Message 1547976.  

Well Batter Up was around for a few posts earlier, but he suddenly disappeared.

Cheers.


Was it the Australian wine do you think Wiggo? :)

My excuse would have been, Johnnie Walker Black Label!

Batter Up replied in another Board - Message 1547826.

It WAS Australian Wine, Yellow Tail!!

Yellow tail, as in fishing? Interesting choice.
ID: 1548000 · Report as offensive
Profile Wiggo
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Jan 00
Posts: 34744
Credit: 261,360,520
RAC: 489
Australia
Message 1548194 - Posted: 26 Jul 2014, 21:46:02 UTC
Last modified: 26 Jul 2014, 22:30:50 UTC

Well it seems that Batter Up is still avoiding supplying us with an explanation for his post. Maybe he can't without sounding r.......

or s........

Cheers.
ID: 1548194 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30608
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1548202 - Posted: 26 Jul 2014, 22:15:14 UTC - in response to Message 1548042.  

Well Batter Up was around for a few posts earlier, but he suddenly disappeared.

Cheers.


Was it the Australian wine do you think Wiggo? :)

My excuse would have been, Johnnie Walker Black Label!

Batter Up replied in another Board - Message 1547826.

It WAS Australian Wine, Yellow Tail!!

Yellow tail, as in fishing? Interesting choice.

No. Yellow Tail, the Australian Wine.

Are you saying he was so starved [for attention] he didn't realize he was actually using techniques for catching

but settled for

to drown his pain.


In any case he still hasn't responded to the question asked by two different moderators.
ID: 1548202 · Report as offensive
Profile Wiggo
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Jan 00
Posts: 34744
Credit: 261,360,520
RAC: 489
Australia
Message 1548206 - Posted: 26 Jul 2014, 22:33:01 UTC

The evidence certainly looks to be pointing that way Gary. ;-)

Cheers.
ID: 1548206 · Report as offensive
Profile Bernie Vine
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 May 99
Posts: 9954
Credit: 103,452,613
RAC: 328
United Kingdom
Message 1548317 - Posted: 27 Jul 2014, 6:53:38 UTC

In any case he still hasn't responded to the question asked by two different moderators.

Which in fact answers the question for me, so perhaps the thread need to get back on track.
ID: 1548317 · Report as offensive
Profile Es99
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Aug 05
Posts: 10874
Credit: 350,402
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 1549235 - Posted: 29 Jul 2014, 0:35:06 UTC

ID: 1549235 · Report as offensive
Profile betreger Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 11360
Credit: 29,581,041
RAC: 66
United States
Message 1549237 - Posted: 29 Jul 2014, 0:51:12 UTC - in response to Message 1549235.  

Satanists Demand Religious Exemption Under Hobby Lobby

Makes sense to me.
ID: 1549237 · Report as offensive
Profile Byron Leigh Hatch @ team Carl Sagan
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Jul 99
Posts: 4548
Credit: 35,667,570
RAC: 4
Canada
Message 1549245 - Posted: 29 Jul 2014, 1:19:29 UTC - in response to Message 1549237.  

Satanists Demand Religious Exemption Under Hobby Lobby

Makes sense to me.

also makes sense to me.

Good Post Es99.
ID: 1549245 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 . . . 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · Next

Message boards : Politics : Corporations are people?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.