GTX 750Ti vs Superclocked 570 times compared

Message boards : Number crunching : GTX 750Ti vs Superclocked 570 times compared
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile GTP

Send message
Joined: 5 Jul 99
Posts: 67
Credit: 137,504,906
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1522190 - Posted: 29 May 2014, 0:25:28 UTC

Basically what I am finding is the 750Ti is half as powerful as a GTX 570 Superclocked while using 1/4 of the power!

GTX 570 240watt TDP
GTX 750Ti 60watt TDP

GTX 570:
Runtime 425.30
CPU time 105.32

GTX 750Ti:
Runtime 901.23
CPU time 261.13

Just thought I would put it out there!

All the best,
Aaron Lephart

www.smartcar451.com
ID: 1522190 · Report as offensive
Chris Adamek
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 15 May 99
Posts: 251
Credit: 434,772,072
RAC: 236
United States
Message 1522250 - Posted: 29 May 2014, 4:40:08 UTC - in response to Message 1522190.  

I actually find the performance to be closer than that on my machines. All of mine are running two wu at a time for both MB and AP... It's a nice little card for sure...
ID: 1522250 · Report as offensive
far_raf

Send message
Joined: 26 Apr 00
Posts: 120
Credit: 47,977,058
RAC: 19
Canada
Message 1522317 - Posted: 29 May 2014, 7:39:19 UTC

Hi GTP, the following are some of my cuda 50 times on my dual gtx 750 ti's.

run/cpu:

1034/228
1648/290
905/207
824/209
1144/280
867/214
1600/280
911/218

Please be aware that I run 8 cores on a xeon w3565 with 2 gtx 750 ti cards, I do run 2 cuda tasks per gpu. This means I run 4 gpu tasks at a time - you might want to take that into account. Further, be aware that 8 cpu tasks are going at the same time.

If you want to see more data just click on my name and follow link to my pc's. This unit is the only one with dual 750's.

Regards
Robert
ID: 1522317 · Report as offensive
Profile Zalster Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 27 May 99
Posts: 5517
Credit: 528,817,460
RAC: 242
United States
Message 1522371 - Posted: 29 May 2014, 12:27:07 UTC - in response to Message 1522317.  

Robert, what is the "average" estimate time you see for your MBs that seti gives


Zalster
ID: 1522371 · Report as offensive
far_raf

Send message
Joined: 26 Apr 00
Posts: 120
Credit: 47,977,058
RAC: 19
Canada
Message 1522564 - Posted: 30 May 2014, 0:56:46 UTC - in response to Message 1522371.  

Hi Zalster, there seems to be 2 common types of mb tasks. The 1st has a gflop estimate of 70k gflops and the 2nd is 180k gflops. So I get 2.5hr or 6.7hr for a standard task and I get 10m or 26m for cuda 50.

Interesting is the ap tasks all give an estimate 1.82mil gflop. This gives me a 42hr on a 6.01 task and 1hr 32m on a 6.04 cl_nvidia_100 task.

Robert
ID: 1522564 · Report as offensive
Profile GTP

Send message
Joined: 5 Jul 99
Posts: 67
Credit: 137,504,906
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1522622 - Posted: 30 May 2014, 6:28:23 UTC - in response to Message 1522564.  

Thanks for the comments guys. Any quick links to getting the 750Ti crunching 2 2WU's at a time?

All the best,
Aaron Lephart

www.smartcar451.com
ID: 1522622 · Report as offensive
tbret
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 May 99
Posts: 3380
Credit: 296,162,071
RAC: 40
United States
Message 1528367 - Posted: 15 Jun 2014, 21:18:31 UTC

I haven't decided whether or not to do two at a time yet, but I *very* recently bought two of these cards. I'm trying that on the more capable of two computers. When I have enough results to know something, we'll know something.

One is in an old and nearly crippled P4 machine and the other is in a machine with an FX-6300.

I haven't "played" a lot yet, but the superclocked model I bought (requires the 6-pin PCIe power plug) does seem to be 25% or more faster than a GTX 550Ti, is much, much cooler, requires less power, and is "nearly silent" with the two fans and ACX cooling.

The computers they are in limit what I can do. The card may be capable of running three work units at one time, but an ancient P4 isn't capable of effectively feeding it three AP tasks at once.

This is the first card I've bought in a while that I'm impressed by. No, it will never outrun your GTX 780, and I doubt it will outrun my GTX 560Ti's. But, it looks like it may give a GTX 560 a run for its money while using a lot less power, producing a lot less heat, and being much, much, much quieter as a result. Again, we'll see. I'm not finished tweaking by any means.

When I have a truly fair comparison I will post it.
ID: 1528367 · Report as offensive
Darrell Wilcox Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 11 Nov 99
Posts: 303
Credit: 180,954,940
RAC: 118
Vietnam
Message 1528412 - Posted: 16 Jun 2014, 0:44:12 UTC - in response to Message 1522622.  
Last modified: 16 Jun 2014, 0:46:22 UTC

Any quick links to getting the 750Ti crunching 2 2WU's at a time?

This is what I use on my four GTX750Tis (search for "Message 1523150"):

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=74386&postid=1523150

Runs 1 AP & 1 MB together, or 2 MB together on each card. [EDIT] And reserves the CPU cores needed to feed them all.
ID: 1528412 · Report as offensive
Profile Tom M
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 28 Nov 02
Posts: 5124
Credit: 276,046,078
RAC: 462
Message 1540975 - Posted: 13 Jul 2014, 16:15:34 UTC - in response to Message 1522317.  

Robert,
Could you post or send in e-mail your app_config.xml, cudaxx.cfgs?

I also have the same Xeon and am about to get a Gtx 750Ti.

I am running stock Seti. The one complication is I am currently running a Radeon HD 5670 (which I stumbled over last night). The Radeon is munching things at about 42 minutes a crack right now.

Thanks,
Tom
A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association).
ID: 1540975 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : GTX 750Ti vs Superclocked 570 times compared


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.