Message boards :
SETI@home Science :
Where do we search?
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Bernard Send message Joined: 11 Apr 12 Posts: 20 Credit: 1,801,975 RAC: 0 |
Why don't you try to focus on possible UFOs near Earth maybe they could emit something. In France there is a strange report called "Rapport COMETA" about them ordered by the government. Why don't you try to focus on earth-compatible planets that are or will be soon discovered? |
Bob DeWoody Send message Joined: 9 May 10 Posts: 3387 Credit: 4,182,900 RAC: 10 |
How can you focus on something that hasn't been discovered yet. They do turn their listening devices toward planets that they think have earth like characteristics. The biggest problem is that they don't really know where else to look or even precisely what to look for. Bob DeWoody My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events. |
Lynn Send message Joined: 20 Nov 00 Posts: 14162 Credit: 79,603,650 RAC: 123 |
Welcome Bernard to the SETI Forums! |
Thomas Send message Joined: 9 Dec 11 Posts: 1499 Credit: 1,345,576 RAC: 0 |
Welcome Bernard to the SETI Forums! +1 Tu peux lire ça pour les dernières avancées du projet et les cibles privilégiées, notamment avec les exoplanètes découvertes par la mission Kepler >> Testimony Dan Werthimer - 05-21-2014 |
Relaisor Send message Joined: 28 May 14 Posts: 3 Credit: 41,078 RAC: 0 |
Hello all, ive got a question and dont ment to open a new Threat for it. Has ever someone tryed to localise the most probably possible start and destination points of the large spacecraft that was maybe found by recieving the "wow"-signal? ok maybe the distance is unknown and meaned to be 200 LJ. A problem could be the exact localisation. Telescops are searching in the same direction but what about the stars arround? i see a problem if we only search on star systems in 100 LJ distance i hope someone understand what i mean. |
Lynn Send message Joined: 20 Nov 00 Posts: 14162 Credit: 79,603,650 RAC: 123 |
Hello all, There was no spacecraft involved with the "Wow" signal. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wow!_Signal You can read about the signal Sorry, not much help. |
Relaisor Send message Joined: 28 May 14 Posts: 3 Credit: 41,078 RAC: 0 |
So, did wie got a "test-signal" a signal that was not meaned to us and just was send in wrong direction or was our position just in the direction, meaned to someone else and we just dont get ist again because the target has moved? ok i found this "Tau Sagittarii is a suspected double star although no companion has been confirmed yet. A lower metal content (Fe to H ratio is 70%) and a high peculiar velocity (64 km/s, 4x the local average) relative to the Sun suggest the star is a visitor from a different part of the Galaxy" This way its maybe not a true doublestar and the orbits of planets could somehow be stable. it would be helpfull to know how long it was back that these Stars found together and when they maybe leave again. |
anniet Send message Joined: 2 Feb 14 Posts: 7105 Credit: 1,577,368 RAC: 75 |
So, did wie got a "test-signal" Hi Relaisor :) I found this reference to Tau Sagittarri possibly being a "wandering" star http://stars.astro.illinois.edu/sow/tausgr.html but nothing else so far that would answer your very interesting questions about it :( Sorry. As for the "wow" signal... it's a puzzle :) One of the extra-terrestrial theories about why it's not been detected since, is that it was beamed in the way a lighhouse or searchlight might rotate, but if it was from an alien intelligence... Scientists say that... they are likely to be an extremely advanced civilization, as the signal would have required a 2.2-gigawatt (2,200,000 kW) transmitter, vastly more powerful than any on Earth ...so your suggestions could be just as plausible... I think! :) |
Bob DeWoody Send message Joined: 9 May 10 Posts: 3387 Credit: 4,182,900 RAC: 10 |
For all of the looking and listening we do I feel we won't discover any other intelligent beings until they want us to find them. This is not to say we shouldn't be looking because I think the looking and listening is a good pursuit. And just because the results so far are zero doesn't mean we are alone, it just means we either haven't looked in the right places yet or we don't have the proper tools to recognise an alien presence in the nearby regions of the galaxy. Bob DeWoody My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events. |
Julie Send message Joined: 28 Oct 09 Posts: 34053 Credit: 18,883,157 RAC: 18 |
For all of the looking and listening we do I feel we won't discover any other intelligent beings until they want us to find them. This is not to say we shouldn't be looking because I think the looking and listening is a good pursuit. And just because the results so far are zero doesn't mean we are alone, it just means we either haven't looked in the right places yet or we don't have the proper tools to recognise an alien presence in the nearby regions of the galaxy. +10 Your posts are always so clear Bob, thanx for that:) rOZZ Music Pictures |
anniet Send message Joined: 2 Feb 14 Posts: 7105 Credit: 1,577,368 RAC: 75 |
For all of the looking and listening we do I feel we won't discover any other intelligent beings until they want us to find them. This is not to say we shouldn't be looking because I think the looking and listening is a good pursuit. And just because the results so far are zero doesn't mean we are alone, it just means we either haven't looked in the right places yet or we don't have the proper tools to recognise an alien presence in the nearby regions of the galaxy. +20 and ditto :) |
William Rothamel Send message Joined: 25 Oct 06 Posts: 3756 Credit: 1,999,735 RAC: 4 |
There most likely is not any alien existence in the nearby regions of our galaxy. There are not that many stars in 1000 light years from us that are main sequence, non-binaries. Additionally we have been listening for some 50 years now. Hopefully we will concentrate on these near neighbors to look for the elusive " Truly Earth-like" planet. I also think that the first order of business would be to verify the existence of life having once started on Mars or perhaps on a moon in our own solar system. This would spur interest and dollars in supporting a wider search and SETI effort. |
anniet Send message Joined: 2 Feb 14 Posts: 7105 Credit: 1,577,368 RAC: 75 |
There most likely is not any alien existence in the nearby regions of our galaxy. +100 and VERY good thinking! :) |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.