Where do we search?

Message boards : SETI@home Science : Where do we search?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile Bernard
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Apr 12
Posts: 20
Credit: 1,801,975
RAC: 0
France
Message 1521254 - Posted: 26 May 2014, 13:04:27 UTC

Why don't you try to focus on possible UFOs near Earth maybe they could emit something. In France there is a strange report called "Rapport COMETA" about them ordered by the government.

Why don't you try to focus on earth-compatible planets that are or will be soon discovered?
ID: 1521254 · Report as offensive
Profile Bob DeWoody
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 May 10
Posts: 3387
Credit: 4,182,900
RAC: 10
United States
Message 1521277 - Posted: 26 May 2014, 15:54:26 UTC

How can you focus on something that hasn't been discovered yet. They do turn their listening devices toward planets that they think have earth like characteristics. The biggest problem is that they don't really know where else to look or even precisely what to look for.
Bob DeWoody

My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events.
ID: 1521277 · Report as offensive
Profile Lynn Special Project $75 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Nov 00
Posts: 14162
Credit: 79,603,650
RAC: 123
United States
Message 1521320 - Posted: 26 May 2014, 17:30:07 UTC - in response to Message 1521277.  

Welcome Bernard to the SETI Forums!
ID: 1521320 · Report as offensive
Thomas
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 9 Dec 11
Posts: 1499
Credit: 1,345,576
RAC: 0
France
Message 1521504 - Posted: 27 May 2014, 5:44:25 UTC - in response to Message 1521320.  

Welcome Bernard to the SETI Forums!

+1
Tu peux lire ça pour les dernières avancées du projet et les cibles privilégiées, notamment avec les exoplanètes découvertes par la mission Kepler >> Testimony Dan Werthimer - 05-21-2014
ID: 1521504 · Report as offensive
Relaisor

Send message
Joined: 28 May 14
Posts: 3
Credit: 41,078
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 1540461 - Posted: 12 Jul 2014, 18:58:14 UTC
Last modified: 12 Jul 2014, 19:00:11 UTC

Hello all,

ive got a question and dont ment to open a new Threat for it.

Has ever someone tryed to localise the most probably possible start and destination points of the large spacecraft that was maybe found by recieving the "wow"-signal? ok maybe the distance is unknown and meaned to be 200 LJ.
A problem could be the exact localisation. Telescops are searching in the same direction but what about the stars arround? i see a problem if we only search on star systems in 100 LJ distance

i hope someone understand what i mean.
ID: 1540461 · Report as offensive
Profile Lynn Special Project $75 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Nov 00
Posts: 14162
Credit: 79,603,650
RAC: 123
United States
Message 1541174 - Posted: 13 Jul 2014, 22:47:11 UTC - in response to Message 1540461.  

Hello all,

ive got a question and dont ment to open a new Threat for it.

Has ever someone tryed to localise the most probably possible start and destination points of the large spacecraft that was maybe found by recieving the "wow"-signal? ok maybe the distance is unknown and meaned to be 200 LJ.
A problem could be the exact localisation. Telescops are searching in the same direction but what about the stars arround? i see a problem if we only search on star systems in 100 LJ distance

i hope someone understand what i mean.


There was no spacecraft involved with the "Wow" signal.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wow!_Signal
You can read about the signal

Sorry, not much help.
ID: 1541174 · Report as offensive
Relaisor

Send message
Joined: 28 May 14
Posts: 3
Credit: 41,078
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 1544256 - Posted: 19 Jul 2014, 10:16:30 UTC - in response to Message 1541174.  

So, did wie got a "test-signal"
a signal that was not meaned to us and just was send in wrong direction
or was our position just in the direction, meaned to someone else and we just dont get ist again because the target has moved?

ok i found this
"Tau Sagittarii is a suspected double star although no companion has been confirmed yet. A lower metal content (Fe to H ratio is 70%) and a high peculiar velocity (64 km/s, 4x the local average) relative to the Sun suggest the star is a visitor from a different part of the Galaxy"

This way its maybe not a true doublestar and the orbits of planets could somehow be stable. it would be helpfull to know how long it was back that these Stars found together and when they maybe leave again.
ID: 1544256 · Report as offensive
anniet
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Feb 14
Posts: 7105
Credit: 1,577,368
RAC: 75
Zambia
Message 1544265 - Posted: 19 Jul 2014, 11:13:20 UTC - in response to Message 1544256.  

So, did wie got a "test-signal"
a signal that was not meaned to us and just was send in wrong direction
or was our position just in the direction, meaned to someone else and we just dont get ist again because the target has moved?

ok i found this
"Tau Sagittarii is a suspected double star although no companion has been confirmed yet. A lower metal content (Fe to H ratio is 70%) and a high peculiar velocity (64 km/s, 4x the local average) relative to the Sun suggest the star is a visitor from a different part of the Galaxy"

This way its maybe not a true doublestar and the orbits of planets could somehow be stable. it would be helpfull to know how long it was back that these Stars found together and when they maybe leave again.


Hi Relaisor :)

I found this reference to Tau Sagittarri possibly being a "wandering" star http://stars.astro.illinois.edu/sow/tausgr.html but nothing else so far that would answer your very interesting questions about it :( Sorry.

As for the "wow" signal... it's a puzzle :) One of the extra-terrestrial theories about why it's not been detected since, is that it was beamed in the way a lighhouse or searchlight might rotate, but if it was from an alien intelligence...

Scientists say that... they are likely to be an extremely advanced civilization, as the signal would have required a 2.2-gigawatt (2,200,000 kW) transmitter, vastly more powerful than any on Earth


...so your suggestions could be just as plausible... I think! :)
ID: 1544265 · Report as offensive
Profile Bob DeWoody
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 May 10
Posts: 3387
Credit: 4,182,900
RAC: 10
United States
Message 1544296 - Posted: 19 Jul 2014, 12:24:49 UTC

For all of the looking and listening we do I feel we won't discover any other intelligent beings until they want us to find them. This is not to say we shouldn't be looking because I think the looking and listening is a good pursuit. And just because the results so far are zero doesn't mean we are alone, it just means we either haven't looked in the right places yet or we don't have the proper tools to recognise an alien presence in the nearby regions of the galaxy.
Bob DeWoody

My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events.
ID: 1544296 · Report as offensive
Profile Julie
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 09
Posts: 34053
Credit: 18,883,157
RAC: 18
Belgium
Message 1545805 - Posted: 22 Jul 2014, 12:26:48 UTC - in response to Message 1544296.  

For all of the looking and listening we do I feel we won't discover any other intelligent beings until they want us to find them. This is not to say we shouldn't be looking because I think the looking and listening is a good pursuit. And just because the results so far are zero doesn't mean we are alone, it just means we either haven't looked in the right places yet or we don't have the proper tools to recognise an alien presence in the nearby regions of the galaxy.



+10 Your posts are always so clear Bob, thanx for that:)
rOZZ
Music
Pictures
ID: 1545805 · Report as offensive
anniet
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Feb 14
Posts: 7105
Credit: 1,577,368
RAC: 75
Zambia
Message 1545838 - Posted: 22 Jul 2014, 13:21:51 UTC - in response to Message 1545805.  

For all of the looking and listening we do I feel we won't discover any other intelligent beings until they want us to find them. This is not to say we shouldn't be looking because I think the looking and listening is a good pursuit. And just because the results so far are zero doesn't mean we are alone, it just means we either haven't looked in the right places yet or we don't have the proper tools to recognise an alien presence in the nearby regions of the galaxy.



+10 Your posts are always so clear Bob, thanx for that:)


+20 and ditto :)
ID: 1545838 · Report as offensive
Profile William Rothamel
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 3756
Credit: 1,999,735
RAC: 4
United States
Message 1545841 - Posted: 22 Jul 2014, 13:31:55 UTC - in response to Message 1545838.  
Last modified: 22 Jul 2014, 13:33:11 UTC

There most likely is not any alien existence in the nearby regions of our galaxy.

There are not that many stars in 1000 light years from us that are main sequence, non-binaries. Additionally we have been listening for some 50 years now.

Hopefully we will concentrate on these near neighbors to look for the elusive " Truly Earth-like" planet. I also think that the first order of business would be to verify the existence of life having once started on Mars or perhaps on a moon in our own solar system. This would spur interest and dollars in supporting a wider search and SETI effort.
ID: 1545841 · Report as offensive
anniet
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Feb 14
Posts: 7105
Credit: 1,577,368
RAC: 75
Zambia
Message 1546098 - Posted: 23 Jul 2014, 0:11:23 UTC - in response to Message 1545841.  

There most likely is not any alien existence in the nearby regions of our galaxy.

There are not that many stars in 1000 light years from us that are main sequence, non-binaries. Additionally we have been listening for some 50 years now.

Hopefully we will concentrate on these near neighbors to look for the elusive " Truly Earth-like" planet. I also think that the first order of business would be to verify the existence of life having once started on Mars or perhaps on a moon in our own solar system. This would spur interest and dollars in supporting a wider search and SETI effort.


+100 and VERY good thinking! :)
ID: 1546098 · Report as offensive

Message boards : SETI@home Science : Where do we search?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.