Dan Werthimer at the U.S. House of Representatives


log in

Advanced search

Message boards : News : Dan Werthimer at the U.S. House of Representatives

Previous · 1 · 2
Author Message
Sirius B
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 11968
Credit: 1,796,002
RAC: 575
Bermuda
Message 1522085 - Posted: 28 May 2014, 20:25:20 UTC - in response to Message 1522079.

""The U.S. may not continue to lead this work," Werthimer said.

"I would find that disappointing," Rep. Suzanne Bonamici, D-Ore., responded."

So would the rest of us.

The US led the Space Race & to see them back away now is a big disappointment.
____________

Batter UpProject donor
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 5 May 99
Posts: 1946
Credit: 24,858,651
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1522243 - Posted: 29 May 2014, 4:00:26 UTC - in response to Message 1522079.

Just saw a mention of this on Space.com

"We'll Find Alien Life in This Lifetime, Scientists Tell Congress"
Congressman Ralph Hall is 91 years old. We better find life yesterday.
____________

Profile Lincy
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 11
Posts: 1
Credit: 216,026
RAC: 436
China
Message 1522295 - Posted: 29 May 2014, 6:34:41 UTC

Good news ,keep working.

QSilver
Send message
Joined: 26 May 99
Posts: 232
Credit: 4,854,161
RAC: 1,426
United States
Message 1522415 - Posted: 29 May 2014, 16:08:19 UTC - in response to Message 1522243.

Congressman Ralph Hall is 91 years old. We better find life yesterday.


Ralph Hall is not going to be a U.S. Representative for much longer...he was defeated in a primary.
____________

Robert M. DellerProject donor
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 23 Apr 05
Posts: 293
Credit: 96,547,421
RAC: 52,024
Canada
Message 1522976 - Posted: 31 May 2014, 11:58:50 UTC - in response to Message 1521871.

Hey...hello back! This is not the thread, however, to greet people!

Robin
Send message
Joined: 21 Sep 13
Posts: 2
Credit: 260,980
RAC: 561
Message 1524169 - Posted: 3 Jun 2014, 21:35:36 UTC - in response to Message 1520363.

Thanx
____________

Profile JulieProject donor
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 09
Posts: 24410
Credit: 4,128,978
RAC: 3,375
Belgium
Message 1525230 - Posted: 6 Jun 2014, 15:32:06 UTC - in response to Message 1520238.

Thanks for telling us about this, Matt.


+1
____________


rOZZ

Profile Andyroo
Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 07
Posts: 1
Credit: 396,996
RAC: 70
United Kingdom
Message 1527067 - Posted: 11 Jun 2014, 21:47:57 UTC

Hey all, hope your all well. Its been a few years since I was lat on here..its great to be back and I am crunching data like mad....great work we are all doing...

ThomasProject donor
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 9 Dec 11
Posts: 1499
Credit: 1,345,505
RAC: 501
France
Message 1527182 - Posted: 12 Jun 2014, 5:20:10 UTC - in response to Message 1527067.

Welcome back Andyroo !
____________

wulf 21
Send message
Joined: 18 Apr 09
Posts: 75
Credit: 12,976,212
RAC: 574
Germany
Message 1527952 - Posted: 14 Jun 2014, 9:49:32 UTC

I wonder what the point of these hearings is. After all, the people who can judge best if good science is done and a project deserves further funding are other scientists.

Having politicians ask question usually puts scientist in the role of being a teacher, teaching non-scientists about what they are doing (as seen in the video). This approach seems to be pretty US-unique.

In about every other country around the world the government pays their experts (who are scientists themselves) to recommend what they should fund.

Batter UpProject donor
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 5 May 99
Posts: 1946
Credit: 24,858,651
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1528048 - Posted: 14 Jun 2014, 17:27:23 UTC - in response to Message 1527952.
Last modified: 14 Jun 2014, 17:31:06 UTC

I wonder what the point of these hearings is. After all, the people who can judge best if good science is done and a project deserves further funding are other scientists.
It is in the Constitution that Congress makes the budget. Just to get a hearing shows it is good science but funding is limited . The hearings are open and public; all sides, if there are sides, are welcome to present their case then the public decides. Write your congressman it works*.


*Offer valid only for US citizens.
____________

wulf 21
Send message
Joined: 18 Apr 09
Posts: 75
Credit: 12,976,212
RAC: 574
Germany
Message 1528227 - Posted: 15 Jun 2014, 12:02:57 UTC - in response to Message 1528048.

Thank you for your answer. Just for clarification:

It is in the Constitution that Congress makes the budget.
...


That's the same over here (and probably in most democracies). In the end the parliament (called "Bundestag") decides.

But the recommendations about what should be funded come from the Ministry for Science and Education which is closely working together with the scientific institutions and universities. If additional input is needed the Bundestag has its own group of experts called "wissenschaftlicher Dienst" (approximate translation: "scientific service").


Just to get a hearing shows it is good science but funding is limited . The hearings are open and public; all sides, if there are sides, are welcome to present their case then the public decides.


So the purpose is not to check wether scientific standards are met, as these checks are already done at that point, but rather to inform politics and the public? (So they can prioritize the amount of funding given to the projects, and of course to spark public interest)

This seems to make sense. Maybe I was mislead by the juristic wording. ( e.g. "hearing", "testimony"). In my ears it just sounded like there are doubts about wether good science is done with public money.

Batter UpProject donor
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 5 May 99
Posts: 1946
Credit: 24,858,651
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1528401 - Posted: 16 Jun 2014, 0:04:39 UTC

This seems to make sense. Maybe I was mislead by the juristic wording. ( e.g. "hearing", "testimony"). In my ears it just sounded like there are doubts about wether good science is done with public money.
The committee is looking for more than pure science as a reason for this funding. A project that generates public interest in science, like SETI, has an advantage.
____________

N9JFE David SProject donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 99
Posts: 12641
Credit: 15,005,270
RAC: 9,728
United States
Message 1528440 - Posted: 16 Jun 2014, 3:06:13 UTC - in response to Message 1528401.

This seems to make sense. Maybe I was mislead by the juristic wording. ( e.g. "hearing", "testimony"). In my ears it just sounded like there are doubts about wether good science is done with public money.
The committee is looking for more than pure science as a reason for this funding. A project that generates public interest in science, like SETI, has an advantage.

A project that is likely to get the politicians votes in the next election has an advantage. Everything else, including the public good, is secondary to that. Sad, but true.
____________
David
Sitting on my butt while others boldly go,
Waiting for a message from a small furry creature from Alpha Centauri.


James W
Send message
Joined: 26 May 12
Posts: 31
Credit: 577,016
RAC: 1,076
United States
Message 1529228 - Posted: 18 Jun 2014, 1:02:40 UTC

I watched the video of the hearing, and in Mr. Werthimer's PowerPoint presentation he noted that Seti@home involves the "screen saver" that crunches the data when computer not in use. Appears that's no longer the case with the current software, as the screen saver animation just illustrates what data the program is crunching. I haven't used the screen saver for some time to save processing power on my older machines, and use this power to actually crunch.

Just an observation. I assume the graphics might bring the curious on board initially?

Profile Johnney Guinness
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 06
Posts: 3093
Credit: 2,651,836
RAC: 83
Ireland
Message 1535470 - Posted: 3 Jul 2014, 12:57:48 UTC

I watched the video of Dan Werthimer at the U.S. House of Representatives.

I found it inspirational! It reminded me of the end of the film "Contact" with Jodie Foster, and she gives here testimony before the jury.

Well done Dan Werthimer, you gave it your best shot!

Johnney Guinness.
____________

Profile Karen Altobelli
Send message
Joined: 28 Feb 13
Posts: 3
Credit: 590,772
RAC: 4,349
United States
Message 1561386 - Posted: 24 Aug 2014, 4:10:19 UTC - in response to Message 1521291.

Thank you for posting the link to the video. I found it very informative and hopefully the funding will continue. In addition, SETI may gain a few new data crunchers now that the students in attendance had the opportunity to learn about SETI.

Roy SkoglundProject donor
Send message
Joined: 27 Feb 14
Posts: 25
Credit: 201,425
RAC: 238
Norway
Message 1596254 - Posted: 3 Nov 2014, 1:57:20 UTC

Nice to see that things are happening. Funding are important, but so are publicity.

Profile Byron Leigh Hatch @ team Carl SaganProject donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 5 Jul 99
Posts: 3623
Credit: 11,949,660
RAC: 238
Message 1609889 - Posted: 6 Dec 2014, 14:54:58 UTC

Dear Byron Leigh Hatch

Thank you for your gift of $1,000.00 via Visa on 09/04/2014.

Your gift will benefit the following area:

SETI@home - $1,000.00

Your confirmation number is: 136657

Previous · 1 · 2
Post to thread

Message boards : News : Dan Werthimer at the U.S. House of Representatives

Copyright © 2014 University of California