Message boards :
Politics :
US Department of Transportation mandates rear-view cameras in all cars built from May 1, 2018
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
KWSN-GMC-Peeper of the Castle Anthrax Send message Joined: 28 May 99 Posts: 274 Credit: 6,936,182 RAC: 0 |
The good news is, my calculations and computer model indicate that automobiles will be too safe for almost everybody to afford before we run out of oil. If you don't touch it, you can't break it. ; |
W-K 666 Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19062 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67 |
The good news is, my calculations and computer model indicate that automobiles will be too safe for almost everybody to afford before we run out of oil. No, they will change the business model. Make them like games consoles or ink jet printers, very cheap to buy, very expensive to use. |
KWSN-GMC-Peeper of the Castle Anthrax Send message Joined: 28 May 99 Posts: 274 Credit: 6,936,182 RAC: 0 |
The good news is, my calculations and computer model indicate that automobiles will be too safe for almost everybody to afford before we run out of oil. Heh. I'd buy into that if i could imagine any possible way to do that with a CCTV feed. If you don't touch it, you can't break it. ; |
The Simonator Send message Joined: 18 Nov 04 Posts: 5700 Credit: 3,855,702 RAC: 50 |
Call me old fashioned, but what's wrong with a mirror? Life on earth is the global equivalent of not storing things in the fridge. |
Мишель Send message Joined: 26 Nov 13 Posts: 3073 Credit: 87,868 RAC: 0 |
And here I was thinking it was a Aprils fools joke.... |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
In 2012 here both the my State's government and the last Federal government were trying to push for rear-view cameras in all new cars due to the alarmingly rising rates of children being killed in driveway accidents. Things have gone quiet on this here lately, but children are still being backed over in their driveways by parents. :-( Cheers. |
TRuEQ & TuVaLu Send message Joined: 4 Oct 99 Posts: 505 Credit: 69,523,653 RAC: 10 |
Will the cameras be connected to the internet for NSA survailance? |
rob smith Send message Joined: 7 Mar 03 Posts: 22202 Credit: 416,307,556 RAC: 380 |
Just don't give them ideas.... Bob Smith Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society) Somewhere in the (un)known Universe? |
KWSN-GMC-Peeper of the Castle Anthrax Send message Joined: 28 May 99 Posts: 274 Credit: 6,936,182 RAC: 0 |
In 2012 here both the my State's government and the last Federal government were trying to push for rear-view cameras in all new cars due to the alarmingly rising rates of children being killed in driveway accidents. because, clearly, if they're unwilling to turn their heads and look, they WILL pay attention to a 4inch screen on their dash. If you don't touch it, you can't break it. ; |
KWSN-GMC-Peeper of the Castle Anthrax Send message Joined: 28 May 99 Posts: 274 Credit: 6,936,182 RAC: 0 |
Two years ago, when shopping for a new vehicle: and after a month driving it i'll wager you don't pay any more attention to the video screen than you did the mirrors. If you don't touch it, you can't break it. ; |
KWSN-GMC-Peeper of the Castle Anthrax Send message Joined: 28 May 99 Posts: 274 Credit: 6,936,182 RAC: 0 |
Two years ago, when shopping for a new vehicle: honestly? I always put my arm over the seat and turn my head while backing up, not using the throttle but at idle speed with my foot on the brake not the gas for the first few feet.. As any driver should. My stand is still on an average day you don't even think about that screen. If YOU do the other 98% don't. If you're careless you're careless and adding $800 worth of devices are unlikely to help after you start ignoring them. If you don't touch it, you can't break it. ; |
Bernie Vine Send message Joined: 26 May 99 Posts: 9954 Credit: 103,452,613 RAC: 328 |
If you're careless you're careless and adding $800 worth of devices are unlikely to help after you start ignoring them. If you're a careless driver then you probably never used them in the first place. You don't realize the 'Blind Spot' directly behind the vehicle, until you have this camera. Agreed!! Had one for a year now and use it all the time when reversing, not the mirror. |
The Simonator Send message Joined: 18 Nov 04 Posts: 5700 Credit: 3,855,702 RAC: 50 |
What about the blind spot directly in front of the vehicle, do we need another camera there. I can see that cameras would be useful on a large vehicle like a Range Rover, but on my Ford Orion they're simply not necessary. So making them mandatory for all vehicles seems rather heavy handed. Someone on a backhander from camera manufacturers do we think? Life on earth is the global equivalent of not storing things in the fridge. |
W-K 666 Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19062 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67 |
Why didn't they go further and insist that the wing mirrors be replaced with cameras. Some people have tried this and report 2.5% to 4% improvement in mpg figures. If a car does 12,000 miles/year @ 30mpg then changing the wing mirrors to cameras would save 12 gallons of fuel/year at a 3% figure. Probably more than enough to offset the cost over the lifetime of the car. And they wouldn't be so easy to break off. |
rob smith Send message Joined: 7 Mar 03 Posts: 22202 Credit: 416,307,556 RAC: 380 |
In part I agree with Simon, particularly about the back hander... But have you ever tried driving a Lotus 47 or a Lotus Europa - the rear view mirrors on these cars were next to useless.... Bob Smith Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society) Somewhere in the (un)known Universe? |
The Simonator Send message Joined: 18 Nov 04 Posts: 5700 Credit: 3,855,702 RAC: 50 |
In part I agree with Simon, particularly about the back hander... Don't think i'd be able to even get in one of those. Life on earth is the global equivalent of not storing things in the fridge. |
KWSN-GMC-Peeper of the Castle Anthrax Send message Joined: 28 May 99 Posts: 274 Credit: 6,936,182 RAC: 0 |
If you're careless you're careless and adding $800 worth of devices are unlikely to help after you start ignoring them. That makes no sense. That blind spot is obvious and in fact exactly the reason I back the way I do. If you don't touch it, you can't break it. ; |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
If you're careless you're careless and adding $800 worth of devices are unlikely to help after you start ignoring them. * sneaks out and puts a cheap 2 gallons plastic bucket just behind rear bumper while 1 is not looking * :-D Cheers. |
KWSN-GMC-Peeper of the Castle Anthrax Send message Joined: 28 May 99 Posts: 274 Credit: 6,936,182 RAC: 0 |
If you're careless you're careless and adding $800 worth of devices are unlikely to help after you start ignoring them. that sir, is not a safety concern, it's sabotage. an entirely different thing. It's not all that difficult to notice if there's anybody on foot near your vehicle while you walk to it and be sure you know where they are before you move. If you don't touch it, you can't break it. ; |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
Sorry, but that's exactly what happens when very small children suddenly bolt out of nowhere and get backed over. :-( Cheers. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.