Message boards :
Number crunching :
all my wingmen's S@H Enhanced tasks end in error, but are validated and credited
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Oz Send message Joined: 6 Jun 99 Posts: 233 Credit: 200,655,462 RAC: 212 |
I just noticed that all of the Enhanced tasks tasks I am crunching seem to take quite a while to complete relative to credit granted while ALL of my wingmen's enhanced tasks end in error after 10-20 seconds, but are validated and credited. Check the SETI@home Enhanced tasks on these rigs: here, here, and here. Did I miss something? Member of the 20 Year Club |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
I can't find the post but during the move to the COLO facility, and database problems at that time, a script was ran to cure a problem and that was just a result of the fix. Hopefully someone may get the time to clean up the old V6 MB database 1 day. So until then just ignore them. ;-) Cheers. |
Oz Send message Joined: 6 Jun 99 Posts: 233 Credit: 200,655,462 RAC: 212 |
@ Wiggo, Thanx and a tip of the hat to you. So I did in fact miss something... I just don't have the time I would like to have to peruse the various threads and keep up to date [sigh]. I will apply the standard S@H fix to this issue - and ignore it to death. Ha! Member of the 20 Year Club |
Link Send message Joined: 18 Sep 03 Posts: 834 Credit: 1,807,369 RAC: 0 |
I just noticed that all of the Enhanced tasks tasks I am crunching seem to take quite a while to complete relative to credit granted while ALL of my wingmen's enhanced tasks end in error after 10-20 seconds, but are validated and credited. Check the SETI@home Enhanced tasks on these rigs: I don't see on any of those computers S@H Enhanced tasks, which run just 10-20 seconds. All I checked seem to have finished cleanly and got the normal* amount of credit. The only thing that's wrong with them, is that they should have been purged from database long time ago, but that's another issue. *: normal for CreditNew |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
Sorry Link but it looks like you missed quite a few with the old, "CUFFT error in file 'c: or d:/Projects/SETI/seti_boinc/client/cuda/cudaAcc_fft.cu' in line 62.", error which was very prevalent at the time when the GT/GTX 6xx cards came out that either didn't have the driver work around initiated or running the lastest Lunatics at that time. ;-) Cheers. |
Link Send message Joined: 18 Sep 03 Posts: 834 Credit: 1,807,369 RAC: 0 |
Sorry Link but it looks like you missed quite a few with the old, "CUFFT error in file 'c: or d:/Projects/SETI/seti_boinc/client/cuda/cudaAcc_fft.cu' in line 62." Hmm... I just checked all Enhanced results of those 3 computers and could not find this line. Could you please point me one WU, where you see this line in the std_err? EDIT: I see I should have look at the wingmen of those computers. Ups... |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
Sorry Link but it looks like you missed quite a few with the old, "CUFFT error in file 'c: or d:/Projects/SETI/seti_boinc/client/cuda/cudaAcc_fft.cu' in line 62." I really don't know how you can miss them as all 3 links are riddled with wingmates with that error, but here's the results from just the wingmates in the 1st link. http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=3017064920 http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=3007650974 http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=3007492525 http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=3005362358 http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=2984035655 Now I'm not going to list the rest as they are easy to see. Cheers. |
Link Send message Joined: 18 Sep 03 Posts: 834 Credit: 1,807,369 RAC: 0 |
See my edit, I thought he posted the computers, that made the errors. |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
Yeah your edit came through while I was posting. ;-) Cheers. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.