AP r2083

Message boards : Number crunching : AP r2083
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile cov_route
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 13 Sep 12
Posts: 342
Credit: 10,270,618
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 1489585 - Posted: 16 Mar 2014, 0:32:57 UTC

I noticed a new version of AP for ATI on Mikes site, r2083. I benched it with Clean_01LC.wu against r1843. Run times are nearly identical at 45 sec but the CPU usage has fallen dramatically from 15 sec to 3 sec.

Intriguing. I'll bench some more wu's. I wonder if there is a reason that might happen.
ID: 1489585 · Report as offensive
Richard Haselgrove Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 14650
Credit: 200,643,578
RAC: 874
United Kingdom
Message 1489588 - Posted: 16 Mar 2014, 0:43:09 UTC - in response to Message 1489585.  

I noticed a new version of AP for ATI on Mikes site, r2083. I benched it with Clean_01LC.wu against r1843. Run times are nearly identical at 45 sec but the CPU usage has fallen dramatically from 15 sec to 3 sec.

Intriguing. I'll bench some more wu's. I wonder if there is a reason that might happen.

I think Raistmer learned some new facts about GPU synching from Oliver Bock at Einstein.

http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu/forum_thread.php?id=10215&nowrap=true#127648
ID: 1489588 · Report as offensive
Profile cov_route
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 13 Sep 12
Posts: 342
Credit: 10,270,618
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 1489592 - Posted: 16 Mar 2014, 1:14:12 UTC

Some more wu's tested, the CPU usage is down by a factors between 3 and 8.


Quick timetable

WU : ap_18se08aa_B6_P1_00046_1LC25.wu
AP6_win_x86_SSE2_OpenCL_ATI_r1843.exe -unroll 10 -ffa_block 2048 -ffa_block_fetch 1024 :
Elapsed 46.817 secs
CPU 16.969 secs
AP6_win_x86_SSE2_OpenCL_ATI_r2083.exe -unroll 10 -ffa_block 2048 -ffa_block_fetch 1024 :
Elapsed 47.014 secs, speedup: -0.42% ratio: 1.00x
CPU 4.563 secs, speedup: 73.11% ratio: 3.72x

WU : Clean_01LC.wu
AP6_win_x86_SSE2_OpenCL_ATI_r1843.exe -unroll 10 -ffa_block 2048 -ffa_block_fetch 1024 :
Elapsed 45.815 secs
CPU 15.563 secs
AP6_win_x86_SSE2_OpenCL_ATI_r2083.exe -unroll 10 -ffa_block 2048 -ffa_block_fetch 1024 :
Elapsed 45.086 secs, speedup: 1.59% ratio: 1.02x
CPU 3.016 secs, speedup: 80.62% ratio: 5.16x

WU : Clean_20LC.wu
AP6_win_x86_SSE2_OpenCL_ATI_r1843.exe -unroll 10 -ffa_block 2048 -ffa_block_fetch 1024 :
Elapsed 843.815 secs
CPU 282.313 secs
AP6_win_x86_SSE2_OpenCL_ATI_r2083.exe -unroll 10 -ffa_block 2048 -ffa_block_fetch 1024 :
Elapsed 847.676 secs, speedup: -0.46% ratio: 1.00x
CPU 33.953 secs, speedup: 87.97% ratio: 8.31x

WU : short_ap_21oc08ab_B2_P0_00081_20081130_08605.wu
AP6_win_x86_SSE2_OpenCL_ATI_r1843.exe -unroll 10 -ffa_block 2048 -ffa_block_fetch 1024 :
Elapsed 37.058 secs
CPU 7.109 secs
AP6_win_x86_SSE2_OpenCL_ATI_r2083.exe -unroll 10 -ffa_block 2048 -ffa_block_fetch 1024 :
Elapsed 37.033 secs, speedup: 0.07% ratio: 1.00x
CPU 2.406 secs, speedup: 66.16% ratio: 2.95x
ID: 1489592 · Report as offensive
Profile cov_route
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 13 Sep 12
Posts: 342
Credit: 10,270,618
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 1489598 - Posted: 16 Mar 2014, 1:31:44 UTC

Apparently this is my idea of a good time on Saturday nights now...
ID: 1489598 · Report as offensive
Profile betreger Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 11361
Credit: 29,581,041
RAC: 66
United States
Message 1489603 - Posted: 16 Mar 2014, 2:09:02 UTC - in response to Message 1489598.  

Apparently this is my idea of a good time on Saturday nights now...

Sad, I'm going over to neighbor's house for a cocktail.
ID: 1489603 · Report as offensive
Profile cov_route
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 13 Sep 12
Posts: 342
Credit: 10,270,618
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 1489607 - Posted: 16 Mar 2014, 2:22:18 UTC - in response to Message 1489603.  

Sad, I'm going over to neighbor's house for a cocktail.

I had dinner at a sports bar with my 9 year old son. A wild and crazy time was had by...nobody.
ID: 1489607 · Report as offensive
anniet
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Feb 14
Posts: 7105
Credit: 1,577,368
RAC: 75
Zambia
Message 1489610 - Posted: 16 Mar 2014, 2:27:36 UTC

:)
ID: 1489610 · Report as offensive
Profile Raistmer
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 01
Posts: 6325
Credit: 106,370,077
RAC: 121
Russia
Message 1489654 - Posted: 16 Mar 2014, 6:59:36 UTC - in response to Message 1489588.  

I noticed a new version of AP for ATI on Mikes site, r2083. I benched it with Clean_01LC.wu against r1843. Run times are nearly identical at 45 sec but the CPU usage has fallen dramatically from 15 sec to 3 sec.

Intriguing. I'll bench some more wu's. I wonder if there is a reason that might happen.

I think Raistmer learned some new facts about GPU synching from Oliver Bock at Einstein.

http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu/forum_thread.php?id=10215&nowrap=true#127648


And I think that TWIN_FFA mod does its work. Conversation about synching led to quite paradoxal result in TOTAL synching for Intel GPU build, ATi build untouched.
SETI apps news
We're not gonna fight them. We're gonna transcend them.
ID: 1489654 · Report as offensive
Profile Raistmer
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 01
Posts: 6325
Credit: 106,370,077
RAC: 121
Russia
Message 1489658 - Posted: 16 Mar 2014, 7:07:25 UTC

@Richard
From your link (I started to worry if I forgot something indeed?) :

Looks like AMD SDK vs Intel SDK doesn't matter for CPU consumption. But what really matters is the synching style. When each runtime call followed by clFinish CPU usage drops considerably. So, synching on blocking read not the same as synching on clFinish for intel (and i suspect for NV too) GPU. AMD GPUs don't affected.


Perhaps, you are too optimistic in what that conversation (though very useful indeed) could do :D
SETI apps news
We're not gonna fight them. We're gonna transcend them.
ID: 1489658 · Report as offensive
Ulrich Metzner
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Jul 02
Posts: 1256
Credit: 13,565,513
RAC: 13
Germany
Message 1489720 - Posted: 16 Mar 2014, 14:05:08 UTC
Last modified: 16 Mar 2014, 14:08:20 UTC

Did i miss something?
Is there anywhere an AP6 r2083 (or later) version for Nvidia available?
I only got AP6 r2058 running.
Aloha, Uli

ID: 1489720 · Report as offensive
Profile Mike Special Project $75 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Feb 01
Posts: 34258
Credit: 79,922,639
RAC: 80
Germany
Message 1489725 - Posted: 16 Mar 2014, 14:42:10 UTC - in response to Message 1489720.  
Last modified: 16 Mar 2014, 14:42:31 UTC

Did i miss something?
Is there anywhere an AP6 r2083 (or later) version for Nvidia available?
I only got AP6 r2058 running.


Not yet.
We are working on new builds.
After additinal testing i will make them available.


With each crime and every kindness we birth our future.
ID: 1489725 · Report as offensive
Profile arkayn
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 May 99
Posts: 4438
Credit: 55,006,323
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1489952 - Posted: 17 Mar 2014, 4:06:26 UTC - in response to Message 1489725.  

Did i miss something?
Is there anywhere an AP6 r2083 (or later) version for Nvidia available?
I only got AP6 r2058 running.


Not yet.
We are working on new builds.
After additinal testing i will make them available.


We are up around r2167 currently, I am running a r2165 build on my 2 GPU's.

ID: 1489952 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : AP r2083


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.