That nice but could be better if we have a way to comunicate with the guy´s at Colo in the night so they could restart the servers faster and leave the lab guy´s sleep/rest in ther homes.

---

FYI, I sent E-Mail to David, Eric, Matt & Jeff - because SSP frozen & UL not possible.

Why it's a Saturday!!

Monday will be quite soon enough.

Why do people expect to have work 24/7 and the staff "on call the same"

If there is work, fine if not fine.

Also I suspect the Co-lo would not do anything unless asked by the owners of the servers, so the very idea that we should be able to contact the Co-lo is totally laughable!!

Relax people, if it's not about RAC two, three, four days downtime means nothing.

---

FYI, I sent E-Mail to David, Eric, Matt & Jeff - because SSP frozen & UL not possible.

Why it's a Saturday!!

Monday will be quite soon enough.

Why do people expect to have work 24/7 and the staff "on call the same"

If there is work, fine if not fine.

Also I suspect the Co-lo would not do anything unless asked by the owners of the servers, so the very idea that we should be able to contact the Co-lo is totally laughable!!

Relax people, if it's not about RAC two, three, four days downtime means nothing.

agreed, yes : I too like it to have a high RAC but sometimes people tend to forget what Seti is really about... Science and hoping to someday E.T.

There is life beyond this VOLUNTEER project isn't there?!

---

FYI, I sent E-Mail to David, Eric, Matt & Jeff - because SSP frozen & UL not possible.

Why it's a Saturday!!

Monday will be quite soon enough.

Why do people expect to have work 24/7 and the staff "on call the same"

If there is work, fine if not fine.

Also I suspect the Co-lo would not do anything unless asked by the owners of the servers, so the very idea that we should be able to contact the Co-lo is totally laughable!!

Relax people, if it's not about RAC two, three, four days downtime means nothing.

+1

---

Om mani padme hum.

01/03/2014 17:08:05 | | Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site
01/03/2014 17:08:07 | | Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down.

No UL or DL for awhile i hope it comes quick my cpu and gpu sleeps.

01/03/2014 17:08:05 | | Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site
01/03/2014 17:08:07 | | Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down.

No UL or DL for awhile i hope it comes quick my cpu and gpu sleeps.

the upload and download servers need a kick in the a## again...

---

.

Hello, from Albany, CA!...

I was just looking through my single core machine's task list and saw an interesting WU.

wuid=1384280749

_0 timed out
_1 completed, validation inconclusive (me)
_2 completed, marked as invalid
_3 in progress


That's.... odd.

---

Linux laptop:
record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up)

Uploads are up.

Claggy

Uploads just started (slowly) completing.
Try to not all stampede them through at once. :^)

Edit: <<shakes tiny internet fist at Claggy>>

---

OK, since AP probably will be unavailable for some time, I did finally bite the bullet, and installed the apps for MB v7, CPU as well as GPU. (manually of course, no installer for me, as long as I still have an intact brain.)

MB v7 will be my backup project, until AP is available again. :-)

I'll probably have to do the same tomorrow, enabling GPU MB work on my home (Linux) machine. petri sent me the mods to do it a few weeks ago but the machine has been unstable, dying irregularly (at least three times while I was sat at the console). Latest change has seen it stable for several days -- when I got the new motherboard and CPU I got 1600 MHz memory to go with it, but the BIOS only wanted to run at 1333 MHz so I manually set it to 1600; I've now let the BIOS have its way but it's still too soon to say "Cured!" as, for example, I haven't had much GPU AP work since. But, with no APs to crunch, the GPUs are idle and my RAC is dropping like a feather in a vacuum...

---

Uploads are running again.
[Edit]Mustn't have noticed that the thread had overflowed to a new page...][/E]

---

Uploads are running again.

...not really...

---

Aloha, Uli

Uploads are running again.

...not really...

Sat 01 Mar 2014 17:59:44 GMT | SETI@home | Started upload of 22my13aa.30113.1472.438086664200.12.76_1_0
Sat 01 Mar 2014 18:00:20 GMT | SETI@home | Finished upload of 22my13aa.30113.1472.438086664200.12.76_1_0

Close enough for Government business!

---

Uploads are running again.

...not really...

01/03/2014 17:56:24 | SETI@home | Reporting 89 completed tasks

:D

Perhaps with a lot of tapping "retry", but that's not intended.

---

Aloha, Uli

Perhaps with a lot of tapping "retry", but that's not intended.

Out of seven machines on my network, that was the only one that was remotely near dry - and yes, I tapped it. It's re-fetched now (including a reasonable number of non-shorties), so I'll run the slowest ones first so as not to generate too many new uploads.

After a draconian project back-off, I tapped retry just once and all three of my uploads went through in 2-3 tries on their own.

I'm thinking the upload server will be struggling a little bit with the DDoS attack it will be receiving, but it will eventually serve all requests.

---

Linux laptop:
record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up)

Finally some tasks found their way back to the server on their own. *thumbsup*
When the upload queue has drained enough, the clients will eventually start asking for new work again.

[edit]
As i wrote the lines above, one client started to ask for new work. Yeah! ;)

---

Aloha, Uli

Ready-to-send buffer is almost back down to nothing again.

Once they sort out the recurring upload issues, maybe they could sort out the splitters?

---

Grant
Darwin NT

I was just looking through my single core machine's task list and saw an interesting WU.

wuid=1384280749

_0 timed out
_1 completed, validation inconclusive (me)
_2 completed, marked as invalid
_3 in progress


That's.... odd.

The Stderr for the invalid has no autocorr result. The guy is still trying to run v7 tasks through a v6 app. Take a look at Invalid tasks for computer 5940769. Lots of resources going to waste.