USA to Return to Moon


log in

Advanced search

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : USA to Return to Moon

Author Message
Lynn
Volunteer moderator
Send message
Joined: 20 Nov 00
Posts: 2574
Credit: 325,617
RAC: 453
United States
Message 1472538 - Posted: 4 Feb 2014, 0:56:35 UTC

America is preparing to land a robot on the moon for the first time in four decades.

Nasa is looking for private partners to participate in the project that will see a new generation of rovers wandering across the moon’s surface.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/10614953/US-ready-to-return-to-moon.html
____________

Profile Bob DeWoody
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 9 May 10
Posts: 1078
Credit: 378,764
RAC: 4,267
United States
Message 1472577 - Posted: 4 Feb 2014, 4:04:59 UTC

I hope it is a good sign for sending men(and women) back to the moon soon. Some people think going to the moon is easy and therefore should be bypassed for more ambitious destinations like an asteroid or Mars. Actually NASA got very lucky in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Ignorance is bliss and had they known then what is known now about the radiation hazards the Apollo Program most likely would have been delayed for at least a decade.
____________
Bob DeWoody

My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required.

Profile Chris S
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 19 Nov 00
Posts: 29530
Credit: 8,957,641
RAC: 26,679
United Kingdom
Message 1472659 - Posted: 4 Feb 2014, 10:38:29 UTC

Nasa is looking for private partners to participate in the project that will see a new generation of rovers wandering across the moon’s surface.

It is good to see. But it is a shame that Obamas government refuses to allocate enough funds not to have to involve private partners.

The American space agency has set up a programme called Catalyst to exploit commercial opportunities offered by the moon. It believes that eventually there will be a market for commercial cargo trips to the lunar surface.

Then let the private people get involved at that point then.

"As Nasa pursues an ambitious plan for humans to explore an asteroid and Mars, US industry will create opportunities for Nasa to advance new technologies on the moon".

It's all wrong. Space exploration should be for scientific endeavour, and mankind's benefit. It should not have to be bankrolled by greedy privatisation getting let in for profit to share holders.

Profile tullio
Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 04
Posts: 3405
Credit: 345,699
RAC: 129
Italy
Message 1472669 - Posted: 4 Feb 2014, 11:41:39 UTC - in response to Message 1472659.

USA private industry has done a great research job inn the past. Think only of the Bell Laboratories, which provided the transistor, the discovery of the cosmic microwave background, the start of radioastronomy, the UNIX operating system, etc.
Freeman J.Dyson, a British born scientist, has called for the engagement of privates in space exploration in his book "Disturbing the universe".
Tullio
____________

Profile Bob DeWoody
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 9 May 10
Posts: 1078
Credit: 378,764
RAC: 4,267
United States
Message 1472741 - Posted: 4 Feb 2014, 14:39:54 UTC - in response to Message 1472669.
Last modified: 4 Feb 2014, 14:42:30 UTC

Actually it was private industry that designed and built all of our previous manned space vehicles. NASA was just the manager and who wrote the specs. Even in the future with increased privatization NASA will still write the specs and decide who gets to launch and when. It is just that now NASA is asking the contractors to risk more of their own money. At least in the USA.
____________
Bob DeWoody

My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required.

Profile Chris S
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 19 Nov 00
Posts: 29530
Credit: 8,957,641
RAC: 26,679
United Kingdom
Message 1472745 - Posted: 4 Feb 2014, 14:46:57 UTC

That is may all be true Bob, but NASA is only doing that because the government won't or can't stump up the money, that is what I think is wrong. Kennedy MADE them find the money.

Profile tullio
Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 04
Posts: 3405
Credit: 345,699
RAC: 129
Italy
Message 1472991 - Posted: 5 Feb 2014, 11:22:03 UTC - in response to Message 1472745.

That is may all be true Bob, but NASA is only doing that because the government won't or can't stump up the money, that is what I think is wrong. Kennedy MADE them find the money.

Yes, but a war was on, the Cold War. Armstrong said that Apollo 11 ended the cold war, which was won by America. Now the Chines are failing on a Moon where America landed six manned missions and a rover. America is exploring Mars.
Tullio
____________

Profile Bob DeWoody
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 9 May 10
Posts: 1078
Credit: 378,764
RAC: 4,267
United States
Message 1473089 - Posted: 5 Feb 2014, 15:54:31 UTC - in response to Message 1472991.

That is may all be true Bob, but NASA is only doing that because the government won't or can't stump up the money, that is what I think is wrong. Kennedy MADE them find the money.

Yes, but a war was on, the Cold War. Armstrong said that Apollo 11 ended the cold war, which was won by America. Now the Chines are failing on a Moon where America landed six manned missions and a rover. America is exploring Mars.
Tullio

And only time will tell which power has made the better choice.
____________
Bob DeWoody

My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required.

anniet
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 Feb 14
Posts: 1172
Credit: 66,352
RAC: 985
United Kingdom
Message 1505641 - Posted: 18 Apr 2014, 16:22:35 UTC

Just saw this - sort of in keeping with this thread I think - though I'm sure not in this manner

Ladee crashes into the moon

Profile Michel448a
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 27 Oct 00
Posts: 1190
Credit: 2,891,635
RAC: 125
Canada
Message 1505673 - Posted: 18 Apr 2014, 17:09:19 UTC - in response to Message 1505641.

another million of debris(junk) again, now on the far side of the moon.

They need to stop to polute the space with their Junk :S
at least send your dead bodies to the sun so it can be recycled
____________

Batter Up
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 5 May 99
Posts: 504
Credit: 24,806,981
RAC: 34,769
United States
Message 1505684 - Posted: 18 Apr 2014, 17:19:53 UTC

NASA no longer gets any defense money and Obama would rather spend on social programs than moon walking. Welcome to the new socially conscious, but broke, US of A.
____________

Profile cov_route
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 13 Sep 12
Posts: 265
Credit: 4,690,710
RAC: 13,328
Canada
Message 1505876 - Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 0:53:05 UTC - in response to Message 1472741.

Actually it was private industry that designed and built all of our previous manned space vehicles. NASA was just the manager and who wrote the specs. Even in the future with increased privatization NASA will still write the specs and decide who gets to launch and when. It is just that now NASA is asking the contractors to risk more of their own money. At least in the USA.

Bob, I work in the business, I'm somewhat familiar with the issues.

"Because Bell Labs was part of the AT&T monopoly, its executives felt a moral, political and legal imperative to share the discovery with other researchers and license it to other companies. “AT&T maintained its monopoly at the government’s pleasure, and with the understanding that its scientific work was in the public interest,”" ~ "The Idea Factory" John Gertner

I don't detect any such ethical calculations on the part of present day executives. Boeing, despite being the senior partner in the nation's aero dupopoly (government sponsored via the approved, nay mandated, merger with McDonell Douglas) gave away the technology to make transonic wings to the Japanese for some money. It's not clear if they could even do a wing any more. Judging by the 787 they can barely manage a project let alone design the product.

Presently their whole business model is predicated on making engineers as marginalized as possible believing that Japan, China, India, and Europe should engineer things and Boeing should put their sticker on them when they are all done. Boeing's current plan for their illustrious R&D center? Move it to right-to-work states so they can get cheap bodies. That's their technology plan.

The pendulum has swung too far the other way. Why can't the DoD tell them "stop giving away the crown jewels or we'll turn off the GIANT PIPELINE OF MONEY FROM THE DOD TO YOUR COMPANY." Boeing didn't get where they are (or were) on their own, the USA taxpayer put them there.

Same with any of NASA's suppliers. And all of defense.

Profile Julie
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 09
Posts: 15288
Credit: 2,734,242
RAC: 5,842
Belgium
Message 1505990 - Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 10:18:52 UTC - in response to Message 1505684.
Last modified: 19 Apr 2014, 10:19:28 UTC

NASA no longer gets any defense money and Obama would rather spend on social programs than moon walking. Welcome to the new socially conscious, but broke, US of A.



They played the maecenas for far too long and now they're paying for it...
____________

Profile Gordon Lowe
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 5 Nov 00
Posts: 428
Credit: 504,929
RAC: 136
United States
Message 1506163 - Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 20:54:17 UTC

I know in reality, space money in the U.S. is way down from what it was during the Apollo program, but I don't think budgets really mean anything. Funny money will eventually get some Earthlings back to the Moon and beyond.
____________


Post to thread

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : USA to Return to Moon

Copyright © 2014 University of California