Valid ?


log in

Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : Valid ?

Author Message
Profile Bill GProject donor
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 1 Jun 01
Posts: 389
Credit: 52,099,865
RAC: 49,884
United States
Message 1468209 - Posted: 24 Jan 2014, 14:38:58 UTC

Is something like this really valid? http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=1409863561

Both are -9 overflows.
____________

SETI@home classic workunits 4,019
SETI@home classic CPU time 34,348 hours

Claggy
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 5 Jul 99
Posts: 4497
Credit: 40,071,854
RAC: 23,008
United Kingdom
Message 1468228 - Posted: 24 Jan 2014, 14:50:24 UTC - in response to Message 1468209.
Last modified: 24 Jan 2014, 15:03:06 UTC

Is something like this really valid? http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=1409863561

Both are -9 overflows.

Most likely as one is done by the Cuda app and the other by the CPU app, Wu's with endings of .255 and .0 and other high or low endings often overflow:

11mr13ab.15678.17245.438086664204.12.0

21au09ad.22928.7843.438086664200.12.0

oc13af.8978.442594.438086664202.12.3

29oc13ae.7280.20926.438086664196.12.3

29oc13ae.8227.24198.438086664206.12.255

Claggy

Message boards : Number crunching : Valid ?

Copyright © 2015 University of California