Valid ?


Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : Valid ?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile Bill G Special Project $75 donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Jun 01
Posts: 1282
Credit: 187,688,550
RAC: 182
United States
Message 1468209 - Posted: 24 Jan 2014, 14:38:58 UTC

Is something like this really valid? http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=1409863561

Both are -9 overflows.

SETI@home classic workunits 4,019
SETI@home classic CPU time 34,348 hours
ID: 1468209 · Report as offensive
Claggy
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 5 Jul 99
Posts: 4654
Credit: 47,537,079
RAC: 4
United Kingdom
Message 1468228 - Posted: 24 Jan 2014, 14:50:24 UTC - in response to Message 1468209.  
Last modified: 24 Jan 2014, 15:03:06 UTC

Is something like this really valid? http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=1409863561

Both are -9 overflows.

Most likely as one is done by the Cuda app and the other by the CPU app, Wu's with endings of .255 and .0 and other high or low endings often overflow:

11mr13ab.15678.17245.438086664204.12.0

21au09ad.22928.7843.438086664200.12.0

oc13af.8978.442594.438086664202.12.3

29oc13ae.7280.20926.438086664196.12.3

29oc13ae.8227.24198.438086664206.12.255

Claggy
ID: 1468228 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : Valid ?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.