compiled version of boinc 4 IRIX?

Message boards : Number crunching : compiled version of boinc 4 IRIX?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
SPECTRA

Send message
Joined: 24 May 04
Posts: 8
Credit: 420,861
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 54773 - Posted: 17 Dec 2004, 23:34:30 UTC

Does anyone knows where to get it? Or want to share?
I have two old indigo2 sitting in the corner doing nothing and I thought about giving them something to crunch.

regards

spectral
ID: 54773 · Report as offensive
Ned Slider

Send message
Joined: 12 Oct 01
Posts: 668
Credit: 4,375,315
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 54892 - Posted: 18 Dec 2004, 11:06:35 UTC - in response to Message 54773.  

> Does anyone knows where to get it? Or want to share?
> I have two old indigo2 sitting in the corner doing nothing and I thought about
> giving them something to crunch.
>
> regards
>
> spectral
>

Your best bet is probably to compile your own client from the linux source. See the links in my signiture below for instructions for compiling on linux. You may need to modify the source headers slightly to work with your compiler on Silcon Graphics.

However, don't expect an indigo to be very fast. My O2's used to take 16-18 hours under seti classic and even my dual MIPS Octane used to take 8 hours per unit per cpu. My guess is you won't even get 1 unit a day out of an indigo.

Ned


*** My Guide to Compiling Optimised BOINC and SETI Clients ***
*** Download Optimised BOINC and SETI Clients for Linux Here ***
ID: 54892 · Report as offensive
Profile Benher
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Jul 99
Posts: 517
Credit: 465,152
RAC: 0
United States
Message 54924 - Posted: 18 Dec 2004, 16:32:40 UTC

Michael Aeschere was attempting to compile boinc/seti for their "SGI Origin 2800".

Check out his questions in http://www.ssl.berkeley.edu/pipermail/boinc_dev/2004-November/000993.html

Mail list was having connect errors when I tried, but google has them cached.

http://www.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
ID: 54924 · Report as offensive
SPECTRA

Send message
Joined: 24 May 04
Posts: 8
Credit: 420,861
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 54941 - Posted: 18 Dec 2004, 18:49:06 UTC - in response to Message 54892.  


> My guess is you won't even get 1 unit a day out of an indigo.

You're probably right, Ned. Sometimes I forget how slow they are compared to nowadays x86 pcs. [good ol' times...]. I'll give it a try though. Thanks, guys!

spectral
ID: 54941 · Report as offensive
Ned Slider

Send message
Joined: 12 Oct 01
Posts: 668
Credit: 4,375,315
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 54966 - Posted: 18 Dec 2004, 21:41:15 UTC

Yes, I was absolutely amazed at how slow an O2 was when I first ran seti classic on it. I never even tried on our older indigo's so I can't give you an accurate estimate.

There are clients for seti classic available for IRIX, so in the mean time you could always run classic on them. This at least should give you an indication of their speed as Boinc/seti seems similar (maybe slightly slower) to seti classic.

Sorry I can't be of more help, but I no longer have access to any SGI hardware to compile clients for it.

Ned

*** My Guide to Compiling Optimised BOINC and SETI Clients ***
*** Download Optimised BOINC and SETI Clients for Linux Here ***
ID: 54966 · Report as offensive
Profile AthlonRob
Volunteer developer
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 378
Credit: 7,041
RAC: 0
United States
Message 54967 - Posted: 18 Dec 2004, 21:44:06 UTC - in response to Message 54773.  

> I have two old indigo2 sitting in the corner doing nothing

I'm jealous - send one to me! :-)

I'll pay shipping...

Rob
ID: 54967 · Report as offensive
Ned Slider

Send message
Joined: 12 Oct 01
Posts: 668
Credit: 4,375,315
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 54970 - Posted: 18 Dec 2004, 21:58:41 UTC - in response to Message 54967.  
Last modified: 18 Dec 2004, 21:59:14 UTC

> > I have two old indigo2 sitting in the corner doing nothing
>
> I'm jealous - send one to me! :-)
>
> I'll pay shipping...
>
>

Have you looked on e-bay? Old SGI hardware is rediculously cheap, but is also rediculously slow by today's standards. Also, it's not uncommon for many University's and Companies to throw this stuff out or give it away ;)

Ned


*** My Guide to Compiling Optimised BOINC and SETI Clients ***
*** Download Optimised BOINC and SETI Clients for Linux Here ***
ID: 54970 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : compiled version of boinc 4 IRIX?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.