Message boards :
Number crunching :
Merry Christmas & I wish Santa would bring me some Astropulse work for Christmas
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4
Author | Message |
---|---|
Batter Up Send message Joined: 5 May 99 Posts: 1946 Credit: 24,860,347 RAC: 0 |
I have a PC running Microsoft Windows XP Professional x86 Edition, Service Pack 3, (05.01.2600.00)with a GT610 PCI no e. It crunches GPU with no problem. If they support OpenGL on that card using the same drivers as a Titan running Win 8.1 I would assume it also supports the OPs card. http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=7088257 |
Batter Up Send message Joined: 5 May 99 Posts: 1946 Credit: 24,860,347 RAC: 0 |
I would go with a LGA-2011; it has 40 PCIe lanes, quad channel DDR3 and can handle 4 PCIe 3.0 X16 Titans in SLI. Also M$ will be supporting Win 8 for 3 years after Win 7 has gone the way of XP, until January 10, 2023 . That setup should be serviceable until M$ stops supporting Win10; if M$ is around that long. |
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
I think you meant OpenCL and not OpenGL. At any rate, as I said to Guy, more than likely you had the OpenCL SDK installed with a previous driver back when OpenCL was still supported on XP and it has carried over through newer driver updates. It isn't necessarily the card that doesn't support it, but the API/SDK that is missing from the OP's machine. Likely he'd have to install an older driver to get it to work. There may be a problem though if the older drivers that have the OpenCL SDK for XP do not support new cards, such as the Titan or GTX 7xx series, to install properly. In which case, there'd be no other options. |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
You don't need SLi for crunching to start with and a card in a PCI-e 4x slot crunches just as fast as 1 on a PCI-e 16x slot. The LGA-2011 platform also isn't very cost effective either (both my rigs support 3 cards anyway and they're 1150 & 1155 based). As for Win8.x I wouldn't touch it with a 10 foot pole and I'm still building PC's here with Win7. Cheers. |
Batter Up Send message Joined: 5 May 99 Posts: 1946 Credit: 24,860,347 RAC: 0 |
I was thinking of an all around rig, not one just for crunching, that will be able to play games with triple 4K monitors; in your face PlayStation. Granted new from a retailer the LGA-2011 is expensive but it is also over 2 years old so it can be almost reasonable if one looks. As for Win 8.1 with a few, now easy to use/find settings, the "metro" interface doesn't get in the way and a form of the start menu is back. Because of the way M$ handled the launch and now the 8.1 service pack it is not selling. It can be had legally for less than Win 7. That is my opinion but granted it is not for everyone. |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
It's not surprising to me why Win8.x isn't selling as it's just plain wrong. On price, both win7 & win8 are the same here. As for the other, mine are workstations 1st and crunchers 2nd, but my kids would love to play games on them (they're happy though with the hand me downs). Cheers. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.