Yes Mark, I already read about that thing.

But what if I rather happened to be someone else and not the one you choose to know?

I mentioned the hair of Madonna at YouTube and perhaps not the most important thing at all.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzAO9A9GjgI&index=8&list=RDGuJQSAiODqI

Really I was thinking about the possible music here and only the music alone, if necessary.

If for some reason you could find Madonna being a possible whore, so it goes, but also I could find the time at both listening as well as appreciating both the music as well as the lyrics.

Still a couple of YouTube links around meant for playback.

Getting back at it and of course the mentioned thing, meaning N/A.

Edit: Mark, don't fall in love with Eric, will you.

Such a thing will never work and also the fact that science, err, does not sell either.

I could add a little more to that later on, if possible.

Edit: Christopher Columbus for that of the discovery of the Americas and next the Portuguese as the Conqueror of both Latin America and South America.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqIIW7nxBgc&list=RDGuJQSAiODqI&index=9

Next, that of "Material World" by Madonna and this makes me possibly sick.

In fact I am not forgetting about a couple of things, except those which are supposed to sell.

Anyone better?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52iW3lcpK5M&index=11&list=RDGuJQSAiODqI

Needs a check for contents above, except for "getting into the groove", again by Madonna.

Indulge me.

At least so or such a thing is being said.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6qUTSZ5Zmk

For idiots, of course, or the fact that you may be listening in.

Guess they moved the servers . . .

Left the other thread, or at least posting for this.

Working on the main account at Photobucket right now,

Yes. dang. not necessarily onlythat of sticky things or such, but in fact contens being obtained during some 14 years on the net.

Logging in on Facebook from what I have, it says no right now.

My primary goal, or purpose here would be that of logging into a user account at or for my disposal, but when

Edit: Launching a couple of windows, or tabs. using Google Chrome and it ends up dead right now-

Should I perhaps check my spelling. ot otherwise give it another try?

Yes, try it and you next could be in for it.

I'll beat you on this main point, or presumably so.

For now working on contents only.

Back later.

Checking in with the news before continuing here.

I was trying to write something else first, but it becomes a continuation of the Saturday beer and I will rather have the rest for later.

But in fact I rather gave a thought about what could be considered by some or most to be a "flop" of sorts.

Some people choose to either have fun, or rather make fun of both celebrities as well as politicians.

Other people may rather choose to believe that we are living in a dangerous and unstable world.

If you happen to be a scientist, you could perhaps ask where we fit in the big picture, where our understanding of nature is based on both knowledge and understanding.

Ask an astronomer why or perhaps how such a thing as a solar system is being created or formed and planets sometimes like the Earth might come into existence and such a thing as time is
always a factor to consider.

A paperbased star atlas may have the selected co-ordinated based on a given selection of an epoch.

1950.0 and 2000.0 are typical examples.

Such things as both the emergence of agriculture as well as that of the industrial revolution are within a given time frame, where at times things are happening slow and sometimes fast.

The age of the dinosaurs lasted 170 million years and unless an asteroid impact had not happened, probably would have ended up in a blind track or spot.

If not that above, we also could be looking at both the emergence of humans from apes based on current knowledge and also that intelligence has evolved in a similar way.

Because that of evolution is a subject on its own, I rather prefer the first word above, because I was not into that of evolution right now.

One of the reasons for the industrial revolution happening was the invention of the steam engine, but here I am almost blank on the subject and only gets to Google Translate for now.

So, if not enough or sufficient, I may have mentioned the imprisonment or captivity of the Jewish people by the Egyptians and also the fact that pictures of possible helicopters could be visible on
the hieroglyphs being part of the Pyramids of Giza and the fact that these monuments were for burial purposes of the Egyptian Pharaohs.

The fact is that both these things could be more or less true, but next that such a thing as possible Reincarnation could be a subject on its own.

We definitely know our place in the world as humans and also that life starts at birth.

But also the fact that I have come to the conclusion that life could end with that of death, but possibly not completely so.

Unfortunately the fact is that while such a thing as Religion and Faith often could be a question about either God, or the possible divine, such a thing might not necessarily be reflected in real life,
despite having such a possible inclination towards the subject.

There could be people around thinking that we may not be alone in space and that technology could be making a possible difference between that of nature and possible intelligence.

Here I was thinking about possible intelligent civilizations in space and not necessarily that of any divine.

My best guess, or perhaps knowledge is that people could approach different subjects each having their own purpose or meaning.

One such could be about the discovery of foreign objects or fragments being found inside both arms and legs of people, which has needed surgery for its removal.

Becomes David M. Jacobs for his name, but the other happen to be Bruce Maccabee, who as a quite reputed scientist, or at least active ufologist made research into a possible atmospheric phenomenon which could be associated with that of possible UFO's.

Unfortunately I am unable to get to the details here and therefore have neither the pros or the cons on the subject, but it also reminds me of "Project Hessdalen", which should not be related to
the work at Bruce Mcabbee at all, but could still be having some similarities.

Possibly somone else could chime in with more details here.

Personally I find a bit of a difference here.

I am not the one thinking that possible Type II or at least Type III civilizations in space should be or mean the same as the Command Ship of Star Wars, or the "Death Star", for that matter.

But if you look at nature alone, it may be possible to see that technology is making such a thing possible and that except for that of both robots and cyborgs,
also that of biology and intelligence should be closely linked together.

Such a thing as computers and processors are typical of today's society, like that of both planes and rockets in a similar way.

Making a robot or cyborg from technology alone, or possibly silicon for such, next puts a human face, or even body on such a thing and we could believe it means the same.

There could be a word or wording around telling about possible "timeless fashion".

Sometimes this could mean that of possibly beauty and sometimes perhaps a different thing.

Women are known to be putting a makeup on their faces before getting in a party in order to look better.

Also people in front of the camera could be doing such a thing as well, but for a different purpose or meaning.

Possibly I stray off a little, but such a thing as "lurking in the shadows" is a word that could be used for a thing possible hiding in disguise.

One possible explanation for this could be that of technology, because as mentioned that of technology could be part of evolution.

Other possible explanations or reason could therefore be harder or more difficult to explain.

In my opinion our understanding of those things which could be something or anything else than that of technology is poorly explained.

My sense is that we could perhaps believe in both God and the Devil, or at least the story of the Bible, but except for that we also have that of Creation Myth.

Also the fact that the article for this in the Wikipedia is not a good one.

The Seti@home client could possibly lie at times, or maybe return errors in the results, but my guess is that we are not alone in space.

If so, could that of technology be the whole explanation?

As humans, like most else of nature, we are supposed to be "flesh and blood".

Everything in nature is either matter or energy and for the latter we think that it should be about radiation only.

My ability of thinking also makes me able to feel pain and for this we have both the neck and spine, together with the nerve or nervous system.

Such a thing as perception comes by the five senses which are part of the brain itself.

The little brain makes it possible to perform both arithmetic and logic, but does such a thing makes us intelligent alone or only?

Or perhaps I should switch the order of the two last sentences above.

Humans are not supposed to be lurking in the shadows, but still there could be things being part of nature which could be doing so.

Both that of technology and also evolution are supposed to be developing processes and therefore part of nature as a whole.

Our current knowledge about the Universe tells us that it is expanding or inflating, because of what we think was the Big Bang.

This was apparently the starting point of the Universe and therefore its birth.

We may not yet know its fate or destiny, but at least when it comes to ourselves, we could perhaps sense that there could be more to it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_M._Jacobs

I should have provided the link to David M. Jacobs.

Notice the exclamation point at the top and therefore I am not quoting here.

But in the second section Ufology, it reads "which sometimes includes utilizing hypnotic regression with alleged alien abductees along with traditional interview techniques..." .

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ufology

Here apparently not the same exclamation point, so therefore take it with a grain of salt.

Except for that of believing in hypnotic regression as a Method, of course.

A remote island in the Pacific, the Easter Island, is known for its monoliths, or statues, apparently built by an ancient human civilization.

An explorer, which now has passed away, gave much of his life or at least career by building a sailboat of wood (rather a float than a sailship), in order to sail across the Pacific to the island.

Also a fact locally known here that a business tried to launch a computer with his name, but had to change the name slightly.

What is the most important here, his feat, or the fact that these monoliths are relics from the Stone Age or the similar?

Should tell that I always was skeptic to the fact that such things as both the Pyramids of Giza and these stone monoliths were built by primitive people and here also that the word "Stone" should be
having different meanings.

Tools of stone were being created by Stone Age Man for that of hunting, but rather painting pictures, except from possible cave paintings, they were left with the evening fire and next watching the stars in the sky.

A bad example or comparison from the movie "2001, A Space Odyssey", where a Monolith apparently changed the lives of such people in order for possible intelligence to come forward.

In fact I do not believe in that story, regardless of such thing rather happening at Jupiter as well.

Our current knowledge tells us that evolution is part of the development of the brain, or at least that of evolution could be for one given purpose and that of intelligence possibly being a result of such evolution.

Charles Darwin definitely was an atheist, in the same way as also Stephen Hawking and Albert Einstein should be the same.

But the fact is that we ended up going to the Moon both because of intelligence and that of technology and not necessarily because of our blood vessels, or nervous system.

You may perhaps recall the figure showing an ape or monkey becoming Charles Darwin.

Why not rather a dinosaur or a crocodile for such a thing, because both aggression and instinct are still part of us today?

Stone Age Man definitely was not a crocodile or dinosaur in any way, but they were not all painters either.

The fact is that we associate the left part of the brain with that of functionality and the right part of the brain with possible perception.

Finally the little brain for that of logic and arithmetic, as already mentioned.

The question could next be asked, should we take everything for granted and assume it to be in such a way?

If not for the asteroid impact, the dinosaurs would probably still be present, together with both lemurs and possibly humans as well.

Therefore I rather would see an explanation for why fish happen to be fish in the same way as apes happen to be monkey, or vice versa for the latter.

If the asteroid impact killed off the dinosaurs, it still left both the lemurs and fish to continue its evolution, followed by humans next.

If the dinosaurs vanished 65 million years ago, they also came into existence some 170 million years ago, but what about the anthill?

Still a brain on top of their head, but only a programmed functionality for their development like that of both bacteria and viruses and nothing more.

The article about the Universe in the Wikipedia is about the galaxies and galaxy clusters of space and not the protons, electrons and neutrons making up everything.

Our knowledge about intelligence is for now limited to our Earth and not the rest of the Universe, despite such things as Laws and Equations and the four Fundamental Forces of Nature.

If there could be even more to it, what could this perhaps be?

Is perhaps superstition and myth the same, only because Stone Age Man did not know everything?

Or are we supposed to believe that Matter Creation and Creation Myth could be two different things for the same reason, even today?

These questions are for the scientists to give answer to and probably noone else.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UFO_religion

Noticing right now that this link has been added under ufology in the Wikipedia.

Needs checking, but it slipped my head right now.

When mentioning the fact that the article about Creation myth in the Wikipedia is not the best one, there should also be noted the difference between a possible link to that of Religion itself and
that of such a Creation Myth.

Here it still should be a difference in my opinion, but for now I do not know whether the article about Creation myth has been written by theologists or scientists.

Needs checking with the References section at the bottom for this.

At least still small caps here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion

Not willing to discuss the subject in detail, but it comes to me that the difference here could be about a given notion of Jesus and his life here on Earth as being told by the Bible.

Rather I am more concerned about that of a possible notion of God rather than Jesus and the possible way any existence of God could be explained by science.

For this I was also thinking about the Big Bang as the moment of Creation of the Universe and that this could be explained by that of Matter Creation.

Religion could be about possible worshipping, but for some reason I happen to know about not only stars and galaxies making up the Universe, but also how societies work and interact by possible
conflicts and wars sometimes becoming the end result.

Ask either Isaac Newton or perhaps some other scientist what happens if you collide, or really smash two cars or trains with each other at high speed.

We definitely know what happens next, but not necessarily the same thing for perhaps a dream or that of painting a picture.

Like another abbreviation currently being around, that of PTSD is also such a thing and for this I make it "Post Traumatic Stress Disorder".

People often forget events happening because of the trauma or stress involved and the events may only be recalled by hypnotic regression.

The question could be whether such a recall of memory needs to be told someone else, or that the person or subject involved may be able to do so on his or her own when being wakened up.

Hypnosis is not sleep in any way, but rather a trance, which for some reason either is still unexplained, or may perhaps not be believed.

You possibly know that I am having problems with my left arm, but for such a thing I do not need any hypnotic therapy or regression at all.

Therefore it should not be any PTSD in a similar way either.

I may not recall getting the fork and knife for yesterday's dinner, but I definitely remember my first day at school and also a couple of other things.

You perhaps noticed that I used the word reputed for that of Bruce Mcabbee as being such a scientist and also an ufologist, like David M. Jacobs.

I rather could have been using another word or words for this, but only the fact that the subject of foreign objects being found in peoples legs and arms is not that bad idea when it comes
to a subject, but what rather about something else?

Come on, Mr. Maccabee. Please write a book on your subject, or possible discoveries.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Maccabee

For orders sake here, because I am having problems with his name.

You probably noticed that it eventually came back with me as well.

So, the question becomes whether or not Ufology is the same as that of Creation myth.

Possibly not, but still two different or separate subjects.

Erich von Däniken gives possible mentioning of gods in his books or written statements or publishments, but are possible aliens or extraterrestrials next such gods?

Remember the Ten Commandments, which tells that you should not lie and also be having no other gods than "me" (meaning God).

If Seti@home or any similar project was ever successful in any way, this was not because of neither ants or anthills.

The only fact that we may perhaps believe that it was someone there, but next not which one or who.

In the Star Wars movies, the battle could be about the Forces of Good versus the Force of Evil.

At least we should know what both these Forces are supposed to be about, or at least that of the Evil, except for possible black versus white.

If the Evil, or just the Devil, could be having any Commandments on his own, it should be "You should lie", but once again perhaps back at that of Logic for such a thing.

For a quite good reason I happen to make a difference between both most of the Universe, including ourselves and that of possible gods which could exist.

If the Universe rather was created by aliens or extraterrestrials, I most likely do not believe in this story either, because for now we could be left to believe that both the Earth as well as
possible other civilizations could be one thing, while that of the Universe itself, including its creation, more likely should be something else.

Still we could be left with two possible options when it comes to a given understanding and therefore still be left with the subject of Religion and Faith as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluorescence

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluorescent_lamp

Came across this in the Wikipedia which is not about numbers at all, but could still be interesting.

Next the possible idea of searching for "Swiss UFO", or something like that using YouTube, knowing that this is not a modern story.

Not on the first page in the search result, but being reminded about Billy Meier, who I had forgotten, or at least which for the story itself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billy_Meier

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKKvodUI2rE

The YouTube link above makes for no given reference at all.

At some 0:54 or 0:55 in the clip and following, is the alien female or woman, which I once may have been told the name of.

This is what I was looking for, but probably needs finishing the clip before possibly getting at the name.

Apparently not so and the clip was shorter than originally thought, but next there is a reference to a clip with the title or header "23 Proofs Billy Meier is a hoaxer".

Really I am not in a mood to discuss whether or not such a thing should be part of the Standard Model or not, but rather the fact that one part of science could be having its possible claim or claims
when it comes to both pros and cons.

There is no proof that extraterrestrials are humanlike or humanoids.

Robots and cyborgs could once again be having a human face, if not a body, but still only functioning because of a microprocessor for its brain.

Another word for this here is that of "android" and for now the robot.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_(robot)

Still the human aspect, or possible look or view on this subject from a general understanding or knowledge.

Again, please remember my skeptical approach or inclination here, or possible view, but the story about Billy Meier is perhaps the most fascinating one currently known.

So, should we next believe that every star in the Milky Way is having an intelligent civilization present?

I remember from younger days looking up a star in the constellation Eridanus with a white dwarf being a member and also a red dwarf, in addition to the main sequence star.

Quite easy to locate, the red dwarf was too faint, but the white dwarf was quite well visible.

Need to pull Burnham's Celestial Handbook for the designation of the star and this is something I will not do.

Also reminds me about a double star in Cassiopeia, where both members are rather close neighbors of our own Solar System in space.

In comparison, a classic book from 1974 is depicting a double star system in Auriga, where the components are red and blue giants, respectively.

Possibly zeta Aurigae here, or the star at the lower right of epsilon Aurigae.

Also the fact that an intelligent civilization could be present in space, because they developed into a Type II civilization and left their planet.

Sorry, when Harry met Sally, it could be a complete different story, but if something else happened to be true, I would not necessarily be any proud.

Back later.

Should tell that I rather was thinking of making it a bit more impersonal and only look for the subject of UFO videos alone.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K58MjoKSMPo

Rather I apparently ended up in the middle of it.

Should tell that in fact I believe in both Billy Meier and most of his videos, so this is not a problem.

But noticing the word "abductee" being used and needs both a rewind and possible checking.

A hoax, or perhaps another similar word, could be of that of possible debunking, or even ridiculing, but without the details, such a thing as either the Chamaleon, or possible Mantis,
could be able to change colors, or perhaps a little more and therefore be a possible hunter, or predator in disguise.

A disguise could at times be near perfect and therefore difficult to reveal.

Therefore the question could perhaps be asked what is meant with being an "abductee"?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPgsEE_QHp0

I may well watch the "Pleiadian connection" next, but then I will be leaving the computer and next be off for tonight.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPgsEE_QHp0

One small digression here.

For now quite early on in the playback, but right now I rather want to play back the whole thing.

The narrator, or presenter makes of the aliens as being able to travel to other galaxies.

I rather would have preferred using other stars here, meaning stars in the Milky Way, because this probably should suffice.

The story is telling that these people are from the Pleiades and this star cluster is some 410 light years distant in the Milky Way.

On the other hand, there could be a possible difference between that of galaxies of the Universe, or perhaps that of Cosmology and the fact that epsilon Pegasi is only a couple of dozen light years away and
has been much scrutinized.

Except for those explorers and researchers, of course.

Take the Andromeda galaxy as an example.

It is some 2.2 million light years distant and also is having two quite small elliptical companion galaxies.

This tells about a great age and also that it is twice as large as the Milky Way, but not necessarily exciting in appearance.

If a Type II or Type III civilization should be found in a galaxy some 100 million light years away, it probably would not be of that much interest for the radio astronomers.

That of Cosmology, or in fact the Universe becomes a different subject and is not the most discussed or relevant subject when it comes to this project.

Again, please remember that I am still open minded on the subject.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abduction

Edit: Looking for "abductee" and it becomes that of Abduction.

Possibly a difference here, at least when watching the video.

Another word could be that of a possible hostage, but probably not the correct one either.

I have not read the rest of it yet.

Edit2: Her name is apparently "Semjase" and at some 36:26 in the video, there is something unusual.

Apparently Billy Meier is able to catch a couple of photographs, meaning still frames, of a glowing object.

When later asking Semjase (remember that she is from the Pleiades), she is unable to give a precise answer.

Only adds to my suspicions when something like this is happening, because this is not about any ridiculing at all.

Perhaps a bit too many lines below.

Should tell that at 09:40 AM in the morning, I fell out of it and lost track of it for now.

But without having the precise word right now, I came to think about Steven M. Greer, who by his words "extraordinary claims needs extraordinary evidence".

First of all, think of some or most of us doing Seti@home by means of running the client as part of the community for this, meaning the Seti@community.

In fact we could be astronomers, or maybe something else.

A possible UFO community would next be possible extraterrestrials, who may have been seeking contact with us.

Here should be made a possible difference.

If I am not wrong, a painter with the name Ann Druyan at times helped out Carl Sagan by making paintings depicting the Universe.

If I was so lucky to get aboard an extraterrestrial craft in order to be able to travel other places, I would still need my toothbrush and also get some sleep,
but also I could be sitting next to a window at times and watching the stars passing by.

Is this still supposed to be science?

Is science supposed to be about numbers all the time, because such a thing could be about that of Proof, including the Method of Proof?

If not so, should suddenly a wishful dream be perhaps even better and next you could perhaps believe in it or such a thing as well?

If that of possibly being a debunker or ridiculer of a given thing, except for that of Religion and Faith, are we supposed to perhaps believe in a possibility because it is science and
not necessarily numbers?

I could perhaps tell about such a story of making a journey across space, possibly by means of an extraterrestrial craft for such, but next you probably could back and tell me that I am a dreamer.

Such a thing would not help at all.

Should have skipped the first line below.

But again the fact that I am having two hands for a given purpose.

Namely that of both making my food and also be a painter, if I chose to be such one.

If you look around at YouTube, there should be videos there about the notion of infinity.

Here by means of such a thing from a numerical perspective.

At least one of these videos goes to show how, or in which way this notion could perhaps be divided or split up, for a better approach.

Time travel could be possible, at least back in time, while that of travel into the future may be impossible.

As I mentioned, there is a story, or actually a tell-tale story being told about possible extraterrestrials being visitors from the future, or that their travel could have been across time.

For now only a 50/50 chance of it being possible, of course and I do not claim neither the possibility of such thing happening, nor the opposite.

The fact is that Einstein could tell us about the notion of time, by means of his Special Theory of Relativity, but whether or not that of being a crocodile, or possibly that of a painter makes it
easier to make a difference between that of possible intelligence or conscience, with that of Religion and Faith, could be another matter.

Look at such things as both birth and death when it comes to the living being, including humans and the possible Religous aspect or definition could be open ended.

Such a thing is not about being an artist, or painter either, because there should be no meaning of depicting that of possible death.

If rather that of Eternity should be used instead of infinity, we are once again back at the subject of Religion and Faith and this is probably a never ending story.

Bluestar, or whatever your name is this week. Isn't it rather obvious that I rounded the figure up to 1 significant figure? Not all of us have to deal in exact unnecessary details. Round it up again and it is indeed a nominal 4 light years away. Happy now?

Make it here perhaps.

Chris.

You know as well as me that the possible search for extraterrestrial intelligence could be more than about numbers.

Regardless of it being either 4, or perhaps 4.37 light years when it comes to Alpha Centauri, we should be more concerned about what we could find, meaning possible discoveries.

Except for going to the Moon and also orbiting the Earth, the human race is not a space born race yet.

Probably there is no specific drive when it comes to this either, even though both Nasa as well as private businesses or enterprises are making attempts both when it comes to manned,
as well as unmanned missions, or possibly expeditions.

As I previously mentioned, a UFO community as such and that of the Seti community could differ, because we could interpret the possible UFO community as that of the extraterrestrials themselves.

I happened to be in a bit of a spiritual mood some two days ago, because I happened to be relaxing off with the weekend.

Became a bit late when doing so and it almost ended up being a Monday.

An old melody by Yes is having the title "Wonderous stories".

This should not make us forget that learning to swim could be a possible opportunity, but when it goes wrong and you possibly drown, or get under water, it could be the end of the day.

There could be many people around wishing for possible contact with extraterrestrials, because they more likely are for the good in such a way, rather than the bad.

Proxima Centauri is only a 11 magnitude red dwarf and may not compare with the other two stars.

Compare with the wide pair zeta Reticuuli and you could be caught up by that of science fiction and the movie Alien.

If for some reason that of science fiction could make a possible reference that what rather should be that of reality, this attempt probably is quite successful.

Either it becomes that of selling a story, or a possible product, but it may not necessarily be true.

I could add a little more about this movie in a later post.

Yes, happening and it becomes a possible event.

At least I was able to do a couple of things when it comes to the business of numbers, but for now only left with CUDA tasks here.

One of the three movies in the Star Wars trilogy, or sequel is mentioning that of a "New Hope".

With that of such hope, one could be thinking of possible optimism.

But not necessarily the word "expectancies", which I happened to be using at PrimeGrid, which also could mean something else.

The fact is that gravity for now leaves us here on Earth and we are not a space traveling race yet.

As I mentioned, the fact is that such a travel could perhaps be a wishful dream, or at least something that you could wish to do, but except for the toothbrush and also needed sleep,
you could end up sitting by the window and watch the stars passing by.

Most likely both Nasa, as well as other private businesses or enterprises could bring us back to the Moon and possibly elsewhere as well.

But you probably know that I was thinking even a bit further.

You probably noticed the fact that I still happen to be having the feet on the ground, so here only perhaps speculation or possible dreams.

As I mentioned, I find my self as being part of a community, at least the Seti@home community.

A possible interaction between humans and extraterrestrials would make the latter being part of, or representing a UFO community.

In the old days of Outlook Express, or perhaps the Agent software, or the like, that of newsgroups were available for download, as well as reading and writing.

Here you could be able to read about the "Galactic Federation", if you chose the right newsgroup.

The sad thing is that we could perhaps be learning about the story of Roswell and also a couple of other things.

If the rest of it perhaps makes no sense, so it should be here as well, because not everyone is willing to believe in the story.

If such a thing as exploration could be for a given purpose, it could be about both knowledge, but also the fact that such a thing as intelligence could carry us at other places,
at least by means of imagination.

I could perhaps be an astronomer and next be able to travel by means of an extraterrestrial craft as a guest.

But if so, I would not necessarily be carrying the Bible in my hand.

A civilization in space could perhaps mean ourselves, or it could rather be someone else.

Still we are supposed to be part of nature and the question becomes whether there still should be a difference left between these two.

Yes, make an idiot of myself and you probably know why.

I happened to fill up my 3 TB disc with numbers in the hope that they could be useful.

Except for that, I also got a reminder that it could be about a couple of other things, including the falling apple in the head and so on.

Did I not once mention that science could be a forgiving business?

Neither being a rich man, or a man without shoes, does not exclude or leave the fact that events happening in fact could make us without shoes.

I may have mentioned "New Deal" earlier on, where an economic program, including that of investment, gave room for possible jobs to be created.

Still, at five minutes to midnight, local time, I do not find room or time giving a thought about the "upper deck", because there should be no reason for it.

But if a budget when it comes to money could be showing the possible difference between that of possible gain versus a similar loss, such a thing as for example the
Uncertainty Principle may not be able to do the same.

An apple hitting someones head from above could perhaps hurt, but it does not necessarily mean "Stairways to Heaven" in any way.

Such a thing as the "Falling man" should be a known fact from history and also what that is supposed to mean.

If by means of a "Probabilistic function", astronomer Frank Drake could be coming up with a Probability for the existence of other intelligent civilizations in space,
the chance for this being nil, or nothing would next probably be the opposite, only because such an equation would tell such a thing.

Please have me corrected, but is not that of Probability also that of an equation for such a thing and because of that, the Drake equation?

The classic movie "Blade Runner" is a very good example of a "futuristic" movie.

Among other things, it deals with the subject of eyes, except for perhaps telling a little more about this fact.

Compare with "Travel into the Future" and here apparently there is no attempt at explaining that such a thing may not be possible.

Rather we are left to believe in the story as it is being told and next that it could be for possible fun and entertainment.

Back tomorrow.

Except for that, I had a visit from my mother and uncle together during the day.

Very nice and polite, or actually "cordially" for such a thing, he drove to the shop for me to have some beers.

Not with me during the early part of the day, but it became a couple of words about my father when my uncle came in for a visit today, together with my mother.

A funeral means that of a burial, or perhaps vice versa, but except for the finishing words in the Church, it could be a choice between that of cremation and that of a burial of the whole body using a coffin.

Still not decided when it comes to the details, even when that of cremation becomes the result or outcome, it next needs an urn or a place or location for such at a graveyard.

The sad thing is that the last 12 or 15 years of his life became that of Parkinsons decease and before that, like his father, they were both quite decent and friendly and offered quite much.

But when it comes to myself it also becomes that of possible "roles", meaning a functionality for a given purpose.

When it comes to science alone, or possibly that of entertainment, you may perhaps recall the movie Alien, where the initial recovery meant a spacewalk on the surface of a moon, or possibly planet.

Next, what they found or discovered was apparently an egg, located inside a protective shell or cover.

Yes, playing with dolls and having light voices should be the main difference between woman and men, but could there be even more to it?

Look at that of nature, which at times I happen to do and it supposedly is "faceless".

Meaning that there could be no such thing as either intelligence or conscience around, except for that of life on Earth.

My guess is that a couple of Laws and equations currently known are supposed to reflect nature and therefore we also could be speaking about the functionality of nature.

If rather speaking about, or perhaps dealing with life on Earth, it could be about Statistics, as well as a couple of other things.

The fact is that evolution could be telling about the possible initial start of life on Earth, but to me that of evolution is only about possible development, or rather change.

That, or such a thing as evolution could most likely favor those who happen to be atheists, or perhaps agnostic.

If we rather should believe in possible other explanations, such a thing as Religion and Faith could be a possibility.

Such a thing as a Gantt diagram, or Venn diagram could be part of Project Management, or at least CASE analysis, but not during my first course or semester.

If either Albert Einstein or Michio Kaku could pick up the pencil rather than using their heads for a given purpose, the outcome would probably be different.

The same thing could perhaps go with that of UFO research as well and the similar when it goes to possible aliens and extraterrestrials.

Those "Daredevils" known from movies about planes and their development (Bess Armstrong and Tom Selleck for a selected choice), could be possible examples of adventurers,
meaning an adventurous story for the whole thing.

Example, or rather fact from real life may show that it may not necessarily be so.

I mentioned the Seti@home community versus the UFO community previously and the fact that UFO's could be interpreted with that of possible intelligent civilizations for such a thing.

Are you supposed to "believe" Billy Meier, or possibly Erich von Däniken because they happen to be ufologists and next they could be telling a story about possible extraterrestrials?

Or could it still be about "Wonderous Stories" by Yes, because this time it happens to be music?

Still a couple of questions remaining, in my opinion.

Like "what it is supposed to mean" and not "what that is supposed to mean".

Too late to edit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gd2Ky9wck5o&feature=youtu.be

Mentioned at Mersenneforum.org, I will have the rest of the evening, or perhaps night, from here.

Also the fact that if you happened to watch the sermon, or perhaps speech by the Pope (or Bishop of Rome) the other day,
most likely his words are getting nowhere, or perhaps blind.

Lost the precise word for this, but here the point is that this is not necessaril or only because of, or for the reason of science, in my opinion, or as far as I am able to tell.

For now it translates into "mercy" for such a thing, but here I was concerned or giving a thought about the possible religious meaning of this word.

Translates into "almighty", or perhaps "omnipotence", which should not be the correct word for the latter.

Is science supposed to be blind in such or a similar way, either because of a possible difference in opinion (meaning that of possible moderation as well).

Not necessarily blindfolded in any way, because we are supposed to be speaking about possible results, as well as possible gains and achievements.

If I happened to be a nuclear scientist and next being able to detect the neutron, or perhaps neutrino, such a thing would probably be both a great discovery,
as well as also becoming a big addition to our knowledge.

Yes, those fine words and next becoming stuck.

But if so, what would or could such a discovery perhaps be related against or with?

As you probably know, one part of the debate could be about science, while another that of a possible God.

In between you could be having possible Demography, as well as that of Statistics, as well as a couple of other things and next think that both, or perhaps all, could be science.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demography

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistics

To my best knowledge, that of possible "Little Green Men" is not supposed to be about neither Demography or that of Statistics.

"Believe" or perhaps "not believe" for such a thing and except for possible numbers it is still supposed to be science.

Any debunkers in here?

Am I still supposed to "believe" and next such a fact that most likely we are not alone in space and you do not have to be an astronomer for this either.

Back tomorrow.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xj6vV3T4ok8

Honestly, should tell that I never have made fun of any physicists.

Anyway, tullio. Are you still with me?

Becoming a needed break, such a thing of crazy or possible "craziness" is either being heard, or possibly implied, or perhaps exclaimed.

You probably never know.

One thing is or could be that of being lazy because of your life or your lifestyle, but what next about possible craziness?

Should tell that for starters we had a debate in the past of perhaps or possibly scientists being mad, but that debate apparently leading nowhere.

If I am not wrong, science could still be carried out by means of a possible leading hand by means of physicists and that mathematics should not be far behind.

It is still supposed to be about nature and this should be a well known fact.

If we at times could be using the word "flawed" about a thing, should this be about a given result. or should it be because of that of science as a more or less whole?

Here I was not thinking only about that of ridiculing or possibly debunking, so therefore, please give it a thought.

If we could, or are supposed to believe in a given method, including both the Standard Model and the Scientific Method, we are not supposed to think or believe of any of these two as
"flawed", in any way, because they happen to be about possible results.

So, in order to perhaps digress a bit, or perhaps stay away from the subject, is a possible ridiculer or debunker a person that could be concerned or perhaps occupied,
meaning with that of possible "flaws" when it comes to a couple of things?

Does that of flaws means possible errors as such and if so, should this mean possible science?

Suggestions welcome, but I am not the one dealing with the possible errors in the results here.

Switch "perhaps" with "possibly" below for a possible better result or comparison.

Or perhaps two times "perhaps" and one time "possibly", I may not know.

Rather the fact that when I took the time at complaining of the spot on the kitchen floor as a result of the leaking, or perhaps opened bottle of acid, there was no proper or immediate response back.

Except for that, I should perhaps tell you about the story as well, but probably you already know.

If you happen to be a family member, or at least a member of the family, such a thing is supposed to matter and when almost confronting my uncle with the issue, he could not give me a clear answer.

Except for that, leaving a bottle of concentric acid on the kitchen floor, as it happened, to me is a crime and is not being accepted.

Water perhaps for that of cleaning and next that of soak and not soap for such a thing.

Of course that of soap could next be tried or attempted, but except for that of kitchen or even floor soap or wash, what about such a thing as concentric acid being left on my kitchen floor?

Really a thing not being accepted and that also became the fact being mentioned against or towards my uncle.

Oh, dear, or perhaps my, this time.

Except for that, it was hanging before posting.

Really the nagging thing being observed is that my uncle became almost completely white in the beard at 71 years of age.

Except for that, only two or three small things or details which drags it completely down the drain, but still that thing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBE-uBgtINg&index=14&list=RDpKezsrhev6I

With respect for tullio, I remove the double link for the playback here.

But except for that, such or those people as the Romans are not supposed to be wearing or carrying swords, you know.

Or perhaps the same or given answer to this back in return like a couple of other or similar ones (meaning questions).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOf4SktPDak&list=RDpKezsrhev6I&index=17

Or perhaps, meaning "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan.

Of course another, or completely different meaning.

At least when it comes to the music.

Hmm, two lines above for the same.