Apologies for that.

It was my Saturday beer (and not Friday).

Two cans (they are metal bottles) of light beer for the food went open in the plastic bag while shopping.

It became a bit too much again, but my guess is that the bag containing these two was not the most heavy.

Probably it bumped with one of the other bags, which contained more.

Only three bottles consumed and not touching the potato chip, just sitting here all day probably makes for a couple of other things to happen.

Except for carrying the plastic bags, the cold air outside really do not help that much, at least when it comes to possible miracles, or the like.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_(element)

I happen to know what Mercury is (except for the planet), but amalgam becomes for my teeth.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetism

It became the ambiguation page first, but perhaps more interesting, the article about Magnetism is quite good.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallen_angel

Found this when returning back a short while ago.

Also the fact that while gravity is supposed to be the weakest force of nature, you could happen to visit a lab at a University in order to have a big electric charge being made.

Next, again remember Benjamin Franklin, who with his kite was trying to understand electricity without possibly knowing about Electromagnetism at all.

Place a spoon of filtered or pulverized iron on a piece of paper and next watch how the iron creates a pattern because of the magnetism.

You could next think of a given scientist perhaps being either "weird", or possibly even mad at times, but not really the main point.

Rather the fact that there should be no secret that not only the mind could be such a place, but also the world we are a part of.

Make a thing and it is supposed to work. If not so, it could also break.

As a previously mentioned, "Tick-tick", so happens with time.

I happened to ask earlier on where such a thing like the Uncertainty Principle, as well as a couple of other things could relate when it comes to the Standard Model, but before checking,
did not receive an answer.

The question becomes whether the subject of mathematics comes first and next that of physics, or possibly vice versa.

If either the world and possibly even the mind happen to be just such a place, it is not only because of the iron, or even the heat being generated from your body.

If there possibly should be another explanation, should we next believe is such a "Falling Angel", or are we only supposed to believe that at given "method" should be having limits or constraints,
only because we are able to see the edges and possibly not everything in between?

Back later.

What is the opposite of innocence?

The answer is most likely that of guilt, or that of being guilty.

Digestion is a biological process which at times unfortunately could go wrong for several reasons.

I happened to look up the subject of Inquisition in the Wikipedia.

Am I not supposed to believe that the Church should be able to put a certain value on its attitudes?

Not finding a better translation here, but except for perhaps Religion and Faith only or alone, could even more be assumed.

My guess is that science and the Church have clinched at least in the past not only because the Church is supposed to be one given thing, while science not always could be the same.

As trying to be a scientist myself, a possible belief should be in the afterworld, or what could be defined as the Heavens, and not necessarily the celestial sky, or even subatomic world.

If God as the possible Creator of the Universe knew that he had only one chance of getting it working, he next made or created in in only six days and had the last day off.

We are supposed to believe that scientists are not supposed to be speaking for God either, but also the fact that our world is not the same as a given Heavens.

Take a couple of recent terms and wordings currently being used and present or available.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determinism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality

Should tell that I have returned back at the latter article a couple of times, but in fact am unable to catch the meaning or contents of this article.

Here for once, I am stuck when it comes to a given understanding.

Any suggestions welcome.

In the world of Seti@home we could at times be using the word fit for that of a chi-square relating to a gaussian score.

Next, possibly that of a best fit, versus that of a given score.

If I am not wrong the Steady State model by Fred Hoyle became left for that of the Big Bang when it comes to that of the Universe.

I mentioned the word or phrase "In the beginning" and that such a wording could be used when it comes to a scientific understanding, or perhaps knowledge.

Earthquakes, tsunamis, or even the bleeding wound, or perhaps stomach, could be part of real life, in the same way as the elements of the Periodic Table.

If I am not wrong there could have been a couple of people getting a bit upset in the past because I may have trampled on someones toes.

But is it not the fact that a subject like Logic is a way of understanding nature in the same way as you could be using a kite for the same thing?

One thing is for sure or certain, namely the fact that everything is supposed to be either matter or energy.

Still, at least the mind could be a mysterious place at times, according to the words of someone else.

If for some reason we could believe "In the beginning" as that of the moment of Creation, is such a thing as a start or beginning always the most important?

Such a thing as infinity or oblivion could be two different terms being used for possible properties related to the Universe, but next the fact that stars are being born from dust and gas,
only to go away at times, ending up becoming either neutron stars or Black Holes.

If for some reason even scientists could be speaking or discusing the subject or notion of "Heaven and Hell", could you next end up stepping on someones toe only because you could be able to
define such a term as Causality, or even Paradoxes and next think that the Uncertainty Principle could be a part of the Standard Model?

In the world of science, both the Event Horizon and the Schwarchild radius could be the place in space where you possibly could go, but not any further.

This not only because of gravity, but more likely because of a given understanding.

If gravity could be understood as a force, we probably are left at still understanding the properties of matter when exposed to huge amounts of gravity.

The Weak Nuclear Force is not the same as the Strong Nuclear Force, but where do these two possibly meet with another or get at its closest?

Really, this ends up becoming more important to me, because this is supposed to be about nature and not Religion and Faith.

Take current UFO research for example, which to some at least could be about understanding a natural phenomenon, while to other people could mean either secret societies or projects,
or the fact that we may not be alone in space.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freemasonry

Here locally, we are having such an institution, at least by means of a building in downtown of the city.

Looking up the article right now, I have almost no knowledge of their business and here they are not visible and also doing no harm.

But rather this could be about the fact that while at one moment a given thing could look or appear to be of no importance at all, we also know that many historical events came out of nowhere
and next changed history forever.

We therefore should define such a thing as being an Event.

An Event Horizon is the place in space where times ceases to exist because of the force of gravity.

What is the reason for this happening?

Like I mentioned, there could be times when the notion of "Heaven and Hell" could be of some importance.

But also the time that scientists could be able to define the notion of infinity when it comes to something without limit or perhaps end.

The Black Hole on the other hand, is supposed to contain a singularity at its core and therefore the possible notion of infinity and that of the singularity is not necessarily the same.

By means of Religion and Faith, we could also define that of possible Eternity, but once again right now on the wrong track and better later on.

Is it not the fact that gravity is a force on its own and also the fact that matter and energy could be more or less the same not only because of the famous equation E=mc2 ?

Remember scientist Stanton Friedman, who is of the opinion that while most things should be open for access, there should still be thing being hidden from open scrutiny.

The movie and entertainment industry is able to come up with products like E.T. and Alien, because such a thing could be a thing for entertainment and possible fear at times.

If we know the fact that the forces of nature could create such things as earthquakes and tsunamis, a given notion about "Heaven and Hell" could soon be that of sins versus forgiveness.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janus

Janus could be a possible god in mythology, but we could also believe in the Janus face.

We next know that the Lord (or perhaps God) is supposed to both give as well as take, but also the fact that Creation (Matter Creation) is not the same as a given destruction.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter

Antimatter is a proven part or element of particle physics.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_field_theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Unified_Theory

At least two different articles about more or less the same and still only about particle physics.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superforce

So what about the Superforce?

Checking in with the ambiguation page first.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything

Perhaps need a cup more of coffee first, but right now out of order.

Nothing in the Bible about this, at least, but next we are supposed to believe in the Big Bang as the moment of Creation (again Matter Creation).

Together with this moment of Creation, such a thing as intelligence evolved from such things like instincts and aggression.

Before checking, it could perhaps be nice to have a common term or definition for what that of intelligence is supposed to be about.

At school, a teacher is supposed to make us able to learn and these become two different words.

Logic and arithmetic is not the same thing either, but most likely the latter is being used in order to have a cup of coffee from the table to your mouth.

The force of gravity is an example of the real world at work, at least that of inertia.

Even such a thing as painting a picture, or that of having a dream while asleep, is not the same as hypnosis, which to some people have yet to be proven.

Look at current practice or perhaps a given statement when it comes to that of believing that we are still alone in space.

The Church is supposed to be divided into at least two different practices when it comes to possible attitude, but not the most important.

If you for some reason could be able to face the Devil, you could also be doing the same when it comes to God, or perhaps vice versa.

If there still could be people around believing in possible alien craft, or even mothership as a sign that we may not be alone in space, such a thing should not be the same as ball lightning.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ball_lightning

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perception

The latter became the slightly better subject that possible was being mentioned.

In fact, noticing that the Rubin vase also reminds be about the possible Janus face, for which the figure in black and white is not being found.

Therfore, perhaps make particle physics part of your day (no pun intended) and next make it possible to come up with a Grand Unified Theory for everything, but still you could end up having a bad day.

What is the opposite of innocence?

The answer is most likely that of guilt, or that of being guilty.

Digestion is a biological process which at times unfortunately could go wrong for several reasons.

I happened to look up the subject of Inquisition in the Wikipedia.

Am I not supposed to believe that the Church should be able to put a certain value on its attitudes?

Not finding a better translation here, but except for perhaps Religion and Faith only or alone, could even more be assumed.

My guess is that science and the Church have clinched at least in the past not only because the Church is supposed to be one given thing, while science not always could be the same.

As trying to be a scientist myself, a possible belief should be in the afterworld, or what could be defined as the Heavens, and not necessarily the celestial sky, or even subatomic world.

If God as the possible Creator of the Universe knew that he had only one chance of getting it working, he next made or created in in only six days and had the last day off.

We are supposed to believe that scientists are not supposed to be speaking for God either, but also the fact that our world is not the same as a given Heavens.

Take a couple of recent terms and wordings currently being used and present or available.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determinism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality

Should tell that I have returned back at the latter article a couple of times, but in fact am unable to catch the meaning or contents of this article.

Here for once, I am stuck when it comes to a given understanding.

Any suggestions welcome.

In the world of Seti@home we could at times be using the word fit for that of a chi-square relating to a gaussian score.

Next, possibly that of a best fit, versus that of a given score.

If I am not wrong the Steady State model by Fred Hoyle became left for that of the Big Bang when it comes to that of the Universe.

I mentioned the word or phrase "In the beginning" and that such a wording could be used when it comes to a scientific understanding, or perhaps knowledge.

Earthquakes, tsunamis, or even the bleeding wound, or perhaps stomach, could be part of real life, in the same way as the elements of the Periodic Table.

If I am not wrong there could have been a couple of people getting a bit upset in the past because I may have trampled on someones toes.

But is it not the fact that a subject like Logic is a way of understanding nature in the same way as you could be using a kite for the same thing?

One thing is for sure or certain, namely the fact that everything is supposed to be either matter or energy.

Still, at least the mind could be a mysterious place at times, according to the words of someone else.

If for some reason we could believe "In the beginning" as that of the moment of Creation, is such a thing as a start or beginning always the most important?

Such a thing as infinity or oblivion could be two different terms being used for possible properties related to the Universe, but next the fact that stars are being born from dust and gas,
only to go away at times, ending up becoming either neutron stars or Black Holes.

If for some reason even scientists could be speaking or discusing the subject or notion of "Heaven and Hell", could you next end up stepping on someones toe only because you could be able to
define such a term as Causality, or even Paradoxes and next think that the Uncertainty Principle could be a part of the Standard Model?

In the world of science, both the Event Horizon and the Schwarchild radius could be the place in space where you possibly could go, but not any further.

This not only because of gravity, but more likely because of a given understanding.

If gravity could be understood as a force, we probably are left at still understanding the properties of matter when exposed to huge amounts of gravity.

The Weak Nuclear Force is not the same as the Strong Nuclear Force, but where do these two possibly meet with another or get at its closest?

Really, this ends up becoming more important to me, because this is supposed to be about nature and not Religion and Faith.

Take current UFO research for example, which to some at least could be about understanding a natural phenomenon, while to other people could mean either secret societies or projects,
or the fact that we may not be alone in space.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freemasonry

Here locally, we are having such an institution, at least by means of a building in downtown of the city.

Looking up the article right now, I have almost no knowledge of their business and here they are not visible and also doing no harm.

But rather this could be about the fact that while at one moment a given thing could look or appear to be of no importance at all, we also know that many historical events came out of nowhere
and next changed history forever.

We therefore should define such a thing as being an Event.

An Event Horizon is the place in space where times ceases to exist because of the force of gravity.

What is the reason for this happening?

Like I mentioned, there could be times when the notion of "Heaven and Hell" could be of some importance.

But also the time that scientists could be able to define the notion of infinity when it comes to something without limit or perhaps end.

The Black Hole on the other hand, is supposed to contain a singularity at its core and therefore the possible notion of infinity and that of the singularity is not necessarily the same.

By means of Religion and Faith, we could also define that of possible Eternity, but once again right now on the wrong track and better later on.

Is it not the fact that gravity is a force on its own and also the fact that matter and energy could be more or less the same not only because of the famous equation E=mc2 ?

Remember scientist Stanton Friedman, who is of the opinion that while most things should be open for access, there should still be thing being hidden from open scrutiny.

The movie and entertainment industry is able to come up with products like E.T. and Alien, because such a thing could be a thing for entertainment and possible fear at times.

If we know the fact that the forces of nature could create such things as earthquakes and tsunamis, a given notion about "Heaven and Hell" could soon be that of sins versus forgiveness.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janus

Janus could be a possible god in mythology, but we could also believe in the Janus face.

We next know that the Lord (or perhaps God) is supposed to both give as well as take, but also the fact that Creation (Matter Creation) is not the same as a given destruction.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter

Antimatter is a proven part or element of particle physics.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_field_theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Unified_Theory

At least two different articles about more or less the same and still only about particle physics.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superforce

So what about the Superforce?

Checking in with the ambiguation page first.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything

Perhaps need a cup more of coffee first, but right now out of order.

Nothing in the Bible about this, at least, but next we are supposed to believe in the Big Bang as the moment of Creation (again Matter Creation).

Together with this moment of Creation, such a thing as intelligence evolved from such things like instincts and aggression.

Before checking, it could perhaps be nice to have a common term or definition for what that of intelligence is supposed to be about.

At school, a teacher is supposed to make us able to learn and these become two different words.

Logic and arithmetic is not the same thing either, but most likely the latter is being used in order to have a cup of coffee from the table to your mouth.

The force of gravity is an example of the real world at work, at least that of inertia.

Even such a thing as painting a picture, or that of having a dream while asleep, is not the same as hypnosis, which to some people have yet to be proven.

Look at current practice or perhaps a given statement when it comes to that of believing that we are still alone in space.

The Church is supposed to be divided into at least two different practices when it comes to possible attitude, but not the most important.

If you for some reason could be able to face the Devil, you could also be doing the same when it comes to God, or perhaps vice versa.

If there still could be people around believing in possible alien craft, or even mothership as a sign that we may not be alone in space, such a thing should not be the same as ball lightning.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ball_lightning

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perception

The latter became the slightly better subject that possible was being mentioned.

In fact, noticing that the Rubin vase also reminds be about the possible Janus face, for which the figure in black and white is not being found.

Therfore, perhaps make particle physics part of your day (no pun intended) and next make it possible to come up with a Grand Unified Theory for everything, but still you could end up having a bad day.

Now there's a post that'll send anyone to sleep.

If I was a doctor I'd prescribe this thread instead of sleeping tablets.

Keep up the good work whoever you are at the moment.

Cheers.

Thanks, Wiggo.

Became slightly unfinished, but also coming from a couple of problems being experienced.

The Wikipedia is a Dictionary and therefore slightly unbiased when it comes to given contents, but not necessarily that of a given opinion.

We certainly know that many things are sought or perhaps tried being explained starting with the smallest of things and next following up with the larger ones, at least when it comes to size.

These articles are continuously improving over time.

Stanton Friedman and Stephen Hawking happen to be two different people, as well as scientists, both being either cautious or perhaps even warning us about possible attempts at making extraterrestrial contact.

If not already being mentioned, I happen to be slightly more open minded myself, because as you probably know, events which could happen to go wrong is likely to be products of nature, for which there
could be an explanation for.

In my opinion such a thing as eternity and infinity is not necessarily the same, only because one of these could belong to, or be part of one given context, while the other another such one.

I wrote the sentence below that "We are supposed to believe that scientists are not supposed to be speaking for God either, but also the fact that our world is not the same as a given Heavens".

Is conscience perhaps the same as a given intelligence because even such things as instincts and aggression could be a kind of intelligence?

More likely we could still be left with the fact that bacteria and viruses are also playing a part of nature and that the visit being experienced by flies and insects in my home did not carry with it any deceases.

If you could be having your leisure time as well, except for perhaps beating me on the age, you may be familiar with the song or melody which became known after the events of September 11 and the words of
then President Bush (the younger) about "Freedom was being attacked today" and so on.

If Mr. Bush could be able to use such a word, there could also be a reminder of the "Face on the wall" for such a thing.

Perhaps believe in the facts of a history, when it could next be found to be perhaps something slightly else.

At least you need a fork and a knife when eating your dinner, so where is the possible symbol being found here?

I have not seen the movie Contact myself, or read any possible books on the subject, so I can not comment on this movie, but are we supposed to be listening and next learning, or possibly even more?

Assumedly being quite good at numbers may still not be the same as the possible dreamer, or at least painter, but in the end, who could be the better of the two when it comes to a given knowledge, or perhaps skill?

If curiosity could be able to kill a cat, it could still be able to catch a mouse.

If some people could be better than other when it comes to a given thing (and not meaning you, Wiggo), an artist could perhaps give us a notion of a world that may not exist in reality, while the rest of us could still be
fumbling in the blind when it goes to coming up with a given answer.

Take Cosmology as an example, where we are left to believe that results from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey now is telling us about not only galaxies and galaxy clusters in the sky, but also empty voids and galaxy filaments.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Void_(astronomy)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy_filament

Compare with current knowledge with the subatomic world, where my best guess is telling me that this knowledge currently ends with the elementary particles making up the atom.

Next read about such a thing as anti-matter and ball lightning and they both happen to be different subjects.

Are you next supposed to believe in the "Upper Deck" in a similar way?

Perhaps better be a child, at least when it comes to size, for such a thing, if I am not wrong.

I previously mentioned the Samsung mobile phone being purchased, which for this version or model probably should be working.

Also a Microsoft laptop computer being purchased lying unused in the living room and need looking for the adapter in order to be charged.

It should be coming with Windows 10, but I have not read that thread at all and therefore not willing to discuss neither pros or cons here.

But when previously checking, it connected to the web without any more add-ons needed, but if possibly running Seti@home using it, most likely CUDA tasks may not be run and it
would probably take a long time with those .guppi tasks if they could be properly run.

Right now it became an overcommitment of the computer, so I will log off shortly and next continue with the tasks.

Back later.

Not that much to say right now, but before signing off, I was able to read that the Doomsday clock had been put forward.

In fact it came as a bit of surprise, because I have heard about this before, but next forgot all about it.

Meant to be posting at BOINC for this, but apparently unable to do so.

But next this never was meant to be my words either.

The only thing that I was able to get or catch is that there could be people around warning us about the risk or consequences being faced by that of climate change.

Here both these words should perhaps be interpreted a bit different and possibly not being the correct ones.

For one thing given we are supposed to trust the politicians being elected and next also the words being whispered in their ears by the scientists.

If possible death by means of hanging could be a slow suffocation, it could well be a sign of the end to come.

But next such a thing could happen if a asteroid was to hit the Earth by means of an impact.

I could next back at such a thing as given Prophecies in order to perhaps about a given thing next going to happen, but for now could rather be left with the choice of
making a guess about possible events which could happen that could make a similar thing possible.

Make it a random event, if you will, or perhaps rather assume that a heavy hand was being thrown or tossed into your head by means of a given intention.

The seven plagues of Egypt in old history could be an example of the latter, but recent history have shown at least two events unrelated to each other, but which came in quick succession,
but next were not linked with each other.

Probably yet another example of "catch you later", since it does not end up into a given context.

General and Special Theory is not supposed to be the same in any way and similarly, a given Prophecy is not supposed to be about any prediction either, at least not Climate Prediction.

Edit: Perhaps make such a thing not only a political issue either, but if a signal could once have been received from a civilization crying for help because it met its destiny, it could be a different thing.

Signing off for the evening in a short time.

There was still one beer left in the fridge, but I was not out for the weekend shopping today.

Rather the question about how good or bad given politicians are supposed to be.

Speak about the weather and most likely we are unable to tell whether our pollution adds to that of global warming.

Add to the already existing factors which makes a couple of things possible, meaning that of humans versus nature, or vice versa.
the factors supposed to be affecting the Earth should come from such things as earthquakes and tsunamis, at its worst.

Add to it the other things like pollution, the release of energy from cars and so on and you have the human factor.

Perhaps the same explanation, or ingredient for each, but both with their separate background or meaning.

Combine this two things together and there becomes a new set which defies a given understanding.

Always the doves versus the hawks when it comes to a given politics, but is the future possible to tell regardless who is in charge?

Back tomorrow.

https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=80940#1845337

For reference only and both poster, contents and the rest of the facts should be considered.

Is it not the fact that while the Universe may not be having any borders, a similar thing could also be said about a given science?

You perhaps know about the story how I found it difficiult to place a couple of things, including that of the Uncertainty Principle, with that of the Four Fundamental forces of nature.

Both ordinary people, as well as Politicians and also scientists are coming up with different terminologies when it comes to perhaps explaining something.

Such a thing as Probability either makes you thing about a given wording or phrase and not the fact that it may even mean 'NOT'.

The game of poker or chess could make for both winners and losers, but again by a given Probability and not such a thing as luck, or even making a draw.

When perhaps speaking about the weather, it could be about the climate and next the factors which affects both weather and climate.

The Butterfly Effect could be about the feather or perhaps needle falling to the ground, but still we may not be able to predict the world by means of an asteroid impact.

A given word which could make you think about a possible "idiot", but in fact is something else, could make you believe that one given cause could be an excuse for something else.

The fact is that not everything goes that well with me and because of that not being blindfolded.

But also the fact that a couple of things could appear to come out of nowhere for any reason given at all.

At times leadership needs a steady hand where you do not stumble either forwards, backwards, or even sideways.

If a given problem should better be traced back at its roots, you could next end up in a situation with no solution being in sight.

The alternative could be looking the other way and leave the rest of it for both the rich and the poor.

If I ever thought that the world I was part of was only photons, I could perhaps be satisfied with such an explanation.

If I rather could be left to believe that it rather could be about a given Consequence, or such a thing as Determinism, the answer could be something else.

Before perhaps making a given word that of a possible "Commandment", at least by given Politics, as seen from a historical perspective, we should also try understanding why things happens to be this way,
only by means of the terminologies or definitions which could be used for such a thing.

You may recall that President John F. Kennedy made the decision of placing a man on the Moon before the end of the decade, not "because it is easy, but because it is hard".

Next only think about what you are doing, including the regular things of your day and such a thing as either success or even failure may be part of the scheme.

If you could be left at guessing what could be inside a locked drawer, such a guesswork could possibly that of a given Logic, but also perhaps not so either.

If an event for some reason happened and it became possible to believe that such a thing could be for a given meaning, we could be able to place it in a given context.

Assume a given Probability with a possible notion or perhaps belief in the divine and you possible could be doing this for a couple of other things as well.

A given Creation could be possible Matter Creation, but it could be a couple of other things as well.

In the same way as a given Prediction is never precisely accurate, even worse it becomes for those things which may not be predicted in advance, like large earthquakes.

The world is constantly changing and the different terms which could be used for this makes such a change a possibility.

Such a thing as time itself could mean the tick of the clock, but also a similar change.

Define such a thing as infinity when it comes to either gravity, or perhaps mathematics and we could also be left with nil or nothing which could mean a given emptiness.

If the fact happens that the Universe is expanding, or inflating into nothing, or perhaps oblivion, we could perhaps be back at the question about whether we should give such a thing as initial
Creation a bit more of thought and not necessarily the facts which could tell us about a given destiny.

Becomes one rather than several ones for this.

Sorry about, needs correct linking.

https://boinc.berkeley.edu/dev/forum_thread.php?id=10244&postid=75657

Edit: Message 18555422 below (needs possible edit, but except for that, perhaps going wrong.

Keeping a tab on it.

For now.

Yes, question possible science rather than or versus given users for such a thing and next you could be back at the "fudge factor".

Also mentioned at BOINC as well.

Making a possible phone at the Pope in the Vatican is not the same as saying he does the same for or when it comes to that of God in the Heavens.

Please forgive me, or rather kill me instead.

Next, perhaps tell me the rest of the story.

Is everything supposed to be still that of Creation, or could you perhaps have a given fate or destiny for such a thing?

The game of Russian Roulette which could make up your life is not supposed to be the same as the "Paradise wheel", which supposedly could run, or turn around forever.

Speaking about the weather, is such a thing supposed to be about the similar, only because it could be a choice among a perhaps fake or not so fake bullet in the chamber?

Or perhaps rather a given thinking, including that of people for such a thing.

So what about those stupid words among a couple of others being mentioned?

Anyway, not Number crunching here right now.

That of "Fiddle" versus that of a given fidelity or Fidelity does not mean the same, but what about the possible "fudge factor" versus that of "You should not lie" from the Ten Commandments of the Bible,
or perhaps "God is not playing with dices" for the similar?

Any evolution in all of this, or perhaps even that of a given Creation instead?

Also, not supposed to be any given music here either, but regardless of any "fudge factor", or maybe something else, are there still perhaps any science in here and if so, not perhaps because of the playing of cards?

Pick up the salary being earned and possibly deserved during the end of the week and next no questions being asked about who, or those supposedly giving you those money.

Is it perhaps give, or rather take for such a thing, but whether or not perhaps red-haired, or maybe something else, you could be a part of nature, or perhaps even a victim at times, for which there could be no possible excuse.

My best guess, or assumption, is that these silly, or perhaps stupid ideas, or opinions, being heard, or coming from sciientists, should be heard. or at least listened to, when it comes to that of any given meaning or opinion.

The phrase by Einstein about "God is not supposed to be playing with dices", may not be about a given Probability at all.

In which way are you supposed to measure a given Probability when that of a given Logic could be able at doing the same?

Or that of a given Probabiltity?

If so, are we perhaps back at the Greek philosophers, including Aristotle, when it comes to such a thing?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristotle

Again, that of earth, wind, soil and fire for such a thing and not necessarily meaning the Earth on its own for such a thing.

The compass perhaps in your possession could show you the direction of the pole, but next not much more.

For a couple of things you could still be left with with your imagination, because your way of living is supposed to be the world.

If it is ever supposed to be a "phrase" for such or a given thing, perhaps this is why God told you that this should be so and next it could be in your head, or at least mind.

Make it science if you will, but at least this came from a given will.

Part of your life could be that of a given accustom, or habit, when it comes to a couple of things, espesially when settling down.

To me not perhaps the correct word before checking, because I know that there could be more to it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3Tbvah7waU&list=RD02cvuUwTHOqj8

Right now listening in at an old video which could possibly be about your lips for such a thing as well.

Anyway, I guess this becomes hidden here, but perhaps not at BOINC.

This because any given woman, or perhaps "personality" for this or such a thing could be a different subject as well and not up for discussion.

Why not waste my time during the week instead?

Assumedly there are still more questions left than answers.

My last two beers right now.

But noticing this.

Finished the last of the two PrimeGrid Genefer20 tasks earlier on and also one of the four remaining Seti@home tasks in the task list.

Still three left to go.

But BoincLogX shows up with an empty box for a single task where it reads CPU time : 00:00:00 (0:00:01 left) Status 0.000 % .

Clicking on the icon in the tray makes for no change.

Personally I have no experience with "ghosts" when it comes to tasks, but can not exclude this ever happening.

The only option is to exit BoincLogX and next restart it in order for a possible change.

When exiting the application and next restarting it, this still shows up.

The last three tasks have yet to be started.

But in fact should tell that I may not recall this ever happening before.

Or rather do than may.

Still this being visible between the tasks, but disappears when a task is started up and next running.

Only the running task being visible and while being a separate add-on application, it lists the given computer name at the top,
together with the word Cache, which right now reads Cache: 2/2 .

This should not be the same as slot for running, because that is for the Manager to handle.

Also the properties for the still remaining task shows that it has not been started.

Also there should be an option in the Preferences section for not running these blc3_2bit_guppi tasks, because they still makes for a strain.

Again, I should have read the thread title, which sometimes becomes forgotten or missed.

But also the fact that possibly dead hardware also means no tasks being returned.

As seen either serverside, or by means of the project itself, the tasks in question and the way they are being returned should be considered more important.

Neither such a thing as an ice age, or the possible "hairy creature" from alpha Centauri could sometimes make us able to

because there could be people around who may think that such things as pollution of the environment (cars and the like)

Right now I do not have the correct word for this, but the planet Venus is a good example.

Here the atmosphere makes for even worse that could be created on Earth by having planes everywhere in the sky.

I had one large task being uploaded at that project in the past, but nothing much else.

At BOINC they rather want me to be a drug addict of sorts by means of my username, rather than that of skin cream in order to prevent possible cancer.

Also there could be people around who may think that such a thing as numbers could be boring at times.

Make it rather science if you will and next you possibly know from which to choose.

Such a thing as the Table of Elements is based on well-established science when it comes to given facts.

For a couple of other things, we could be left with possible speculation or hype for which there could be no proof.

You perhaps know that I already mentioned that word, namely "Hippocricy" and needs checking.

Starting up at 08:15 AM this morning, at least I need something to do in order to make it my day.

The very nice wintry weather which finally arrived, with a bit of snow coming down, but not too cold, does not hide the fact that both snow and rain could be hiding the
"Faceless coward" at times.

Is such a thing supposed to be any science, or could there perhaps be a difference?

When possibly speaking about the Table of Elements and the similar, we also could be doing the same when it comes to possible results or accomplishments.

But is it not the fact that there could be a flip-side or opposite effect when it comes to doing such a thing?

When perhaps doing so, we should perhaps be reminded about the fate of Giordano Bruno as a result of the "Inquisition", or perhaps even Robert Oppenheimer becoming a culprit for
science perhaps ending up wrong.

The latter possibly not final in its apparent fact, or final conclusion, or maybe even typesetting, but there could be rumors around making such a thing being a fact or true.

Is a typical project that of building a bridge or road, or the similar?

If the bridge for some reason should fail or perhaps coming down, you could end up being a "scapegoat".

Look at such a thing as nuclear fission and you could have a better alternative than a similar fusion when it comes to a couple of things.

If Giordano Bruno ended up being burnt in the fire, this did happen because the Church most likely is not able to recognize or acknowledge a "scientific" God.

For such a thing we are still supposed to rely in Faith.

A couple of things could end up having no definite meaning at all, or at least its contents could change.

The fact is that we are supposed to believe in "Little Green Men" or the like because at times the results being returned could be telling about such a thing.

Is such a thing as "believe" versus "not believe" about that of possible Faith, or could it rather be about a given Logic instead?

Look up such a thing as "Falling angel" or perhaps the "Janus face" in the Wikipedia and you may notice that both have lost its meaning.

Rather make it "Wisdom" or even that of "Conscience" instead and you could perhaps be better off.

At BOINC, there could be times when I could make a point of nature, or possibly even God being that of a "give and take" for a couple of things.

Because of that, we could be looking at both such things as Creation, as well as a similar demise or destruction in the context of either science, or possibly that of Religion.

You may be having both psalms as well as verses in the Bible, but also the Revelation of John if you happen to be "snooping" around.

Next the fact that even scientists most likely do not bother about Ezekiel and his claim about that of a given vehicle which was having "wheels inside wheels".

Possibly neither disputed, or even contradicted, such a thing is supposed to be fact, despite lack of any evidence.

Being already mentioned, we could perhaps measure a given energy output from an alien civilization by means of that of a Dyson sphere.

If such a thing could be for real, we next could perhaps believe in the alien creature lying on a table meant for an autopsy.

What if such a thing happened and next even Stephen Greer went down the drain in the similar way as a couple of others, because he happened to believe in a given science?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_M._Greer

Are scientists concerned, or perhaps bother about such a thing as either a given correctness, or perhaps that of validity, because such a thing is supposed to benefit science?

That of possible Logic could mean the difference between True or False, or even Right versus Wrong when it comes to a couple of things.

Think of the same when it comes to that of both Probability as well as the Uncertainty Principle.

In the world of science we could have both Symantics and Semantics for possible verbal communication, including that of a given syntax.

In my opinion, E. T. is not using a teletyper or even morse codes for a possible means of communication, but still the fact that we could believe in such things as teleportation, or maybe telepathy or the like,
for the sake of a given business.

Not necessarily that of Wormholes either, because in my opinion such a thing is not only about a given proof or method, but perhaps that of a given thinking.

If not necessarily that of a possible intelligent signal itself, what is the possible option or alternative?

Make it that of an alien autopsy if you will, but we could still end up with the brain for such a thing.

The human brain is supposed to be a product of evolution and next we are supposed to know what evolution is all about.

Is it possible to "predict" a given evolution and next the path which it is supposed to follow, or should we still take into consideration such things as events or coincidences?

If not that of a possible coincidence, we could be left with the possible "Janus face" when it comes to such a thing and next the fact that this could mean nothing.

Believe me, but there could be times when I could be around for the sake of science by means of returning those tasks in my task list.

If a given scientist is not able to prove his statements, or this or the whole thing could end up wrong, he could end up being a scapegoat for such a thing.

Next the question could be asked whether such a thing could mean the possible difference between a "believer" and the possible opposite for such a thing.

Make it that of a skeptic, or perhaps debunker if you will, but is it still supposed to be science?

Edit: Perhaps a little more, namely that of our brain.

For the sake or purpose of a given intelligence, such words as "Wisdom", or perhaps "Conscience" could be used for such a thing, which could be thought of as a given functionality.

Look at the crocodile for such a thing as both instinct and aggression and next we are having that of the "Survival of the fittest" because of that of evolution for such a thing.

Make it perhaps something else and you have the wording mentioned above.

The opposite of "abstract" or that for real should mean that of a given reality and for such a thing a painting as such is not needed.

I mentioned the teletyper above and next that of teleportation.

Please have me excused, but still the suggestion by Wikipedia about that of possibly donating.

Rather I could make a possible difference between that of "Hyperspace" and that of possible Wormholes for such a thing.

Believe me or not, but I am supposed to know the alphabet being used by my own language, as well as that of the English spoken world.

Make it WYSIWYG if you will, or perhaps the difference between ASCII and EBCDIC and you may be having part of the answer.

Or perhaps make it the Ten Commandments instead, in order to make a difference between that of possible Logic and that of Wisdom.

If you ever heard about Nostradamus, you could perhaps believe in events happening in the future.

But if so, not necessarily that of the weather for such a thing, but rather that of possible "Omens", or even the fact that some people could be looking for the return of Jesus.

Again, that of a possible or given "Hippocracy" for that above, for the lack of anything else.

Being a scientist, you are supposed to believe in the Scientific Method for such a thing and also the Standard Model when it comes to that of elementary particles being part of Physics.

But what about a possible story without any words, including that of a possible dream?

Acccording to the printed version of "Encyclopedia Britannica" and here the extended section or reference, such a thing as dreams makes for no conclusive evidence when it comes to given facts.

Make such a thing as the teletyper perhaps your day and not the Drake equation and we are still supposed to believe in E. T.

Or perhaps it rather could become a dream and for such a thing you are not supposed to believe in the Scientific Method at all.

Could perhaps get it wrong in the following.

So next perhaps prove me "wrong", or in error and next believe that such a thing as intelligent beings by means of possible extraterrestrial intelligence should not be true, or even a fact, we could once again be back at nature for such a thing.

Think about possible "Law and order" by means of a given Justice as being a given fact when it comes to that of a society.

Here on Earth, we find a society both more globally mixed, or perhaps intertwined in between both races, a given sexuality, as well as possible Religion at times, because we are supposed to believe in the global economy.

And not necessarily that of global warming either. Please read around.

Therefore, when perhaps saying, or mentioning that of Religion, I could perhpas be wrong.

The nice man living a stairs below me could perhaps be a Muslim when it comes to a given Religion, or possibly attitude, but not necessarily that of Islam.

I mentioned the "depiction", for which the precise or exact name became lost.

Something like an engraving of sorts, starting with first name "F".

This depiction is that of a human of sorts, for some reason climbing the stairs and next having a look into the Heavens by climbing the seven shells of the sphere, making up the given Heavens.

Should we perhaps know any better?

Ever heard about Edwin Hubble, together with his pipe, or even that of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey for such a thing?

I guess we could still be small, not necessarily because of the Ten Commandments alone or only, but rather the fact that we are supposed to either believe in that of microcosmos versus macrocosmos for such a thing.

Because of that, you first need to be a scientist and next believe in that of a possible difference.

Being a physicist, you could perhaps believe in those elementary particles for a given thing, or you could rather be an astronomer, or astrophysicist and next "believe" in such a thing as galaxies and galaxy clusters.

Any "Little Green Men" in there perhaps?

I mentioned the word "business" earlier on, but not necessarily in a given context.

Make a possible difference between an ant and a humble bee and you next should know about the dance being carried out when a stock or inventory of honey is being discovered, or come across.

At least the humble bee for such a thing.

Is such a thing perhaps typical, or even possible, when it comes to the ants, only because they are using their receptors in order to communicate?

Because of that, are we supposed to rather believe more in the bees rather than the ants, only because of their way of communicating?

The thing possibly missed or forgotten earlier on should be that of telepathy for a given purpose.

The little sad thing is that I could end making a possible confusion between the young lady in front of the television and that of the "Abyss", which could be about a possible adventure at sea.

Needs checking, because I do not have the title for this here.

Still thinking and the young lady should be having her own set, or perhaps title for such a thing.

Again the teletyper, or perhaps a given similar, but not necessarily AP or Reuters for such a thing, because they are supposed to report the news.

By the way, perhaps ending up becoming possible "quasi-science", or pseudo-science could send you early in bed rather than late?

Or perhaps the fact that using a teletyper or the like for a means of a given communication, you could perhaps "believe" in possible science, by means of perhaps detecting an intelligent signal.

The fact is that if such a thing ever is supposed to happen, it could end up becoming a possible "hype" and when so, the remaining part of the story should be known as well.

Edit: For that of perhaps science going wrong in the previous post.

Back from the second toilet after the weekend shopping and not really too bad, because I am working on it.

Make it possible U-boats, or that of similar submarines and you could be having "Pigs on the rocks" for such a thing.

Rather, I am more concerned about the pig itself and the fact that this animal could be both intelligent and still suffering a brutal death or end by means of a given slaughter.

Next the fact that Jews, or Hebrews, do not like or appreciate the food coming from such a slaughter, but make it perhaps bacon for such a thing, or perhaps something else,
it may not always be your feast or pleasure, even when doing it yourself.

In fact, we could be back at the start or beginning of things, literally, at least by means of the notion of time, which noone is supposed to "believe".

For this being possible, rather make it the Special Theory of Relativity and next suppose or think that such a thing could be possible science.

Are scientists ever supposed to be questioning God and if so, could this perhaps be done by means of the Special Theory of Relativity?

Perhaps noone knows right now, or perhaps have the correct answer, but rather should think about the possible edit of contents.

Edit: "Perhaps building a bridge" and so on.

Should tell that the other word for submarine is not the best word for it either.

Also noticing that the browser may have got sorted at least part of the previous log for my surfing, but when next clicking in order to
access the remaining pages, it jumps off, either because there is a running Seti@home CUDA task, or possibly malware in one of the tabs.

Apparently some 15 tabs in the first one and some 33 tabs in the second and perhaps the first one should be tried out first.

Not all Seti@home related, but I happened to access Hubblesite.org from a link suggestion in Yahoo!

Next should tell that I did not like the animation in the movie for the mentioned link, but when next getting to Hubblesite, the introduction video there is a quite nice one.

There is a problem with the keyboard and mouse, but noticing that right-clicking on this video, the Adobe Flash Player menu with its pull-out menu apparently jumps off.

Possibly needs a replay later on, but perhaps still a bit unfinished there when it comes to the contents, but as mentioned quite good when it comes to that being available.

Also, because of yet another restart of the computer, I get one additional set of tabs in another browser window, which except for the initial setting, comes up with this post still in editing,
except for perhaps the last line, or even less.

Also, was going to mention the 15 and 35 tabs now being available from the browser log, but the most recent restart apparently took it both away.

Not all Seti@home related, but there happened to be quite much opened there and getting back at it manually using the log makes it more cumbersome.

But this also reminds me about another subject of some importance, namely that of possibly being a genius at times and therefore having a certain "intellect".

Having such an intellect next means that you could be an "intellectual" and this perhaps does not mean the same as intelligence, at least not all the time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellect

Also the similar words of Wisdom and Knowledge, which together with a couple of other things are supposed to tell us in which way we should perhaps proceed, or continue our development.

The above may perhaps need some better wording.

Take two different people from the community of science, namely Dr. Michio Kaku and Dr. Stephen Hawking.

If possible, it could be easier to skip the title each time, but it should not be forgotten either.

If you happen to know about the mirror and what next is happening when watching yourself in such a mirror, you could be having a deviation from reality.

This because what you are able to see may actually be reality, but not necessarily telling the whole truth.

When doing so, your right arm becomes your left arm and vice versa and so could perhaps go with the eyes in your face as well.

Perhaps a bit hard to tell, but one of these two scientists perhaps is more concerned about space, meaning the Universe, while the other about that of nuclear physics.

Except for that, we could perhaps believe that these two subjects could go hand in hand at times and therefore reflect much the same things.

I happened to wake up a bit cold here this early morning, but after a cup of coffee, it became too hot in the room because of the panel oven, which meant opening the window.

The same could go for that of space as well, because in between the emptiness of space, we also could find the furnace making up the core of a star, or even the lack of such a thing inside that of a Black Hole.

Next we could perhaps think that such a thing could be Creation, but when doing so, there could be someone else around with the idea about "Intelligent Design".

Look at where we are supposed to come from and also the fact that I missed the original debate because of several reasons.

A couple of tabs being opened before the most recent restart makes a reminder about the Earth being a water planet.

Some 70 % of the surface is covered by oceans and also we are having both the ice on Greenland, as well as the ice cap covering the South Pole continent.

If all this ice melted away, the sea level would rise by at least tens of meters, or perhaps even more.

From something earlier being noticed, there could be a debate around when it comes to the origin of comets in the solar system.

Think of the Earth as being at least 4.5 billion years old and next the water in such comets at least made up for the water on Earth.

Rather than the Hydrogen and Helium and possibly even more making up the gaseous planets of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune, most of the elements of the
Table of Elements are being found in abundance here on Earth.

Compare with the surface of Mars and we probably should know that this is the place where we should go.

If such a thing as Philosophy could help defining, or perhaps even explaining such a thing as existence, we should know that this happens to be so, not because of a given emptiness,
but rather something else.

So when looking up the word "Quintessence" for such a thing, I do not necessarily want to jump the wagon either.

Rather I choose to read the article about the Aether first in the Wikipedia, because the reference makes for this being the fifth classical element after earth, fire, water, and air.

Also this could be a hypothetical form of Dark Energy and next we are supposed to believe in both this, as well as that of Dark Matter and next misreading, it should perhaps be the other way.

In the same way as the mentioned equation under the first section "Scalar Field", this next reminds me about the Drake equation being somewhat similar.

Next, is it possible to come up with a similar equation for that of evolution, because we could think that this subject better should be approached in a given way than another?

I mentioned the wagon above and the fact you already know that this project is not supposed to be about that of Ufology either.

In the same way as the possible mirror, there could be times when we could believe in the tricks being performed by a magician and next that each such trick is having a given explanation.

There is a small constellation in the sky with the name of Lacerta, which before checking reminds me about the Lizard as an animal here on Earth.

Next the similar Mantis, which by means of either a cover for a musical record, or perhaps that of a book corporation, or maybe software language could perhaps tell us something.

We all should know about the classical movie "Close Encounters of the Third Kind" and also that this movie is not that bad at all.

Compare with the young lady in front of the television next being caught and disappearing and I next confuse this movie with that of the Abyss when it comes to the title,
in that I happened to lose the title for the first one, but not the second.

If possible aliens are visiting the Earth, they could be coming here by means of spaceship or the like, which to us become more or less UFO's.

Rather than believing in such a thing as natural phenomena, we could choose to put a face on such a thing by thinking of possible intelligence, or at least someone behind the wheel.

For now no other similarity here, but possibly could get back at it.

A movie like Terminator reminds us that the battle could be between humans and machines, which because of our technological advances got self-knowledge, or that of a given intelligence,
or conscience for such a thing.

Perhaps that of self-awareness is an even better word.

Next we are supposed to believe that such a battle next happening could be about that of good versus bad, because we could be able to separate between these two.

The voice translation system being used by Stephen Hawking because of his physical handicap, does not hide his sharp intellectual mind or capability.

Unfortunately I do not have his words in their full meaning, but should tell that I possibly had my own opinion about this earlier on.

Therefore, make it not only earth, wind, soil and fire for such a thing, but also the aether in order for a better understanding.

A given survival by a species is because of their adaptation to nature.

One reason for our evolution is because of our intellect, or intellectual capabilities because of an evolving, or developing brain.

Except for possibly the battle between the sexes, we rather could find ourselves in a battle between good and bad because we could be left with only once choice or option.

Look at E. T. in the classical movie and he is supposed to be more or less for the good.

In the same way, the Alien from the other movie is thought of as being similarly bad.

Are we supposed to believe that one thing could perhaps be evolution, while another could be that of possible intellect, or even conscience, because such a thing as technology
could leave us thinking that this could be the whole point?

There could be reason to believe that such a thing as evolution is not necessarily random, but rather because of a given reason.

Make a car for the sake or purpose of driving and it could be even better looking when coming with the purple tint of color.

This makes for a given design, in addition to that of manufacturing, development and construction, but still such a thing may not always be true when it comes to a given painting.

We are supposed to believe in possible intelligent civilizations by means of the Kardashev scale, which is using that of energy production and consumption as a basic principle.

But rather we could end up looking into the sky and next believe in something which is not supposed to be there.

For our civilization we assume a given technology as part of our development and therefore assume both that of electronics as well as someone behind the wheel for a couple of things.

Rather the fact that we could still are supposed to believe in evolution and not necessarily the fact that such a thing as electronics came from Silicon Valley.

Nature itself is coming up with both electricity, as well as that of Electromagnetics as one of the Four Fundamental Forces of nature.

But for a given understanding of such things, we should also be reminded about (lost his name) but running around with his kite for a better understanding of this phenomenon.

Make it perhaps "Men in Black" or the similar for a given title of a movie, but next you are supposed to believe that given technology next should mean that of electronics.

I mentioned the intelligence test being carried out in the Military and the fact that this is not a simple one.

Perhaps believing in such a thing as UFO's could next make us do the same when it comes to possible gravity amplifiers for the sake of propulsion.

Also their living room, including the medical room for any emergencies and also their possible chairs and their screens or monitors for that of visualization and monitoring.

Such a thing, as well as some other may perhaps be your taste, or perhaps not.

We are supposed to believe in a given nature because it could offer a couple of possibilities.

If I ever happened to believe in the "Upper Deck" and what this is supposed to mean, I could be possibly mad or crazy, or perhaps even something else.

If a dream should ever become true, it would be a real fact and we are supposed to believe in such a thing.

We end up finding both lead, gold and mercury here on Earth in addition to water and air and next take such a thing for granted.

The basic principle for life is supposed to be that of organic compounds making up the amino acids being part of the DNA of our cells.

Rather than thinking that everything could be just that simple, the truth is that this is not actually the case and here the laboratory experiments by Stanley Miller comes to my mind.

Perhaps think of one thing as a substitute or replacement for another and the fact that neither a painting or even dream is supposed to beat that of technology for our way of life.

This because we are supposed to be part of nature and not necessarily anything else.

And supposedly it was Benjamin Franklin for the kites in the air and I lost his name.

Anyway, becomes too short deadline for posting right now and better should be one hour since last update on a given post rather than its creation time.

Also losing that above when next cutting and pasting wrong in order to get it to the top.

Perhaps still time to mention that right now I happen to recall a picture of some three people of this community and also what we choose to be calling ourselves for this.

Not necessarily because we are supposed to be flying a kite, but perhaps we could be having an interest in the sky and what could be around.

If I am not wrong, I mentioned Hubblesite.org earlier on and the recent discoveries by the Hubble Telescope.

Add to this current knowledge about not only such things as star formation, but also that of Cosmology as a whole and it is a fascinating subject.

A couple of structures in the Universe are supposed to make up such superclusters of galaxies and therefore we could perhaps think of the Universe as a place where life could be a possibility as well.

But apparently not so and is this only because of the possible difference between the kite and the way are supposed to be thinking about possible life elsewhere?

Is it not a given fact that a picture could be telling more than a thousand words and next the fact that a processor could mean the same as a computer chip and next be held by your hand?

A human brain could perhaps need two hands, but still probably the most developed such thing which could exist or be around.

An artificial human, or perhaps that of an android (being stuck on the name), could be that of a robot instead and for this it becomes that of technology.

Still with the subject of the brain, we next could be choosing between that of good and bad as well, because as mentioned, technology could be one given thing, while that of evolution,
including that of possible biological processes, could be something else.

Following that, we probably are not able to make it into a single context or meaning and next be able to tell whether or not a given technology perhaps also could mean or imply something else.

Galaxies making up space could belong to clusters of galaxies, or sometimes even superclusters of such.

The Local Group of Galaxies, including the Milky Way is thought of as having some 20-30 galaxies and not being part of the Virgo cluster of galaxies, with its 3,000 or so members.

One limit of space apparently is the speed of light.

Intelligent life is perhaps possible in the Andromeda galaxy, but still not a place to travel, because such a thing would take some 2,2 million years, even with the speed of light.

Therefore no dedicated search is therefore likely for this galaxy when it comes to that of any life, because any visitors from there would be less likely than any signal coming the same way.

We still happen to do this, but rather I was thinking about those things we do not necessarily see, but still could be part of Cosmos.

For the purpose of our search, we could think that an intelligent civilization could perhaps be found in our backyard, or at least the Milky Way.

One such star in the past happened to be epsilon Pegasi and whether or not anything was found, I am not sure of.

Looking it up, the name for the star is also Enif.

From my recall, there happens to be several interesting binary stars in the constellations of Bootes and Corona Borealis.

One of these, which needs checking, is Izar, or epsilon Bootes, which should not be confused with epsilon Pegasi.

If I am not wrong, this star is at least a double, but also a difficult one to observe.

This star also goes by the name "Pulcherrima", which has a possible translation, but right now unable to find.

Back later.

Initially takes a little while loading the pages again, but better when next in the buffer.

Apparently a Sunday today, so not that much business around.

But sitting here, I happened to recall a French television series dating back a couple of years which in fact was a quite good one.

More or less an animated series, or production, this was a story of some three people I think, who happened to be living through or between the times and in such way being a
representative of the human race.

We ended up seeing these men as both that of belonging to the Stone Age, as well as that of both agriculture and fishing and next, modern civilization developing, as a result of our origin.

Fortunately not the same as something else here, which ended up in a bit of controversy.

But perhaps think of a given belief when it comes to our origins and the fact that we are supposed to have evolved from the apes and next climbing down from the trees.

The complete 24 hour period of a single day is perhaps 12 hours daylight and 12 hours night, but this could vary between both seasons and relative location on Earth.

Stone Age Man could have invented the fire and finally got time for some relaxation before going for the sleep each night and therefore could ended up watching the stars in the sky.

I wish the truth could be coming around about the actual facts about this story.

The Pyramids of Giza, as well as similar other structures were built for a given purpose in mind and also included that of slavery for the finishing of the job.

Not the same as a similar slavery perhaps better known, because such a thing could be about living downstairs and having a cup of coffee, or perhaps dinner for those living upstairs.

The visual appearance of the sky is not the same as that of similar photographs, but the latter could be showing fainter objects and next give a better understanding.

Personally I may have seen the elliptical galaxy M49 in Virgo a couple of times with a small telescope, but only because this object is a bright and easy one.

Most of the others, except for M85 were missed because of the southern latitude and also that of living in a city.

With a personal computer which is doing quite well, except for a possible heat problem, also there are both a laptop computer and a quite good mobile phone here as well.

Next, perhaps I am either lazy, or possibly could be taking a couple of things granted, but I early on had a sense that these things could be making for a possible difference.

We earlier on had a debate about the possible use of technology in my country, but not necessarily about such things as encryption or the like.

The still returning question is perhaps whether or not a given technology could be for the good or bad, or rather we should blame people for this and not the machines.

I used the word "android" earlier on, because I again missed the correct word, which should be that of "cyborg".

Also the name for a given computer was not in my mind as well, but is being noticed right now.

Looking it up, it becomes both an operating system as that of a "humanoid robot or synthetic organism designed to look and act like a human" by its meaning.

Except for perhaps movies like Terminator and the two robots of Star Wars, I do not have any similar reference right now, because I choose to make the Alien not necessarily such a thing either.

Perhaps we rather should shy away from such things as making robots possibly human, but next I am reminded of the fact that this actually could be happening in the near future.

Both the robots of Star Wars are having their individual personalities, but for some reason R2-D2 perhaps makes it even better than C-3PO when it comes to performance.

Such a thing as voice translation and expression is an important subject, but perhaps is not given that much notice or point in the three movies.

Also having feet to walk on could make you stumble at times as well, unless being really unlucky.

But is it not fact that such a thing could be part of real life as well and here I was thinking of Stephen Hawking.

It became with the single look at the web-pages belonging to him and also the slight disappointement in the way this is supposed to be presented.

Next I could also be left with the fact that he actually is that sharp when it comes to a given mind, that he once and for all could make a conclusion about one thing versus another.

I mentioned the possible restart of the computer and the fact that you could wake up to yet another day and perhaps think you may be slightly better off.

But rather you could end up losing your things and next have to start over again.

I may possibly have mentioned the fact that both astronomers and astrophysicists are believing in such a thing as inflation when it comes to the Universe.

Not necessarily the fact that galaxies or clusters of galaxies are moving with respect to each other and next at different speed.

If the clock ticks, time is supposed to be going one second forward.

The same is perhaps not true when it comes to a heatbeat, but each such makes for a fraction of your life and the fact that it makes you older each time.

If nature perhaps had the same idea, it could become that of "Wait a little", pause for a moment before next continuing.

This is what could be meant by that of inflation, namely the fact that this process for a while ceased, but now is being found to once again "take off", at even higher speed.

We could perhaps be back at the question about for which purpose this is happening and not only because of that of inflation.

Such a thing as Project Management became extended with that of CASE analysis when making the second attempt after a rather slow start.

Next it becomes that of the "Life Cycle Mechanism" for the same thing and the fact that a product could be having a lasting time from its initial manufacturing process, or production, until becoming
waste meant for the trash.

Therefore, both the glass jar of coffee beside me on the table, as well as the metal box containing beer for the potato chips is therefore recycled products.

I also mentioned the fact that at times science could be more than a single thing and for this I had the hibernation process in my thoughts.

Such a thing was present in "2001 A Space Odyssey", where part of the crew was lying in such a state ready to be wakened up when arriving at the final destination.

Again, perhaps science fiction rather than perhaps science, but my guess is that we now are taking the steps which could bring us into space.

Currently we lack the engine for such a thing and if you recall the last page of a classic book from 1977 for such a thing, we could still think believe such a thing being science fiction only,
because we most likely are unable to agree on the means for propulsion.

A movie like "Battlestar Galactica" sees a battle between a humanlike civilization for which I lost or do not recall the individual names and that of the cyborgs, which also happen to be evil when it comes to
their ambitions.

Really, is it a fact that you may end up battling youself between that of good versus bad, or should it always be between different people, or perhaps people versus robots?

If such a thing as the Seti@home client could tell about possible hibernation, most likely noone will believe in such a thing and therefore should not be mentioned.

Next also the fact that even such a thing as prediction of the future may not be the same as a given prediction of the weather, because Nostradamus could perhaps be viewed as being a prophet and
next we could be back at the subject of Religion and Faith.

Again, there was even some more here on my mind which could be added for clarity, but before the cup of coffee, this does not come up in my mind.

Also we should not forget neither Bob Lazar or Bruce Maccabee for a couple of things related to physics, because at least the latter was able to reach the conclusion that there could be even more to a
couple of things, rather than those known about lightning or even ball lightning.

My guess is that we could be ready to acknowledge that we are not alone in space, but next the fact that for now, a given Contact has yet to be made.

I have not seen the movie of the same title myself, nor read the book, but only know about Jodie Foster and the fact that she was listening in.

Presumably a given conclusion of such a fact may only be obtained by means of analysis of the numbers and for this both the computer and the experienced user.

Next the fact that a given conclusion may only be reached by means of a Consensus for such a thing in order to prove the fact that we are not alone in space.

Starting up early, so only a short one right now.

You probably know that as the Earth, together with the moon and also the other planets of the solar system are orbiting the Sun, it becomes a
constant free-fall in space.

Rather than having no relative speed at all, or perhaps coming in from an angle in order to hit the Sun like a comet, the orbits of the planets are
almost fixed in space relative to the Sun, except for the motion of the whole Solar system through space, or perhaps even the larger motions as well.

It became a bit of pure speculation yesterday, including the subject of UFO's, but also the fact that it became a thing not being mentioned.

Namely that of the possible resurrection of Jesus and also the fact that there could be people around waiting for his return back to Earth.

There is possibly a better wording for this, but at 06:50 AM in the morning, I do not have it and therefore will not continue on this either.

Rather the fact we should know that nature and the human being part of it are not always the same.

The Asian tsunami of late 1994 was a reminder of a catastrophe here on Earth and despite its magnitude, we probably are unable to make it anything else.

The fact is that there could be people around losing a possible faith, but also the fact that earthquakes themselves should not be forgotten as possible major killers.

If you happen to believe in either Jesus, or perhaps the story of the Bible, you could still be left with either Nostradamus, or possibly someone else for that of a given "Prophecy",
but once again we most likely are back at the Bible for such a thing.

I earlier mentioned the fact that Nostradamus was a Prophet and when so, you could be reminded of that of possible Religion and Faith once again.

Think of perhaps having or experiencing a bad day, at least when starting up in the morning, or sometimes before going to bed.

Is it possible to make any similarity or difference between a good and a bad day with that of possible good versus bad when it comes to a given belief?

Also I mentioned the fact that the leaflet book in the possession by my parents about Nostradamus did not get my way and probably became lost.

In the same way as not everything is being mentioned by Nostradamus, such words like "Stairways to Heaven" comes to my mind right now, but here needs checking.

Is perhaps such a thing as music any better than a given painting, or the similar, in order to explain a given thing or subject?

Are we supposed to be wishing for, or perhaps believe in the return of Jesus, only by listening to the music by Enya, for example?

Or rather that of Erich von Däniken who both became a bit controversial and next could be jumping between the pages in order for a given answer.

Before signing off yesterday, there was a tab in my browser at Wikipedia, related to the subject of Paleontology.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleontology

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecology

Also looking up that of Ecology as well, because it came up in my mind.

Do you supposedly make that of Paleontology the subject of dinosaurs, or is this only picked as an example, being a possible reference subject?

Here my guess is that the word "Paleontology" itself should be first or readily explained, by means of a translation, before perhaps relating it to a given subject.

If you are familar with a couple of pages around, you may notice a couple of questions related to that of the Butterfly effect through something else, when next compared with
subjects which could be related to that of elementary particles, or nuclear physics.

Make your day perhaps that of robots or cyborgs, or the like, if you will, but next you could end up with the battle between good and evil (or perhaps bad).

If so, is such a thing synonymous with that of possible Religion, because a given Logic could make a possible difference between such good or bad, or perhaps right or wrong?

As another example, we could be speaking of the Big Bang as the moment of Creation of the Universe, by means of making such a thing Matter Creation.

When possibly speaking about the opposite thing around, namely the possible fate or destiny of the Universe, we could be left either blank on the subject, or perhaps come up with
such things as Armageddon, nuclear Holocaust, or the like.

We definitely know that the Sun makes up Helium by fusing Hydrogen into such an element.

Still, this is not what is being typical of the Earth and the parts and components making it up, in that Carbon is supposed to make up such things as both humans as well as that of life,
but also that there are elements like Iron, Calcium and Iodine as well.

The above could perhaps be written slightly better.

The protective element being used in order to prevent radiation during nuclear experiments, which I lost the name for, is probably based on the element Carbon.

I mentioned the YouTube video related to that of star size comparison earlier on and also the fact that both planets and exoplanets are part of this comparison.

I could get back at that of exoplanets later on, since as mentioned, I did not want to jump the wagon for this.

But if you only think about the stars themselves, we also know that there are two different fusion processes happening in order for energy to be created.

One of these and not the one happening in the Sun, could possibly go wrong and the end result would be a supernova explosion.

When such a thing as a supernova explosion is happening, it could become a cataclysmic effect, but my guess is that such a thing should not be any Armageddon either.

For one thing we get the creation of most or all of the heavier elements of the Periodic Table, including that of gold, mercury and lead.

Next the possible demise, or fate of the remaining part of the star, which next ends up either a neutron star, or possibly Black Hole.

For such a thing we do not see any suc like an Armageddon, or Holocaust, because most of these words probably have no religious significance, but perhaps might not relate
directly with that of science either, at least elementary particles, or nuclear physics.

Perhaps a better word than "religious" could be used above, but it should not be that of any "divine" either.

You know, the same story around all the time about possible naive or even idiots at times claiming to see UFO's in the sky and next think that we are not alone in space.

Next the task of the scientists in order to prove whether or not such claims could be true and most likely we are having the same debate all over.

Also the fact that even when mentioning a couple of other things, including that of events, coincidences and consequences and so on, there could still be the ultimate question
which next needs an answer.

I mentioned the fact that even science may not be able to predict the future and that such a thing should not be part of any entertainment either.

Is a given Prediction supposed to be the same as a given Probability, because you either could roll a dice for such a thing, or pick the Ace rather than the Joker in a card game?

Is it possible to predict the future because you could perhaps be able to make a simple guess?

Think of a possible God as being a symbol for both love as well as that of hatred?

Could you next give a possible explanation for such a thing by only looking at such things as either probability or coincidences because a given event could happen because of the
Butterfly effect and next you could perhaps believe in the Mandelbrot set?

Make it either one of the things above, or perhaps that of either a prediction of the weather, or possibly the Uncertainty Principle instead, one thing for sure is that we could believe in
such a thing as Matter Creation for our existence and not necessarily that of any "Little Green Men".

The stony planet freely floating in space, or even the planets orbiting other stars may not be a place for any life, but supposedly the water and air on Earth makes such a thing possible.

The history of both the Earth as well as the Universe should be known because of given facts and next the question becomes why such facts makes for this possibly happening.

Posting before losing, but probably got most of it right now.