Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 61 · 62 · 63 · 64 · 65 · 66 · 67 . . . 332 · Next

AuthorMessage
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1822322 - Posted: 6 Oct 2016, 23:07:01 UTC

Missing contents?

I think about it before it gets too late.

More coming.
ID: 1822322 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1822331 - Posted: 6 Oct 2016, 23:24:14 UTC
Last modified: 6 Oct 2016, 23:29:02 UTC

Take what I have.

I lost the words in my mind when starting speaking about those demons.

In fact I had some better words in my thoughts, but lost them on the way.

If you happen to believe that the birth of life is that of the unification of the male sperm together with the female egg, perhaps next watch the birth of a child as it happens and you most likely could be thinking of this in a slightly different way.

The same thing goes with the process of death when it comes to a living being, because death could be occurring in a freak accident, or it could happen in your sleep.

Neither the processes or events related to birth as well as death are readily being marked in todays societies, because a possible belief in God by means of a possible worship most likely could be something else.

Because of that, we are probably making a separation between events happening in our lives and those which could be either preceding or following this period which could next be called existence.

Here again, only the link related to Existence and not necessarily the second link previously mentioned.

Life itself should definitely be valued, because it could also be about such things like moral and justice.

If a murder is being carried out, justice is supposed to be carried out for the perpetrator.

Having a beer and perhaps being together with someone and you could at times be either immoral or at least wasteful.

Because we happen to be living in a physical world, it always becomes a question of both moral and justice when it comes to such things.

When it comes to the possible non-physical world, we probably are left with either believing in God or perhaps the Devil.

Regardless of something being material, or immaterial, there still is supposed to be a possible presence, possibly by a divine entity, or if not so, perhaps be speaking about existence from a philosophical point of view.

Again, remember the article about the Big Bang in the Wikipedia.

Make it perhaps Creation, if you will, or rather Genesis, if you rather prefer, but if you happen to be looking at nature from the point of science, it should be clear that such things like evolution should better explain changes happening, as well as possible moments of initial birth and death as being viewed in a similar way.

Even if you happened to believe in the Superforce, you probably would relate this subject to possible Creation, in the way previously mentioned.

My best guess is that some of these things could be either related, or explained in one given way or another, but perhaps not all the time either.

A possible belief in God could still be about a possible presence, or existence, but God itself probably does not evolve in a similar way as those processes which could be the reason for evolution.

One thing is for sure, namely that we are supposed to both explain and understand nature by means of the equations being given for such a thing.

If God invented mathematics and physics, it became for the sake of a materialistic world, where matter and energy happen to be mutually equivalent and more or less the same thing.

Therefore, if someone pushes a button, something is bound to happen.

Still, the fact is that someone in fact did such a thing.

If the laws and equations being part of nature is the result of the Big Bang initially happening, we could still believe in such a thing as being Creation.

If we next start asking whether such things like randomness, unpredictability and chaos happens to be part of such a thing, who was then the initial creator of the Universe?

Is the possible existence or presence of the divine supposed to be readily explained by religion and faith alone, or does it only become a thing related to that of possible belief alone?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_proof

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic

Again, the important thing is that since I am not dealing with alien research myself and also tend to be at least biased when it comes to religion and faith,

Some sciences relates to the subjects being part of the physical world, while others may relate to a possible non-physical world, meaning Metaphysics.

When rather speaking about those things which happens to be non-physical, it either becomes a question of Belief and next we are back to the subject of religion and faith.

Cosmology is the subject dealing with space, including galaxies and clusters of galaxies.

In order to be able to understand space, we are using equations for such things and it next becomes mathematics or physics.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metabolism

So, by pure chance I happened to look up this article in the Wikipedia.

If you happen to be a Biologist, definitely you should know about this subject before dealing with such a thing like Evolution.

Both Chemistry, Biology and other sciences are supposed to be readily explained from a given point of view, including a knowledge about cyclical processes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemistry

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology

Are any of these sciences able to explain the properties of objects belonging to Cosmos or the Universe?

Should we perhaps be looking at these subjects in order to be able to explain a couple of others?

The Greek philosophers, including Plato, were trying to give an explanation for the world they were living in, not because they were Chemists or Biologists, but rather because they
happened to be something else.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plato

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life

The article about Life is a quite good one and I happened to come across it only a short while ago.

First of all, should it be small or large caps for the definition of a couple of words?

Next, it soon wears off and I start watching the wrong YouTube video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGMGOdKOPKk

If you happen to see a UFO for yourself, you would definitely know that these things are physical objects.

The same thing could possibly be said about any occupants.

These objects could be flying at considerable speed, but we still think that they are objects being part of nature.

Perhaps we should return back to the question about where we happen to belong ourselves in comparison with possible others, as well as nature itself.

Intelligence makes us able to think, but still neither the processes of life or death when it comes to the living being may still not be the same as those objects that might be observed and could be related to the physical.

Not necessarily angels or spirits all the time, so the discussion could therefore be diverse.

A car is supposed to be having an engine, but if a UFO is a physical object in a similar way, it could still be having an engine for propulsion.

Because of that, even a UFO together with possible inhabitants does not necessarily tell about angels or spirits in any way.

Is the Kardashev scale perhaps any better when it comes to this?

Are we still left to believe that a Type II or III civilization could be Darth Vader and his Command Ship, or are we once again left to believe about possible angels and spirits in the sky?

The fact is that after 15 years of surfing the web, I find no problem when it comes to a couple of videos being mentioned and therefore believe they are true.
ID: 1822331 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1822332 - Posted: 6 Oct 2016, 23:24:36 UTC
Last modified: 6 Oct 2016, 23:30:56 UTC

Not the time for sleeping in bed.

Rather I had a warm meal in order to continue the day.

Perhaps time for a cup of coffee right now, because it is only 09:17 AM in the morning and this could show up.

I still need to do the shopping.

Here, in the room I am sitting, it is neither the top of the mountain, nor the bottom of the ocean.

Therefore, only the stories being told makes it possible to gain knowledge about new things.

Not everything is getting the same interest and because of that I mentioned that I happened to skip one video for another.

Also I took the time at watching the mentioned YouTube video, together with a couple of others.

One thing being noticed is the fact that one of the videos is being slightly damaged by a misspoken word probably not intentional.

But he chooses to use the word inquiry, which is next being corrected into investigation.

With he, I am here referring to Nick Pope, who on behalf of the British Military is quite open when it comes to the subject.

I am glad that he at least knows which word to use, because even though the military could be able to detect such objects, it is probably not for them to decide their possible origin.

Like cryptological codes and other secrets being visible for "Eyes Only" when it comes to possible secrecy, also particular music and videos could be appreciated under special circumstances and not only
during the regular day.

Such a thing could possibly happen when it comes to experiences sometimes being experienced.

My assumption is that if contact ever should be made, or perhaps already have happened, a given level of communication skills would be necessary and not only that of intelligence alone.

But the sad thing is that even here on Earth, people of different countries are often not speaking the same language and most people living in Continental Europe have no knowledge about the English language at all.

When I look at the subject of UFO's, I am left to believe that these could be visitors coming from space.

But having a knowledge about astronomy, I am next asking myself from where they could come.

The initial assumption would be that we first should be looking at the Milky Way itself, with its population of some 200-300 billion separate or individual stars.

So, if you happen to know about the voice with the American slant telling about a hairy creature coming from Alpha Centauri (and not the same words being told here, by the way,
but rather a software application), where the ending word slips in the throat, you probably are better off when it comes to knowledge.

In the same way, some YouTube videos are definitely better than others and the same should go with your way of perhaps believing in a given subject.

Not everything being told is necessarily true.

Continuing with the session, I am checking in with Yahoo!

A question related to science asks "What Were the First Lunar Landings".

Next a reference is being made to Neil Armstrong's famous words "That's one small step for [a] man, one giant leap for mankind.

Yes, those famous words, but were they perhaps misread or misinterpreted?

Remember that the quality of the sound was perhaps a bit bad because of a poor line.

Since this came back to me, I happen to remember giving it a thought in the past.

First of all, these are famous words meant to be remembered for all time.

Whether or not these words came from Neil Armstrong himself, or perhaps someone wrote them in advance, we probably will never know.

But my best guess is that he was speaking this sentence by using kind of a symbolic language.

Possibly the original wording here was "A small step for man, one giant leap for mankind" and nothing more than that.

It should be well known that Neil Armstrong retired into oblivion only a short time later, leaving it for Buzz Aldrin to comment on the Lunar landing itself and
its possible discoveries.

Giving this a little thought and right now I also remember the finishing sequence before the departure of the Apollo 17 astronauts from the Moon in 1972.

You may perhaps recall a shortage of breath in the voice of the astronaut making the final statement.

The reason for this was that they had just returned from a marathon spacewalk or excursion on the Moon which had lasted for many hours.

It would have been nice to know more about that spacewalk, but I do not have the details here.
ID: 1822332 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1822334 - Posted: 6 Oct 2016, 23:25:30 UTC
Last modified: 7 Oct 2016, 0:17:14 UTC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pN4tPkX0MG0

Nice here and I mentioned it.
ID: 1822334 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1822351 - Posted: 7 Oct 2016, 0:36:11 UTC
Last modified: 7 Oct 2016, 1:34:50 UTC

Too late to edit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pN4tPkX0MG0

Nice here and I already mentioned it.

This could also be a story of right and wrong, but if I am not wrong, Creation could be about possible wrong, rather than

Perhaps or possibly "Our interpretation" of Justice and Law which supposedly, or most likely tells about a given fact being either wrong, or possibly legal.

The fact is that once a thing is supposedly legal, it could also be interpreted by a religious opinion or thought when it comes to the same thing.

Sadly, both creation and destruction most often comes hand in hand.

Therefore, make religion and faith part of the subcject and it next becomes hatred.

You supposedly already know what this is all about, including the spider, the banana fly, as well as the Ladybug.

Need I say anything more?

See you later.
ID: 1822351 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1822359 - Posted: 7 Oct 2016, 1:16:52 UTC
Last modified: 7 Oct 2016, 1:33:35 UTC

Or thought of as such...

Edit:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Tr0otuiQuU

Should be Beethoven - Moonlight Sonata (FULL)

At least when switching.

Please correct me if I am wrong.

Should also be checking in with the Banana fly, because as mentioned, neither the spider or the Ladybug as being the insect, or possible penetrator or intruder worth being an examination should be worth such an investigation.
ID: 1822359 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1822369 - Posted: 7 Oct 2016, 1:43:53 UTC
Last modified: 7 Oct 2016, 1:45:49 UTC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyknBTm_YyM

In my Google Chrome incognito window.

With 15 years of running BOINC, I could be in the mood, for short.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyknBTm_YyM

Liked this.

Nice.
ID: 1822369 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1822585 - Posted: 7 Oct 2016, 23:06:53 UTC

How do I activate Microsoft Office 365 in order to use it?

I think it became the name above, but apparently more installation packages are available, but I really only intend to be using the one I purchased.

Visiting most of the web pages for this, as well as checking my inbox at the servers, I do not find this information.

The username, password, or e-mail address is not what I am looking for, but there could also be a product key associated with this.

Also the mentioned error when opening a file using Notepad is still present. Possibly this could get away if I get Office working.

It could be nice to have in order for a clean up of the stored e-mail, as well as a couple of other things.

Any suggestions appreciated.

Back later.
ID: 1822585 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1822608 - Posted: 8 Oct 2016, 1:51:05 UTC
Last modified: 8 Oct 2016, 1:59:15 UTC

Yes, loopback.

Continuing after experiencing at least one momentarily shutdown of the computer possibly two, because of the mentioned undervolt problem.

Better have an e-mail at my vendor regarding this problem.

It is not the processor fan this time.

Also looking around for the manual, but unable to find it right now.

Also losing the single factorization task, but I could have the number from my notes.

Also back to running using the most effective way of processing in the BIOS, because the undervolt is not related to the mode of running.

I did not return back to Standard or Normal mode in the BIOS, but could try that out the next time, but it should mean no difference.

Becomes a mode of running, among a total of three possible, but right now the name for it went out of my head.

Also two blue screens while first suspending the tasks waiting to run, or rather to start.

The sensor panel in AI Suite II 1.02.16 shows both temperature and voltage for the fans and processor, as well as the power connectors.

Also it is not the temperature either, or the processor fan when it comes to the problem.

It shows up in blue when restarting and right now I do not pull open the box for this in the BIOS anymore.

The other one beside when running is CPU Frequency and is not important here.

But in the sensor panel, the 3.3 V is at 2.816 V or 2.832 V showing up in red.

That is what makes the whole problem.

Lost the editing buffer for the previous post about this which had not been posted, but it was only a couple of lines.

Also the Event Log comes up before the main window, as mentioned.

Even the web browser went into Restore mode from the Maximize, which has not been seen that often.

Chrome has otherwise become very good browser.

Getting new tasks for the CPU, I next choose to display All tasks in order to suspend those waiting to run, or rather to start and only have some four running.

Down to four tasks after suspending possibly some 8 others, it once again becomes a blue screen when next continuing.

Also BOINC Manager jumps out of maximize and becomes visible in restore mode.

I also need to connect to Localhost almost every time I launch the Manager.

I receive a box at each boot-up related to an installed module for which there could be no driver or application.

Also here the message went out of my head right now, but it is related to the ASUS wireless connection or solution on the motherboard.

Earlier I had the motherboard out of the computer and removed the Bluetooth module which is having its own slot.

Right now I do not remember if the message went away and this I will not do again.

Got a total of three of these and the one being installed is apparently a better one.

Possibly becoming a slight confusion between FireWire and Bluetooth here, but once again inserting the Bluetooth module, it is evident that this is not the problem.

Not using FireWire right now, it could be used for a video camera and any connectors for this should be external ones.

Possible internal SATA connectors could be located on the motherboard, but with a couple of others lying around, it becomes easy to confuse.

I probably already knew so, because I suspected the problem was something else.

Should also note that when removing the module, the undervolt problem had not been experienced.

Better check out both these things during the day and not in the middle of the night.

Apparently working for now, but it could go down once more.

Again, since this is a power supply problem, I used the finger on the internal cables and connectors, both for the SATA cables for the discs, as well as the 12 V main power supply
and the auxiliary power connector above the processor fan.

The auxiliary power cable should be coming from the power supply and not the motherboard, by the way.

Not attaching this cable when assembling the computer, I was unable to start and that became something new.

But is the second power supply 12 V, or is it perhaps 5 V ?

Except for that, Vcore is at 1.352 V showing up in blue and not the problem.

The 12 V (in fact it reads +12 V and the like for all three sensors) shows up at 11.712 V.

The 5 V is at 4.720 V.

The 3.3 V is at 2.832 V and showing up in red, making the whole problem.

Again, should perhaps have the manual for this, but probably will not help.

Two of the tasks finished up and next continuing with another two.

Also thinking a litte about the Science part of all this in the late night and will have more coming up later.

Also when editing, a blue screen is not the same as a Bluetooth module.

The problem is that since the tasks could be quite demanding, there could be a compromise between effective running and the shutdown of the computer.

Right now I do not know where it should go.
ID: 1822608 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1822628 - Posted: 8 Oct 2016, 3:34:28 UTC
Last modified: 8 Oct 2016, 4:12:33 UTC

The following is my personal opinion only and not related with that any others.

This project, like several others under BOINC, is typically related to number crunching for the processing of data.

This is for a given purpose in mind when it comes to each project.

For most of this, a computer is being needed.

A project like PrimeGrid could be using different types of given tasks in order to determine how given numbers relate to each other and possibly reveal hidden secrets at times, because of the way we choose to treat these numbers.

Make it science, if you will, or perhaps make it Russian roulette, or perhaps gaming instead, if you choose.

As I possibly already mentioned, I choose to be using this graphics card for the sake of number crunching, not necessarily for playing a game of poker, or even Doom.

One thing is that of validity of given tasks and for such a thing assumedly the a task running by means of the processor could still be more trusted or valid than a similar running by means of the graphics card, or GPU.

This is not to say that a graphics card or GPU is not worth the money in the same way, but rather about the possible validity of the result itself.

The nVidia GTX 680 4 GB card being used here, together with a second one, is a very good one and I have completed three Genefer World Record CUDA tasks at PrimeGrid, one of which had a 5 digit value for b.

If you happen to use the Wikipedia, there could be an article related to that of presentation of numbers which could need either a spreadsheet, or possibly a graphics package in order to use.

If scientists are supposed to be making a difference between number crunching and that of using such numbers for a given purpose, one part of it could next be about the numbers themselves and what they otherwise could mean in a given context.

Therefore, one thing for a given purpose, while yet another thing for another purpose.

When needing one extra year for the finishing of my computer education because of a bad start, the latter year had a three month course related to that of Project Management.

I had already been into this course earlier on, but the second course had new contents which differed quite much from the first one.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venn_diagram

This should be related to this posting only about number crunching and possible science use and not be related to some other posts, because I am referring to projects as a whole and this example came up in my mind.

I may be wrong, but one of the slightly more poor explanations for the WOW signal I have come across, is that this signal possibly could have been a "snippet of data", or possibly a communication between some two ships.

Not impossible, but I do not think this is the total explanation.

In fact, I have not used too much time on this, but when using the numbers from the results in my logs in SMV, as well as the logs which could be opened using Notepad, it is quite clear that some of these numbers could be having multiple sources.

This does not necessarily tell about any signs of extraterrestrial intelligence and their levels when it comes to possible score, but radio signals are supposed to be coming from radio sources and there are
many sources in nature which produces such signals.

Again, I do not have the older logs readily available, but from a log containing or having 12713 lines, the highest gaussian score is 14.525034.

The corresponding graphics curve for this score when it comes to a gaussian is found by selecting the Gaussian table in SMV and next sort on fields or columns like score, peak, or maxpow.

The pot field at the right shows a graphics representation or diagram for the corresponding score.

So, if you happen to be a member of a project, you are next a user and therefore supposed to contribute.

My guess is that Jerry R. Ehman as being the discoverer of the Wow! signal and being a radio astronomer, initially was looking for signs of extraterrestrial intelligence by means of using the tools at his disposal.

This was the Ohio State University's Big Ear telescope, which later has been disassembled (1998).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wow!_signal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_State_University_Radio_Observatory

If you compare with such a thing like a Venn diagram, for one thing is that information could be about possible transmission of data, by means of either cable, wireless, or possibly through space.

According to Mr. Ehman, the WOW! signal was not a gaussian on its own, but the signal curve became the power of the main parts of the signal, as being measured by the analog part of it as it became detected.

One thing for sure is that there could be questions around whether the audio being available for the signal is the actual part of it as it became detected.

The original printout for the signal is available in the article and it also has an unmarked 6 at the top.

If the audio is in fact the actual transmission, the corresponding digital representation could next be available, but apparently there could still be a difference between actually decoding the message or transmission,
rather than only accepting the fact of its existence.

RFI stands for Radio Frequency Interference.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_interference

It has been my thought or assumption that such interference should be related to background sources and not to a possible signal itself and therefore should be excluded.

Still the analog output from the WOW! signal becomes a wave and its power or strength alone makes it resemble RFI.

So if such a signal might only be interpreted by means of an analog to digital conversion or transformation and not only being able to decode or decipher it, why not be doing such a thing?

There are some people who may believe that when such a decoding is being carried out, it rather is referring or relating to a terrestrial source, like that of a bus or taxi service, or possibly those of the emergency services.

Nothing possibly could be excluded, but the audio could belong to that of the original WOW! signal, but for now I do not find it possible to match this audio with the different levels of power making up the famous letters "6EQUJ5" which are being associated with this signal.

Next could possibly be asked whether or not a gaussian score on its own or alone could be a sign of extraterrestrial intelligence, because either the power or score should be an indicator of such intelligence based on the level of such a score.

If the audio for the signal could be available as a single file in the .wav format, things could have been easier.

Recovering the first partition of the 3 TB disc initially being used, it only becomes a mess of files and directories and both Documents and Settings, as well as the Windows directory is gone.

Also the same for the recording being made using a microphone against the speakers and playing back the YouTube video of the audio for the signal.

If you should happen to believe such videos being mentioned before signing off a couple of days back, other civilizations in space could be technologically advanced and such things like telepathy, vision and dreams
could still be something else.

Therefore a difference should perhaps be made between those things which are supposed to be part of nature and those which could be related to those of intelligent civilizations, including humans.

But starting to use such things like Microsoft Office 365, together with applications like Outlook 2016 and OneNote 2016, among others, as well as purchasing both a Samsung Galaxy Gold mobile phone and a Microsoft Office Surface 4 laptop computer coming with an Intel i7 processor and 16 GB of installed RAM, I am not so sure or certain anymore.

We already had a general discussion or debate about the way in which such products and their innovation could affect society, but if you happen to next be using these products, this discussion should perhaps be once again
visited and at least not forgotten.

These products and tools are not only for the benefit or sake when it comes to people or societies, but also should be the same when it comes to science development.

Part of research is supposedly development. Another is that of sales and marketing which could next make the whole business profitable and next create jobs as well as possible talents when it comes to skills.

But such tools could also be used for the purpose of scientific advances and next such a thing as being fooled or decieved could be yet another part of the game which could next be coming up or follow.

In a game of war, like that being part of the movie "War Games", such a game could be about possible strategies at times.

Also such things as competition and possible conflicts could be a part of such a game as well.

If you think the whole world is a game, why not play such a game for yourself?

If doing such a thing, does it next become science in any way?

If so, where does science belong in all of this?

A gaming computer is not supposed to be the same as a computer meant for research or business, but is this only because of such things like a sound card or a graphics processor, or is it rather because you are using Microsoft Excel instead?

Is profit or profitability supposed to be linked with your efforts or skills when it comes to being able to do your things or business?

Could you be lazy and still be profitable only because you choose to be using a computer rather than a shovel?

Again, technology and innovation could be one thing meant for both ourselves as well as societies.

Being able to understand nature by means of its own technology, or possibly lack of it could be yet another thing.
ID: 1822628 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1822652 - Posted: 8 Oct 2016, 4:39:05 UTC
Last modified: 8 Oct 2016, 5:14:09 UTC

The Friday evening for the previous video.

Apparently it became the same YouTube link twice.

When clicking on the second link, the picture in the selection menu when playing back the first time is gone and selecting the "Show more" option does not help.

It had a blue color and was a little more than halfway down the list.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YjvZRPKNjM

Something else in the meantime and the name of this British scientist went out of my head before starting playing back.

We should be aware of the fact that whether or not this could happen to be Professor Martin Rees, or maybe someone else, he at least is looking intelligent, even though he should not be related with any Artificial Intelligence at all,
which would be impolite.

I happen to read at least part of this discussion without necessarily making any reference or resemblance with that of the use of technology and at least not that of intelligence.

If we happen to be around and next happen to be intelligent, nature should be intelligent on its own as well, regardless of possible technology or the way it is being used.

Remember the discussion about Intelligent Design, by the author or user of the same name, this is not the important point here, but perhaps rather the fact that some of us could be atheists or agnostic when it comes to possible religious belief, while others could in fact be believers.

Really, I am still more dealing with the subject of technology development and innovation right now than a couple of other things, since these have been mentioned in the past.

But the subject of evolution definitely belongs in the hands of atheists and agnostics and you do not have to be a believer when it comes to such a thing.

Listening to the YouTube video, the word "artificial" is being used and this reminds me about "Artificial Intelligence", but also in a different context.

Such Artificial Intelligence could be robots, or it could also be the presence of both good and bad, meaning angels and spirits, or the possible force behind.

Humans are not robots, but supposedly a product of nature because of laws and equations being present or found.

This is not about the subject of mathematics and physics alone, but could be even more or something else.

The world could be full of lies and deceits, as well as it could be viewed in only black and white at times.

But the fact is that the world is a complex place and both such lies and deceits might be found together with those colors which are not colors at all.

You could take the time at playing a game of DOOM even for your leisure time alone.

But no spreadsheets or even a shovel when using such a thing.

One main or important thing when it comes to a project alone, is being able to define its intended purpose or meaning.

Still listening in, simplicity is the opposite of complexity, including the complexity of the world.

The latter is more typical of events happening in nature, including biology and chemistry.

Such things like Chaos Theory, Predictability and Uncertainty, by means of the Heissenberg Uncertainty Principle only demonstrates or makes it clear that such complexity exists and next makes up nature.

Look at nature itself for this to be true and not necessarily mathematics or physics alone.

We are supposed to believe in given contents at times, or most of the time, but once again we should not forget about those lies and deceits either.

Technology and its use makes certain things possible, but this is still because of laws and equations as being defined by nature.

We definitely know that some things work, while others might not.

Is this because of such laws and equations alone, or could it be even more to it?

Remember this is still supposed to be about technology and its use and possible development.

Edit: Is predictability supposed to be the same as probability?

Also we are having both a left part brain, as well as a right part brain.

If I am not wrong, the little brain is meant for both the processing of numbers, as well as being able to stand up right.

What about the rest of it if I happen not to be using the shovel?

The article about Predictability in the Wikipedia could have been slightly better.

Back later.
ID: 1822652 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1822684 - Posted: 8 Oct 2016, 8:27:16 UTC
Last modified: 8 Oct 2016, 8:40:43 UTC

This is not working right now.

I put the spaghetti and meatballs in the micro and left it standing, forgetting the meal.

At least it turned off when becoming finished.

But perhaps I am still able to do a couple of other things.

I also wrote a note about the Big Bang, but it is still lying around here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6UvXFw1u9s

Not making any guarantee of the links when it comes to contents.

Scientists are supposed to be able to explain both the Earth as well as the Universe.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=d0be4e33-6b6b-4757-b17e-ac387a8a5a2d&feature=cards&src_vid=Ngu9qDHvPpo&v=AdwSImMmsno

There is a picture of an astronaut on the surface of the Moon in the menu.

It will become the next video after watching the current one.

Is it not the fact that possible science being carried out on paranormal or unexplained phenomena could be of lesser value, either because such things are either not explained or perhaps not be thought of as valid or relevant?

This could also be about UFO research as well, but not necessarily all the time.

Our world of technology sometimes makes it easy to forget that such things could also be used for fun and entertainment.

Not necessarily because it could be cheap or a substitute for something else, because I am still thinking about subjects related to science here, but also the time of day.

If the question should ever be "Are we alone", we should be looking into space for such a thing.

UFO's could be a product or phenomena being associated with the Earth, but they have also been observed in Moon orbit by Apollo astronauts.

Therefore intelligent life most likely is found in space and neither water or air could exclude such a fact.

Such things like UFO's could be technologically related products in my opinion, but whether or not these could be having living inhabitants regardless of size is probably still an open question.

If you happen not to believe in such things like UFO's, I am not with you, because I am unable to find any proof of the opposite.

DNA and RNA, as well as enzymes are products of nature, which itself is a product of creation.

You do not necessarily have to be a believer in order to understand such things like evolution or creation.

If nature and life is not necessarily the same thing all the time, we choose to base our understanding of life based on processes related to chemistry and biology.

Next it could become mathematics and physics as well, if the smallest or most basic things should be readily understood.

Both chemistry and biology are based on complex processes happening in nature and the same could be thought of when it comes to evolution as well.

To some people evolution could mean changes happening over time and not about the subject of birth, life and subsequent death when it comes to the physical part.

But such things like Predictability or Probability could perhaps be used when it comes to a thing like evolution as well?

Not totally sure about this right now and needs checking.

But the sad fact is that if one thing could be predicted in advance, even such things like evolution might be having an unpredictable outcome, because an asteroid impact could happen to wipe out some
80% of all life on Earth.

Therefore unpredictability should be the opposite of predictability, but do we have or find the same thing when it comes to probability?

Take a previously mentioned example from mathematics.

Why introduce such a thing like the randomize function in a programming language, when a similar rand() function is supposed to output a random number to the screen?

The living and the dead right now.

Life itself is supposed to be a process in the same way death is supposed to be and making an edit for this, because birth of course if happening before death.

Perhaps we are forgetting such things like plants and trees at times.

Are our human senses, or perhaps rather our conscience because of a high level of intelligence able to make any difference between right and wrong, or perhaps the difference between God and the Devil if you happen to
be a believer?

And not necessarily because you could be drunk at times (no pun intended).

The fact is that intelligence and possible conscience could be one thing, while technology and its development could still be something else.

Part of a computer, at least when it comes to its ability of running software is that of logical thinking, or at least computing.

Typically, such things like 0 and 1 when it comes to the individual bits could mean either power off or on, or it rather mean true or false instead.

More complex solutions for the handling of such things for a given purpose only could also be present, including NAND gates when it comes to computing.

So perhaps the question could be asked whether or not such things like probability or predictability could be used in connection with phenomena in nature for which there is still no explanation for.

Possibly such things like ghosts and spirits could be just as difficult to explain as that of those which could perhaps be explaining UFO's.

The same thing should perhaps be told when it comes to make a possible separation between what is supposed to be a possible belief in a religious figure by means of a given name.

It should be better to perhaps name only God or the Devil himself in such a context.

My best guess is that there could be some people running this project having a religious belief and next assume that UFO's, or possible spirits and angels could be a similar thing.

So, if a religious or perhaps believer could be having a glass or bottle standing on the desk, while an atheist or agnostic is supposed to be running science applications for the lack of something else, why not perhaps try making it slightly better both here and there and perhaps meet halfway?

Carrying out science on a given subject does not necessarily make an "endorsement" of a possible God between the lines either, in my opinion.

Seeing is believing, the word or phrase could sometimes be.

Next make your own opinion about what this is supposed to mean or imply.

Edit: One small deviation from the current subject.

We happen to make a difference or separation between a couple of things, because it could be about values, or moral, or it could be about Justice, being able to separate right from wrong when it comes to carrying out an act of crime.

When it comes to religion and possible faith, we definitely could be making a difference between God and the Devil most of the time.

But in the same way as a given subject could be ridiculed or the like at times, depending on either such things like true opinion or possible bias towards a given subject, could it be possible to make a similar thing if you happened not to be an atheist or agnostic?

If gods and angels really should exist, they would not necessarily relate to any physical laws or equations currently being known.

One thing is that of perhaps throwing out a given subject, like the flat Earth, for example, because you happen to know it is not true.

Next, you probably should only be able to believe in such things like angels or spirits, or perhaps gods or devils, for that matter, if you happen to be a believer.

If not so, are you next supposed to be having an opinion on a given subject, because you think that it could be approached and next explained by carrying out science on the subject?

Therefore, put a finger on those who happen to be believers and not someone else, because one thing is supposed to go when it comes to one given thing, but not necessarily another.

If this is supposed to mean the difference between an atheist, agnostic, or believer, perhaps I am missing a point and become slightly disappointed.

Back after the dinner.
ID: 1822684 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1822690 - Posted: 8 Oct 2016, 10:52:23 UTC
Last modified: 8 Oct 2016, 11:39:20 UTC

Starting up the day having the dinner after the first cup of coffee is perhaps not the best thing to do.

Before continuing, I clicked the links for the YouTube videos.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6UvXFw1u9s

What is being visible at some 0:17 or 0:18 in this clip?

Possibly an overlay or some other type of manipulation, my guess is that this is for illustration purposes only and not something else.

I leave it for others to decide.

If you happen to be looking into a microscope for signs of possible life, this is not the same as being able to watch space from the window of a spacecraft.

Therefore both knowledge as well as understanding should be based on your point or angle of approach and not what you are supposed to actually be knowing.

Either you happen to know a given thing, or it next could be a best guess only for the same thing.

Dinosaurs right now.

Checking my disc, I have no file for this being stored locally.

Therefore it becomes starting from scratch here, but at least I should be able to put it into a context.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinosaur

Evolution is about knowing about things belonging to the past because we are able to observe both the distant past of the Universe as well as the history of the Dinosaurs because of the notion of time.

Time is sometimes running slow, or it could be running fast at times.

At least when it comes to the calendar, the period of the Dinosaurs took place and lasted a long time ago, before coming to an abrupt end because of an asteroid impact.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicxulub_crater

It takes about 20 seconds or so finding this article by only making a guess on its name based on a recall.

Therefore this article should be worth reading and I will next be doing so.

The asteroid impact which created this impact crater should be made a separate subject than the dinosaurs themselves, because such a thing like evolution could be associated with these animals.

For one thing some of these were plant eaters, while others were reptiles or cacass eaters.

Some were living on land, while others were found in the sea or oceans.

Also there were those who were flying in the air as well.

When mentioning such a thing like evolution, perhaps a separation should be made between those factors which are responsible for such a thing itself and the sometimes unpredictable events which could be happening at times
and next lead to change.

This because according to Charles Darwin, evolution is supposed to be as a result of natural selection and the well-known phrase "Survival for the fitness" for a given purpose.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_selection

These words came to me before searching the text.

Evolution most likely could be viewed as an extension of the other sciences, including chemistry and biology.

Therefore the subject of paleontology is the subject or science which better could explain the lives and deaths and also the evolution of dinosaurs over time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleontology

Next could perhaps be asked if some of these things could perhaps be related with each other.

When next returning back to the Wikipedia article about Evolution and next the article about Paleontology, notice the illustration for the timeline scales being present.

Is this perhaps because one given thing is supposed to be the reason for another thing and next being able to explain it any further?

I already mentioned such things like Unpredictability and Probability.

Both these things should probably go with regards to the weather, but for such a thing we are having climate models and not necessarily evolution itself.

Yes, a couple of things flying in the air or perhaps walking in the woods could be either UFO's or maybe Blackfoot, but I am not going to blow myself when it comes to a single subject with respect for other things that could be even more relevant or informative.

In my opinion, UFO research could be one thing in the same way as possible ghosts or spirits. This does not necessarily mean or imply that I believe in everything.

Being able to detect an intelligent signal coming from space could rather be something else, because we find it more reasonable to believe in Little Green Men rather than possible ghosts, spirits, or angels when it comes to a couple of things and at least a project could be relevant if it was based on fundamental or known principles, rather than making possible guesses about the unknown or non-physical.

This means that at times science could mean knowledge, but it also means that there could still be room for a couple of questions being asked.

If such a thing like evolution could be related with either Unpredictability or Probability, next perhaps the question of how these things are related when it comes to the subject of Mathematics could be asked.

Is Probability supposed to be the same as Logic?

Definitely the programming language for this is having the name of Prolog, but then it becomes a question about symantics or semantics and this is not what it is supposed to be all about.

The Earth is a planet on its own and floating in empty space.

Therefore we are a part of this place, including its environment.

For one thing, there is no air and mostly no water in empty space and gravity is being replaced by either micro-gravity in near Earth orbit, or possible weightlessness in empty space.

As previously mentioned, both air and water are needed components when it comes to living organisms, but not necessarily for the purpose of thinking or dreaming, at least not all the time.

Sleep is part of our lives and we do not need or drink any water while doing so.

Rather than thinking, we could perhaps be dreaming instead.

Because of that, is there any relationship between chemistry and evolution, since the fact is that evolution and sleep should not be related in a similar way?

What are the possible laws and equations behind chemical processes alone?

The fact is that you might be able to come up with a law or equation because it could fit a given purpose, or perhaps be able to explain a given thing even better.

The equation E=mc2 could explain the relationship between matter and energy, but not necessarily why H2O makes it water, or the fact that evolution killed off the dinosaurs and not necessarily an asteroid impact.

Yes, catch me wrong here, because that was what I meant to say.

Unable to make the subscript right now. Checking out later.

Make science of it because you are supposed to be earning money for your living.

I still could be having one more thing in my sleeves, but this might not be popular with everyone.

The beer should better be cold and therefore should be kept in the fridge.

Better have the coffee and cake first, before finishing off the rest of the beer.

I lost the sunset for now, but probably not the sunrise.

Edit: Should rather be "should" than "could" a little down.
ID: 1822690 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1822704 - Posted: 8 Oct 2016, 12:45:36 UTC
Last modified: 8 Oct 2016, 13:11:04 UTC

I looked up NAND gate in the Wikipedia after the cup of coffee and came across the word functionality.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NAND_gate

In my opinion a function when it comes to programming is not the same as functionality itself.

Rather it should be about the way a given thing is supposed to be working.

Next compare with such a word like Mechanics.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanics

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanical_engineering

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamics

The fact is that some readers courd be nerds, while others could be more naive.

Why is it the fact that I always have misunderstood or misinterpreted the meaning of this word?

One assumption, or possibly a simple guess does not necessarily mean that I will throw out one thing for another, or perhaps be telling the whole story.

Should tell that I am reading these articles right now and have not yet been watching the video or even the article for the second link above.

Because of that, a couple of related subjects, including that of possible Quantum Theory or Quantum Mechanics should be off for now and rather be for a later time.

At least it is being mentioned in the article as a reference.

Definitely the engine for a vehicle like a ship is not the same as the possible engine being used for propulsion through space by an extraterrestrial craft.

The first, or former is using electricity or oil for its similar functionality or way of working, while a gravity engine is not using at least oil.

Plasma is supposedly charged ions and reading a little more, it is one of four fundamental states of matter, the others being solid, liquid and gas.

Here it should be no relationship with the Four Fundamental Laws of Physics, which is something quite different.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_(physics)

The ambiguation page initially being accessed could be making for a slight confusion about this subject.

Also one of the Periodic Elements happens to be Neon. Perhaps gives a reminder about those neon lights.

Such things like lightning and electric sparks, as well as ball lightning could be related to Electromagnetism, which is one of the Fundamental Laws of Nature.

But if I rather choose to stick with Isaac Newton when it comes to this, he probably knew less about Electromagnetism than Albert Einstein did when it comes to Quantum Mechanics or Quantum Theory.

Take an example or two for this.

First, if I have a steel feather which is wired or intertwined into itself, it is having a possible momentum even in its current state.

Pull it open using force and it will next pull back on itself.

Still it could be possible to squeeze it slightly more tighter as well using a similar force and the same thing will happen.

Is this still supposed to be Mechanics, or could it rather be something else?

As a second example, connect an object like a stone with a rope and next use your hands in order to throw the stone through a circle by possibly rotating around your axis, or perhaps spinning around.

Such a thing could create possible inertia because of the Laws of Gravity by Newton.

The escape velocity from Earth is some 40,000 km/h, or 11.2 km/s and you will never be able to get to that speed.

Still it becomes a possible slingshot, but the stone is still attached to the rope and therefore going nowhere.

If you rather choose to believe in a subject like Quantum Mechanics or Quantum Theory, or even gravity or the notion of time, this is because each of these subjects or elements are supposed to meant for a given purpose.

In a similar way, I happen to find it hard to neither debunk or ridicule such a thing like UFO's being even more than such things like orbs, rods, critters, or the like, because once again one given thing is meant for a given purpose, while another could be having a different purpose and therefore also having its interpretation or meaning in a different context.

Many of these things are not supposed to be able to give a better explanation for such things like evolution or the creation of the Earth by being a part of the Solar System, including the Sun.

Or rather it should be Paleontology instead, since an alternative subject or option at first went out of my head.

We do not see divine creation of objects being part of neither microcosmos, or macrocosmos, but perhaps we could be doing so at times when it comes to those things or elements which are supposed to be fundamental when it comes to our understanding of nature, including Mathematics as a possible tool or resource.

Not forgetting Physics either, but it next becomes biology or chemistry and so on when doing so.

Among these are the Four Fundamental Forces of Nature, as well as both gravity and time, if not belonging to another subject and finally the Big Bang itself which should be thought of as either an event, or at least a moment of creation.

Perhaps ask why a plane is supposed to be able to fly in a similar way as a helicopter is supposed to be able to do the same thing.

Is it only because of the presence of air, or could it be something else?

The fact is that the development of the helicopter was a quite big challenge or feat, but that is another story.

Now it is time for the coffee and cake.
ID: 1822704 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1822706 - Posted: 8 Oct 2016, 13:03:07 UTC
Last modified: 8 Oct 2016, 13:08:02 UTC

"Tears in the rain".

You are not supposed to be making any science out of religion, are you?

Back later.
ID: 1822706 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1822709 - Posted: 8 Oct 2016, 13:45:03 UTC
Last modified: 8 Oct 2016, 13:51:10 UTC

Two things being noticed in the early afternoon.

First of all, we are having a variant of water here being mineral water, called "Farris" which only has Coal Di Oxyde, or CO2 being added.

It comes from a natural source of pure water deep below the ground in the woods of the southern part of the country.

For consumption it typically comes on either 0.5 l bottles, or 1.5 l for the same.

It possibly may not be a distilled or purified product either, because the last time I had a closer look and there were small particles being visible.

Because of either the wording itself, or the possible meaning of it, I am using the national edition of the Wikipedia here.

You could chose to end up your life by walking into a garage for a car and next close the gate and turning the engine on.

The exhaust makes for CO which is Carbon Monoxide and is both poisonous as well as possibly lethal.

In contrast, CO2 is being added to the mineral water, making it a delicacy when being cold in the fridge.

Therefore, love drinking such a bottle of water because there is hardly anything better, but then how easy it is to possibly mistake or confuse.

Second, I am having the problem that because of the CO2 being added, it becomes pressurized and I therefore choose to tighten the screw while contents is still present.

If I next try to open or untighten the bottle after first opening it and next putting it back into the fridge, it becomes stuck and makes it unable to open.

Put the opening screw or cork under hot water and it should next open.

But what about the cold water that should be inside and next be consumed?

Becomes another word for this which for some reason was not intitially being accepted or recognized.

Perhaps we should already know why such a thing could be happening.

Or it rather could be a lack of knowledge at times.
ID: 1822709 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1822716 - Posted: 8 Oct 2016, 14:15:28 UTC
Last modified: 8 Oct 2016, 14:32:56 UTC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHWjlCaIrQo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCWKZWieMSY

"Shall we play a game"?

Again no pun intended, because I have finished off the day.

A possible nuclear war could be an Armageddon of sorts, but I also happen to know that fission and fusion is not the same.

Then perhaps the same question about "Fitness for a given purpose", or one meaning for a given thing versus yet another thing still could be valid in a similar way.

My guess is that Armageddon could be related to a couple of things which could be part of nature, but for now we probably have no actual examples of this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypernova

I looked it up earlier, but a known example for this happened in a separate galaxy, NGC 1260, located in Perseus.

A little more became a separate note on my disc.

Events happening in nature probably makes no distinction between good or evil, because a possible interpretation of such a thing is possible only when religion is being applied on the subject.

Because of that it could sometimes be difficult to make a direct link between these two things, even though this is actually what I could be making an attempt of doing.

Again, one purpose meant for one given thing, but not necessarily another.

Guess it only becomes fun and entertainment and not a "carcass".

Edit: I previously mentioned that unpredictability should be the opposite of predictability and next asked if this should also be true when it comes to probability.

Apparently back to the subject of Logic once again, but there could be a slight difference of opinion or meaning.

Also life itself could be synonymous with at least moral and values, if not anything else or more.

Those people who choose to be either for or against this are not necessarily scientists all the time.

Therefore I am completely blank on the subject and have no personal opinion to offer.
ID: 1822716 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1822726 - Posted: 8 Oct 2016, 14:43:10 UTC
Last modified: 8 Oct 2016, 14:43:36 UTC

What is the possible difference between "Invaluable science" and "Valuable science"?

Looking up the first word using Google gives me a couple of selections, where I choose one for further reading.

Next making another search using the second word and another set of suggestions are being offered.

Perhaps the second page being visited is slightly better than the first one, but this probably gives no answer to the question.
ID: 1822726 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1822729 - Posted: 8 Oct 2016, 15:04:39 UTC
Last modified: 8 Oct 2016, 15:40:49 UTC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttR2O8Xt7M8

Should note that right now I am a bit hesitant or reluctant when it comes to possible science alone.

Orbs and rods are supposedly alien or extraterrestrial objects being observed at times and could be having a similar intelligence associated with it.

So if a pilot with some 29 years experience is reporting that he is able to observe a craft being twice the size of his plane, or even an aircraft carrier, for that matter, it should probably be believed.

But regardless of any difference when it comes to size or possible other properties, an orb or rod is not the same as a mothership.

My knowledge about such possible objects is actually relatively limited, but this does not necessarily mean that I dismiss it altogether.

At least unless it possibly could be calling.

Slip my fingers and perhaps forget the whole thing.

Becomes only yet another cold day and therefore becomes a part of life and what next could be happening.

Yes, I happen to know about the movie "Close Encounters of the Third Kind".

Needs getting back to this for any link or more information.

Make your own opinion on the subject and next think whether or not such a thing could become popularized by means of creating a movie about the subject.

At least the movie is quite good and the final sequence in the second version of the movie in fact makes me believe I am seeing the real thing.

Perhaps Steven Spielberg should know better, but neither him or myself happen to be airline pilots.

Edit: Watching a little more of the video and it perhaps rather becomes "Wonders of Nature" instead.

Then the question could perhaps be asked about what is supposed to be most important, meaning either the Universe itself, or the possible existence of intelligent civilizations and the possible conscience or thinking which should be coming along or being present when it comes to such a thing.

For this we are having Type III civilizations, but if it happens to be so, we probably are back to such things like spirits and angels once again and not necessarily Darth Vader and his command ship.

If rather being a Type I civilization it quite easily could be a hard landing or some other mishap as a result.

Therefore I gave a little more thought about possible Type II civilizations instead and think I may be having some knowledge here.

Needs more checking for possible Type III civilizations which could also be associated with possible mothership, but not necessarily fun and entertainment.
ID: 1822729 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1822740 - Posted: 8 Oct 2016, 16:13:25 UTC
Last modified: 8 Oct 2016, 16:16:17 UTC

Guess how easy it could be if I happen to blow it all and make a laugh of it all.

Please do not give me such a chance or opportunity.

Remember I perhaps mentioned the fact that the Commander of the Rendlesham Air Force Base also got involved in the incident, but apparently at a later stage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rendlesham_Forest_incident

Making an edit of the name of the base when looking up the article.

If you happen to be so fortunate at being able to ask the question, the answer would probably be that even the people of the military are not any better at giving definite answers to these questions.

The only thing being true or for sure is that it could be easier to either dismiss or reject a given story, or rather the opposite when such sources are being used, than what it otherwise could end up being.

My best guess is that since I earlier asked what was being found on the "upper deck, I possibly received a response to that question", but for now do not recall the exact contents.

This is because assumedly Robert Lazar was either invited, or perhaps even abducted by possible alien beings and next being learnt how to fly, or at least getting a knowledge about in which way these craft are working.

Because of that, we are left to believe that the propulsion for the craft is some three gravity amplifiers, located at the bottom and therefore being their engine.

Above that, or in the middle, is the deck for staying, which almost becomes their living room.

This room is almost empty, but the gravity amplifiers are supposed to be going to the top as well, at least when it comes to their control.

Their ways or means of communication could be in some other way.

Next Robert Lazar was not allowed to visit the mentioned upper deck, or at least he was not allowed to be speaking about it.

Possibly he was not being given access when it comes to all.

It therefore becomes almost the same thing as being a passenger on a train, plane or even ship.

You are having a seat and could be enjoying the trip, but someone else is behind the wheels and this is not you.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_gravity

Again, like the subject of Quantum Mechanics or Quantum Theory, I am not ready for this at the moment, but at least you have the article.

Also, the otherwise very forthcoming Nick Pope, working with the British Ministry of Defense, should be a valuable source for possible reference.

In fact the Wikipedia article states that "A comprehensive 2009 evaluation by scientific skeptic author Brian Dunning concluded there was, in fact, nothing other-worldly about the incident."

Should I perhaps say the same about this event as well as a couple of other ones?

Where is the truth possibly being found and are we perhaps all being fooled?

Next we could perhaps be saying that an extraterrestrial signal has never been detected, except for one possible time and that this leads into nowhere.
ID: 1822740 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 61 · 62 · 63 · 64 · 65 · 66 · 67 . . . 332 · Next

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.