CPUs. Can someone explain this one please?

Message boards : Number crunching : CPUs. Can someone explain this one please?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · 3 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile gregh

Send message
Joined: 10 Jun 99
Posts: 220
Credit: 4,292,549
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 53982 - Posted: 14 Dec 2004, 21:05:13 UTC

I had a P4 1.7Ghz CPU with 512megs DDR aboard. Nothing flash and fabulous but definitely not bad, OK?

So, I recently get a 3.4Ghz CPU, pull out the 1.7Ghz and put the 3.4 in and off I go again, no problems, machine now twice as fast and yes, suddenly the "2 CPU" processing of Boinc/Seti is possible and active.

I try, for days, on 3.4Ghz to get the damned thing to work as easily as it all appeared to work on the 1.7Ghz but every single task appeared as slow as or slower than the 1.7ghz one now. I suspend Boinc/Seti and off everything goes marvellously. So, I try out ONE CPU through prefs at Boinc/Seti and things go well again. OK, figured that much out and went back to using 2 CPUs for a couple of days. Crap with any prog all the time. I have had to forcibly reduce to 1 CPU only so all other progs work reasonably.

Anyone got any idea why with 2 Boinc/Setis on a 3.4ghz with the same ram, things run worse for the rest of my machine that on a 1.7ghz using only 1 CPU?

Got me beat, I have to admit!

Greg.
ID: 53982 · Report as offensive
Hans Dorn
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 2262
Credit: 26,448,570
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 53983 - Posted: 14 Dec 2004, 21:25:53 UTC

What OS are you running?

You might get more answers if you unhide your computers :o)

Regards Hans

ID: 53983 · Report as offensive
Profile Keck_Komputers
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 1575
Credit: 4,152,111
RAC: 1
United States
Message 54007 - Posted: 14 Dec 2004, 23:31:51 UTC

If you are running 2 BOINCs then you will most likely be running 2 setis per processor which may be part of the problem. You should run BOINC once per computer and let BOINC handle multiple processors.

I assume you have one real processor that is divided into two logical processors. This can cause problems since the OS thinks they are both real and assigns CPU time accordingly. This in turn can cause lower priority tasks to get too much CPU time due to memory conflicts. This is especially true if using any version of windows prior to XP.

Another idea is that if you are using the same motherboard and memory that you were using with the slower processor they may not be up to it even though they will function. A newer motherboard with dual channel memory can help alot.
BOINC WIKI

BOINCing since 2002/12/8
ID: 54007 · Report as offensive
Pascal, K G
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 2343
Credit: 150,491
RAC: 0
United States
Message 54038 - Posted: 15 Dec 2004, 1:39:56 UTC

First rule, always check to see if the MOBO can handle the CPU, second rule always reload your os and all drivers.... Third rule check BIOS to see if CPU is setup correctly....
Semper Eadem
So long Paul, it has been a hell of a ride.

Park your ego's, fire up the computers, Science YES, Credits No.
ID: 54038 · Report as offensive
Joe Rhodes
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 02
Posts: 24
Credit: 1,288,238
RAC: 0
United States
Message 54079 - Posted: 15 Dec 2004, 3:08:49 UTC - in response to Message 53982.  

> I had a P4 1.7Ghz CPU with 512megs DDR aboard. Nothing flash and fabulous but
> definitely not bad, OK?
>
> So, I recently get a 3.4Ghz CPU, pull out the 1.7Ghz and put the 3.4 in and
> off I go again, no problems, machine now twice as fast and yes, suddenly the
> "2 CPU" processing of Boinc/Seti is possible and active.
>
> I try, for days, on 3.4Ghz to get the damned thing to work as easily as it all
> appeared to work on the 1.7Ghz but every single task appeared as slow as or
> slower than the 1.7ghz one now. I suspend Boinc/Seti and off everything goes
> marvellously. So, I try out ONE CPU through prefs at Boinc/Seti and things go
> well again. OK, figured that much out and went back to using 2 CPUs for a
> couple of days. Crap with any prog all the time. I have had to forcibly reduce
> to 1 CPU only so all other progs work reasonably.
>
> Anyone got any idea why with 2 Boinc/Setis on a 3.4ghz with the same ram,
> things run worse for the rest of my machine that on a 1.7ghz using only 1
> CPU?
>
> Got me beat, I have to admit!
>
> Greg.
>
ID: 54079 · Report as offensive
Joe Rhodes
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 02
Posts: 24
Credit: 1,288,238
RAC: 0
United States
Message 54083 - Posted: 15 Dec 2004, 3:14:35 UTC - in response to Message 53982.  

> I had a P4 1.7Ghz CPU with 512megs DDR aboard. Nothing flash and fabulous but
> definitely not bad, OK?
>
> So, I recently get a 3.4Ghz CPU, pull out the 1.7Ghz and put the 3.4 in and
> off I go again, no problems, machine now twice as fast and yes, suddenly the
> "2 CPU" processing of Boinc/Seti is possible and active.
> Greg.
If you are running windows xp; go to programs, accessories, system tools, system info. You will find your processor speed in the middle of the list. I suspect that your motherboard does not support the 3.4 GHz CPU and it defaulted to a lower multiplier.
ID: 54083 · Report as offensive
Profile gregh

Send message
Joined: 10 Jun 99
Posts: 220
Credit: 4,292,549
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 54168 - Posted: 15 Dec 2004, 10:43:35 UTC - in response to Message 54007.  

> If you are running 2 BOINCs then you will most likely be running 2 setis per
> processor which may be part of the problem. You should run BOINC once per
> computer and let BOINC handle multiple processors.
>

No, as explained, 2 Boinc/Setis not 2 Boinc.

> I assume you have one real processor that is divided into two logical
> processors. This can cause problems since the OS thinks they are both real and
> assigns CPU time accordingly. This in turn can cause lower priority tasks to
> get too much CPU time due to memory conflicts. This is especially true if
> using any version of windows prior to XP.

You wont want to try anything but 2000 or XP on a 3.4Ghz machine. I believe ME works up to 3.0 Ghz but not sure over that.

>
> Another idea is that if you are using the same motherboard and memory that you
> were using with the slower processor they may not be up to it even though they
> will function. A newer motherboard with dual channel memory can help alot.
>

I do have an MB that does that, just dont have the cash to buy that sort of ram.
ID: 54168 · Report as offensive
Profile gregh

Send message
Joined: 10 Jun 99
Posts: 220
Credit: 4,292,549
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 54169 - Posted: 15 Dec 2004, 10:43:56 UTC - in response to Message 53983.  

> What OS are you running?
>
> You might get more answers if you unhide your computers :o)
>
> Regards Hans
>
>

XPSP2.
ID: 54169 · Report as offensive
Profile gregh

Send message
Joined: 10 Jun 99
Posts: 220
Credit: 4,292,549
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 54170 - Posted: 15 Dec 2004, 10:45:56 UTC - in response to Message 54038.  

> First rule, always check to see if the MOBO can handle the CPU, second rule
> always reload your os and all drivers.... Third rule check BIOS to see if CPU
> is setup correctly....
>

Errr....I work doing this sort of thing so I know the MB can handle the CPU.

There is absolutely no need to reload drivers when just changing to another CPU unless the drivers have become corrupted. That is just a waste of time (not trying to be nasty but that is just the truth!).

I do work doing all this, building, rebuilding computers and networks etc so I know how that stuff goes.

Thanks anyway. :)

Greg.
ID: 54170 · Report as offensive
Profile gregh

Send message
Joined: 10 Jun 99
Posts: 220
Credit: 4,292,549
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 54171 - Posted: 15 Dec 2004, 10:47:28 UTC - in response to Message 54083.  

> > I had a P4 1.7Ghz CPU with 512megs DDR aboard. Nothing flash and fabulous
> but
> > definitely not bad, OK?
> >
> > So, I recently get a 3.4Ghz CPU, pull out the 1.7Ghz and put the 3.4 in
> and
> > off I go again, no problems, machine now twice as fast and yes, suddenly
> the
> > "2 CPU" processing of Boinc/Seti is possible and active.
> > Greg.
> If you are running windows xp; go to programs, accessories, system tools,
> system info. You will find your processor speed in the middle of the list. I
> suspect that your motherboard does not support the 3.4 GHz CPU and it
> defaulted to a lower multiplier.
>

If it didnt support the 3.4Ghz CPU, I couldnt post this. I have used exactly the same MB on many occasions on other computers I have built for other people and no problems. No problems with me excepting Boinc/Seti and BoincView so it all points to software.
ID: 54171 · Report as offensive
nmeofdst8

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 7
Credit: 352,752
RAC: 0
United States
Message 54191 - Posted: 15 Dec 2004, 13:07:31 UTC - in response to Message 54171.  

Post which board you are using and what revision. That might help in helping you. Unless you bought a new board and put an "old" cpu in it (1.7), I'm not sure which of the older chipsets would handle a 3.4..that would have handled a 1.7 back when. You have 512 of DDR...is that 2 x 256 or one 512? Or more directly, does your board have dual channel or single channel memory. If you are using WinXP, you should be using at least 1Gb of memory if you are running in HT mode and want to do other mulitasking events. Please post your M/B, Memory, and Video that you are using and I bet I or others can help you out for sure. Also, what do you have running invisible/visible in the system tray or in the processes?

Alex

> > > I had a P4 1.7Ghz CPU with 512megs DDR aboard. Nothing flash and
> fabulous
> > but
> > > definitely not bad, OK?
> > >
> > > So, I recently get a 3.4Ghz CPU, pull out the 1.7Ghz and put the 3.4
> in
> > and
> > > off I go again, no problems, machine now twice as fast and yes,
> suddenly
> > the
> > > "2 CPU" processing of Boinc/Seti is possible and active.
> > > Greg.
> > If you are running windows xp; go to programs, accessories, system
> tools,
> > system info. You will find your processor speed in the middle of the
> list. I
> > suspect that your motherboard does not support the 3.4 GHz CPU and it
> > defaulted to a lower multiplier.
> >
>
> If it didnt support the 3.4Ghz CPU, I couldnt post this. I have used exactly
> the same MB on many occasions on other computers I have built for other people
> and no problems. No problems with me excepting Boinc/Seti and BoincView so it
> all points to software.
>
>
ID: 54191 · Report as offensive
Profile Papa Zito
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Feb 03
Posts: 257
Credit: 624,881
RAC: 0
United States
Message 54203 - Posted: 15 Dec 2004, 15:12:44 UTC

People, get off the hardware kick. He already said he has tons of experience in the field, and he's already done the troubleshooting to narrow down where the problem is. It's obviously a software issue.
ID: 54203 · Report as offensive
Profile gregh

Send message
Joined: 10 Jun 99
Posts: 220
Credit: 4,292,549
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 54372 - Posted: 16 Dec 2004, 2:44:25 UTC - in response to Message 54191.  

> Post which board you are using and what revision. That might help in helping
> you.

As posted before, it has nothing to do with that. It is all about the software. I WORK in this field fixing, installing computers, networks etc. I KNOW what I am doing with that and all is OK.

It is Boinc/Seti and also Setiview. They are the ONLY progs which cause a problem.
ID: 54372 · Report as offensive
Hans Dorn
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 2262
Credit: 26,448,570
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 54379 - Posted: 16 Dec 2004, 3:21:44 UTC - in response to Message 54372.  
Last modified: 16 Dec 2004, 3:24:07 UTC

> > Post which board you are using and what revision. That might help in
> helping
> > you.
>
> As posted before, it has nothing to do with that. It is all about the
> software. I WORK in this field fixing, installing computers, networks etc. I
> KNOW what I am doing with that and all is OK.
>
> It is Boinc/Seti and also Setiview. They are the ONLY progs which cause a
> problem.
>
>
Did you check CPU temperature? When Running 3.4 GHz at full load, you'll need good cooling, or your CPU will be throttled.

This could explain the meager performance.

Try opening the PC case and putting a fan in front of it. (I'm not kidding here..)

Regards Hans

ID: 54379 · Report as offensive
Pascal, K G
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 2343
Credit: 150,491
RAC: 0
United States
Message 54395 - Posted: 16 Dec 2004, 4:25:08 UTC - in response to Message 54170.  
Last modified: 16 Dec 2004, 4:27:13 UTC

> > First rule, always check to see if the MOBO can handle the CPU, second
> rule
> > always reload your os and all drivers.... Third rule check BIOS to see if
> CPU
> > is setup correctly....
> >
>
> Errr....I work doing this sort of thing so I know the MB can handle the CPU.
>
> There is absolutely no need to reload drivers when just changing to another
> CPU unless the drivers have become corrupted. That is just a waste of time
> (not trying to be nasty but that is just the truth!).>
> I do work doing all this, building, rebuilding computers and networks etc so I
> know how that stuff goes.
>
> Thanks anyway. :)
>
> Greg.


I will still follow my big three heh. Which BOINC are you using? I have an intermittent problem with 4.56 not keeping both cpus going, so far I have just had to hit the update button and number 2 starts right up.....>I think this happens when BOINC can not download new WUWUs and it shuts one CPU down, just a guess....

Semper Eadem
So long Paul, it has been a hell of a ride.

Park your ego's, fire up the computers, Science YES, Credits No.
ID: 54395 · Report as offensive
wrzwaldo
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jul 00
Posts: 113
Credit: 1,073,284
RAC: 0
United States
Message 54405 - Posted: 16 Dec 2004, 5:18:55 UTC

I have my doubts about the hardware. I would be willing to bet a memory upgrade is in order. Of course you asked for opinions and then when you get some you suddenly know it all. Also look into the heat issue. If you had xx # of years doing this kind of stuff then you would probably have found an answer by now. Of course not giving any info on your hardware makes it tough to give an honest answer, be it hardware or software! Good luck...
ID: 54405 · Report as offensive
Dustman

Send message
Joined: 19 Jul 99
Posts: 9
Credit: 3,186,569
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 54408 - Posted: 16 Dec 2004, 5:23:56 UTC

Have you reloaded the OS after putting the new CPU in.
ID: 54408 · Report as offensive
Joe Rhodes
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 02
Posts: 24
Credit: 1,288,238
RAC: 0
United States
Message 54447 - Posted: 16 Dec 2004, 11:46:03 UTC

Have you checked the priority of seti at home. It should be set to low.
ID: 54447 · Report as offensive
nmeofdst8

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 7
Credit: 352,752
RAC: 0
United States
Message 54474 - Posted: 16 Dec 2004, 15:16:30 UTC - in response to Message 54203.  

> People, get off the hardware kick. He already said he has tons of experience
> in the field, and he's already done the troubleshooting to narrow down where
> the problem is. It's obviously a software issue.
>

First,
I have been doing this for more years than I can remember, and I still get stumped some times and ask for help. He asked for help, we tried to give it.

Second,
It doesn't sound to me like he did enough troubleshooting, or he would have found the problem and not had to post for help.

Third,
If you look at my post, it has some valid points. 512mb Memory with XP doing BOINC in HT Mode and anything else may cause problems. This problem could be compounded if it is single channel vs. dual channel memory. If he was using a rather outdated 1.7ghz processor + mobo and just upgraded the processor to where he did, there is a good chance their is an issue with the board. Only the newest boards have the thermal detection/protection built in and would keep the processor from throttling. This is a large problem and is mentioned in numerous writeups (Tomshardware has a nice one on the subject).

Fourth,
How did you come to the conclusion it is a software issue? There are what, 150k people, many running multiple clients, and they aren't having his problem? There's nothing in his post that would automatically suggest software.

Fifth,
BE NICE! He asked for help and I and others tried to help. Be helpful and productive or be quiet. My 2c's

Alex
ID: 54474 · Report as offensive
STE\/E
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 29 Mar 03
Posts: 1137
Credit: 5,334,063
RAC: 0
United States
Message 54482 - Posted: 16 Dec 2004, 15:52:40 UTC
Last modified: 16 Dec 2004, 15:53:23 UTC

Unless gregh Re-installs XP Pro or what ever OS does support the Hyper Threading Technology of the P4 HT Cpu's the OS won't recognize the the capabilities of the new P4 HT Cpu that he installed ...

I went thru this on a few recent upgrades, I went from none HT Cpu's to HT capable Cpu's and even though I already had Xp Pro installed before making the switch I still had to re-install the XP Pro OS again in order to get it to recognize the HT Capabilities of the new Cpu ...

ID: 54482 · Report as offensive
1 · 2 · 3 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : CPUs. Can someone explain this one please?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.