v7 that ran as v6

Message boards : Number crunching : v7 that ran as v6
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
David S
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 99
Posts: 18352
Credit: 27,761,924
RAC: 12
United States
Message 1418033 - Posted: 20 Sep 2013, 13:26:58 UTC

I was checking my inconclusives and found http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=1320805048. It's supposed to be a v7, I ran it as a v7, it was assigned to my wingmate as a v7, but his stderr output shows it ran as v6.11. How can this happen?

FWIW, I just checked the host's tasks and it shows Validation pending (413) · Validation inconclusive (14) · Valid (30) · Invalid (764) · Error (4). Methinks something is rotten in Anonymousland.


David
Sitting on my butt while others boldly go,
Waiting for a message from a small furry creature from Alpha Centauri.

ID: 1418033 · Report as offensive
Profile Mike Special Project $75 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Feb 01
Posts: 34257
Credit: 79,922,639
RAC: 80
Germany
Message 1418036 - Posted: 20 Sep 2013, 13:44:32 UTC
Last modified: 20 Sep 2013, 13:46:16 UTC

He is running an outdated application.
Therefore marked as invalid.

If no autocorr signal is found in a work unit it will be validated.


With each crime and every kindness we birth our future.
ID: 1418036 · Report as offensive
Profile Mike Special Project $75 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Feb 01
Posts: 34257
Credit: 79,922,639
RAC: 80
Germany
Message 1418039 - Posted: 20 Sep 2013, 13:47:32 UTC - in response to Message 1418037.  

I was checking my inconclusives and found http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=1320805048. It's supposed to be a v7, I ran it as a v7, it was assigned to my wingmate as a v7, but his stderr output shows it ran as v6.11. How can this happen?

FWIW, I just checked the host's tasks and it shows Validation pending (413) · Validation inconclusive (14) · Valid (30) · Invalid (764) · Error (4). Methinks something is rotten in Anonymousland.



He's one of those Smart**** who edited their app_info to run the new V7 with the old V6 app, because before Eric made sure it didn't pay off (they now becomes invalid), runnning like that, gave more credit, and did run the tasks faster (no autocorr in V6)


Wrong.
Each unit without autocorr signal is still valid on his host.



With each crime and every kindness we birth our future.
ID: 1418039 · Report as offensive
Profile Wiggo
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Jan 00
Posts: 34744
Credit: 261,360,520
RAC: 489
Australia
Message 1418055 - Posted: 20 Sep 2013, 14:28:24 UTC

Sadly there are quite a few Linux rigs around doing this since MB V7. :-(

Cheers.
ID: 1418055 · Report as offensive
David S
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 99
Posts: 18352
Credit: 27,761,924
RAC: 12
United States
Message 1418059 - Posted: 20 Sep 2013, 14:44:14 UTC - in response to Message 1418039.  

Each unit without autocorr signal is still valid on his host.

Okay, but I found 2 autocorrs. When the 3rd host comes back and agrees with me, won't this guy's work be marked as invalid and be granted 0 credit? I can't see any real advantage to him for doing this. What good is it to do the work faster if it's invalid?

Should something be done about it?

David
Sitting on my butt while others boldly go,
Waiting for a message from a small furry creature from Alpha Centauri.

ID: 1418059 · Report as offensive
Josef W. Segur
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 99
Posts: 4504
Credit: 1,414,761
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1418098 - Posted: 20 Sep 2013, 16:00:02 UTC - in response to Message 1418039.  

I was checking my inconclusives and found http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=1320805048. It's supposed to be a v7, I ran it as a v7, it was assigned to my wingmate as a v7, but his stderr output shows it ran as v6.11. How can this happen?

FWIW, I just checked the host's tasks and it shows Validation pending (413) · Validation inconclusive (14) · Valid (30) · Invalid (764) · Error (4). Methinks something is rotten in Anonymousland.



He's one of those Smart**** who edited their app_info to run the new V7 with the old V6 app, because before Eric made sure it didn't pay off (they now becomes invalid), runnning like that, gave more credit, and did run the tasks faster (no autocorr in V6)


Wrong.
Each unit without autocorr signal is still valid on his host.

Specifically, that applies only to tasks with -9 result_overflow. In that case with no reportable autocorr the v7 and v6 result files do match so there's no harm done.
                                                                  Joe
ID: 1418098 · Report as offensive
Profile Mike Special Project $75 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Feb 01
Posts: 34257
Credit: 79,922,639
RAC: 80
Germany
Message 1418119 - Posted: 20 Sep 2013, 16:17:19 UTC - in response to Message 1418069.  

I was checking my inconclusives and found http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=1320805048. It's supposed to be a v7, I ran it as a v7, it was assigned to my wingmate as a v7, but his stderr output shows it ran as v6.11. How can this happen?

FWIW, I just checked the host's tasks and it shows Validation pending (413) · Validation inconclusive (14) · Valid (30) · Invalid (764) · Error (4). Methinks something is rotten in Anonymousland.



He's one of those Smart**** who edited their app_info to run the new V7 with the old V6 app, because before Eric made sure it didn't pay off (they now becomes invalid), runnning like that, gave more credit, and did run the tasks faster (no autocorr in V6)


Wrong.
Each unit without autocorr signal is still valid on his host.


It's not wrong, it wasn't the whole truth though, that's all. It was right that he used the old app to run v7. At least give me 58,5% right will ya :-)

After all it's Friday, so be a bit generous. LOL

You can have 60% Sten.



With each crime and every kindness we birth our future.
ID: 1418119 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : v7 that ran as v6


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.