Moondust probe

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Moondust probe
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile cov_route
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 13 Sep 12
Posts: 342
Credit: 10,270,618
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 1415197 - Posted: 13 Sep 2013, 18:00:02 UTC

All of the recent moon probes were supposed to be in support of a manned return. Unfortunately it doesn't look like that's going to happen.
ID: 1415197 · Report as offensive
Profile Bob DeWoody
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 May 10
Posts: 3387
Credit: 4,182,900
RAC: 10
United States
Message 1415506 - Posted: 14 Sep 2013, 7:01:41 UTC

It's too bad that a manned return to the moon has been all but cancelled. The moon is about the only place outside of LEO that humans have a decent chance of surviving on a long term basis. That is assuming that shelter can be made or found to protect the inhabitants from radiation. I fail to understand why even scientists have that "been there, done that" attitude about the moon. I think if we don't master living on the moon long term then we are doomed to fail on more difficult missions to Mars or an asteroid.
Bob DeWoody

My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events.
ID: 1415506 · Report as offensive
Profile skildude
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 00
Posts: 9541
Credit: 50,759,529
RAC: 60
Yemen
Message 1415941 - Posted: 15 Sep 2013, 13:23:57 UTC - in response to Message 1415506.  

I think its more a matter of finding a suitable site to land and build a base. Remember its beyond boiling hot during the moon day and -300 or so in its night and its nights last about 14 days.

Which leads to problem 2. Power. you'll need to generate a lot of electricity to maintain a base and the easiest way is solar power. the only problem is the long nights. So you need batteries to store the power.

So you need very heavy sheilding to protect the occupants very heavy solar panels and very heavy batteries. IF the 3 could be combined and made lighter you'd probably be on the moon already


In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face.
Diogenes Of Sinope
ID: 1415941 · Report as offensive
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20140
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 1416578 - Posted: 16 Sep 2013, 21:05:59 UTC - in response to Message 1415941.  

... So you need very heavy sheilding to protect the occupants very heavy solar panels and very heavy batteries. IF the 3 could be combined and made lighter you'd probably be on the moon already

But, but, but... If you make the shielding lighter then it wouldn't be the "very heavy shielding"!

Hence various ideas that have been floated of going underground, or using lunar regolith, or even of extracting water ice and cocooning the lunarnauts in that.



Meanwhile, there is the very destructively harsh environment of the violent temperature extremes, unabated solar wind to erode everything, and electrostatically charged sharp volcanic dust to foul everything and destroy air seals...


We should be amazed at how the Apollo program worked as well as it did!

Keep searchin',
Martin

See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 1416578 · Report as offensive
Profile Bob DeWoody
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 May 10
Posts: 3387
Credit: 4,182,900
RAC: 10
United States
Message 1416602 - Posted: 16 Sep 2013, 22:17:02 UTC

But, like I pointed out. If we can't make it on the moon then it is extremely unlikely that that man could survive for any length of time elsewhere in the solar system. And, unlike other destinations, if things aren't working out for moon explorers earth is only three days away.
Bob DeWoody

My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events.
ID: 1416602 · Report as offensive
Profile Julie
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 09
Posts: 34041
Credit: 18,883,157
RAC: 18
Belgium
Message 1416796 - Posted: 17 Sep 2013, 11:02:31 UTC - in response to Message 1416602.  

But, like I pointed out. If we can't make it on the moon then it is extremely unlikely that that man could survive for any length of time elsewhere in the solar system. And, unlike other destinations, if things aren't working out for moon explorers earth is only three days away.



You're right about the moon's distance but I do think Mars has a less hostile environment than the moon in terms of temperatures or its 'weather' in general...
rOZZ
Music
Pictures
ID: 1416796 · Report as offensive
Profile Bob DeWoody
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 May 10
Posts: 3387
Credit: 4,182,900
RAC: 10
United States
Message 1416817 - Posted: 17 Sep 2013, 12:01:03 UTC - in response to Message 1416796.  

But, like I pointed out. If we can't make it on the moon then it is extremely unlikely that that man could survive for any length of time elsewhere in the solar system. And, unlike other destinations, if things aren't working out for moon explorers earth is only three days away.



You're right about the moon's distance but I do think Mars has a less hostile environment than the moon in terms of temperatures or its 'weather' in general...

Don't be fooled by the movies that were made. Even though Mars has a thin atmosphere it has no magnetic field and no shielding from radiation. A torn space suit or hole in the shelter is just as dangerous on Mars as it is on the moon. Mars also has terrific dust storms that are not present on the moon. I think most experts would agree that the environment on the moon is no more dangerous than that on Mars. Also, near it's poles the moon has a good supply of water to exploit along with other critical elements.
Bob DeWoody

My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events.
ID: 1416817 · Report as offensive
Jim Martin Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Jun 03
Posts: 2473
Credit: 646,848
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1416997 - Posted: 18 Sep 2013, 1:33:13 UTC

There are natural caves on the Moon, for possible habitation. Whether or not they're near some form of water, would remain to be determined.

A factory on the Moon, for manufacturing much of the material for Mars
space ships, would be ideal. The escape velocities from the Moon would
be, certainly, less than on the Earth -- a big savings in vehicle design.

As for funding, let the Chinese provide it, plus cheap manufacturing would
be nothing new, to them. Still, its magnitude would require a multi-national
approach.

ID: 1416997 · Report as offensive
Profile Julie
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 09
Posts: 34041
Credit: 18,883,157
RAC: 18
Belgium
Message 1417116 - Posted: 18 Sep 2013, 7:45:32 UTC
Last modified: 18 Sep 2013, 8:03:54 UTC

And then we have the icy sattelites in our Solar System who seem to have all the building blocks for life...
Found a quite interesting article on Saturn's moon Enceladus:
http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2013/04/saturns-enceladus-emerging-as-the-most-habitable-spot-beyond-earth-in-solar-system.html

Whether Enceladus' environment is friendly for humans, appears to be different food for thought...
rOZZ
Music
Pictures
ID: 1417116 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Moondust probe


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.