Message boards :
Number crunching :
Just Out of Curiosity
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Gatekeeper Send message Joined: 14 Jul 04 Posts: 887 Credit: 176,479,616 RAC: 0 |
Note this AP WU. Can anyone explain why my job was marked as invalid? It looks for all the world to me that my results were identical to the canonical result, and returned before the 3rd copy came back. |
Claggy Send message Joined: 5 Jul 99 Posts: 4654 Credit: 47,537,079 RAC: 4 |
I wonder if the validator is comparing to a greater precision than is displayed in the stderr.txt Claggy |
Donald L. Johnson Send message Joined: 5 Aug 02 Posts: 8240 Credit: 14,654,533 RAC: 20 |
Note this AP WU. The std.err.txt file is just a summary, it doesn't tell the whole story, but I don't know enough about it to explain it. Appears to me that the validator found enough difference between your and _0's results to rule "inconclusive" and send out the _2. Result _2 aparently agreed with _0, but was not sufficiently similar to yours, so you got marked invalid. Happens sometimes between stock CPU and GPU or Optimized apps. Joe/Richard/Claggy could give you a more-detailed explanation. Unless it starts happening often, I would not worry about it. Donald Infernal Optimist / Submariner, retired |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.