Just Out of Curiosity

Message boards : Number crunching : Just Out of Curiosity
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile Gatekeeper
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Jul 04
Posts: 887
Credit: 176,479,616
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1392175 - Posted: 18 Jul 2013, 22:40:38 UTC
Last modified: 18 Jul 2013, 22:42:05 UTC

Note this AP WU.

Can anyone explain why my job was marked as invalid? It looks for all the world to me that my results were identical to the canonical result, and returned before the 3rd copy came back.
ID: 1392175 · Report as offensive
Claggy
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 5 Jul 99
Posts: 4654
Credit: 47,537,079
RAC: 4
United Kingdom
Message 1392178 - Posted: 18 Jul 2013, 22:57:20 UTC - in response to Message 1392175.  
Last modified: 18 Jul 2013, 22:58:07 UTC

I wonder if the validator is comparing to a greater precision than is displayed in the stderr.txt

Claggy
ID: 1392178 · Report as offensive
Profile Donald L. Johnson
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 02
Posts: 8240
Credit: 14,654,533
RAC: 20
United States
Message 1392337 - Posted: 19 Jul 2013, 7:22:00 UTC - in response to Message 1392175.  

Note this AP WU.

Can anyone explain why my job was marked as invalid? It looks for all the world to me that my results were identical to the canonical result, and returned before the 3rd copy came back.

The std.err.txt file is just a summary, it doesn't tell the whole story, but I don't know enough about it to explain it.

Appears to me that the validator found enough difference between your and _0's results to rule "inconclusive" and send out the _2. Result _2 aparently agreed with _0, but was not sufficiently similar to yours, so you got marked invalid. Happens sometimes between stock CPU and GPU or Optimized apps. Joe/Richard/Claggy could give you a more-detailed explanation. Unless it starts happening often, I would not worry about it.
Donald
Infernal Optimist / Submariner, retired
ID: 1392337 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : Just Out of Curiosity


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.