Very sad times

Message boards : Politics : Very sad times
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2

AuthorMessage
Sirius B Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 24879
Credit: 3,081,182
RAC: 7
Ireland
Message 1411369 - Posted: 4 Sep 2013, 13:53:29 UTC

Carrier Jet programme hugh risk

"The committee's report cast doubt on the MoD's claim that the new carrier-based strike force would be fully operational by 2020.

The Labour government placed orders for two carriers to be equipped with the F-35B variant of the US-built joint strike fighter (JSF), which is capable of short take-off and vertical landing.

In its 2010 Strategic Defence and Security Review, the coalition changed to the F-35C version, which has a longer range and can carry more weapons."

So no brains then? Wouldn't it have made more sense to keep HMS Ark Royal & Invincible in service with their Harriers until the new carriers were fit for service?


ID: 1411369 · Report as offensive
W-K 666 Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 19048
Credit: 40,757,560
RAC: 67
United Kingdom
Message 1411377 - Posted: 4 Sep 2013, 14:05:48 UTC - in response to Message 1411369.  

Wouldn't it have made more sense to keep HMS Ark Royal & Invincible in service with their Harriers until the new carriers were fit for service?


It would have made more sense to order new carriers after the '82 incident, when it was shown that to conduct operations away from home you need more than strike aircraft. Something like these, Northrop Grumman E-2 Hawkeye, search and rescue helicopters for any downed planes, elint and anti-submarine aircraft etc.
ID: 1411377 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2

Message boards : Politics : Very sad times


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.