Two mysteries of the Cambrian explosion.

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Two mysteries of the Cambrian explosion.

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile Intelligent Design
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 12
Posts: 3626
Credit: 37,520
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1389639 - Posted: 11 Jul 2013, 0:37:05 UTC

One a lack of ancestral fossils and the other a perplexing engineering challenge. Two hours long.
Must not conflict resolve by suggesting that someone should go sit on an ice pick...
ID: 1389639 · Report as offensive
rob smithProject Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 03
Posts: 13338
Credit: 154,894,265
RAC: 117,953
United Kingdom
Message 1389664 - Posted: 11 Jul 2013, 5:36:21 UTC

Actually only two MINUTES and five SECONDS long!
Bob Smith
Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society)
Somewhere in the (un)known Universe?
ID: 1389664 · Report as offensive
WinterKnight
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 10192
Credit: 30,543,942
RAC: 3,425
United Kingdom
Message 1389674 - Posted: 11 Jul 2013, 6:11:16 UTC
Last modified: 11 Jul 2013, 6:14:22 UTC

Analysis of the Discovery Institute's Bibliography

A report from National Center for Science Education (NCSE)

As it was originally furnished to the Board, the Bibliography was prefaced with the following explanation:

The publications represent dissenting viewpoints that challenge one or another aspect of neo-Darwinism (the prevailing theory of evolution taught in biology textbooks), discuss problems that evolutionary theory faces, or suggest important new lines of evidence that biology must consider when explaining origins.

Because the representatives of the Discovery Institute who appeared at the March 11 meeting — Jonathan Wells and Stephen C. Meyer — were widely touted as promoters of "intelligent design," it would have been reasonable for the Board to assume that among the "dissenting viewpoints" included in the Bibliography was "intelligent design." But it isn't.

NCSE sent a questionnaire to the authors of every publication listed in the Bibliography, asking them whether they considered their work to provide scientific evidence for "intelligent design."[5] None of the 26 respondents (representing 34 of the 44 publications in the Bibliography) did; many were indignant at the suggestion.


I therefore submit that every entry promoting the pseudo-science of the Discovery institute be removed from this Science board.
ID: 1389674 · Report as offensive
Profile William Rothamel
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 3226
Credit: 1,265,867
RAC: 310
United States
Message 1389727 - Posted: 11 Jul 2013, 10:53:52 UTC - in response to Message 1389674.  
Last modified: 11 Jul 2013, 10:54:26 UTC

We probably should allow crackpot theories and then point out where they are dead wrong using logic and scientific results.
ID: 1389727 · Report as offensive
Profile Chris SCrowdfunding Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 19 Nov 00
Posts: 38185
Credit: 21,401,994
RAC: 27,753
United Kingdom
Message 1389750 - Posted: 11 Jul 2013, 13:31:07 UTC

We probably should allow crackpot theories and then point out where they are dead wrong using logic and scientific results.


Happens every day over in Politics LOL
ID: 1389750 · Report as offensive
Profile Intelligent Design
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 12
Posts: 3626
Credit: 37,520
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1389763 - Posted: 11 Jul 2013, 14:12:37 UTC

WoW, you bitterly complained Rob over the last one being to long. Did you by chance have the time for this one?
Must not conflict resolve by suggesting that someone should go sit on an ice pick...
ID: 1389763 · Report as offensive
Profile Intelligent Design
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 12
Posts: 3626
Credit: 37,520
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1389764 - Posted: 11 Jul 2013, 14:13:24 UTC - in response to Message 1389727.  

We probably should allow crackpot theories and then point out where they are dead wrong using logic and scientific results.


Example being global warming?

Must not conflict resolve by suggesting that someone should go sit on an ice pick...
ID: 1389764 · Report as offensive
Profile Intelligent Design
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 12
Posts: 3626
Credit: 37,520
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1389765 - Posted: 11 Jul 2013, 14:13:46 UTC - in response to Message 1389750.  

We probably should allow crackpot theories and then point out where they are dead wrong using logic and scientific results.


Happens every day over in Politics LOL

+1
Must not conflict resolve by suggesting that someone should go sit on an ice pick...
ID: 1389765 · Report as offensive
Profile Indocrination Centers aka K-12; College&Uni_Run By DEMLibProgressiveCOMMIESocialist Indocrinators Led by DEMLIbProgressiveCOMMIESocialist Unions&Pols Creating CRYBABIES Hugging;Cryin';Whimpering Into A Collapsing Future
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 02
Posts: 3143
Credit: 4,561,075
RAC: 357
United States
Message 1389813 - Posted: 11 Jul 2013, 16:44:10 UTC

550 Million Years Ago = Lots 'O Mysteries. Duh.

In The Last 10 Years of My Reading 'bout 10,000 +++ pages of Evolutionary Theory, The Brain Boys are doing a Pretty Good Job of 'splaining Thangs.

In The Last 10 Years, GOD Done No 'splainin' To Me. I've Asked, but All Quiet On Da Supernatural Front.

And IDers, well, Nice Try Boyz, but No Go.

Evolution Da Winner.

Bound For IT IT.


ID: 1389813 · Report as offensive
Profile Intelligent Design
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 12
Posts: 3626
Credit: 37,520
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1389888 - Posted: 11 Jul 2013, 23:23:46 UTC - in response to Message 1389813.  

550 Million Years Ago = Lots 'O Mysteries. Duh.

In The Last 10 Years of My Reading 'bout 10,000 +++ pages of Evolutionary Theory, The Brain Boys are doing a Pretty Good Job of 'splaining Thangs.

In The Last 10 Years, GOD Done No 'splainin' To Me. I've Asked, but All Quiet On Da Supernatural Front.

And IDers, well, Nice Try Boyz, but No Go.

Evolution Da Winner.

Bound For IT IT.


Dull, I believe in Evolutionary hypothesis. I just reject the chance part. And I do so for good reason---engineering. A single cell cannot be called a simple cell.

Bound For IT--hell you are. ;-)
Must not conflict resolve by suggesting that someone should go sit on an ice pick...
ID: 1389888 · Report as offensive
Profile Chris SCrowdfunding Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 19 Nov 00
Posts: 38185
Credit: 21,401,994
RAC: 27,753
United Kingdom
Message 1390162 - Posted: 12 Jul 2013, 16:12:29 UTC

No mystery that I can see. Take a back garden (not an American lot, or a yard, a proper garden) and leave it a bit. Soon the weeds will start to grow. Leave it long enough and the weeds will flourish like triffids. That is what all species will do, breed in favourable conditions.

There was never any divine design by a single entity. Now if you are talking intelligent intervention at some point, that might be slightly different .....

ID: 1390162 · Report as offensive
Profile Intelligent Design
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 12
Posts: 3626
Credit: 37,520
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1390225 - Posted: 12 Jul 2013, 19:50:50 UTC - in response to Message 1390162.  

No mystery that I can see. Take a back garden (not an American lot, or a yard, a proper garden) and leave it a bit. Soon the weeds will start to grow. Leave it long enough and the weeds will flourish like triffids. That is what all species will do, breed in favourable conditions.

There was never any divine design by a single entity. Now if you are talking intelligent intervention at some point, that might be slightly different .....



At the start, and from time to time it would appear....

Must not conflict resolve by suggesting that someone should go sit on an ice pick...
ID: 1390225 · Report as offensive
Profile ignorance is no excuse
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 00
Posts: 9529
Credit: 44,433,321
RAC: 0
Korea, North
Message 1390233 - Posted: 12 Jul 2013, 20:11:32 UTC

please explain the evidence of an initial intervention and those so-called subsequent interventions. What physical evidence are you using to derive your hypothesis
In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face.
Diogenes Of Sinope

End terrorism by building a school

ID: 1390233 · Report as offensive
Profile Intelligent Design
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 12
Posts: 3626
Credit: 37,520
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1390251 - Posted: 12 Jul 2013, 21:21:09 UTC - in response to Message 1390233.  

please explain the evidence of an initial intervention and those so-called subsequent interventions. What physical evidence are you using to derive your hypothesis


I thought that would be obvious, the topic of this thread.

Must not conflict resolve by suggesting that someone should go sit on an ice pick...
ID: 1390251 · Report as offensive
Profile ignorance is no excuse
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 00
Posts: 9529
Credit: 44,433,321
RAC: 0
Korea, North
Message 1390760 - Posted: 15 Jul 2013, 1:05:33 UTC
Last modified: 15 Jul 2013, 1:07:08 UTC

so ignore facts and speculate on invisible powers
Stephen Meyer in a nutshell
In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face.
Diogenes Of Sinope

End terrorism by building a school

ID: 1390760 · Report as offensive
Profile betregerProject Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 4850
Credit: 11,271,858
RAC: 10,040
United States
Message 1390761 - Posted: 15 Jul 2013, 1:13:52 UTC - in response to Message 1390251.  

please explain the evidence of an initial intervention and those so-called subsequent interventions. What physical evidence are you using to derive your hypothesis


I thought that would be obvious, the topic of this thread.

ID, spell it out, some of can not read your mind.
ID: 1390761 · Report as offensive
Profile Intelligent Design
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 12
Posts: 3626
Credit: 37,520
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1390763 - Posted: 15 Jul 2013, 1:28:11 UTC

Nothing was ignored.
Must not conflict resolve by suggesting that someone should go sit on an ice pick...
ID: 1390763 · Report as offensive
Profile betregerProject Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 4850
Credit: 11,271,858
RAC: 10,040
United States
Message 1390768 - Posted: 15 Jul 2013, 1:56:54 UTC - in response to Message 1390761.  

please explain the evidence of an initial intervention and those so-called subsequent interventions. What physical evidence are you using to derive your hypothesis


I thought that would be obvious, the topic of this thread.

ID, spell it out, some of can not read your mind.


ID: 1390768 · Report as offensive
Profile ignorance is no excuse
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 00
Posts: 9529
Credit: 44,433,321
RAC: 0
Korea, North
Message 1391012 - Posted: 15 Jul 2013, 18:43:01 UTC - in response to Message 1390768.  

you give invisible answers much like his theoretical Itelligent designer
In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face.
Diogenes Of Sinope

End terrorism by building a school

ID: 1391012 · Report as offensive
Profile Intelligent Design
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 12
Posts: 3626
Credit: 37,520
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1391072 - Posted: 15 Jul 2013, 21:15:45 UTC - in response to Message 1391012.  

you give invisible answers much like his theoretical Itelligent designer


“What do you think science is? There's nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. Which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?”

― Steven Novella
Must not conflict resolve by suggesting that someone should go sit on an ice pick...
ID: 1391072 · Report as offensive
1 · 2 · Next

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Two mysteries of the Cambrian explosion.


 
©2016 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.