Planet Hunters Report Record-Breaking Discovery, Search for other habitable planets

Message boards : SETI@home Science : Planet Hunters Report Record-Breaking Discovery, Search for other habitable planets
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 . . . 23 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile William Rothamel
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 3756
Credit: 1,999,735
RAC: 4
United States
Message 1421205 - Posted: 28 Sep 2013, 0:32:12 UTC - in response to Message 1420992.  
Last modified: 28 Sep 2013, 0:38:39 UTC

Do you have a link that would indicate the methane content would have been higher than trace amounts?


No I don't have a link other than the one just provided by Julie. This idea is really out of my fields and any specific knowledge that I have in Geology, Chemistry and Atmospheric Science.

I have postulated in the past--more as a question--as to wether or not intelligent life needs a moon to provide spin stabilization, tidal lock and hence the tides in order to provide for the formation of intelligent life. I was thinking that maybe this collision should be added to requirements for intelligent life formation. I am asking for informed opinion.
ID: 1421205 · Report as offensive
Profile Lynn Special Project $75 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Nov 00
Posts: 14162
Credit: 79,603,650
RAC: 123
United States
Message 1422184 - Posted: 30 Sep 2013, 0:21:49 UTC - in response to Message 1421205.  

New information..

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/29/alien-planets-confirmed-1000_n_4012175.html

Number Of Alien Planets Confirmed Beyond Our Solar System Nears 1,000, Data Shows

_____________________________________
The universe wastes nothing, it's simply transferred.
Lynn
ID: 1422184 · Report as offensive
Profile Julie
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 09
Posts: 34041
Credit: 18,883,157
RAC: 18
Belgium
Message 1427107 - Posted: 11 Oct 2013, 15:00:13 UTC

ID: 1427107 · Report as offensive
Profile William Rothamel
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 3756
Credit: 1,999,735
RAC: 4
United States
Message 1427867 - Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 0:05:36 UTC - in response to Message 1427107.  
Last modified: 13 Oct 2013, 0:05:53 UTC

All very true but not a one that would sustain Human life if we were to go there. Let's keep looking though.
ID: 1427867 · Report as offensive
Profile Julie
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 09
Posts: 34041
Credit: 18,883,157
RAC: 18
Belgium
Message 1429719 - Posted: 17 Oct 2013, 15:50:25 UTC

ID: 1429719 · Report as offensive
Profile Julie
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 09
Posts: 34041
Credit: 18,883,157
RAC: 18
Belgium
Message 1429841 - Posted: 17 Oct 2013, 20:24:06 UTC

ID: 1429841 · Report as offensive
Profile Lynn Special Project $75 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Nov 00
Posts: 14162
Credit: 79,603,650
RAC: 123
United States
Message 1432037 - Posted: 23 Oct 2013, 0:50:32 UTC - in response to Message 1429841.  
Last modified: 23 Oct 2013, 0:51:16 UTC

Exoplanet tally soars above 1,000

The number of observed exoplanets - worlds circling distant stars - has passed 1,000.

Of these, 12 could be habitable - orbiting at a distance where it is neither "too hot" nor "too cold" for water to be liquid on the surface.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-24549384

___________________________
The universe wastes nothing, it's simply transferred.
Lynn
ID: 1432037 · Report as offensive
Profile William Rothamel
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 3756
Credit: 1,999,735
RAC: 4
United States
Message 1432155 - Posted: 23 Oct 2013, 10:34:04 UTC - in response to Message 1432037.  
Last modified: 23 Oct 2013, 10:36:16 UTC

Keep in mind that temperature is one of perhaps 2 dozen parameters that must be in a narrow range for intelligent life (like us) to form. Reports of estimates of tens of billions of habitable planets in the Milky Way are way way off base. I predict that we will never find another planet like Earth that would support life as we know it. Would such a planet support us if we went there ?

I am eagerly staying tuned in to this search. In time we will be able to answer whether or not more of the essential characteristics are present.

We could start by spending more time in Alpha Centauri where it's relative proximity would present the easiest chance for close inspection.

For now I will keep my interest up but will remain an agnostic on this subject for the time being.
ID: 1432155 · Report as offensive
Profile Julie
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 09
Posts: 34041
Credit: 18,883,157
RAC: 18
Belgium
Message 1432181 - Posted: 23 Oct 2013, 11:49:10 UTC

ID: 1432181 · Report as offensive
Profile William Rothamel
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 3756
Credit: 1,999,735
RAC: 4
United States
Message 1432219 - Posted: 23 Oct 2013, 14:54:07 UTC - in response to Message 1432155.  

I think that we should promote a proper definition of "Habitable Planet". I propose the definition as: We could go there, breathe the atmosphere and live out a normal life expectancy with no artificial methods of providing an enclosed living environment.

This could be called a "Type 1" habitat

Type 2 could provide for life underground or in a shelter.

Type 3 may require living in a dome-like structure and manufacturing a breathable atmosphere.

and so on--what do you all think.


I think that we do ourselves a dis-service to trumpet billions of "Habitable Planets" in the Galaxy since we haven't yet found a one and may never do so.
ID: 1432219 · Report as offensive
Profile Julie
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 09
Posts: 34041
Credit: 18,883,157
RAC: 18
Belgium
Message 1432278 - Posted: 23 Oct 2013, 18:44:05 UTC

There could also be life in the clouds of Jupiter-like planets or in the clouds of planets like Venus...
rOZZ
Music
Pictures
ID: 1432278 · Report as offensive
Profile Julie
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 09
Posts: 34041
Credit: 18,883,157
RAC: 18
Belgium
Message 1432359 - Posted: 23 Oct 2013, 20:52:36 UTC

ID: 1432359 · Report as offensive
aka_Sam
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 1 Aug 07
Posts: 471
Credit: 1,637,878
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 1433968 - Posted: 26 Oct 2013, 12:06:39 UTC
Last modified: 26 Oct 2013, 12:08:32 UTC

Earth wouldn't have qualified as a 'Type 1' planet back in the time of the dinosaurs due to low oxygen levels (10 to 18%) compared to around 21% today. The air was breathable back then but I wouldn't say it was conductive to a normal life expectancy.

By the strict 'Type 1' definition I too would be surprised to find any truly habitable planets.

OTOH, planets that could support earth like life (i.e. carbon/water based) are probably plentiful. With Earth as an example, where life is even remotely possible it finds away to exist and I see no reason why that would be any different on other worlds. And if life exists then the potential for intelligent life exists.
ID: 1433968 · Report as offensive
Profile William Rothamel
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 3756
Credit: 1,999,735
RAC: 4
United States
Message 1433999 - Posted: 26 Oct 2013, 14:25:14 UTC - in response to Message 1433968.  
Last modified: 26 Oct 2013, 14:28:45 UTC

I believe that they are plentiful in the Universe. But per Galaxy--maybe only a very few. As we develop the means to look out to say 1000 light years we can test this. If we can measure things like atmosphere composition, ground temperature, orbit eccentricity, magnetic field, ozone presence, water and land mixture, stable spin and so on then we will know more.

Assuming that we are doing a proper job of listening via SETI--we should have heard anyone out to maybe 100 light years and more by now. Thus we may conclude that if there are "Habitable" planets out at these distances, then the inhabitants have not progressed to the point of having developed electronics a few hundred years ago.
ID: 1433999 · Report as offensive
Profile Lynn Special Project $75 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Nov 00
Posts: 14162
Credit: 79,603,650
RAC: 123
United States
Message 1434068 - Posted: 26 Oct 2013, 19:06:31 UTC - in response to Message 1433999.  

The discovery of a seventh planet around the dwarf star KIC 11442793 could be a record, according to two separate teams of researchers.

The system bears some similarities to our own, but all seven planets orbit much closer to their host star, which lies some 2,500 light-years from Earth.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-24642603



The universe wastes nothing, it's simply transferred.
Lynn
ID: 1434068 · Report as offensive
Profile Bob DeWoody
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 May 10
Posts: 3387
Credit: 4,182,900
RAC: 10
United States
Message 1434083 - Posted: 26 Oct 2013, 19:48:33 UTC
Last modified: 26 Oct 2013, 19:49:10 UTC

How about this as an idea? Send out a probe in the most likely direction for finding a planet that could support life with as many sensors and instruments as possible that could detect "life signs". On the way out of our solar system aim it back toward earth periodically and find out how far out it can detect the evidence of life here. If it can't find life here then it isn't going to be likely that we can detect life, intelligent or not, elsewhere. If it does continue to find evidence of life here then we will begin to have a gauge of how far out our instruments can find life elsewhere.
Bob DeWoody

My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events.
ID: 1434083 · Report as offensive
Profile Lynn Special Project $75 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Nov 00
Posts: 14162
Credit: 79,603,650
RAC: 123
United States
Message 1434120 - Posted: 26 Oct 2013, 21:32:22 UTC - in response to Message 1434083.  

Astronomers believe that the universe is expanding - that all points in the universe are getting farther apart all the time. If that is the case, any intelligent being would be gone.
___________________

The universe wastes nothing, it's simply transferred.
Lynn
ID: 1434120 · Report as offensive
aka_Sam
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 1 Aug 07
Posts: 471
Credit: 1,637,878
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 1434443 - Posted: 27 Oct 2013, 18:14:10 UTC - in response to Message 1434120.  

Astronomers believe that the universe is expanding - that all points in the universe are getting farther apart all the time. If that is the case, any intelligent being would be gone.
___________________

The universe wastes nothing, it's simply transferred.
Lynn


Depends on how far away the intelligent being is. If in our general neighbourhood (say within 1000 LY) then the effects of universal expansion would require billions, or maybe even trillions, of years to become evident.

ID: 1434443 · Report as offensive
Profile Lynn Special Project $75 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Nov 00
Posts: 14162
Credit: 79,603,650
RAC: 123
United States
Message 1434556 - Posted: 27 Oct 2013, 22:29:19 UTC - in response to Message 1434443.  

Astronomers believe that the universe is expanding - that all points in the universe are getting farther apart all the time. If that is the case, any intelligent being would be gone.
___________________

The universe wastes nothing, it's simply transferred.
Lynn


Depends on how far away the intelligent being is. If in our general neighbourhood (say within 1000 LY) then the effects of universal expansion would require billions, or maybe even trillions, of years to become evident.


Maybe intelligent life got swolled up by black holes. Maybe Not. But I love the whatifiness of the question. I hope extraterrestrial life exists. Right now it's not looking good.
ID: 1434556 · Report as offensive
Profile Julie
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 09
Posts: 34041
Credit: 18,883,157
RAC: 18
Belgium
Message 1434761 - Posted: 28 Oct 2013, 15:04:34 UTC

And if life exists then the potential for intelligent life exists.


I agree completely. And the time it takes to evolve into an intelligent species is a bagatelle in astronomical terms...
rOZZ
Music
Pictures
ID: 1434761 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 . . . 23 · Next

Message boards : SETI@home Science : Planet Hunters Report Record-Breaking Discovery, Search for other habitable planets


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.