Famous Atheists


log in

Advanced search

Message boards : Politics : Famous Atheists

1 · 2 · Next
Author Message
Profile SciManStev
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 20 Jun 99
Posts: 4665
Credit: 77,235,304
RAC: 42,086
United States
Message 1372592 - Posted: 27 May 2013, 22:09:09 UTC

Many of these were a surprise to me.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/25/living/gallery/atheists/index.html?hpt=hp_c3

I am certainly not the only atheist, and have said many of the same things these atheists have said.

Steve
____________
Warning, addicted to SETI crunching!
Crunching as a member of GPU Users Group.
GPUUG Website

Lynn
Volunteer moderator
Send message
Joined: 20 Nov 00
Posts: 2568
Credit: 325,209
RAC: 447
United States
Message 1372604 - Posted: 28 May 2013, 0:54:44 UTC - in response to Message 1372592.
Last modified: 28 May 2013, 0:56:28 UTC

Many of these were a surprise to me.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/25/living/gallery/atheists/index.html?hpt=hp_c3

I am certainly not the only atheist, and have said many of the same things these atheists have said.

Steve


Thanks for the link, Steve. I had no idea Javier Bardem, was included.

musicplayer
Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 1361
Credit: 606,397
RAC: 1,428
Message 1372880 - Posted: 29 May 2013, 0:52:05 UTC
Last modified: 29 May 2013, 0:55:25 UTC

Why not try consolidating all of this a little bit?

My best guess is that you may be able to do science of value regardless of whether you are a "believer", an "atheist" or an "agnostic".

I guess you are not with me on this.

betreger
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 1752
Credit: 3,603,864
RAC: 8,002
United States
Message 1372906 - Posted: 29 May 2013, 2:12:31 UTC - in response to Message 1372880.

Why not try consolidating all of this a little bit?

My best guess is that you may be able to do science of value regardless of whether you are a "believer", an "atheist" or an "agnostic".

I guess you are not with me on this.

Some science of value , possibly much science but I think cosmology and biology could present problems for all but an agnostic.
____________

Profile Gary Charpentier
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 11732
Credit: 5,969,877
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1372922 - Posted: 29 May 2013, 3:46:58 UTC - in response to Message 1372906.

Some science of value , possibly much science but I think cosmology and biology could present problems for all but an agnostic.

You over limit as I think you only are considering a subset of the monotheist religions to encompass all believers.

____________

betreger
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 1752
Credit: 3,603,864
RAC: 8,002
United States
Message 1372928 - Posted: 29 May 2013, 3:56:38 UTC - in response to Message 1372922.

Some science of value , possibly much science but I think cosmology and biology could present problems for all but an agnostic.

You over limit as I think you only are considering a subset of the monotheist religions to encompass all believers.

Interesting point, however, IMO, if one believes, they do not allow for what is outside their belief system.
____________

Profile James Sotherden
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 16 May 99
Posts: 7892
Credit: 26,759,635
RAC: 29,041
United States
Message 1372931 - Posted: 29 May 2013, 4:09:15 UTC - in response to Message 1372928.

Some science of value , possibly much science but I think cosmology and biology could present problems for all but an agnostic.

You over limit as I think you only are considering a subset of the monotheist religions to encompass all believers.

Interesting point, however, IMO, if one believes, they do not allow for what is outside their belief system.


I dont think that is a true statement.Why cant a biologist who enjoys doing what they do also be religious?
____________

betreger
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 1752
Credit: 3,603,864
RAC: 8,002
United States
Message 1372933 - Posted: 29 May 2013, 4:25:56 UTC - in response to Message 1372931.

I dont think that is a true statement.Why cant a biologist who enjoys doing what they do also be religious?

Well if their work involves how life began and their religion says some exterior force was the prime cause they are going to have problems. Granted most biology research does not involve the origins of life.
____________

Profile Gary Charpentier
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 11732
Credit: 5,969,877
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1372954 - Posted: 29 May 2013, 5:48:04 UTC - in response to Message 1372933.

I dont think that is a true statement.Why cant a biologist who enjoys doing what they do also be religious?

Well if their work involves how life began and their religion says some exterior force was the prime cause they are going to have problems. Granted most biology research does not involve the origins of life.

Not all religions have a creator deity.

____________

Profile Guy
Volunteer moderator
Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 1987
Credit: 29,283,939
RAC: 134,913
United States
Message 1373036 - Posted: 29 May 2013, 12:21:11 UTC
Last modified: 21 Mar 2014, 19:18:12 UTC

--

Profile Chris S
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 19 Nov 00
Posts: 29507
Credit: 8,931,868
RAC: 26,247
United Kingdom
Message 1373049 - Posted: 29 May 2013, 13:13:30 UTC

How come you BILLIONS and BILLIONS and BILLIONS of atheists don't gather once a week to mourn the absence of GOD, just like the very small minority of the planet gets together once a week to celebrate the existence of GOD?

1. The current world population is estimated at 7 billion

2. The number of atheists is estimated at 2% or 140 million.

3. Religious folk are estimated at 84% or 5.9 billion

4. Non-religious 14% or 1 billion

Typical melodramatic response from Guy.

Profile John Neale
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 16 Mar 00
Posts: 480
Credit: 2,742,520
RAC: 2,646
South Africa
Message 1373061 - Posted: 29 May 2013, 13:57:17 UTC

Comme ci comme ça?

Amazingly, this was written in 1959!
____________

betreger
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 1752
Credit: 3,603,864
RAC: 8,002
United States
Message 1373136 - Posted: 29 May 2013, 21:44:12 UTC - in response to Message 1372954.

I dont think that is a true statement.Why cant a biologist who enjoys doing what they do also be religious?

Well if their work involves how life began and their religion says some exterior force was the prime cause they are going to have problems. Granted most biology research does not involve the origins of life.

Not all religions have a creator deity.

Gary, my copy of Webster states
the service and worship of God or the supernatural

I guess the implication is not all belief systems are religions.
____________

Profile Gary Charpentier
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 11732
Credit: 5,969,877
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1373148 - Posted: 29 May 2013, 22:00:37 UTC - in response to Message 1373136.

I dont think that is a true statement.Why cant a biologist who enjoys doing what they do also be religious?

Well if their work involves how life began and their religion says some exterior force was the prime cause they are going to have problems. Granted most biology research does not involve the origins of life.

Not all religions have a creator deity.

Gary, my copy of Webster states
the service and worship of God or the supernatural

I guess the implication is not all belief systems are religions.

The victors write the history.

____________

Profile Mr. Kevvy
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 15 May 99
Posts: 625
Credit: 61,633,900
RAC: 79,751
Canada
Message 1373203 - Posted: 30 May 2013, 0:41:42 UTC

{/lurk}

I'll just leave this here.

{lurk}
____________
“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has.”
--- Margaret Mead

Profile Guy
Volunteer moderator
Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 1987
Credit: 29,283,939
RAC: 134,913
United States
Message 1373637 - Posted: 30 May 2013, 17:44:31 UTC - in response to Message 1373203.
Last modified: 21 Mar 2014, 19:16:55 UTC

--

betreger
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 1752
Credit: 3,603,864
RAC: 8,002
United States
Message 1373968 - Posted: 31 May 2013, 3:56:52 UTC - in response to Message 1373148.

I dont think that is a true statement.Why cant a biologist who enjoys doing what they do also be religious?

Well if their work involves how life began and their religion says some exterior force was the prime cause they are going to have problems. Granted most biology research does not involve the origins of life.

Not all religions have a creator deity.

Gary, my copy of Webster states
the service and worship of God or the supernatural

I guess the implication is not all belief systems are religions.

The victors write the history.

Gary, definitions are very important, if someone else's definition is different than mine then I may not know what they are saying.
____________

betreger
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 1752
Credit: 3,603,864
RAC: 8,002
United States
Message 1373970 - Posted: 31 May 2013, 4:00:25 UTC - in response to Message 1373637.

Guy, a whole lot of people who believe in their faith could be a major contributing factor in the poor funding of basic science, such as this project.
____________

Profile Gary Charpentier
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 11732
Credit: 5,969,877
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1373983 - Posted: 31 May 2013, 4:42:18 UTC - in response to Message 1373968.

I dont think that is a true statement.Why cant a biologist who enjoys doing what they do also be religious?

Well if their work involves how life began and their religion says some exterior force was the prime cause they are going to have problems. Granted most biology research does not involve the origins of life.

Not all religions have a creator deity.

Gary, my copy of Webster states
the service and worship of God or the supernatural

I guess the implication is not all belief systems are religions.

The victors write the history.

Gary, definitions are very important, if someone else's definition is different than mine then I may not know what they are saying.

The point, if monotheists write the dictionary do define the word religion to mean belief in a single deity and as many of the monotheists religions, as organized anyway, have, at some time, required their followers to kill those who don't believe the same ...

So what can you call a belief system that does not "service God" or require "worship of God"? heathen? And I see Webster doesn't even allow for multiple God's.

OBW my dictionary app says:
religion
1) A strong belief in a supernatural power or powers that control human destiny
2) An institution to express belief in a divine power

Which is quite at odds with Webster.

Then there is http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/religion?s=t
1. a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.
2. a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects: the Christian religion; the Buddhist religion.
3. the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices: a world council of religions.
4. the life or state of a monk, nun, etc.: to enter religion.
5. the practice of religious beliefs; ritual observance of faith.

Which is again different.

I think I'll stick to my comment: The victors write the history.

____________

betreger
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 1752
Credit: 3,603,864
RAC: 8,002
United States
Message 1373995 - Posted: 31 May 2013, 5:18:04 UTC

Gary, your post just confirms my statement that definitions are important.
OBW, I think Webster calling on the supernatural allows for much, probably including multiple Gods, after all that would be supernatural.
____________

1 · 2 · Next

Message boards : Politics : Famous Atheists

Copyright © 2014 University of California