SETI Signal Type Distribution

Message boards : SETI@home Science : SETI Signal Type Distribution

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Bill Butler
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Aug 03
Posts: 101
Credit: 3,349,545
RAC: 3,262
United States
Message 1370144 - Posted: 20 May 2013, 22:54:55 UTC

On the Science status page, the Master Science Database table - I wondered what the distribution of those huge numbers was. Easy pie chart. Here are the results.






"It is often darkest just before it turns completely black."

ID: 1370144 · Report as offensive
Profile Bob DeWoody
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 May 10
Posts: 2696
Credit: 763,484
RAC: 2,349
United States
Message 1370190 - Posted: 21 May 2013, 4:06:07 UTC

So, what is the significance, if any, of the distribution?


Bob DeWoody

My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events.

ID: 1370190 · Report as offensive
Bill Butler
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Aug 03
Posts: 101
Credit: 3,349,545
RAC: 3,262
United States
Message 1370339 - Posted: 21 May 2013, 20:31:36 UTC

That is likely a question for the ongoing science research.

What I noticed:


    1. The short term 24 hour observation doesn't differ much from the entire signal database. The distribution of signal types is about the same. I was a little

    disappointed by that. I was hoping the sky would be more robust. One expects the huge longterm database to average out signal distribution. I wanted the short term

    distribution (24 hrs) to show a little "noise" and change significantly by comparison. Not sooooo.


    2. About half of the signal database is spikes, a suprise to me. This might emphasize the value of Astropulse. Astropulse searches for brief (0.4 μs to 204.8 μs)

    radio pulses. I guess I can call them spikes.


    3. I was pleasantly suprised by how many triplets are in the signal mix. We think these are on the high road to assembling an ETI signal.


    4. Caveats:

    We don't know how the signal distibution is affected by purely technical factors like:

    Arecibo just looks at a narrow band across the sky. Maybe other radio observatories will see a different signal distribution across the broader sky.

    I don't know what project scientists think about the amount of rfi contamination in the signal database. Hopefully the database is reasonably clean since there are rfi countermeasures in hardware and software.

    Potentially, the signal distribution could change if irrelevant technical side effects are removed or a broader SETI database is built.



"It is often darkest just before it turns completely black."

ID: 1370339 · Report as offensive
rob smithProject Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 03
Posts: 13295
Credit: 154,051,992
RAC: 111,910
United Kingdom
Message 1370349 - Posted: 21 May 2013, 20:43:13 UTC

A lot of effort is given to the problem of RFI, and blanking it out.

The orientation of Arecibo is such that its main axis is pretty much along our arm of the Milky Way, so it probably covers the bulk of the sky with the highest potential. However, as you say, other observatories will give a different view, particularly into the "off plane" regions.


Bob Smith
Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society)
Somewhere in the (un)known Universe?

ID: 1370349 · Report as offensive
Josef W. Segur
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 99
Posts: 4504
Credit: 1,414,761
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1370351 - Posted: 21 May 2013, 20:44:24 UTC - in response to Message 1370190.

So, what is the significance, if any, of the distribution?

Well, Spike searches are done first, so when there's a lot of RFI tasks tend to overflow and add another 31 Spikes to the total. And because Gaussian fitting is only used on WUs with medium angle range, the total for those is lower.

In short, the distribution indicates the thresholds for reporting signals are tuned as intended. That's about a 50% chance of normal noise being seen as one reportable signal in each WU.
                                                                   Joe

ID: 1370351 · Report as offensive
Profile ML1
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 9201
Credit: 5,925,179
RAC: 1,874
United Kingdom
Message 1370403 - Posted: 21 May 2013, 23:35:20 UTC - in response to Message 1370351.
Last modified: 21 May 2013, 23:36:27 UTC

So... That reported distribution is most likely an artifact of the analysis algorithm...


I find it interesting that even for what is essentially random input data, there are over 20% of the entries for triplets found. Also very intersting is that a 24hour period is very similar in results to the whole average over the many years.

Ofcourse, of far far greater interest is whether there are any few consistent sources with consistent findings for any sort of non-natural signal!


Keep searchin',
Martin


See new freedom: Mageia5
See & try out for yourself: Linux Voice
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)

ID: 1370403 · Report as offensive

Message boards : SETI@home Science : SETI Signal Type Distribution


 
©2016 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.