Sweet spot for price vs performance?

Questions and Answers : GPU applications : Sweet spot for price vs performance?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Andy Williams
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 May 01
Posts: 187
Credit: 112,464,820
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1358528 - Posted: 19 Apr 2013, 11:01:04 UTC

Hi all,

I have been running several MSI GTX 260s factory OC for several years. They are champs. They easily outperform 2 ASUS 450-series cards I have. I would like to upgrade for performance and less power consumption.

I really like the looks of MSI's GTX 660 factory OC 2 GB card with 960 CUDA cores for about $200. Going to a 680 is well over double the cost. Even 670s are almost double the cost.

What are your thoughts? The card is PCI Express 3.0, which will work in my PCI Express 2.0 slots as I understand it. How many WUs can I expect to run on such a card simultaneously?

Thanks.
--
Classic 82353 WU / 400979 h
ID: 1358528 · Report as offensive
Profile arkayn
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 May 99
Posts: 4438
Credit: 55,006,323
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1358573 - Posted: 19 Apr 2013, 15:20:36 UTC - in response to Message 1358528.  

I normally run 2 at a time on my card, but can easily go to 3 if I want too.

I leave it at 2 as this is also my primary system.

Shorties are coming in around 3 minutes on the 660 while the 670 does them in about 2:15.

ID: 1358573 · Report as offensive
Andy Williams
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 May 01
Posts: 187
Credit: 112,464,820
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1358741 - Posted: 20 Apr 2013, 1:32:33 UTC - in response to Message 1358573.  

Shorties are coming in around 3 minutes on the 660 while the 670 does them in about 2:15.


You are getting about double the performance of my 260s. I looked at my latest results. Running one WU at a time, the last 3 short WUs were 2:51, 2:53 and 2:58.
--
Classic 82353 WU / 400979 h
ID: 1358741 · Report as offensive

Questions and Answers : GPU applications : Sweet spot for price vs performance?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.