Panic Mode On (83) Server Problems?

Message boards : Number crunching : Panic Mode On (83) Server Problems?

1 · 2 · 3 · 4 . . . 22 · Next

Author	Message
arkayn Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 14 May 99 Posts: 3786 Credit: 48,777,915 RAC: 1,076	Message 1356408 - Posted: 13 Apr 2013, 0:03:38 UTC
	Starting to warm up here in the northern hemisphere and I am once again only crunching on the GPU's until November. ____________
	ID: 1356408 ·

zoom314 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 48010 Credit: 37,415,877 RAC: 4,839	Message 1356417 - Posted: 13 Apr 2013, 1:12:54 UTC
	Ok I've moved to Boinc 7.0.58 x64, so far, so good. ____________ My Facebook, War Commander, Under Dog
	ID: 1356417 ·

HAL9000 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 4833 Credit: 129,982,949 RAC: 41,851	Message 1356422 - Posted: 13 Apr 2013, 1:23:58 UTC - in response to Message 1356417.
	Ok I've moved to Boinc 7.0.58 x64, so far, so good. If you are not yet aware. BOINC v7 uses different cache settings. So instead of like 0 and 2, for a 2 day cache, you would want use 2 & 0.01. ____________ SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the BP6/VP6 User Group today!
	ID: 1356422 ·

Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 6100 Credit: 65,570,379 RAC: 44,520	Message 1356424 - Posted: 13 Apr 2013, 1:27:00 UTC - in response to Message 1356408.
	Starting to warm up here in the northern hemisphere and I am once again only crunching on the GPU's until November. Luckily even through the buildup i'm still able to crunch on both CPu & GPUs. Although the CPU runs in the mid 80s°c & the GPU in the mid 70s° with the fans almost flat out, they keep cool enough to not produce errors. ____________ Grant Darwin NT.
	ID: 1356424 ·

zoom314 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 48010 Credit: 37,415,877 RAC: 4,839	Message 1356432 - Posted: 13 Apr 2013, 2:06:40 UTC - in response to Message 1356422. Last modified: 13 Apr 2013, 2:10:22 UTC
	Ok I've moved to Boinc 7.0.58 x64, so far, so good. If you are not yet aware. BOINC v7 uses different cache settings. So instead of like 0 and 2, for a 2 day cache, you would want use 2 & 0.01. Mine is set for (Maintain)0.15 and (and up to)3 days, not like I'll see that much, but... I'm just having a problem with Boinctasks 1.46, I have to start BoincManager after BoincTasks to get Boinc to run, as starting Boinc from BT by itself doesn't seem to work like under 6.10.58, otherwise I'm not experiencing any problems. I've left a message to Fred on this. ____________ My Facebook, War Commander, Under Dog
	ID: 1356432 ·

HAL9000 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 4833 Credit: 129,982,949 RAC: 41,851	Message 1356433 - Posted: 13 Apr 2013, 2:25:32 UTC - in response to Message 1356432.
	Ok I've moved to Boinc 7.0.58 x64, so far, so good. If you are not yet aware. BOINC v7 uses different cache settings. So instead of like 0 and 2, for a 2 day cache, you would want use 2 & 0.01. Mine is set for (Maintain)0.15 and (and up to)3 days, not like I'll see that much, but... I'm just having a problem with Boinctasks 1.46, I have to start BoincManager after BoincTasks to get Boinc to run, as starting Boinc from BT by itself doesn't seem to work like under 6.10.58, otherwise I'm not experiencing any problems. I've left a message to Fred on this. With those settings BOINC will build up 3.15 days of work and then not ask for more work until the queue gets down to .15 days. As v7 works in a high to low queue mode now unlike v6. Maybe that is what you want. Just wanted to make sure you were aware of the change. ____________ SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the BP6/VP6 User Group today!
	ID: 1356433 ·

Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 6100 Credit: 65,570,379 RAC: 44,520	Message 1356434 - Posted: 13 Apr 2013, 2:35:37 UTC - in response to Message 1356433.
	With those settings BOINC will build up 3.15 days of work and then not ask for more work until the queue gets down to .15 days. As v7 works in a high to low queue mode now unlike v6. Maybe that is what you want. Just wanted to make sure you were aware of the change. Yep. As i mentioned in the other thread, if you want to maintain the same amount of work that you had with v6.x, you have to swap the cache values around. ____________ Grant Darwin NT.
	ID: 1356434 ·

zoom314 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 48010 Credit: 37,415,877 RAC: 4,839	Message 1356435 - Posted: 13 Apr 2013, 2:37:39 UTC - in response to Message 1356433.
	Ok I've moved to Boinc 7.0.58 x64, so far, so good. If you are not yet aware. BOINC v7 uses different cache settings. So instead of like 0 and 2, for a 2 day cache, you would want use 2 & 0.01. Mine is set for (Maintain)0.15 and (and up to)3 days, not like I'll see that much, but... I'm just having a problem with Boinctasks 1.46, I have to start BoincManager after BoincTasks to get Boinc to run, as starting Boinc from BT by itself doesn't seem to work like under 6.10.58, otherwise I'm not experiencing any problems. I've left a message to Fred on this. With those settings BOINC will build up 3.15 days of work and then not ask for more work until the queue gets down to .15 days. As v7 works in a high to low queue mode now unlike v6. Maybe that is what you want. Just wanted to make sure you were aware of the change. No, I'm talking about when one starts Boinc under BT, BT just has a lost connection status, I then have to start Boinc with BM, then close BM while leaving Boinc running. Fred should be able to handle this. ____________ My Facebook, War Commander, Under Dog
	ID: 1356435 ·

Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 6100 Credit: 65,570,379 RAC: 44,520	Message 1356441 - Posted: 13 Apr 2013, 3:15:23 UTC - in response to Message 1356435. Last modified: 13 Apr 2013, 3:15:34 UTC
	Looks like the shorty storm is abating. Network traffic has dropped off, results-returned-in-the-last-hour has declined, and the ready-to-send buffer is starting to recover. ____________ Grant Darwin NT.
	ID: 1356441 ·

HAL9000 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 4833 Credit: 129,982,949 RAC: 41,851	Message 1356444 - Posted: 13 Apr 2013, 3:42:52 UTC - in response to Message 1356435.
	Ok I've moved to Boinc 7.0.58 x64, so far, so good. If you are not yet aware. BOINC v7 uses different cache settings. So instead of like 0 and 2, for a 2 day cache, you would want use 2 & 0.01. Mine is set for (Maintain)0.15 and (and up to)3 days, not like I'll see that much, but... I'm just having a problem with Boinctasks 1.46, I have to start BoincManager after BoincTasks to get Boinc to run, as starting Boinc from BT by itself doesn't seem to work like under 6.10.58, otherwise I'm not experiencing any problems. I've left a message to Fred on this. With those settings BOINC will build up 3.15 days of work and then not ask for more work until the queue gets down to .15 days. As v7 works in a high to low queue mode now unlike v6. Maybe that is what you want. Just wanted to make sure you were aware of the change. No, I'm talking about when one starts Boinc under BT, BT just has a lost connection status, I then have to start Boinc with BM, then close BM while leaving Boinc running. Fred should be able to handle this. I wasn't talking about Boinctasks at all. Just BOINC & the cache settings. The manager you use has nothing to do with it. Well at least when using the web preferences. ____________ SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the BP6/VP6 User Group today!
	ID: 1356444 ·

zoom314 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 48010 Credit: 37,415,877 RAC: 4,839	Message 1356449 - Posted: 13 Apr 2013, 4:09:07 UTC - in response to Message 1356444.
	Ok I've moved to Boinc 7.0.58 x64, so far, so good. If you are not yet aware. BOINC v7 uses different cache settings. So instead of like 0 and 2, for a 2 day cache, you would want use 2 & 0.01. Mine is set for (Maintain)0.15 and (and up to)3 days, not like I'll see that much, but... I'm just having a problem with Boinctasks 1.46, I have to start BoincManager after BoincTasks to get Boinc to run, as starting Boinc from BT by itself doesn't seem to work like under 6.10.58, otherwise I'm not experiencing any problems. I've left a message to Fred on this. With those settings BOINC will build up 3.15 days of work and then not ask for more work until the queue gets down to .15 days. As v7 works in a high to low queue mode now unlike v6. Maybe that is what you want. Just wanted to make sure you were aware of the change. No, I'm talking about when one starts Boinc under BT, BT just has a lost connection status, I then have to start Boinc with BM, then close BM while leaving Boinc running. Fred should be able to handle this. I wasn't talking about Boinctasks at all. Just BOINC & the cache settings. The manager you use has nothing to do with it. Well at least when using the web preferences. Ok, but I was. ____________ My Facebook, War Commander, Under Dog
	ID: 1356449 ·

Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 6100 Credit: 65,570,379 RAC: 44,520	Message 1356491 - Posted: 13 Apr 2013, 8:07:54 UTC
	Another new record for download traffic- 470Mb/s. ____________ Grant Darwin NT.
	ID: 1356491 ·

Lionel Send message Joined: 25 Mar 00 Posts: 600 Credit: 255,198,304 RAC: 133,233	Message 1356513 - Posted: 13 Apr 2013, 9:53:38 UTC - in response to Message 1356491. Last modified: 13 Apr 2013, 9:55:14 UTC
	also try 640+kB/s as a personal download high ... that's right, bytes not bits per second ... at N=2 it is taking about 2-3 sec to download an entire MB WU ... the 640+kB was on an AP WU ... cheers all ____________
	ID: 1356513 ·

Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 6100 Credit: 65,570,379 RAC: 44,520	Message 1356875 - Posted: 14 Apr 2013, 17:48:05 UTC - in response to Message 1356513.
	Once again, the splitters are unable to keep up with demand, ready-to-send buffer continues to shrink. ____________ Grant Darwin NT.
	ID: 1356875 ·

Fred E. Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 22 Jul 99 Posts: 768 Credit: 24,139,004 RAC: 0	Message 1356886 - Posted: 14 Apr 2013, 18:05:29 UTC
	I seem to have misplaced the link for the server stats graphs that somebody posted a while back....that might confirm the trend. This one? http://setistats.haveland.com/#seti@home ____________ Another Fred Support SETI@home when you search the Web with GoodSearch or shop online with GoodShop.
	ID: 1356886 ·

Sliver Send message Joined: 18 May 11 Posts: 281 Credit: 7,192,984 RAC: 22	Message 1356903 - Posted: 14 Apr 2013, 18:35:50 UTC
	Shorty batch. buh. ____________
	ID: 1356903 ·

Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 8839 Credit: 103,723,803 RAC: 61,524	Message 1356952 - Posted: 14 Apr 2013, 21:06:27 UTC - in response to Message 1356903.
	Creation rate is low and certainly not keeping up with demand. Maybe my backup projects will get a touch up. Cheers.
	ID: 1356952 ·

Gone Send message Joined: 31 May 99 Posts: 150 Credit: 125,774,760 RAC: 0	Message 1356964 - Posted: 14 Apr 2013, 22:11:22 UTC - in response to Message 1356881. Last modified: 14 Apr 2013, 22:13:04 UTC
	http://setistats.haveland.com/#seti@home Are these the graphs you are looking for ? [Edit] Doh, someone already posted while I wasn't looking ____________
	ID: 1356964 ·

1 · 2 · 3 · 4 . . . 22 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Panic Mode On (83) Server Problems?