Discussion of what logic is and is not?

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Discussion of what logic is and is not?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3

AuthorMessage
Profile Sarge
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Aug 99
Posts: 12273
Credit: 8,569,109
RAC: 79
United States
Message 1360437 - Posted: 24 Apr 2013, 0:56:17 UTC - in response to Message 1360304.  

It is perhaps a poor name? If it relies on probability, then I am willing to bet there's a completely logically foundation for fuzzy logic, which in turn relies on the axiomatic set up on probability I already mentioned.

There is only one way in which I came anywhere close to fuzzy logic of which I am aware. A prof had handed off to me something he had not been able to completely solve. He thought it would only get to a certain point and then would have to go off into something probabilistic. (We knew we could not determine the number of some things completely and why. But, I was able to show him that through a change in perspective we could determine it concretely with only one thing unknown, eliminating the need for probabilistic solutions.)
ID: 1360437 · Report as offensive
Profile Sarge
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Aug 99
Posts: 12273
Credit: 8,569,109
RAC: 79
United States
Message 1360452 - Posted: 24 Apr 2013, 2:51:45 UTC

Errr, completely logical.
ID: 1360452 · Report as offensive
Profile Sarge
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Aug 99
Posts: 12273
Credit: 8,569,109
RAC: 79
United States
Message 1360896 - Posted: 25 Apr 2013, 4:05:45 UTC

Course run.
ID: 1360896 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Discussion of what logic is and is not?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.