SETI@home's Best Gaussians

http://seticlassic.ssl.berkeley.edu/Candidates/index.html

1.SHGb11+15a (2.682e-17)
2.SHGb22+12b (1.258e-16)
3.SHGb05+18a (1.263e-16)
4.SHGb06+12a (8.179e-16)
5.SHGb06+18a (9.005e-16)
6.SHGb14+23a (1.326e-15)
7.SHGb00+18a (1.889e-15)
8.SHGb03+18a (2.181e-15)
9.SHGb03+18b (2.792e-15)
10.SHGb15+17a (1.528e-09)
11.SHGb15+17b (1.639e-09)
12.SHGb19+10a (1.982e-09)
13.SHGb22+14a (1.982e-09)
14.SHGb06+13a (2.029e-09)
15.SHGb00+21a (2.222e-09)
16.SHGb09+17a (2.222e-09)
17.SHGb00+21b (2.222e-09)
18.SHGb12+20a (2.474e-09)
19.SHGb06+10a (2.519e-09)
20.SHGb02+14a (2.567e-09)
21.SHGb21+20a (2.669e-09)
22.SHGb04+14a (2.707e-09)
23.SHGb14+13a (2.757e-09)
24.SHGb22+23a (2.778e-09)
25.SHGb08+11a (2.786e-09)

Which should then be as follows:

Score Power Fit

2.682e-17
1.258e-16
1.263e-16
8.179e-16
9.005e-16
1.326e-15
1.889e-15
2.181e-15
2.792e-15
1.528e-09
1.639e-09
1.982e-09
1.982e-09
2.029e-09
2.222e-09
2.222e-09
2.222e-09
2.474e-09
2.519e-09
2.567e-09
2.669e-09
2.707e-09
2.757e-09
2.778e-09
2.786e-09

And possibly replacing - with + as well.

I guess it is back to doing the science thing.