Panic Mode On (81) Server Problems?

Message boards : Number crunching : Panic Mode On (81) Server Problems?

Previous · 1 . . . 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 . . . 21 · Next

Author	Message
Fred E. Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 22 Jul 99 Posts: 436 Credit: 12,952,893 RAC: 35,211	Message 1335155 - Posted: 6 Feb 2013, 11:57:22 UTC
	Just got the first connect in about 30 hours and got some gpu tasks. I'm not using a proxy. Think it's just because of the relatively light load at this time of day and not a sign that anything has been fixed. ____________ Another Fred Support SETI@home when you search the Web or shop online with GoodSearch and GoodShop
	ID: 1335155 ·

N9JFE Send message Joined: 4 Oct 99 Posts: 2518 Credit: 8,422,639 RAC: 14,794	Message 1335164 - Posted: 6 Feb 2013, 15:20:39 UTC
	My GPU-only rig has 99 in progress. My i7 has 200 in progress and a bunch of new ghost timeouts. Both made contact within the last half hour. ____________ David Sitting on my butt while others boldly go, Waiting for a message from a small furry creature from Alpha Centauri.
	ID: 1335164 ·

skildude Send message Joined: 4 Oct 00 Posts: 8942 Credit: 36,636,721 RAC: 60,115	Message 1335167 - Posted: 6 Feb 2013, 15:33:07 UTC
	I am able to upload and receive work. I cannot return the WU's though ____________ Proud member of TSWB. End terrorism by building a school
	ID: 1335167 ·

TRuEQ & TuVaLu Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 4 Oct 99 Posts: 282 Credit: 8,647,118 RAC: 10,386	Message 1335170 - Posted: 6 Feb 2013, 16:33:36 UTC - in response to Message 1335167.
	I am able to upload and receive work. I cannot return the WU's though You are lucky. I can't reach the servers today.....
	ID: 1335170 ·

Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 5059 Credit: 40,862,522 RAC: 52,921	Message 1335174 - Posted: 6 Feb 2013, 17:50:30 UTC - in response to Message 1335170. Last modified: 6 Feb 2013, 18:26:47 UTC
	Still struggling to contact the Scheduler. "Couldn't connect to server" is the usual reply. Still. EDIT- it's taken me half an hour of endless retries just to report the work done overnight. Now to see how long it takes to get some more work. EDIT- about 15min for one system, almost 30min for the other. ____________ Grant Darwin NT.
	ID: 1335174 ·

Philip Stehno Send message Joined: 17 May 99 Posts: 6 Credit: 4,397,531 RAC: 3,983	Message 1335267 - Posted: 6 Feb 2013, 22:00:54 UTC
	I keep getting: 2/6/2013 4:54:22 PM \| SETI@home \| Scheduler request failed: HTTP bad gateway any fixes? or just need to keep waiting.
	ID: 1335267 ·

Bernie Vine Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 26 May 99 Posts: 5675 Credit: 14,265,492 RAC: 51,348	Message 1335268 - Posted: 6 Feb 2013, 22:11:49 UTC - in response to Message 1335267.
	I keep getting: 2/6/2013 4:54:22 PM \| SETI@home \| Scheduler request failed: HTTP bad gateway any fixes? or just need to keep waiting. Looks like an expired proxy. Working OK for me. 7391 SETI@home 06/02/2013 22:06:30 Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. 7392 SETI@home 06/02/2013 22:06:30 Reporting 27 completed tasks, requesting new tasks for CPU and NVIDIA 7393 SETI@home 06/02/2013 22:07:53 Scheduler request completed: got 27 new tasks ____________
	ID: 1335268 ·

fscheel Send message Joined: 13 Apr 12 Posts: 73 Credit: 11,135,641 RAC: 41	Message 1335270 - Posted: 6 Feb 2013, 22:21:24 UTC - in response to Message 1335268.
	I keep getting: 2/6/2013 4:54:22 PM \| SETI@home \| Scheduler request failed: HTTP bad gateway any fixes? or just need to keep waiting. Looks like an expired proxy. Working OK for me. 7391 SETI@home 06/02/2013 22:06:30 Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. 7392 SETI@home 06/02/2013 22:06:30 Reporting 27 completed tasks, requesting new tasks for CPU and NVIDIA 7393 SETI@home 06/02/2013 22:07:53 Scheduler request completed: got 27 new tasks I get that also..then on the next try it will connect..
	ID: 1335270 ·

juan BFB Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 16 Mar 07 Posts: 2446 Credit: 152,168,627 RAC: 407,751	Message 1335271 - Posted: 6 Feb 2013, 22:25:14 UTC - in response to Message 1335268.
	I keep getting: 2/6/2013 4:54:22 PM \| SETI@home \| Scheduler request failed: HTTP bad gateway any fixes? or just need to keep waiting. Looks like an expired proxy. Working OK for me. 7391 SETI@home 06/02/2013 22:06:30 Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. 7392 SETI@home 06/02/2013 22:06:30 Reporting 27 completed tasks, requesting new tasks for CPU and NVIDIA 7393 SETI@home 06/02/2013 22:07:53 Scheduler request completed: got 27 new tasks I agree that is normaly a proxy error but still nothing here: 06/02/2013 20:22:12 \| SETI@home \| Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. 06/02/2013 20:22:12 \| SETI@home \| Reporting 20 completed tasks 06/02/2013 20:22:12 \| SETI@home \| Requesting new tasks for CPU and NVIDIA 06/02/2013 20:22:36 \| SETI@home \| Scheduler request failed: Couldn't connect to server 06/02/2013 20:22:50 \| \| Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site 06/02/2013 20:22:54 \| \| Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down. ____________
	ID: 1335271 ·

soft^spirit Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 6231 Credit: 27,514,409 RAC: 9,410	Message 1335309 - Posted: 7 Feb 2013, 0:27:29 UTC
	2/6/2013 4:06:56 PM \| SETI@home \| Scheduler request failed: Failure when receiving data from the peer 2/6/2013 4:07:10 PM \| \| Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site 2/6/2013 4:07:12 PM \| \| Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down. _______________________________________________________________________ 2/6/2013 4:22:30 PM \| SETI@home \| Scheduler request failed: Failure when receiving data from the peer 2/6/2013 4:22:44 PM \| \| Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site 2/6/2013 4:22:46 PM \| \| Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down. more often than not. ____________ Janice
	ID: 1335309 ·

Cosmic_Ocean Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 2079 Credit: 6,724,082 RAC: 4,752	Message 1335355 - Posted: 7 Feb 2013, 4:59:16 UTC - in response to Message 1335148.
	I suppose it's a question of scale, I run one medium cruncher here on SETI@Home 6851722 And 5 medium to slow on Seti Beta, yet have not had any problems keeping my modest caches filled. I don't babysit my machines very much. 6851772 has download it's maximum tasks today without any help from me. So from my perspective there are no problems!! Same here for the most part. My old single-core non-GPU machine (4082448) is a "set and forget" machine. I just use BM to see what it's doing about once a week, but other than that, it uploads, reports, and downloads without any intervention and has absolutely zero problems maintaining a modest 2.5-day cache. That usually means 10-15 MBs in total. My current machine (6392429) chews through 6 APs/day and has nearly zero issues maintaining a full 10-day cache, which is 55-65 APs. It probably doesn't need babysitting, but since that is my daily driver, I like to push buttons and move things along. Aside from that, if I leave it to its own devices, it probably would end up running dry due to 18-hour project back-offs and such. ____________ Linux laptop uptime: 1484d 22h 42m Ended due to UPS failure, found 14 hours after the fact
	ID: 1335355 ·

Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 5059 Credit: 40,862,522 RAC: 52,921	Message 1335382 - Posted: 7 Feb 2013, 6:39:16 UTC - in response to Message 1335355. Last modified: 7 Feb 2013, 6:41:28 UTC
	Same here for the most part. Where as for me the Scheduler is still borked. Most requests result in "Couldn't connect to server". If i'm lucky, i do get a connection before the backoffs become ridiculous. Otherwise it's hitting Retry for an hour or so to report & then get more work. ____________ Grant Darwin NT.
	ID: 1335382 ·

Cosmic_Ocean Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 2079 Credit: 6,724,082 RAC: 4,752	Message 1335405 - Posted: 7 Feb 2013, 7:38:31 UTC - in response to Message 1335382.
	Same here for the most part. Where as for me the Scheduler is still borked. Most requests result in "Couldn't connect to server". If i'm lucky, i do get a connection before the backoffs become ridiculous. Otherwise it's hitting Retry for an hour or so to report & then get more work. Well after my post, I had just reported 5 completed tasks and wasn't requesting new work. After the 303-second delay, it started asking for more work on its own. Five "couldn't connect to server" failures in a row followed by getting one single AP to satisfy 83.25 seconds of work request. That AP managed to only stall/time-out twice before completion. That's about the best I've seen it be "set and forget" since I switched to something higher than 6.2.19. Two weeks ago, it took 20+ attempts to get the scheduler to respond, and after a few hours, I had nearly 20 APs trying to download. Hours of button-pushing finally got them through.. even with the assistance of a proxy. So I have definitely seen way worse, but it could still be much better. ____________ Linux laptop uptime: 1484d 22h 42m Ended due to UPS failure, found 14 hours after the fact
	ID: 1335405 ·

Ex Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 12 Mar 12 Posts: 2883 Credit: 1,158,956 RAC: 830	Message 1335406 - Posted: 7 Feb 2013, 7:45:45 UTC Last modified: 7 Feb 2013, 7:46:53 UTC
	I've been watching this thread for a couple days, all the while my RAC has been rising and my active machines' 12 cores (16 threads) and 1 small GPU have been busy. However as soft said, most request for work result in: Thu 07 Feb 2013 02:26:05 AM EST \| \| Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site Thu 07 Feb 2013 02:26:05 AM EST \| SETI@home \| Scheduler request failed: Couldn't connect to server Thu 07 Feb 2013 02:26:07 AM EST \| \| Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down. I have my Boinc set for 4 days and additional .01 ____________ -Dave #2 3.2.0-33
	ID: 1335406 ·

Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 5059 Credit: 40,862,522 RAC: 52,921	Message 1335419 - Posted: 7 Feb 2013, 9:20:22 UTC - in response to Message 1335406.
	I have my Boinc set for 4 days and additional .01 There are presently server side limits in place. 100 WUs per CPU & 100WUs per GPU. Which means with a bunch of shorties my GPU can go through them all in a couple of hours. ____________ Grant Darwin NT.
	ID: 1335419 ·

Vipin Palazhi Send message Joined: 29 Feb 08 Posts: 218 Credit: 73,958,969 RAC: 123,613	Message 1335430 - Posted: 7 Feb 2013, 12:42:22 UTC Last modified: 7 Feb 2013, 12:47:30 UTC
	None of my machines are able to report back to the servers, all requests are timing out. Is there any news from the seti staff regarding this prolonged issue? I will try abusing the retry button, something which I have never done before.
	ID: 1335430 ·

juan BFB Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 16 Mar 07 Posts: 2446 Credit: 152,168,627 RAC: 407,751	Message 1335434 - Posted: 7 Feb 2013, 13:08:05 UTC
	No SETI WU for the last 5 days here too. ____________
	ID: 1335434 ·

ExchangeMan Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 9 Jan 00 Posts: 67 Credit: 41,687,801 RAC: 226,540	Message 1335437 - Posted: 7 Feb 2013, 13:23:15 UTC
	It seems like the only way to get work units and report back is constant baby sitting. Hey I still need to go to work so that's where I get my break. I really wish the Seti management would make some official statements as to whether we can hold out any hope for improvements in the near future. It sucks when you invest money into hardware, GPUs, etc for Seti and have to battle this out. I've played with Einstein a little, but still highly prefer to crunch exclusively for Seti. Maybe too many people thinking like me. ____________
	ID: 1335437 ·

Vipin Palazhi Send message Joined: 29 Feb 08 Posts: 218 Credit: 73,958,969 RAC: 123,613	Message 1335441 - Posted: 7 Feb 2013, 13:51:29 UTC - in response to Message 1335437.
	I've played with Einstein a little, but still highly prefer to crunch exclusively for Seti. Maybe too many people thinking like me. I too am feeling something like that. I crunch exclusively for seti and the lack of information from the staff is highly disheartening. Oh well, I shall just wait.
	ID: 1335441 ·

Spiked Punch Send message Joined: 8 Dec 01 Posts: 10 Credit: 11,045,395 RAC: 30,425	Message 1335451 - Posted: 7 Feb 2013, 14:51:00 UTC - in response to Message 1335441.
	I've played with Einstein a little, but still highly prefer to crunch exclusively for Seti. Maybe too many people thinking like me. I too am feeling something like that. I crunch exclusively for seti and the lack of information from the staff is highly disheartening. Oh well, I shall just wait. Another voice in the chorus, and another two cents in the SETI@Home swear jar. I have to push it constantly to get anything reported or new tasks, it is practically like a watched pot every time. ____________
	ID: 1335451 ·

Previous · 1 . . . 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 . . . 21 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Panic Mode On (81) Server Problems?