Message boards :
Number crunching :
Open beta for OpenCL AstroPulse for Intel GPUs started
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 . . . 6 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
hbomber Send message Joined: 2 May 01 Posts: 437 Credit: 50,852,854 RAC: 0 |
I'll join the test tonight also, got i3-3225 today. |
Raistmer Send message Joined: 16 Jun 01 Posts: 6325 Credit: 106,370,077 RAC: 121 |
I'll join the test tonight also, got i3-3225 today. Good news! Regarding work fetch - not so easy as I thought. I recive _only_AP now.. so CPU sits idle. Reported issue on BOINC alpha mail list. Think the reason in gpu_intel support. It supported in client but not in server code. So server thinks it sends CPU work while client accepts it as GPU Intel work... and ask more for CPU and so on and so forth. Had to switch venue to one that will not ask AP work at all to fill CPU queue with some MB tasks. SETI apps news We're not gonna fight them. We're gonna transcend them. |
Claggy Send message Joined: 5 Jul 99 Posts: 4654 Credit: 47,537,079 RAC: 4 |
I'll join the test tonight also, got i3-3225 today. I had the same problem at Collatz, David changed in Boinc 7.0.34 what device name the client reported to the scheduler from CUDA to NVIDIA (when running anonymous platform), projects with older Boinc server software wouldn't sent GPU work unless CPU work was also requested, then it suddenly became GPU work: No work available for the applications you have selected Claggy |
zombie67 [MM] Send message Joined: 22 Apr 04 Posts: 758 Credit: 27,771,894 RAC: 0 |
this one gets work OK: BOINC says there is an error with this app_info.xml. But I can't find it. I tried it with both .52 and .54. 1 3/11/2013 9:40:12 AM Starting BOINC client version 7.0.52 for windows_x86_64 2 3/11/2013 9:40:12 AM log flags: file_xfer, sched_ops, task, sched_op_debug 3 3/11/2013 9:40:12 AM Libraries: libcurl/7.25.0 OpenSSL/1.0.1 zlib/1.2.6 4 3/11/2013 9:40:12 AM Data directory: C:\ProgramData\BOINC 5 3/11/2013 9:40:12 AM Running under account zombie67 6 3/11/2013 9:40:12 AM Processor: 8 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770S CPU @ 3.10GHz [Family 6 Model 58 Stepping 9] 7 3/11/2013 9:40:12 AM Processor: 256.00 KB cache 8 3/11/2013 9:40:12 AM Processor features: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss htt tm pni ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes syscall nx lm vmx smx tm2 pbe 9 3/11/2013 9:40:12 AM OS: Microsoft Windows 8: Professional x64 Edition, (06.02.9200.00) 10 3/11/2013 9:40:12 AM Memory: 15.90 GB physical, 18.15 GB virtual 11 3/11/2013 9:40:12 AM Disk: 465.42 GB total, 309.34 GB free 12 3/11/2013 9:40:12 AM Local time is UTC -7 hours 13 3/11/2013 9:40:12 AM VirtualBox version: 4.2.6 14 3/11/2013 9:40:12 AM OpenCL: Intel GPU 0: Intel(R) HD Graphics 4000 (driver version 9.17.10.2932, device version OpenCL 1.1, 1624MB, 1624MB available, 45 GFLOPS peak) 15 SETI@home 3/11/2013 9:40:12 AM Found app_info.xml; using anonymous platform 16 SETI@home 3/11/2013 9:40:12 AM Syntax error in app_info.xml Dublin, California Team: SETI.USA |
William Send message Joined: 14 Feb 13 Posts: 2037 Credit: 17,689,662 RAC: 0 |
this one gets work OK: You did surround the 'works ok' example with <app_info> </app_info> tags? No offence meant, just checking. A person who won't read has no advantage over one who can't read. (Mark Twain) |
zombie67 [MM] Send message Joined: 22 Apr 04 Posts: 758 Credit: 27,771,894 RAC: 0 |
You did surround the 'works ok' example with *smacks forehead* Duh, that's it. Thanks! Edit: Now, if I could only get some tasks. I have everything selected in my project preferences. All devices and all applications. Also, "If no work for selected applications is available, accept work from other applications?" is yes. 361 SETI@home 3/11/2013 10:46:33 AM [sched_op] Starting scheduler request 362 SETI@home 3/11/2013 10:46:33 AM Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. 363 SETI@home 3/11/2013 10:46:33 AM Requesting new tasks for intel_gpu 364 SETI@home 3/11/2013 10:46:33 AM [sched_op] CPU work request: 0.00 seconds; 0.00 devices 365 SETI@home 3/11/2013 10:46:33 AM [sched_op] intel_gpu work request: 108000.00 seconds; 1.00 devices 366 SETI@home 3/11/2013 10:46:40 AM Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 367 SETI@home 3/11/2013 10:46:40 AM [sched_op] Server version 701 368 SETI@home 3/11/2013 10:46:40 AM No tasks sent 369 SETI@home 3/11/2013 10:46:40 AM No tasks are available for SETI@home Enhanced 370 SETI@home 3/11/2013 10:46:40 AM No tasks are available for Astropulse v505 371 SETI@home 3/11/2013 10:46:40 AM No tasks are available for SETI@home v7 372 SETI@home 3/11/2013 10:46:40 AM No tasks are available for AstroPulse v6 373 SETI@home 3/11/2013 10:46:40 AM Project has no tasks available Dublin, California Team: SETI.USA |
Holmis Send message Joined: 1 Jun 99 Posts: 30 Credit: 951,184 RAC: 0 |
361 SETI@home 3/11/2013 10:46:33 AM [sched_op] Starting scheduler request That's exactly the same as I got. Haven't tried for a few day now as I'm waiting on a response over on the Intel board on why all OpenCL apps ran on the Intel HD Graphics stall when I turn my TV/monitor off. The only way I was able to get any work was by adding another AP-app to the app_info and then manually reschedule the tasks to the Intel GPU. I think that Claggy's comment about the server backend not being able to handle Intel GPUs yet is correct. |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
361 SETI@home 3/11/2013 10:46:33 AM [sched_op] Starting scheduler request For starters AP's have not been produced for a several days now and until new files are loaded there won't be any other than resends (see server page for those details). Also rescheduling tasks from CPU to GPU (and visa versa) is not a very good idea at all as has been discussed many times before. Cheers. |
Holmis Send message Joined: 1 Jun 99 Posts: 30 Credit: 951,184 RAC: 0 |
Also rescheduling tasks from CPU to GPU (and visa versa) is not a very good idea at all as has been discussed many times before. Yeah I've read about that and I only did it to test a suggestion from the Intel Developers forum. Won't be doing it again if not absolutely necessary. |
trader Send message Joined: 25 Jun 00 Posts: 126 Credit: 4,968,173 RAC: 0 |
[quote]Binaries are available here: http://lunatics.kwsn.net/12-gpu-crunching/open-beta-for-intel-opencl-ap-application.0.html To check if your intel processor supports OpenCL for GPU check this list: http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/opencl-release-notes/#2 [quote] looked for thintel sdk on the intel site with the link provided else where in this thread. couldnt find where exactly to download. also just for my own curiousity is there a reason you use the 7zip format for your dl's and not regular zip format? i really hate having to install software on my system that isnt needed. I RTFM and it was WYSIWYG then i found out it was a PEBKAC error |
hbomber Send message Joined: 2 May 01 Posts: 437 Credit: 50,852,854 RAC: 0 |
I ran several APs I had here, while there weren't new units split. I hit several problems. First - when you close most programs, I'm certain on Firefox, IE9, GPU-Z, Paint, crunching stops and needs BOINC restart or snooze/unsnooze. All cores were free during all my tests, so problem isn't there. This is game breaker unfortunately. Second - I'm using BOINC 6.10.58, heavily modified by me version, but just cosmetics, and problem is that it runs ALL AP tasks at once. I had to suspend them(more on this later) and allow them running one by one manually. And finally, suspend doesn't work at all - tasks remains running, so it needs additional BOINC restart(at least it marks it suspended in client_state.xml). I understand my BOINC/Manager version is very outdated, but warning about this behavior is needed - I'm not sure is this app supposed to run on such old BOINC version at any future moment. I'm gonna run Intel OpenCL app now on live data and as I'm not into BOINC bugs or misfeatures itself, which version will be best to use? As for performance. Those WUs I ran, were zero blanked tasks, crunched before with 4.6 GHz 2500K. Times were little above 15K seconds. On Intel GPU, HD4000, they took 9200-9300 second per WU, which is good enough, even very good. It differs big time from what I saw so far, as times, listed from users here, and it is unexplainable for me. Perhaps my relatively fast memory helps alot, but I doubt it is that much. Memory is running 1866 8-8-8-24 1T. Overclocking is not giving a big deal - from 1050 MHz to 1350 MHz gave like 17% crunch time decrease, but almost doubled power consumption(well, its not a problem, it still barely reaches 14W). As for start parameters. Just leave it with default parameters, my tests say. There are slight decreases with some other combinations of parameters, but not more than 1.7% by my measures. I'm excited about this app, it could bring more RAC from weak CPU as my i3-3225, almost can double it, but only when first problem, with sudden stops, if fixed somehow. Ah, forgot to mention - turning monitor on/off by power policy or intentionally with program able to do it, doesn't affect crunching. It was fixed for me with latest(current) drivers. I'll run tests for a week or so only. It has Windows 2003 installation, where it serves its purposes. When this app is mature, I'll definitely switch to other OS, where Intel OpenCL can run. |
hbomber Send message Joined: 2 May 01 Posts: 437 Credit: 50,852,854 RAC: 0 |
Well, whats wrong again?!?! Whole day not a single task assigned to the host. 3/14/2013 9:10:51 PM | SETI@home | update requested by user 3/14/2013 9:10:55 PM | SETI@home | [sched_op] Starting scheduler request 3/14/2013 9:10:55 PM | SETI@home | Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. 3/14/2013 9:10:55 PM | SETI@home | Requesting new tasks for intel_gpu 3/14/2013 9:10:55 PM | SETI@home | [sched_op] CPU work request: 0.00 seconds; 0.00 devices 3/14/2013 9:10:55 PM | SETI@home | [sched_op] intel_gpu work request: 864000.00 seconds; 1.00 devices 3/14/2013 9:11:02 PM | SETI@home | Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 3/14/2013 9:11:02 PM | SETI@home | [sched_op] Server version 701 3/14/2013 9:11:02 PM | SETI@home | No tasks sent 3/14/2013 9:11:02 PM | SETI@home | No tasks are available for SETI@home Enhanced 3/14/2013 9:11:02 PM | SETI@home | No tasks are available for Astropulse v505 3/14/2013 9:11:02 PM | SETI@home | No tasks are available for AstroPulse v6 3/14/2013 9:11:02 PM | SETI@home | Project has no tasks available 3/14/2013 9:11:02 PM | SETI@home | Project requested delay of 303 seconds 3/14/2013 9:11:02 PM | SETI@home | [sched_op] Deferring communication for 5 min 3 sec 3/14/2013 9:11:02 PM | SETI@home | [sched_op] Reason: requested by project |
Raistmer Send message Joined: 16 Jun 01 Posts: 6325 Credit: 106,370,077 RAC: 121 |
1) Regarding BOINC version. You use BOINC w/o OpenCL support. So it can't properly handle GPU apps. It looks into their CPU share perhaps and launches many tasks at once cause CPU share is low. For such old configs ALL my GPU apps have so called "GPUlock" feature. Now, with BOINC 7 introduction, it disabled by default but still presents. Read ReadMe file and try corresponding switches listed there. Or BOINC 7.0.52 and up that understand what Intel GPU is. 2)Regarding app stops on firefox and so on closing. Definitely not app-level issue. So please take time to report your config and findings on Intel forum (look links above for corresponding thread there). This was reported issue already but Intel's support still has no clue how to fix this. Does your host has another GPU ? 3) I found that crunching time strongly depends (as with other OpenCL flavors) from CPU load. But for my own host leaving cores free is waste of resourses (I have HD2500 not HD4000) so i crunch with full cores busy + GPU AP. SETI apps news We're not gonna fight them. We're gonna transcend them. |
zombie67 [MM] Send message Joined: 22 Apr 04 Posts: 758 Credit: 27,771,894 RAC: 0 |
Has anyone been able to get any tasks? I know the AP queue is empty, but I haven't even been able to get resends over the past three days. So I am not sure if the would issue them to me, if they were available. Dublin, California Team: SETI.USA |
Mike Send message Joined: 17 Feb 01 Posts: 34257 Credit: 79,922,639 RAC: 80 |
I got 4 at least. With each crime and every kindness we birth our future. |
trader Send message Joined: 25 Jun 00 Posts: 126 Credit: 4,968,173 RAC: 0 |
[quote]Binaries are available here: http://lunatics.kwsn.net/12-gpu-crunching/open-beta-for-intel-opencl-ap-application.0.html quote] could someone convert this file to zip format for me. pm me if you are willing I RTFM and it was WYSIWYG then i found out it was a PEBKAC error |
arkayn Send message Joined: 14 May 99 Posts: 4438 Credit: 55,006,323 RAC: 0 |
[quote]Binaries are available here: Why, 7-zip is a very good application. http://www.7-zip.org/ |
trader Send message Joined: 25 Jun 00 Posts: 126 Credit: 4,968,173 RAC: 0 |
[quote]Binaries are available here: because windows has a built in zip extractor. and i do not like adding software that i do not need. I RTFM and it was WYSIWYG then i found out it was a PEBKAC error |
Raistmer Send message Joined: 16 Jun 01 Posts: 6325 Credit: 106,370,077 RAC: 121 |
LoL, how you define "needed software" then if you can't use app because you don't have archiver to extract binaries? Some "search toolbar" installed together with "free" app and never used - that's unneeded software. But archiver required for extraction - is very needed software. I would say even "must have" one. And what included in Windows doesn't really matter. Prev Windows did not have even zip, but peoples used zip, rar, arj, uc2 and so on even w/o M$ help. Archivers are system software that should present on host. SETI apps news We're not gonna fight them. We're gonna transcend them. |
trader Send message Joined: 25 Jun 00 Posts: 126 Credit: 4,968,173 RAC: 0 |
i do not install search toolbars or any toolbar for that matter. and i owned a current copy of zip (pre windows days) and winzip up until windows incoperated a zip extractor at which time i stopped installing winzip. even whan i buy hardware 95% of the stuff that comes with it is not installed. I RTFM and it was WYSIWYG then i found out it was a PEBKAC error |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.