Why are we still having to debate about abortion?


log in

Advanced search

Message boards : Politics : Why are we still having to debate about abortion?

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4
Author Message
Profile Scary Capitalist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 21 May 01
Posts: 7407
Credit: 76,869
RAC: 41
United States
Message 1332186 - Posted: 28 Jan 2013, 7:38:55 UTC - in response to Message 1330643.

You still are not addressing the issue of personhood. Regardless of what someone believes on the issue there should be an agreement that the judgement should be based upon what that actually is and not emotional or mystical arguments.


____________
Founder of BOINC team Objectivists. Oh the humanity! Rational people crunching data!
I did NOT authorize this belly writing!

Profile Es99Project donor
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 23 Aug 05
Posts: 9030
Credit: 256,224
RAC: 125
Canada
Message 1332254 - Posted: 28 Jan 2013, 16:23:53 UTC - in response to Message 1332186.

You still are not addressing the issue of personhood. Regardless of what someone believes on the issue there should be an agreement that the judgement should be based upon what that actually is and not emotional or mystical arguments.


Robert, the issue of personhood has been addressed lots of times in this thread.
____________
Are you a feminist? Take the test

Profile Gary CharpentierProject donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 12754
Credit: 7,297,177
RAC: 17,971
United States
Message 1332370 - Posted: 28 Jan 2013, 23:40:58 UTC - in response to Message 1332254.

You still are not addressing the issue of personhood. Regardless of what someone believes on the issue there should be an agreement that the judgement should be based upon what that actually is and not emotional or mystical arguments.


Robert, the issue of personhood has been addressed lots of times in this thread.

see http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=70637&postid=1330237 for instance ...

____________

Profile betregerProject donor
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 2501
Credit: 5,244,798
RAC: 8,202
United States
Message 1332375 - Posted: 29 Jan 2013, 0:02:40 UTC

The tax deduction for a dependent occurs in the year of birth not the year of conception.
____________

Profile Sarge
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Aug 99
Posts: 9258
Credit: 1,505,398
RAC: 1,610
United States
Message 1332383 - Posted: 29 Jan 2013, 0:48:27 UTC - in response to Message 1332375.

The tax deduction for a dependent occurs in the year of birth not the year of conception.

Anyone see a contradiction? :)

Terror Australis
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 14 Feb 04
Posts: 1716
Credit: 205,851,474
RAC: 28,017
Australia
Message 1332396 - Posted: 29 Jan 2013, 2:35:45 UTC
Last modified: 29 Jan 2013, 2:36:40 UTC

If a woman miscarries naturally in the first trimester it is not recorded as a birth.

I'm not sure, but I think that in Australia it only counts as a "legal" birth from the end of the second trimester. i.e. The baby had a chance of independent existence.

T.A.

Profile Gary CharpentierProject donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 12754
Credit: 7,297,177
RAC: 17,971
United States
Message 1332420 - Posted: 29 Jan 2013, 4:47:59 UTC - in response to Message 1332396.

If a woman miscarries naturally in the first trimester it is not recorded as a birth.

In California, under 20 weeks gestation no record is made, even if induced.


____________

Profile Ex
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 12 Mar 12
Posts: 2895
Credit: 1,797,699
RAC: 1,325
United States
Message 1332422 - Posted: 29 Jan 2013, 4:58:25 UTC

I think 21 weeks ga in NY. I know my son made the dnr cutoff by just a few days luckily, when he was born.
____________
-Dave #2

3.2.0-33

Profile Bob DeWoody
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 9 May 10
Posts: 1630
Credit: 575,274
RAC: 334
United States
Message 1332424 - Posted: 29 Jan 2013, 5:05:34 UTC

I think some of the anti-abortion crowd are masking another agenda. They feel that women who have sex for reasons other than procreation, in other words for fun, are committing a sinful act and allowing abortions to be legal encourages them to be sinful. These people would also ban forms of birth control that prevent fertilization.
____________
Bob DeWoody

My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events.

Profile James Sotherden
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 16 May 99
Posts: 8930
Credit: 36,010,065
RAC: 44,695
United States
Message 1332495 - Posted: 29 Jan 2013, 13:01:16 UTC - in response to Message 1332424.

I think some of the anti-abortion crowd are masking another agenda. They feel that women who have sex for reasons other than procreation, in other words for fun, are committing a sinful act and allowing abortions to be legal encourages them to be sinful. These people would also ban forms of birth control that prevent fertilization.


Or not pay for them. IE as the case of Catholic churches complaining about the health care reform bill. Use the rythym medthod they say. Yeah that works out real good. Granted birth control is not 100% but some methods are absolutely dismall.
____________

Old James

Profile Gary CharpentierProject donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 12754
Credit: 7,297,177
RAC: 17,971
United States
Message 1332508 - Posted: 29 Jan 2013, 14:57:25 UTC - in response to Message 1332495.

I think some of the anti-abortion crowd are masking another agenda. They feel that women who have sex for reasons other than procreation, in other words for fun, are committing a sinful act and allowing abortions to be legal encourages them to be sinful. These people would also ban forms of birth control that prevent fertilization.


Or not pay for them. IE as the case of Catholic churches complaining about the health care reform bill. Use the rythym medthod they say. Yeah that works out real good. Granted birth control is not 100% but some methods are absolutely dismall.

Simple, don't hire people, get them to volunteer. If you are an employer, follow ALL anti-discrimination rules.

____________

Profile Ex
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 12 Mar 12
Posts: 2895
Credit: 1,797,699
RAC: 1,325
United States
Message 1332519 - Posted: 29 Jan 2013, 15:26:12 UTC - in response to Message 1332508.

Simple, don't hire people, get them to volunteer.


Jumbo shrimp, anyone?
____________
-Dave #2

3.2.0-33

Profile Es99Project donor
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 23 Aug 05
Posts: 9030
Credit: 256,224
RAC: 125
Canada
Message 1332543 - Posted: 29 Jan 2013, 20:26:33 UTC - in response to Message 1332424.

I think some of the anti-abortion crowd are masking another agenda. They feel that women who have sex for reasons other than procreation, in other words for fun, are committing a sinful act and allowing abortions to be legal encourages them to be sinful. These people would also ban forms of birth control that prevent fertilization.

I think it is even more sinister than that.

The thing that had the biggest effect on women's liberation was control over their own fertility. A pregnant woman can't work, a woman with lots of children can't support herself.

By trying to take back control over women's fertility the patriarchal elements in society are trying to push her back into the home and back under control of her husband.

In some cases this is quite blatant, for example when they try to introduce legislation that means a husband must give permission for abortions.

The next step will be going back to when women had to be married to get birth control and have the permission of their husband.

These attitudes towards woman are not so far removed from those held in Saudi Arabia.
____________
Are you a feminist? Take the test

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4

Message boards : Politics : Why are we still having to debate about abortion?

Copyright © 2014 University of California