OK...how did THIS timeout happen?

Message boards : Number crunching : OK...how did THIS timeout happen?

Author	Message
msattler Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 34154 Credit: 344,609,882 RAC: 545,192	Message 1321095 - Posted: 29 Dec 2012, 2:38:24 UTC
	AP WU 1142265986. Sent to one of my rig and one other on 28 Dec 2012 \| 22:23:40 UTC. The other user has a deadline of 22 Jan 2013 \| 22:23:40 UTC. Mine shows time out, no response at 29 Dec 2012 \| 2:28:26 UTC. It was then reissued with a deadline of 23 Jan 2013 \| 2:28:37 UTC. Why didn't the kitties have until Jan. 22nd to finish it? ____________ ****** "Ask not, what your kitty can do for you. Ask what you can do for your kitty." As it is kitten, so shall it be done.
	ID: 1321095 ·

Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 1490 Credit: 62,712,162 RAC: 87,017	Message 1321099 - Posted: 29 Dec 2012, 2:44:29 UTC - in response to Message 1321095.
	I've always thought that it was part of the same mechanism that stops VLAR's being sent on a nVIDIA request myself. Cheers. ____________
	ID: 1321099 ·

jravin Send message Joined: 25 Mar 02 Posts: 717 Credit: 61,306,262 RAC: 70,599	Message 1321106 - Posted: 29 Dec 2012, 3:38:52 UTC - in response to Message 1321099.
	I've always thought that it was part of the same mechanism that stops VLAR's being sent on a nVIDIA request myself. Could you please explain this remark? Is it a joke? Am I missing something (besides 100 or so IQ points)? ____________
	ID: 1321106 ·

msattler Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 34154 Credit: 344,609,882 RAC: 545,192	Message 1321120 - Posted: 29 Dec 2012, 4:30:15 UTC
	Got another one just about like it.......must be the idiot scheduler sending WUs where they don't belong because comms are trashed. ____________ ****** "Ask not, what your kitty can do for you. Ask what you can do for your kitty." As it is kitten, so shall it be done.
	ID: 1321120 ·

Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 1490 Credit: 62,712,162 RAC: 87,017	Message 1321145 - Posted: 29 Dec 2012, 5:49:55 UTC - in response to Message 1321106.
	I've always thought that it was part of the same mechanism that stops VLAR's being sent on a nVIDIA request myself. Could you please explain this remark? Is it a joke? Am I missing something (besides 100 or so IQ points)? With people who are not running the nVIDIA openCL app then the Astropulse workunit will be treated the same as a VLAR, CPU request makes it through but isn't acknowledged at the user end so the workunit becomes a ghost and then the machine requests GPU work so any ghosts that can only run on CPU for that setup will be automatically timed out. Cheers. ____________
	ID: 1321145 ·

Message boards : Number crunching : OK...how did THIS timeout happen?