Servers are back on line after Monday's outage

Message boards : News : Servers are back on line after Monday's outage

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 4 · 5 · 6 · 7

AuthorMessage
Profile bj

Send message
Joined: 11 Oct 00
Posts: 163
Credit: 50,429,507
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1329712 - Posted: 21 Jan 2013, 3:05:43 UTC - in response to Message 1329625.

Count me in too.

bj


ID: 1329712 · Report as offensive
tbret
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 May 99
Posts: 3373
Credit: 248,361,978
RAC: 18,079
United States
Message 1330085 - Posted: 22 Jan 2013, 6:57:38 UTC - in response to Message 1329625.

So Grateful For Whatever We Get





ID: 1330085 · Report as offensive
Profile BakCompat
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Jun 00
Posts: 7
Credit: 5,017,546
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1330293 - Posted: 23 Jan 2013, 3:43:36 UTC

Just a confirmation on WUs. I just completed receiving 20 of them right now. Speed was roughly 20K/sec as the gigE graph still shows 100% utilization. However, they are being fed out! So stay in line and you will get some eventually. :)


ID: 1330293 · Report as offensive
Profile Cornhusker

Send message
Joined: 20 Apr 09
Posts: 29
Credit: 35,265,878
RAC: 21,158
United States
Message 1330322 - Posted: 23 Jan 2013, 7:45:01 UTC

Here it is Wednesday morning (Jan 23) and for the first time since the air conditioner outage 10 days ago I have no WUs trying to download.

It was a frustrating 10 days as so many of these posts have noted -- and I'll admit I didn't think I'd ever get back to a "normal" work cache and was pretty sure the usual Tuesday outage would back things up even more.

So, congratulations on whatever you guys did abd keep up the good work.

ID: 1330322 · Report as offensive
Profile EclipseSkye

Send message
Joined: 16 Jan 13
Posts: 1
Credit: 174,863
RAC: 0
Malaysia
Message 1330432 - Posted: 23 Jan 2013, 17:55:09 UTC

Question: Is it perfectly normal for transfer speeds to be around 5kbps and a maximum of 2 concurrent transfer at the same time?

ID: 1330432 · Report as offensive
Richard HaselgroveProject Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 11136
Credit: 83,478,287
RAC: 40,896
United Kingdom
Message 1330435 - Posted: 23 Jan 2013, 18:06:03 UTC - in response to Message 1330432.

Question: Is it perfectly normal for transfer speeds to be around 5kbps and a maximum of 2 concurrent transfer at the same time?

'concurrent' is user configurable, but 2 is the default.

Transfer speed is whatever the server can send when overloaded - 5kbs sounds about right for the SETI project, most of the time.

But please ask questions in one of the discussion fora, not a news thread - unless it directly relates to the subject of the news post.

ID: 1330435 · Report as offensive
Profile KWSN THE Holy Hand Grenade!
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Dec 05
Posts: 2576
Credit: 34,629,497
RAC: 19,116
United States
Message 1330737 - Posted: 24 Jan 2013, 16:26:14 UTC

I hate to make more work for the staff, but I think the scheduler is having one of it's snits again, as I write... I've tried to update on three different computers and get "Scheduler request failed: Failure when receiving data from the peer" each time, whether the computer is just reporting completed tasks or is also requesting new tasks...


.

ID: 1330737 · Report as offensive
Norman L BrownProject Donor

Send message
Joined: 23 Sep 04
Posts: 3
Credit: 2,033,594
RAC: 1,694
United States
Message 1330890 - Posted: 24 Jan 2013, 20:35:45 UTC

I think the SETI project needs a complete equipment and/or program overhaul. This "works one day and not the next" is getting out of hand.


ID: 1330890 · Report as offensive
TPCBF

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 54
Credit: 2,726,132
RAC: 944
United States
Message 1330920 - Posted: 24 Jan 2013, 21:50:21 UTC - in response to Message 1330737.

I hate to make more work for the staff, but I think the scheduler is having one of it's snits again, as I write... I've tried to update on three different computers and get "Scheduler request failed: Failure when receiving data from the peer" each time, whether the computer is just reporting completed tasks or is also requesting new tasks...
Yup, the same here... :-(

ID: 1330920 · Report as offensive
rob smithProject Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 03
Posts: 13295
Credit: 154,075,636
RAC: 111,942
United Kingdom
Message 1330933 - Posted: 24 Jan 2013, 22:01:32 UTC

Ladies and Gents,
The place to discuss the current performance of the servers is in "number crunching", not a news thread relating to an event of a few weeks back.


Bob Smith
Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society)
Somewhere in the (un)known Universe?

ID: 1330933 · Report as offensive
S@NL - JBG

Send message
Joined: 26 Jan 00
Posts: 11
Credit: 14,309,189
RAC: 44
Netherlands
Message 1330984 - Posted: 25 Jan 2013, 0:46:15 UTC - in response to Message 1328670.

(With an estimate of 2.5 minutes, you must have high-end nVidia Keppler(s)!)


The same overhere:
My card is a GTX690 it could crunch per 24h upto 4600 WUs
Per WU aprox 2,5min workingtime // setup to crunch 8 WUs simultaneous.
To not waist GPU time iam using as backup Collatz Conjecture for the time i dont get S@H work..

ID: 1330984 · Report as offensive
Profile Uli
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Feb 00
Posts: 10833
Credit: 5,700,926
RAC: 361
Germany
Message 1331466 - Posted: 26 Jan 2013, 5:59:19 UTC - in response to Message 1329625.

And behold one of my computer just got one Astroplulse WU to chew on ;-)

There is still hope for mankind. :-)


Well there you go. Perhaps you were a bit hasty earlier?

Bill W and I, and many others, are around for the long term, despite all the ups and downs that Seti has. You either fundamentally believe in this project or you don't. If you aren't prepared to ride the waves, then we all wish you well if you wish to crunch elsewhere.

Yes, we are grateful for what we do get, as well as being satisfied. Doesn't mean we wouldn't like more though :-)


+1 Chris!
Pluto will always be a planet to me.

Seti Ambassador

ID: 1331466 · Report as offensive
Profile S@NL Blue Angel
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 May 03
Posts: 271
Credit: 4,553,017
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 1335173 - Posted: 6 Feb 2013, 17:49:20 UTC
Last modified: 6 Feb 2013, 17:56:24 UTC

My account on seti@home says I have 60 work units to run
but sorry 4 are running near the end, and then I still
have 3 works left..and then my seti@home guff is empty.
I do see that allot of splitters are not working..?
May I ask why and what the problem is?

Thank you

Greetings Blue Angel


ID: 1335173 · Report as offensive
rob smithProject Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 03
Posts: 13295
Credit: 154,075,636
RAC: 111,942
United Kingdom
Message 1335179 - Posted: 6 Feb 2013, 18:11:12 UTC

Head off to number crunching where you will find a thread about the current server behaviour.


Bob Smith
Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society)
Somewhere in the (un)known Universe?

ID: 1335179 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 . . . 4 · 5 · 6 · 7

Message boards : News : Servers are back on line after Monday's outage


 
©2016 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.