One unanswered question that still allows for the existence of God

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : One unanswered question that still allows for the existence of God

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4

Author	Message
Chris S Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 19 Nov 00 Posts: 28915 Credit: 7,757,003 RAC: 12,586	Message 1322610 - Posted: 31 Dec 2012, 12:56:41 UTC
	That is correct.
	ID: 1322610 ·

Michel448a Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 27 Oct 00 Posts: 1187 Credit: 2,883,231 RAC: 11	Message 1322641 - Posted: 31 Dec 2012, 13:14:40 UTC
	maybe it s just cause it s in space, where is no weight. like if you put a clock way down inside earth, the time also will be different. ____________
	ID: 1322641 ·

Michael Watson Send message Joined: 7 Feb 08 Posts: 487 Credit: 193,724 RAC: 92	Message 1322679 - Posted: 31 Dec 2012, 15:32:25 UTC - in response to Message 1322641.
	maybe it s just cause it s in space, where is no weight. like if you put a clock way down inside earth, the time also will be different. They did an experiment where one very accurate clock was flown in a jet one way around the world, and another was flown around in the other direction. Both clocks were obviously subject to the same weight-conferring property of gravity. Because of their motion relative to one another, the clocks then differed very slightly in their elapsed time. The amount of this deviation was consistent with that predicted by relativity theory.
	ID: 1322679 ·

Chris S Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 19 Nov 00 Posts: 28915 Credit: 7,757,003 RAC: 12,586	Message 1322709 - Posted: 31 Dec 2012, 16:52:25 UTC
	Einstein is consistently annoying !!!
	ID: 1322709 ·

Michael Watson Send message Joined: 7 Feb 08 Posts: 487 Credit: 193,724 RAC: 92	Message 1322714 - Posted: 31 Dec 2012, 17:03:24 UTC - in response to Message 1322709.
	And consistently right!
	ID: 1322714 ·

Chris S Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 19 Nov 00 Posts: 28915 Credit: 7,757,003 RAC: 12,586	Message 1322716 - Posted: 31 Dec 2012, 17:08:05 UTC
	Yep, he tends to do that a lot ;-)))
	ID: 1322716 ·

Allie in Vancouver Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 16 Mar 07 Posts: 3938 Credit: 1,600,653 RAC: 229	Message 1322759 - Posted: 31 Dec 2012, 18:25:54 UTC - in response to Message 1322641. Last modified: 31 Dec 2012, 18:26:21 UTC
	maybe it s just cause it s in space, where is no weight. like if you put a clock way down inside earth, the time also will be different. Weight is just the mass multiplied by the force of gravity (converted to units of earth gravity). So, on the surface of the earth one kilo of mass also happens to weigh one kilo. Take it to the moon and that same mass would weigh only 0.167 kilo. In orbit around earth, it would have effectively no weight. The mass, however, remains one kilo no matter where it is. ____________
	ID: 1322759 ·

Chris S Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 19 Nov 00 Posts: 28915 Credit: 7,757,003 RAC: 12,586	Message 1323614 - Posted: 2 Jan 2013, 14:56:06 UTC
	Density = Mass per unit volume, Weight is due to gravity. I was OK up until the point where the school chemistry lab renamed the Specific Gravity (SG) bottles to Relative Density (RD). I lost the plot after that .....
	ID: 1323614 ·

ML1 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 25 Nov 01 Posts: 7809 Credit: 3,980,479 RAC: 690	Message 1323698 - Posted: 2 Jan 2013, 18:49:24 UTC - in response to Message 1323614. Last modified: 2 Jan 2013, 18:53:24 UTC
	Density = Mass per unit volume, Weight is due to gravity. A significant observation for Relativity: 'Weight' due to gravity or due to acceleration are indistinguishable. (Which I find to be rather interesting...) I was OK up until the point where the school chemistry lab renamed the Specific Gravity (SG) bottles to Relative Density (RD). I lost the plot after that ..... Relative to what standard reference?... That sounds like a good move to avoid artificial units arbitrary conversion constants... Hence the SI units where strangely enough, the only 'arbitrary Human artefact' unit is mass... (Temperature is 'out on its own' as an arbitrary Human scale until being redefined with respect to Boltzmann's constant.) All of the SI system of units is being updated to be uniformly based upon physical constants only. Anyone for the old femtofurlongs per second? Keep searchin' Martin ____________ See new freedom: Mageia4 Linux Voice See & try out your OS Freedom! The Future is what We make IT (GPLv3)
	ID: 1323698 ·

ML1 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 25 Nov 01 Posts: 7809 Credit: 3,980,479 RAC: 690	Message 1323748 - Posted: 2 Jan 2013, 20:27:19 UTC - in response to Message 1323698. Last modified: 2 Jan 2013, 20:31:02 UTC
	Meanwhile, OT for a waste of time: Anyone for the old femtofurlongs per second? Anyone up to the 'challenge' of converting femtofurlongs per helek into something more understandable?! It's all to do with a Hebrew system using Babylonian barleycorns! (See also the FFF system :-) ) Keep searchin' Martin ____________ See new freedom: Mageia4 Linux Voice See & try out your OS Freedom! The Future is what We make IT (GPLv3)
	ID: 1323748 ·

WinterKnight Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 8128 Credit: 21,284,835 RAC: 10,917	Message 1323764 - Posted: 2 Jan 2013, 20:57:43 UTC
	Anyone for poundals and slugs , or ergs and dynes.
	ID: 1323764 ·

Chris S Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 19 Nov 00 Posts: 28915 Credit: 7,757,003 RAC: 12,586	Message 1324289 - Posted: 3 Jan 2013, 19:16:18 UTC
	Lets bring back ells, pecks, bushels, gills, grains, pennyweights, white fivers .... Yes, fortify Dover, repel boarders, a plague on the Continent, Bournemouth for the incontinent, run up the Union flag .....
	ID: 1324289 ·

Scary Capitalist Send message Joined: 21 May 01 Posts: 7407 Credit: 69,623 RAC: 17	Message 1331571 - Posted: 26 Jan 2013, 14:04:43 UTC - in response to Message 1322679.
	Stop making sense with facts and logic!! Can't you just get along with the other people's delusions!!! You are upsetting people and should be shamed! SHAMED! ____________ Founder of BOINC team Objectivists. Oh the humanity! Rational people crunching data! I did NOT authorize this belly writing!
	ID: 1331571 ·

Michel448a Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 27 Oct 00 Posts: 1187 Credit: 2,883,231 RAC: 11	Message 1343917 - Posted: 8 Mar 2013, 1:16:02 UTC - in response to Message 1343893. Last modified: 8 Mar 2013, 1:18:09 UTC
	With the revised Drake Equation we find that it takes a lot more for intelligent life to pop up then we once thought in the 60's. .... Life as we know it, the placement needed for life, and complexity all deny a chance happening. yeah maybe the %chance for life is alot lower than originally thought but we know now 99.8% of all stars in the universe have from 1 to 16 planets. not only we dont divide anymore the number of suns / by the chance to have planets. we instead multiply the number of suns by a median number of planets ( stars X 8 planets ) not counting the number of moons these planets have ^^ ____________
	ID: 1343917 ·

betreger Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 1631 Credit: 3,268,311 RAC: 6,855	Message 1343942 - Posted: 8 Mar 2013, 3:11:14 UTC - in response to Message 1343893.
	That is statistically silly. ____________
	ID: 1343942 ·

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : One unanswered question that still allows for the existence of God