Did Murdoch try to buy the Presidency


log in

Advanced search

Message boards : Politics : Did Murdoch try to buy the Presidency

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next
Author Message
Profile Blurf
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 06
Posts: 7265
Credit: 6,271,005
RAC: 2,244
United States
Message 1318580 - Posted: 22 Dec 2012, 2:06:41 UTC - in response to Message 1318562.

You think you know it all? You think I know it all?

What I do know I cannot say..........there are still a few who might hunt me down to cover said tracks. As long as I keep quiet about it, they kinda let me sleep between the sheets, because they know true proof can no longer be obtained. That's the only reason I am still alive, Blurf.

LHO did not kill JFK. Simple fact, and I know that.
The next president in line did it, in cohorts with the CIA.
LBJ had it done to step in line. There is ample evidence to support this from many sources. It's too far gone for many to come after me after all these years, I hope.

Now, are you happy that I have served your questioning mind?


No actually I am not satisfied. The personal insult is unnecessary.

This is nothing new that hasn't been said before. I've read all the conspiracy stuff--you just echo them. I am only trying to see evidence as to why you say you know so much more than others. What places your "knowledge" of the situation as fact others?? What distinguishes your info?
____________


msattler
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 37384
Credit: 500,170,169
RAC: 525,108
United States
Message 1318587 - Posted: 22 Dec 2012, 2:22:03 UTC - in response to Message 1318580.
Last modified: 22 Dec 2012, 2:23:34 UTC

You think you know it all? You think I know it all?

What I do know I cannot say..........there are still a few who might hunt me down to cover said tracks. As long as I keep quiet about it, they kinda let me sleep between the sheets, because they know true proof can no longer be obtained. That's the only reason I am still alive, Blurf.

LHO did not kill JFK. Simple fact, and I know that.
The next president in line did it, in cohorts with the CIA.
LBJ had it done to step in line. There is ample evidence to support this from many sources. It's too far gone for many to come after me after all these years, I hope.

Now, are you happy that I have served your questioning mind?


No actually I am not satisfied. The personal insult is unnecessary.

This is nothing new that hasn't been said before. I've read all the conspiracy stuff--you just echo them. I am only trying to see evidence as to why you say you know so much more than others. What places your "knowledge" of the situation as fact others?? What distinguishes your info?

You have read it all.?

Every bit of it, as I have?

You must have more info than I do, then.......certainly.

I have. Shredded and documented every shred of data I could find over the years.

The evidence is overwhelming. Simply astounding that some were never brought to trial. The Warren commission was a total farce. Bought and sold from day one.
____________
******************
Crunching Seti, loving all of God's kitties.

I have met a few friends in my life.
Most were cats.

Profile Blurf
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 06
Posts: 7265
Credit: 6,271,005
RAC: 2,244
United States
Message 1318591 - Posted: 22 Dec 2012, 2:36:20 UTC - in response to Message 1318587.

You have read it all.?

Every bit of it, as I have?

You must have more info than I do, then.......certainly.

I have. Shredded and documented every shred of data I could find over the years.

The evidence is overwhelming. Simply astounding that some were never brought to trial. The Warren commission was a total farce. Bought and sold from day one.


Again nothing that hasn't been said in years. I know there was material shredded--I don't agree with why it was done but again that doesn't help my understanding of how your level of info is so distinguished from others?

I did a 50 page paper specifically focussing on this situation in college. We had a military family friend who worked in the Pentagon (now passed) and I was fortunate to have 2 days of reading paperwork from some library archives (I was in a room with a guard) to use in my research. What I read wasn't classified but it was better than encyclopedia material for sure. I doubt you've read other than what would be obtained in this situation.

You've clarified some of my question... that you know what's already out there. It's all good.
____________


Profile Es99
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 23 Aug 05
Posts: 8022
Credit: 237,928
RAC: 76
Canada
Message 1318597 - Posted: 22 Dec 2012, 2:53:19 UTC - in response to Message 1318562.

No, I really thought it would come down to a head shot.
Russian ex mil guy.......a pawn, much as LHO was.

He did not shoot JFK.

I happen to know that now, and live in fear for my life, kids.

Crap, said too much. Watch not just the Verpruder film, but the surviving footage surrounding it.
It was a CIA hit.


More conspiracy theory bunk. Your same statement has bneen made many a time in many another fashion. This stuff that you know more than others on this simply isn't true or you wouldn't "slip" and say "too much". Either lay out what you know or let it wash, man.

You are quite the arrogant man, Blurf.
You think you know it all? You think I know it all?

What I do know I cannot say..........there are still a few who might hunt me down to cover said tracks. As long as I keep quiet about it, they kinda let me sleep between the sheets, because they know true proof can no longer be obtained. That's the only reason I am still alive, Blurf.

LHO did not kill JFK. Simple fact, and I know that.
The next president in line did it, in cohorts with the CIA.
LBJ had it done to step in line. There is ample evidence to support this from many sources. It's too far gone for many to come after me after all these years, I hope.

Now, are you happy that I have served your questioning mind?

Prick.
Simple New York prick.

You stick your dick into things you pretend to know something about, but don't.
But you HAVE to have something to say about it.


Sorry for you if that's the way things work out east.
But here in the midwest, we have something to say about thingys before we say it.

Are you confessing to being on the grassy knoll?

Do tell us more.
____________
"Law and justice are not always the same. When they aren't, destroying the law may be the first step toward changing it." - Gloria Steinem

Profile Blurf
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 06
Posts: 7265
Credit: 6,271,005
RAC: 2,244
United States
Message 1318599 - Posted: 22 Dec 2012, 2:56:58 UTC - in response to Message 1318597.

Are you confessing to being on the grassy knoll?

Do tell us more.


That's what I'm asking him??? Says he knows more then we do??
____________


msattler
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 37384
Credit: 500,170,169
RAC: 525,108
United States
Message 1318608 - Posted: 22 Dec 2012, 3:27:18 UTC
Last modified: 22 Dec 2012, 3:28:35 UTC

All I can tell you is this.
The 'grassy knoll' theory is NOT a theory.

It was the CIA's hit man.
LBJ's hitman.

There are a couple of frames of video that do show the assassin.
Very hard evidence? Not. But, supported by hundreds of hours of testimony, yes.

There are a few frames of the evidence that were deleted from the public record, never seen by you. I saw them.
I ran across them quite by chance some years ago when doing research. Was immediately contacted and told to delete any such info and files from my computers. Remember when I 'lost' all my hard drives a few years ago?

They were taken, not lost.

Those frames of video were rather damning.

As I stated, Blurf, you have been bamboozled too.

Now you know........the rest of the story.
____________
******************
Crunching Seti, loving all of God's kitties.

I have met a few friends in my life.
Most were cats.

WinterKnight
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 8219
Credit: 21,807,086
RAC: 11,887
United Kingdom
Message 1318627 - Posted: 22 Dec 2012, 4:13:13 UTC

In answer to some of you that wonder why I raised this question.

You do realise that Rupert Murdoch is only an American, because it is a legal requirement, so he can own US TV companies.

Profile Chris S
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 19 Nov 00
Posts: 29540
Credit: 8,975,379
RAC: 27,115
United Kingdom
Message 1318746 - Posted: 22 Dec 2012, 10:48:54 UTC

These conspiracy theories will always be there, whilst there are people whose interests are in bringing down or embarrassing an administration, and others willing to believe them.

The JFK one is perhaps the best known. At its height the Kennedy Dynasty virtually ran America, it is alleged that there were those who thought one families control like that was wrong. Then there is the Monroe connection. The Twin towers at Ground Zero continues to abound, as does our own Princess Diana. If there were any conspiracies they would have been so serious, that they would have been hidden in such a way that it would never come to light. If they exist, some may be making educated or inspired guesses a bit too close to the truth, but it will never get proved.

Guido makes an open allegation about JFK. Perhaps the reality is that it's what the global population WANT to believe, to explain what happened. He mentions SI groups, this has been alleged many times over many years. They say that in every country there are groups of the most rich and powerful, that see themselves as above the elected governments, Masons, Templars, and others get regularly mentioned as also being involved. If they exist they will be pretty damn sure to cover their tracks.

Going back to the thread title, I don't think Murdoch tried to buy the Presidency, as such, but it is possible that among others, he did want to have some influence on future policy and legislation. We have a somewhat similar situation over here where the Conservative party is traditionally funded by the middle and upper class shires, and the Labour party is bankrolled by the trade unions. A millionaire landowner wouldn't want a new Motorway going through his estate, any more than the Unions would want anti-strike laws.

We have to be pragmatic and accept that it is the way of things, and we won't change it by ranting here.



Profile Chris S
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 19 Nov 00
Posts: 29540
Credit: 8,975,379
RAC: 27,115
United Kingdom
Message 1318810 - Posted: 22 Dec 2012, 13:27:53 UTC

I thought the Seti Forums would be a place where National Boundaries,
personal prejudice, and local customs, would give way to a Universal Gestalt.
i guess NOT!.

As I have said many times before Guido, these boards give certain people the opportunity to anonymously say things, that they wouldn't have to guts to do so, face to face in real life. That is the reality of Internet forums.

Message 1318845 - Posted: 22 Dec 2012, 16:13:38 UTC

If you got beat by welfare liberals... well.. you don't got much going for ya.


The Meek Shall Inherit The U.S. And The Earth.

Once The U.S. is destroyed By The Lazy Ass Meek, The Rest Of The World, Except China and Russia follows.

Please Please Please Destroy The White American Male. Please.

Sweetness

DEMON...HOT One
____________


Profile Guy
Volunteer moderator
Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 1987
Credit: 29,524,826
RAC: 141,144
United States
Message 1318854 - Posted: 22 Dec 2012, 16:36:05 UTC
Last modified: 21 Mar 2014, 18:37:55 UTC

--

Profile Es99
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 23 Aug 05
Posts: 8022
Credit: 237,928
RAC: 76
Canada
Message 1318867 - Posted: 22 Dec 2012, 17:03:25 UTC - in response to Message 1318854.

If you got beat by welfare liberals... well.. you don't got much going for ya.


Hmmmmm...

$295 a week unemployment check or

$270 a week working at McDonalds (if they offer you 40 hours/week) standing and trying not to fall down on a slippery greasy floor, trying to keep it clean with a greasy mop, swiping EBT cards for angry customers with screaming children who want their Big Macs NOW, picking up trash left behind by those uncontrolled screaming messy little kids, unloading trucks and stacking boxes in the freezer, changing the oil in the frier, burning your fingers on the grill and coming home and not being able to wash the smell of McDonalds off in the shower no matter how much soap you use and immediately falling asleep due to sheer exhaustion every night.

Or doing WHATEVER IT TAKES to gain a skill in demand that pays a decent wage to become independent so you can pay taxes which get redistributed to those angry EBT card holders complaining about how evil republicans are.

Hmmmmm...

Ya, us conservatives don't have much going for us.

You should be angry at the corporations that keep wages down below a living wage.

The problem isn't the welfare system dear, your post makes that obvious,
____________
"Law and justice are not always the same. When they aren't, destroying the law may be the first step toward changing it." - Gloria Steinem

Terror Australis
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 14 Feb 04
Posts: 1627
Credit: 200,855,263
RAC: 60,179
Australia
Message 1318880 - Posted: 22 Dec 2012, 17:28:17 UTC - in response to Message 1318854.

...Or doing WHATEVER IT TAKES to gain a skill in demand that pays a decent wage to become independent so you can pay taxes which get redistributed to those angry EBT card holders complaining about how evil republicans are.

Hmmmmm...

Ya, us conservatives don't have much going for us.

If the jobs aren't there it doesn't matter how highly qualified you are.

I have a step daughter living in California. She is a qualified and experienced medical lab technician and also has administrative qualifications and experience. All in all she has the qualifications and experience to make her a valued employee.

She was laid off from her last job 18 months ago. Since then, despite applying for at least one job per week she has not been able to find work.

For each job she applies for there are scores of others competing against her. Moving to another state is not an option as her husband is a Serviceman so she is locked in as far as location goes.

So please Guy, drop the simplistic attitude. In the US at the moment the jobs simply aren't there no matter how well qualified a person is. For each vacant position there are scores of well qualified applicants. Finding a job is more a matter of luck than qualifications.

It really irks me that people like you insist on blaming the unemployed for their situation, rather than the economic conditions that made them unemployed in the first place. Your assumption that 47% of the population of the US are "Welfare Bludgers" living that way by choice is totally invalid.

T.A.

Profile Chris S
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 19 Nov 00
Posts: 29540
Credit: 8,975,379
RAC: 27,115
United Kingdom
Message 1318882 - Posted: 22 Dec 2012, 17:34:30 UTC

$295 a week unemployment check or

$270 a week working at McDonalds

It should never pay to stay at home on benefits rather than work, but from the example given, can you blame them?

Profile Es99
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 23 Aug 05
Posts: 8022
Credit: 237,928
RAC: 76
Canada
Message 1318911 - Posted: 22 Dec 2012, 18:48:37 UTC - in response to Message 1318882.

$295 a week unemployment check or

$270 a week working at McDonalds

It should never pay to stay at home on benefits rather than work, but from the example given, can you blame them?


I am stunned that McDonalds gets away with paying so little? Are those numbers genuine?
____________
"Law and justice are not always the same. When they aren't, destroying the law may be the first step toward changing it." - Gloria Steinem

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next

Message boards : Politics : Did Murdoch try to buy the Presidency

Copyright © 2014 University of California