wireless?

Message boards : Number crunching : wireless?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile dancer42
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 2 Jun 02
Posts: 455
Credit: 2,422,890
RAC: 1
United States
Message 1311793 - Posted: 6 Dec 2012, 16:26:25 UTC

I was wondering has anyone though about 2 wireless routers being pairing the with 2

parabolic dishes.

the dishes would give the routers almost 100db of passive noise free gain and make them point-able.

this is admittedly a temporary solution, but would the 100 to 600 mb additional

bandwidth 1 or 2 pairs could provide not be welcome till something more permanent is done?
ID: 1311793 · Report as offensive
W-K 666 Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 19048
Credit: 40,757,560
RAC: 67
United Kingdom
Message 1311796 - Posted: 6 Dec 2012, 16:52:01 UTC - in response to Message 1311793.  

I was wondering has anyone though about 2 wireless routers being pairing the with 2

parabolic dishes.

the dishes would give the routers almost 100db of passive noise free gain and make them point-able.

this is admittedly a temporary solution, but would the 100 to 600 mb additional

bandwidth 1 or 2 pairs could provide not be welcome till something more permanent is done?

What size dishes do you think would be needed to get 100dB gain?
ID: 1311796 · Report as offensive
Profile HAL9000
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 99
Posts: 6534
Credit: 196,805,888
RAC: 57
United States
Message 1311798 - Posted: 6 Dec 2012, 16:54:06 UTC - in response to Message 1311793.  

I was wondering has anyone though about 2 wireless routers being pairing the with 2

parabolic dishes.

the dishes would give the routers almost 100db of passive noise free gain and make them point-able.

this is admittedly a temporary solution, but would the 100 to 600 mb additional

bandwidth 1 or 2 pairs could provide not be welcome till something more permanent is done?

The SSL is something like 2.5 miles from where the other end would need to be. The equipment to do that is available, but would be a waste of money for a "temporary solution".
SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours
Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[
ID: 1311798 · Report as offensive
rob smith Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 03
Posts: 22190
Credit: 416,307,556
RAC: 380
United Kingdom
Message 1311805 - Posted: 6 Dec 2012, 17:01:55 UTC

Not only that there would be the small issue of getting the uni to agree to having the dish put onto its building - and you thought getting them to agree to allow S@H to use the whole of its 1Gb cable was difficult...
Bob Smith
Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society)
Somewhere in the (un)known Universe?
ID: 1311805 · Report as offensive
Profile dancer42
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 2 Jun 02
Posts: 455
Credit: 2,422,890
RAC: 1
United States
Message 1311825 - Posted: 6 Dec 2012, 17:45:12 UTC

A 1 meter dish should be enough.

the dishes could be pointed though a window or a wall as long as the metal content was low.

the ptp connection would be to the nearest wired building.

And as long as the routers are reliable they need not be commercial.

my thoughts were along the lines of 2 donated routers, 2 donated dishes, from like direct tv, possibly 2 hand built high q antennas put components in box put box in window plug in to power and network.

if the nearest possible connection is 2 1/2 miles away this would not work,

but I have seen several remarks about the fiber optic cable only needing to be run 1000 yards down hill.

for that this could easily work.
ID: 1311825 · Report as offensive
Ianab
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 11 Jun 08
Posts: 732
Credit: 20,635,586
RAC: 5
New Zealand
Message 1312017 - Posted: 7 Dec 2012, 2:34:05 UTC - in response to Message 1311825.  

What is technically possible (technically this could be done), and what is politically allowed are 2 different things.

Any network infrastructure stuff like that, that needs to connect to the University network, is the domain of the University IT department, and only their approved gear gets connected, which is fair enough. They will be the ones that have the headache if some random piece of gear causes problems elsewhere on the network.

Ian
ID: 1312017 · Report as offensive
Profile HAL9000
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 99
Posts: 6534
Credit: 196,805,888
RAC: 57
United States
Message 1312039 - Posted: 7 Dec 2012, 4:58:57 UTC

IIRC back in the classic days SETI@Home was actually getting their internet connection for wu's from a microwave internet connection across the San Francisco bay. However, I think it was pretty unreliable. Over 1 or 2 miles a system would probably be OK, but I don't know what they would be able to do for bandwidth these days.

We are only now starting to get into the realm of wireless GiB for LANs with 802.11ac.

SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours
Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[
ID: 1312039 · Report as offensive
rob smith Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 03
Posts: 22190
Credit: 416,307,556
RAC: 380
United Kingdom
Message 1312048 - Posted: 7 Dec 2012, 6:27:01 UTC

What is really frustrating is that there is a 1Gb ready cable in place, but because of the uni's rules/politics only 10% of it can be used.
Bob Smith
Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society)
Somewhere in the (un)known Universe?
ID: 1312048 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : wireless?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.