Scheduler is back up...


log in

Advanced search

Message boards : News : Scheduler is back up...

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3
Author Message
rob smithProject donor
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 03
Posts: 8302
Credit: 55,216,742
RAC: 75,365
United Kingdom
Message 1336545 - Posted: 10 Feb 2013, 8:22:41 UTC

This was reported many hours ago in "number crunching" - http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=70730

Or if you want to see how the servers are behaving take a look at the cricket graphs http://fragment1.berkeley.edu/newcricket/grapher.cgi?target=%2Frouter-interfaces%2Finr-250%2Fgigabitethernet2_3;view=Octets The blue line is the data requests being fed to the servers, and the green mass the data coming out of the servers for us to work on. Normally one would expect the blue to be about 10MBs and the green to be about 90MBs, but as I type they are both down in the noise.
____________
Bob Smith
Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society)
Somewhere in the (un)known Universe?

Profile Chris SProject donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 19 Nov 00
Posts: 31449
Credit: 12,169,162
RAC: 28,855
United Kingdom
Message 1336567 - Posted: 10 Feb 2013, 9:47:53 UTC

The servers all seem to be up, but the Cricket graph is almost zero. Sounds like a network problem.

rob smithProject donor
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 03
Posts: 8302
Credit: 55,216,742
RAC: 75,365
United Kingdom
Message 1336578 - Posted: 10 Feb 2013, 10:23:43 UTC - in response to Message 1336567.

Last update on the server status page was 22:30 UTC Saturday (2013-02-09)
____________
Bob Smith
Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society)
Somewhere in the (un)known Universe?

Number 6
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 26 Nov 05
Posts: 2
Credit: 105,153
RAC: 0
New Zealand
Message 1336704 - Posted: 10 Feb 2013, 17:42:53 UTC - in response to Message 1336578.

Thanks for that info guys - problem seems to have been resolved now.
____________
-------------------------------------
By Hook or by Crook....We Will
-------------------------------------

Profile Franck
Send message
Joined: 13 Aug 12
Posts: 1
Credit: 55,484
RAC: 50
Netherlands
Message 1336716 - Posted: 10 Feb 2013, 18:13:42 UTC

I've got a problem guys, no idea why, but all my transfers/uploads get stuck at 16.00/27.70 or 16.00/33.06 or 16.00/34.86 (always on 16.00). Anyone with some idea why, and what I can do to fix it?

Profile Michael McMahon
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 15 Mar 12
Posts: 4
Credit: 293,184
RAC: 139
United States
Message 1337838 - Posted: 13 Feb 2013, 18:36:05 UTC

Is there still problems with the scheduler or other servers, as I had to abort a 8.0 MB transfer, that kept stalling and had been going on 12 hours downloading. I checked my internet speed, and according to the results, the download should have taken less than 30 seconds , at worst. I have another download trying to come down, I have had to hit retry download 3 times in the last 40 minutes, as it has now been downloading for 45 minutes having downloaded 5.7 of the 8 MB?
____________

ClaggyProject donor
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 5 Jul 99
Posts: 4067
Credit: 32,893,305
RAC: 7,289
United Kingdom
Message 1337866 - Posted: 13 Feb 2013, 19:27:06 UTC - in response to Message 1337838.

Is there still problems with the scheduler or other servers, as I had to abort a 8.0 MB transfer, that kept stalling and had been going on 12 hours downloading. I checked my internet speed, and according to the results, the download should have taken less than 30 seconds , at worst. I have another download trying to come down, I have had to hit retry download 3 times in the last 40 minutes, as it has now been downloading for 45 minutes having downloaded 5.7 of the 8 MB?

Don't worry about it, the Hurricane link on which downloads, uploads and scheduler contacts rely on is normally very heavily utilised, making everyone's downloads slow, with frequent timeouts, they'll download eventually, resuming from where they got to earlier,

Claggy

William Roeder
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 19 May 99
Posts: 69
Credit: 523,414
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1338246 - Posted: 14 Feb 2013, 22:15:01 UTC - in response to Message 1337866.

Look at the cricket graph (posted above)
As long as the green is pegged at 90, everything is going to be slow
____________

Profile Chris SProject donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 19 Nov 00
Posts: 31449
Credit: 12,169,162
RAC: 28,855
United Kingdom
Message 1338424 - Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 10:43:34 UTC

I'm not sure you are right William. I remember the days when it was pegged at 50. and everyone bellyached, now it is nearly double, and people are still not happy. Out of 1,361,805 Seti users, just 145,642 (10.69%)are active. Of even those, only a handful bother to regularly moan on the boards, say 10? This equates to 0.007% of active crunchers.

I don't think Seti need worry too much do you?

ClaggyProject donor
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 5 Jul 99
Posts: 4067
Credit: 32,893,305
RAC: 7,289
United Kingdom
Message 1338429 - Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 11:14:23 UTC - in response to Message 1338246.
Last modified: 15 Feb 2013, 11:15:16 UTC

Look at the cricket graph (posted above)
As long as the green is pegged at 90, everything is going to be slow

Too general a statement, You can't tell if downloads are just pegged at 90, or if we're in a middle of a Shortie Storm with 5 times as many downloads attempting to go through, in both instances it will still be pegged at 90.

Claggy

N9JFE David SProject donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 99
Posts: 11162
Credit: 13,947,084
RAC: 12,360
United States
Message 1338455 - Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 14:16:06 UTC - in response to Message 1338429.

Look at the cricket graph (posted above)
As long as the green is pegged at 90, everything is going to be slow

Too general a statement, You can't tell if downloads are just pegged at 90, or if we're in a middle of a Shortie Storm with 5 times as many downloads attempting to go through, in both instances it will still be pegged at 90.

Claggy

Which, parenthetically, is the same kind of lack of information that hid the root cause of the Apollo 13 accident.

____________
David
Sitting on my butt while others boldly go,
Waiting for a message from a small furry creature from Alpha Centauri.


Profile Chris SProject donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 19 Nov 00
Posts: 31449
Credit: 12,169,162
RAC: 28,855
United Kingdom
Message 1338461 - Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 14:28:31 UTC

Which, parenthetically, is the same kind of lack of information that hid the root cause of the Apollo 13 accident.

Now that is not a fair comparison, and I think you know that.

Profile Bernie Vine
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 26 May 99
Posts: 6904
Credit: 25,742,139
RAC: 39,178
United Kingdom
Message 1338635 - Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 22:03:55 UTC - in response to Message 1338461.

Which, parenthetically, is the same kind of lack of information that hid the root cause of the Apollo 13 accident.

Now that is not a fair comparison, and I think you know that.


+1
____________


Today is life, the only life we're sure of. Make the most of today.

Rolf
Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 09
Posts: 114
Credit: 7,816,984
RAC: 151
Switzerland
Message 1338637 - Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 22:11:41 UTC - in response to Message 1338461.

Which, parenthetically, is the same kind of lack of information that hid the root cause of the Apollo 13 accident.

Now that is not a fair comparison, and I think you know that.



Sorry but as Swiss I need more explanation(s), I can't understand these words! If explanation is too heavy for public eyes, please put it in private mail.

N9JFE David SProject donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 99
Posts: 11162
Credit: 13,947,084
RAC: 12,360
United States
Message 1338662 - Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 23:29:42 UTC - in response to Message 1338461.

Which, parenthetically, is the same kind of lack of information that hid the root cause of the Apollo 13 accident.

Now that is not a fair comparison, and I think you know that.

Only in the consequences. If you think I meant otherwise, you took my statement way too seriously. I was not trying to imply that the limitations of the Cricket graph in any way could lead to potential loss of life or anything of the like.

I was just noticing in passing that just as we can't tell how much more attempted traffic there is when the graph is pegged, NASA was also unable to see that the interior of the oxygen tank had gotten much hotter than it should because the thermometer didn't read any higher than the intended maximum.

Geez. Ya can't say anything anymore without someone misinterpreting it.

____________
David
Sitting on my butt while others boldly go,
Waiting for a message from a small furry creature from Alpha Centauri.


Rolf
Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 09
Posts: 114
Credit: 7,816,984
RAC: 151
Switzerland
Message 1339129 - Posted: 17 Feb 2013, 11:22:21 UTC - in response to Message 1338662.

NASA was also unable to see that the interior of the oxygen tank had gotten much hotter than it should because the thermometer didn't read any higher than the intended maximum.

I understand! Missing imagination?

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3

Message boards : News : Scheduler is back up...

Copyright © 2014 University of California