Are the US courts stirring the Argentinan pot?

Argentina willing to go to U.S. Supreme Court in bond row

(Reuters) - Argentina will appeal a U.S federal court ruling ordering it to pay $1.33 billion to holdout bond investors, the government said on Thursday, vowing to fight "judicial colonialism" all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary.

Yes I noticed that the last Argentinian thread got closed back in July. Until now there was no reason to replace it, no matter, we'll just start this new one. It's of special importance to the UK, and it will be discussed. Argentina is still seen as pretty much a banana republic by most of the world, although that is not strictly true. Argentina

What is true, is that it has an unstable political scene with many military coups in its history. Investing financially in such a country has to be seen as highly risky at best. This is just political posturing by a desperate administration.

No wonder the "Malvinas" are back on the menu!
____________

Now the motorcycling world gets involved.

MotoGP postpones Argentinian round due to political rows

A nice comment made about the Argentian President: -

"This is the way she [Kirchner] operates. It’s just cheap and nasty politics from a cheap and nasty politician."

Full story
____________

That comment was made by Simon Weston. I would think that at the time he made it, and given his background, he was a bit upset.

Major General Julian Thompson, who led 3 Commando Brigade during the conflict, said: ‘I think that the cruise companies should stand up and say, “If you behave like that to us we’re not going to visit Argentina, we’ll close our office and the much needed revenue will go”.

‘It is shameful that elements within a large country like Argentina should seek to strangle the economy of a small group of Islands. Such action benefits nobody and only condemns those who lend it support. We have made this very clear to the government of Argentina. We will take every necessary measure to support the Falkland Islanders.’

Details of the new round of Falklands hostilities broke hours after the funeral of Sir Rex Hunt, the doughty governor of the islands during the 1982 war.

Agree with the sabre rattling, but as the past has already proven, those sabres do end up cutting rather than rattle.

If that happens, just who is going to retake the islands? Our lot?

What with? No carriers, no long range bombers & can you see the Euro Army doing it?

With the way the EU is working on the financial crisis with their useless summits, one would be looking at years before any military agreement would be forthcoming!

The Yanks certainly hasn't helped by cancelling their tours - their only thoughta are the loss of $$$$$.
____________

Agree with the sabre rattling, but as the past has already proven, those sabres do end up cutting rather than rattle.

If that happens, just who is going to retake the islands? Our lot?

What with? No carriers, no long range bombers & can you see the Euro Army doing it?

With the way the EU is working on the financial crisis with their useless summits, one would be looking at years before any military agreement would be forthcoming!

The Yanks certainly hasn't helped by cancelling their tours - their only thoughta are the loss of $$$$$.

The attacks were made by the hardline Left-wing group Quebracho. They were not done directly by the Argentine government, although it is pretty obvious that they didn't lift a finger to stop it, and were quite happy to look the other way. It was clearly in reaction to the funeral of past Governor Rex Hunt. There were similar happenings when Prince William went there for helicopter training. All along, Argentina always feels that it has to make a response back, when anything significant happens that reminds them that they lost the war.

You can be quite sure that the MOD have been keeping close tabs on the situation out there for many years. Modern surveillance would alert them immediately to any kind of military build up, and they would react accordingly. For obvious reasons they never comment upon the deployment of submarines and surface vessels, or locations of aircraft, but it would be very likely that within hours, there would be a pre-planned response. Yes, we don't have the means to mount a task Force like we did before any more, but 30 years later, perhaps we won't need one :-)

I have to ask that with the tensions between the U.K. and Argentina why did you guys retire an aircraft carrier before your new one came online?

Seems to me you should have a couple of air squadrons right on the Island also.

But submarines can be an equalizer.
____________

Horacio,

Firstly let me thank you very much for contributing to this thread. Secondly, let me assure you at once, that the people of the UK do not bear any animosity towards you and your fellow countrymen. The conflict is a political one between our two governments. We have also not forgotten that in the past conflict, 649 Argentine military personnel died. We remember them as loyal to their country as indeed our troops were to us.

Knowing how things work here, even a fish boat will be enough to keep the islands safe... ;D

I'm pretty sure, that both countries, or better said, politicians from both countries are using all this steamy discussions just to divert atention from other things... Grab a bag of popcorn and watch the next episode tomorrow at the same time in the same channel...

Oh, by the way, to those "vultures" that want their money back... good luck... knowing how stubborn our president is, they are not going to get their money not even breaking her legs and arms...

(or the legs and arms of the rest of us, which is the most probable thing that's going to happen).

I have to ask that with the tensions between the U.K. and Argentina why did you guys retire an aircraft carrier before your new one came online?

Seems to me you should have a couple of air squadrons right on the Island also

But submarines can be an equalizer.

I have to ask that with the tensions between the U.K. and Argentina why did you guys retire an aircraft carrier before your new one came online?

James,

Our current government inherited the worst peacetime debt since WWII from the Labour party. Cuts have had to be made across all sorts of Government departments, and the MOD was no exception. The 2010 Strategic Defence Review came to the conclusion that the UK did not need it's own independent deterrent force. It was argued that wars and conflicts in the future would not be between two individual countries, such as in 1982, but a coalition of countries against a common enemy, as we saw in Iraq, and Libya, and pobably will do in Syria and Iran.

Prediction: Crystal ball says "Learn Mandarin"

The statement by the incoming coalition government quoted by me was meant to refer to the Budget deficit

Also, UK troops in Afghanistan might take offense at your statement that the last election occurred during peacetime.

1950 Korea
1956 Suez
1964 Aden
1965 Borneo
1982 Falklands
1991 Gulf War 1
1999 Kosovo
2000 Sierra Leone
2003 Gulf War 2
2012 Afganistan

Did we get out of bed the wrong side today? I'm sending Sirius some liver pills for Christmas, sounds like I'd better send you some as well.

The statement by the incoming coalition government quoted by me was meant to refer to the Budget deficit

Also, UK troops in Afghanistan might take offense at your statement that the last election occurred during peacetime.

Now you're just being picky. I specifically referred to WWII. Of course we have had other conflicts since then.

1950 Korea
1956 Suez
1964 Aden
1965 Borneo
1982 Falklands
1991 Gulf War 1
1999 Kosovo
2000 Sierra Leone
2001 Afghanistan
2003 Gulf War 2

Did we get out of bed the wrong side today? I'm sending Sirius some liver pills for Christmas, sounds like I'd better send you some as well.

1968 was the only year in the 20th Century that a British soldier didn't die in Action.