Cameras watching us everywhere |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Politics : Cameras watching us everywhere
1 · 2 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
I've seen some discussions here lately about personal freedoms. Here's one that was a big difference between the UK and US, but now is becoming less of a difference and more of a common ground. | |
| ID: 1309138 · | |
|
Until they brought in the new point to point cameras, I was pretty safe in that I knew where they all were, including the fools in blue who always used the same spots for the radar guns. | |
| ID: 1309147 · | |
|
Don't worry. Relax. Those cameras are there to protect you. Trust your/our government. They'd never use them for nefarious reasons. | |
| ID: 1309247 · | |
|
In 1989, the book Earth by David Brin came out. A Frakking Masterwork on Predicting The Future. | |
| ID: 1309285 · | |
|
As a law abiding citizen I have no problem with cameras. It seems to me the people who complain about them have something to hide. Motorists seem to be the biggest complainers, usually just after being caught doing something wrong, muttering about extra tax on motoring. Well in here in the UK there are signs telling what the speed limit is, (except for for 30mph limit on lit roads), there signs telling there are cameras, speed cameras are in open and painted yellow so you can see them, there are maps telling you where the permanent cameras are, Sat Nav tells you there are cameras there, so lets call it a tax - a tax on stupidity. | |
| ID: 1309291 · | |
|
I dont know if I like it, but I dont see an invasion of privacy if the cameras are pointing to public places... | |
| ID: 1309297 · | |
If Ive locked the door and turned on the radio at a high volume ... ;D But it is easy to subtract a radio from the sound recording as they know exactly what was broadcast. (Was a lot harder before computer signal processing.) ____________ | |
| ID: 1309301 · | |
|
If there was a prohibition on more than one copy existing and a requirement for destruction after 30 days, with some teeth, say life no parole for violation, then perhaps it might be permissible. But the FBI/NSA/CIA would never agree to such a reasonable limit. It is important to them to build multi-decade dossiers on "dissidents" or Nixon style enemy lists. | |
| ID: 1309304 · | |
If Ive locked the door and turned on the radio at a high volume ... ;D Your right... I'll have to untune it so it produces just noise... LOL EDIT: Im fried, modern receivers shut off the sound when there is no carrier detected :( ____________ | |
| ID: 1309318 · | |
If Ive locked the door and turned on the radio at a high volume ... ;D (Time to break out the shortwave and turn the squelch down.) Horacio, you brought up a great point in your first post. These cameras are in public places, and what right to privacy can anyone expect to have when they are not in their own home? Now, if they start pointing cameras in windows or using future technology to peer into peoples homes, that's a line I never want to see crossed. Also, Luigi mentioned that the cameras across the pond are well marked. In the US, only some of them are well marked (like red-light cameras and police cameras) the rest are not marked at all, and who knows what their purpose is... ____________ -Dave #2 | |
| ID: 1309387 · | |
|
But isn't it realistic to believe that if the window to your home is wide open and a camera in a public place has a view, you're opening up your home to the public? | |
| ID: 1309405 · | |
And if someone is taking measures to hide something, shouldn't that be enough for a judge to issue a wire tap order and to allow some unmarked vans in the public street to paint the windows with lasers in order to find out what that person is hiding? Of course it should. Anyone hiding anything is up to no good. That much is obvious. ____________ | |
| ID: 1309414 · | |
But isn't it realistic to believe that if the window to your home is wide open and a camera in a public place has a view, you're opening up your home to the public? If you open a window anybody that pass in front of it can see inside your home. And you can do almost nothing to avoid that (unless you proove that someone in particular is a stalker or something like that). The difference between passing people and the cammera will be that to avoid beeing constantly watched you will need to keep that window always closed. I guess that in this case you should have the right to request to the entity that holds the cammera to redirect it so it doesnt point to your window... if not then you will need a courtain... (or a better lawyer) ____________ | |
| ID: 1309430 · | |
|
How is it that whenever National/Local government do things to excess, that the ones complainng about that excess are labelled as "people with something to hide"? | |
| ID: 1309511 · | |
|
So what did you do on Black friday, did your wife/girl-friend drag you to the shops because she needed a beast-of-burden. If so were you observed by the Bionic Mannequins. | |
| ID: 1309517 · | |
But isn't it realistic to believe that if the window to your home is wide open and a camera in a public place has a view, you're opening up your home to the public? If you are a woman and take your clothes off if front of a window and a man sees you, he is a peeping tom. If you are a man and take your clothes off in front of a window and a woman sees it you are a flasher. What if it is the Google street view crew? ____________ | |
| ID: 1309523 · | |
|
its good streaming. | |
| ID: 1309537 · | |
|
Something else to worry about..... | |
| ID: 1309551 · | |
Something else to worry about..... wow. And that's exactly where I become clear on my views. That's too far. Like I mentioned earlier, when you use technology to make inferences about what a person has done (or may do), then you are crossing a line. That is a whole step beyond simply surveilling a public area. ____________ -Dave #2 | |
| ID: 1309598 · | |
|
Well if "Minority Report" AI type cameras are not progress, I don't know what is. | |
| ID: 1309670 · | |
Message boards : Politics : Cameras watching us everywhere
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |