Latchezar Filipov |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : SETI@home Science : Latchezar Filipov
1 · 2 · 3 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
What do you guys think of this? There's a lot of controversy around it... | |
| ID: 1304464 · | |
|
shutdown the receivers we now know why we haven't found anything. Apparently, every alien species communicates without use of radiowaves. | |
| ID: 1304483 · | |
|
There are a lot of people who believe that aliens are already amongst us, in some form and that they communicate through telepathy. | |
| ID: 1304487 · | |
|
You mean they stuck around? for what? They've learned about all they could in a few days observing us. | |
| ID: 1304499 · | |
|
Dr. Latchezar Filipov appears to have legitimate scientific credentials. See, below, the linked copy of his educational background, and curriculum vitae. | |
| ID: 1304506 · | |
|
Looks like some serious credentials. | |
| ID: 1304527 · | |
|
In connection with the issue of Mexican volcanic eruptions, I found the linked article, below, from May 2012, interesting. If Popocatepetl should happen to catastrophically erupt on or about the appointed date, we might be well advised to listen to Dr. Filipov more carefully. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/47283440/ns/technology_and_science-science-t/surprising-threat-mexicos-awakened-volcano#UJ6bvhweQc8/ | |
| ID: 1304583 · | |
|
One thing I wonder though,what if Seti wouldn't work because of those magnetic fields?? | |
| ID: 1304604 · | |
|
Found an interesting article: | |
| ID: 1304609 · | |
|
The article speaks of SETI but which? There is not a monolithic SETI but there are several institutions and groups doing SETI research. One is our SETI@home, another still is the SETI Institute but there are others doing optical SETI research. It seems to me that they ignore these simple facts. | |
| ID: 1304766 · | |
|
I think it's about SETI in general, that they have to take into account certain laws of phyzix, like multiple dimensions. And also maybe the magnetic fields Filipov was talking about. According to Stephen Hawking, there are 11 dimensions in space. We might have to take that into account, looking for extraterrestrial life with optical resources and with radiosignals. | |
| ID: 1304864 · | |
|
Nearly all UK crop circles have been explained as elaborate hoaxes by students and other groups. But it has to be said the intricate designs are very clever and amazingly carried out in the dark at night at ground level. I remain 95% skeptical. | |
| ID: 1304873 · | |
|
It's good to be skeptical but some things really remain unexplainable, like these big drawings in Peru. Nobody knows how they came there. | |
| ID: 1304879 · | |
|
You mean Nazca? | |
| ID: 1304970 · | |
|
Yes (cfr. Von Däniken) | |
| ID: 1304989 · | |
|
One way or another, I'm already convinced they are (or were) amongst us... | |
| ID: 1305018 · | |
|
All the bumpf online & in books regarding aliens & ufo's, I've always taken with a pinch of salt. | |
| ID: 1305023 · | |
|
That was also what I've initially been thinking of, an ancient airfield, an alien one, that is... | |
| ID: 1305333 · | |
|
I first read Von Danikens books 20 years ago, and I still find them compelling. Also Duncan Lunan. The Nasca lines and images are world famous. They were created by scraping off the surface soil to expose a different colour rock underneath. But they can only be truly appreciated from the air, which gives us the controversy over their purpose. | |
| ID: 1305338 · | |
|
Interesting link, Chris. Thanx:) | |
| ID: 1305449 · | |
Message boards : SETI@home Science : Latchezar Filipov
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |