We are recovering from a database crash |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : News : We are recovering from a database crash
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
Yes, they've asked the university for more network capacity. There's a lot of internal politics involved in that and it would probably only be worse if a lot of outsiders tried to stick their noses into it. I would judge that you would be about correct. The Lab knows what they are doing. | |
| ID: 1306812 · | |
The problem is that the infrastructure (servers and bandwidth capacity) is way under what is needed for the current operation. I believe that is what I said. The only valid question is data being collected that never will be analyzed? The answer to that is no. Does it matter if the data is analyzed next week or next decade? No. However there is a real issue. Is say the optical Seti search data being combined with radio Seti search data? No. That means if ET alternates between radio and optical contact methods, we won't find them. There is no single Seti clearing house. ____________ | |
| ID: 1306912 · | |
|
I have had problems with my 'SETI@Home Advanced' Tasks with a Status: Waiting to Run. Can only assume this might have something to do with the outage. Everything was going ok until I had to reboot my system. I also lost a couple of other projects as well. | |
| ID: 1306964 · | |
|
Well anyway I will shut down my computer tonight, I have 18 | |
| ID: 1307000 · | |
|
I had hope to find some work, but my pc is empty | |
| ID: 1307069 · | |
|
Thanks | |
| ID: 1307089 · | |
|
Matt; Some of the previous posts recommended doing other projects while waiting and waiting for Seti. That may have been a strategy to get users to use Seti less and maybe ultimately leave Seti and have more of Seti to themselves. Whatever the reason As of now SETI community, I have taken the dedicated (Intel(R) Xeon(R)CPU X5650@ 2.67GHz[Family6 Model 44 Stepping 2](24 processors)NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 (1023MB) driver: 301.42) away from the SETI Project because of inadequate Server Bandwidth and several Programing issues that impact overall Reliability and Functionally. All that has significantly diminished my sense of any doing any meaningful scientific contribution with Seti@Home. I started with SETI in June of 1999. I currently rank 9,667 out of 2,488,900 (99.6116 percentile) | |
| ID: 1307179 · | |
Matt; Some of the previous posts recommended doing other projects while waiting and waiting for Seti. That may have been a strategy to get users to use Seti less and maybe ultimately leave Seti and have more of Seti to themselves. Whatever the reason As of now SETI community, I have taken the dedicated (Intel(R) Xeon(R)CPU X5650@ 2.67GHz[Family6 Model 44 Stepping 2](24 processors)NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 (1023MB) driver: 301.42) away from the SETI Project because of inadequate Server Bandwidth and several Programing issues that impact overall Reliability and Functionally. All that has significantly diminished my sense of any doing any meaningful scientific contribution with Seti@Home. I started with SETI in June of 1999. I currently rank 9,667 out of 2,488,900 (99.6116 percentile) I too started in 1999 (August) and starting to think the same. Presently using 2 Laptops and a Desktop - with a dedicated GPU. Will probably cut back. But not leave completely. A shame. ____________ | |
| ID: 1307196 · | |
|
I too have recently cut back on my SETI activity. I regularly run out of WUs for days on end. Luckily there are lots of other valuable science projects available to contribute to. I am currently contributing to seven projects and find that many of them run short of WUs. | |
| ID: 1307199 · | |
|
My client hasn't updated for days. I just tried (again) to manually update and it's still not uploading my finished WUs and it hasn't downloaded any new ones. In fact, it's doing nothing but deferring communication over and over. | |
| ID: 1307222 · | |
|
I too have a machine that is unable to connect and upload/download work units. What I find more interesting is that it is the machine that has a serious GPU and multi CPU cores to do the processing. I have another machine that has a less capable GPU and a modest 2 core CPU that seems to get units as required and keeps the buffer full or close to it. I have a third machine that has no GPU and a slow CPU that I don't run BOINC on but have in the past just for testing. | |
| ID: 1307281 · | |
My client hasn't updated for days. I just tried (again) to manually update and it's still not uploading my finished WUs and it hasn't downloaded any new ones. In fact, it's doing nothing but deferring communication over and over. Same here and no notice from SETI@home whatsoever. I hope the problems will be resolved shortly... ____________ <--- Searching for this one ;-) | |
| ID: 1307308 · | |
|
F Y I | |
| ID: 1307443 · | |
|
Hi | |
| ID: 1307482 · | |
The problem is that the infrastructure (servers and bandwidth capacity) is way under what is needed for the current operation. http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=70080&postid=1307567 Well there it is. Too many people trying to crunch for SETI. We knew this day would come. ____________ | |
| ID: 1307568 · | |
Well there it is. Too many people trying to crunch for SETI. We knew this day would come.Well, maybe they should start and limit the number of WUs a single host can receive to cut down the the number of WUs that are "in progress" (forever). Each time I check on one of my WUs that hasn't been validated in weeks, it comes down to a deadbeat cruncher hoarding thousands of WUs on a single host and then just abandoning them... If there would be a way to weed those out, that would probably already help to level the issue at hand... :( Ralf | |
| ID: 1307588 · | |
Well there it is. Too many people trying to crunch for SETI. We knew this day would come.Well, maybe they should start and limit the number of WUs a single host can receive to cut down the the number of WUs that are "in progress" (forever). There is a limit of 100 CPU WUs and 100 GPU WUs per host. It's been in place for a couple of weeks. Each time I check on one of my WUs that hasn't been validated in weeks, it comes down to a deadbeat cruncher hoarding thousands of WUs on a single host and then just abandoning them... Don't call them all deadbeats. They may just be having trouble getting through to report the ones they've finished. I like to keep a large cache on board to carry me through "normal" server outages. However, right now I have 63 GPU WUs which aren't getting done anytime soon because I also have about 300 Einstein GPU WUs, which the computer downloaded when it couldn't get any from Seti (I assume that's what happened, anyway). It'll get to them eventually. I know how frustrating it is to see WUs you finished weeks ago still pending on your account page, but they will get done someday and you will get credit for them (unless they come out invalid on your part). ____________ David Sitting on my butt while others boldly go, Waiting for a message from a small furry creature from Alpha Centauri. | |
| ID: 1307719 · | |
Matt; Some of the previous posts recommended doing other projects while waiting and waiting for Seti. That may have been a strategy to get users to use Seti less and maybe ultimately leave Seti and have more of Seti to themselves. I don't think anyone would do that. Some would joke about doing it, but wouldn't really. Whatever the reason As of now SETI community, I have taken the dedicated (Intel(R) Xeon(R)CPU X5650@ 2.67GHz[Family6 Model 44 Stepping 2](24 processors)NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 (1023MB) driver: 301.42) away from the SETI Project because of inadequate Server Bandwidth and several Programing issues that impact overall Reliability and Functionally. All that has significantly diminished my sense of any doing any meaningful scientific contribution with Seti@Home. I started with SETI in June of 1999. I currently rank 9,667 out of 2,488,900 (99.6116 percentile) I hope you and several others who posted in the last few days understand that you can add other projects without dropping Seti. Just let the computer do whatever work it's able to get. You can even set your resource shares so that it will do all Seti when it can and switch to others only when it can't get Seti. ____________ David Sitting on my butt while others boldly go, Waiting for a message from a small furry creature from Alpha Centauri. | |
| ID: 1307722 · | |
Apparently not...Well there it is. Too many people trying to crunch for SETI. We knew this day would come.Well, maybe they should start and limit the number of WUs a single host can receive to cut down the the number of WUs that are "in progress" (forever). I just checked my oldest WU stuck in PV jail right now, and while it is not as bad as those folks with a couple thousands of WUs, this shows that this limit doesn't exist or doesn't work. All tasks for computer 3988571 288 WUs in progress right now, while by your statement, this host should not have more than 200. State: All (346) · In progress (288) · Validation pending (23) · Validation inconclusive (20) · Valid (12) · Invalid (0) · Error (3) Application: All (346) · Astropulse v505 (0) · AstroPulse v6 (2) · SETI@home Enhanced (344) · SETI@home v7 (0) So either that limit doesn't exist or it doesn't work/there are ways around it... If they show as with no server contacts for more than 7 days, sorry, I just call them deadbeats, I don't think that I had any of my hosts have a problem contacting the servers for more than 3 or 4, and that was during the power outage saga...Each time I check on one of my WUs that hasn't been validated in weeks, it comes down to a deadbeat cruncher hoarding thousands of WUs on a single host and then just abandoning them... Btw, above referenced host is contacting the servers more frequently, so it's not one of them, but still disproves the 100 WU limit your mentioned... Ralf | |
| ID: 1307734 · | |
If they show as with no server contacts for more than 7 days, sorry, I just call them deadbeats, I don't think that I had any of my hosts have a problem contacting the servers for more than 3 or 4, and that was during the power outage saga... Sorry for being a "deadbeat" a while back when my HDD died and I couldn't afford a new one for a couple of weeks. Then of course there was the time I had a PSU fail and I was working away. Still the time I had an MB fail I actually put the HDD in another cruncher with a shorter queue and avoided being a deadbeat. I must try harder! ____________ | |
| ID: 1307744 · | |
Message boards : News : We are recovering from a database crash
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |