Help Understanding RAC & Improving Mine |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Number crunching : Help Understanding RAC & Improving Mine
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
I'm hoping to get a better understanding on how a lot of other users have RAC in the 100,000s--while I am in the 200-300 range. | |
| ID: 1297912 · | |
|
These users with high RAC are running tasks on graphics card/s | |
| ID: 1297937 · | |
These users with high RAC are running tasks on graphics card/s I suspect it's a laptop that's only turned on for a few hours a day and set to not allow Boinc to process work if on battery or if other work useage is higher than 25%. | |
| ID: 1297953 · | |
|
Ah, that could be it. I have noticed it is pulling a lot less GPU tasks. I think the fan filter is due for a cleaning. Thank you! | |
| ID: 1297964 · | |
Ah, that could be it. I have noticed it is pulling a lot less GPU tasks. I think the fan filter is due for a cleaning. Thank you! The best way is to build a desktop machine, add a 1000W+ PSU and a MOBO that can handle 2-3 GPU's. Then populate the machine with those 2-3 GPU's (480's, 560's and higher are the most popular). I'll catch flak for this, but your CPU doesn't really matter that much in the grand scheme of things when you're dealing with GPU computing. Both AMD and Intel make some very powerful CPU's that are quite affordable. It all boils down to how many numbers your PC can crunch in a set amount of time. ____________ Executive Director GPU Users Group Inc. - brad@gpuug.org | |
| ID: 1297983 · | |
I'm hoping to get a better understanding on how a lot of other users have RAC in the 100,000s--while I am in the 200-300 range. I don't know much about the other projects, but will assume they give credit similar to SaH. The combined RAC of 329.41 shown is about what a host averaging 3 midrange SaH tasks per day (21 per week) would have. Based on the "Average processing rate" (APR) values from http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/host_app_versions.php?hostid=5330289, full crunching with 8 CPU cores and the GPU would get 21 tasks done in about 14 hours. I put that on a weekly basis on the assumption the usage may vary on weekends. Those APR values show the 8 CPU cores together at about 39 GFLOPS, the GPU at 29 GFLOPS. But the CUDA (6.08) and CUDA23 (6.09) APRs are about the same, an indication of a known problem where both apps end up using the same cudart.dll and cufft.dll files, and IIRC it's the slower (earlier) ones. My guess is that CUDA23 processing would be considerably faster with the right files, but I don't know if anyone has found a way to avoid the problem while running stock on a 2xx CUDA card. Joe | |
| ID: 1298061 · | |
|
Just looking at your PC's results, ALL the work units returned have been CUDA ones, nothing from the CPU at all? | |
| ID: 1298296 · | |
|
Lunatics has nothing to download as they are currently on hold due to leagl Issues. So Its stock apps for now. | |
| ID: 1298399 · | |
Message boards : Number crunching : Help Understanding RAC & Improving Mine
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |