LOL.....discussing Obama's raping of our economy for his political means?????/


log in

Advanced search

Message boards : Politics : LOL.....discussing Obama's raping of our economy for his political means?????/

1 · 2 · Next
Author Message
Message 1297387 - Posted: 21 Oct 2012, 0:18:30 UTC

Ah, The Smell of Left and Right Brain burning out in The Evening. Nice.

Ewww, that smell. The Smell is.....

The DENOM...ella
____________


Profile Robert Waite
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 23 Oct 07
Posts: 2226
Credit: 5,814,760
RAC: 713
Canada
Message 1297475 - Posted: 21 Oct 2012, 7:36:41 UTC

Marky thinks only repubs actually pay taxes

____________
I do not fight fascists because I think I can win.
I fight them because they are fascists.
Chris Hedges

A riot is the language of the unheard. -Martin Luther King, Jr.

Profile Sarge
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Aug 99
Posts: 9258
Credit: 1,557,097
RAC: 565
United States
Message 1297772 - Posted: 22 Oct 2012, 2:14:54 UTC - in response to Message 1297362.

Now THAT might be considered politics.

But he gets away with it with you liberals.

Now THAT might be considered obscene.


Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for Mitt.

Profile soft^spirit
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 6374
Credit: 28,647,395
RAC: 516
United States
Message 1297780 - Posted: 22 Oct 2012, 3:30:22 UTC

Obama is a moderate. If he was liberal, he would have shut down the TSA, cleaned up the USDA, Put some teeth in the FDA, Cracked down on the ARA,
and done much much more.

The liberals are disappointed. But currently the Teapublicans have hijacked our congress and face us with real regress. We still have some hope for a
bit of progress.

The borrow and spend teapublicans created the mess. He has been trying to bail it out while congress has been trying to drill holes in the bottom of the boat.


____________

Janice

Profile betregerProject donor
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 2662
Credit: 5,507,660
RAC: 6,723
United States
Message 1297795 - Posted: 22 Oct 2012, 4:47:47 UTC - in response to Message 1297780.

+1
____________

Profile Sarge
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Aug 99
Posts: 9258
Credit: 1,557,097
RAC: 565
United States
Message 1297987 - Posted: 22 Oct 2012, 21:43:49 UTC - in response to Message 1297795.
Last modified: 22 Oct 2012, 21:44:06 UTC

Thank you for +1ing "Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for Mitt", Betreger. :)
Next time we have a 911, I will do as the LowestCommonDENOMinatorELLA tells me to, and "go shopping", so he can profit from his speculations.

Profile betregerProject donor
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 2662
Credit: 5,507,660
RAC: 6,723
United States
Message 1298007 - Posted: 22 Oct 2012, 23:13:13 UTC - in response to Message 1297987.

Sarge, your response to my approval of Soft Spirit/s post does not make sense to me, please spell it out for an elder. Sorry if I am slow.
____________

Profile Sarge
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Aug 99
Posts: 9258
Credit: 1,557,097
RAC: 565
United States
Message 1298095 - Posted: 23 Oct 2012, 4:09:56 UTC - in response to Message 1298007.

Sarge, your response to my approval of Soft Spirit/s post does not make sense to me, please spell it out for an elder. Sorry if I am slow.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6jx1QZskGFg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxk9PW83VCY

BarryAZ
Send message
Joined: 1 Apr 01
Posts: 2580
Credit: 12,446,204
RAC: 3,285
United States
Message 1298260 - Posted: 23 Oct 2012, 23:31:21 UTC - in response to Message 1297780.

Soft, during Bush II it wasn't borrow and spend TeaPublicans -- it was borrow and spend Republicans. The Teapublican hijack didn't really take place until the tone of the presidency went dark.

Then you have Romney who is at various times Obama-Lite (debate on foreign policy), Romney-Moderate -- previous two debates, Romney the 'severe conservative' and Romney the Teapublican.

The thing is, if Romney is elected, the Democrats will have enough votes to play the same game the Teapublicans have and block action -- be full up partisan.

Absent compromise from both parties -- Romney would inherit a new recession and then the Democrats could emulate the dog/manger Teapublican behavior of the past two years as it seems people are far more inclined to blame the President than Congress when things don't go well.

Profile Gary CharpentierProject donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 13187
Credit: 7,945,461
RAC: 15,452
United States
Message 1298306 - Posted: 24 Oct 2012, 2:46:06 UTC - in response to Message 1298260.

Excellent analysis. I suspect Romney being a business person would actually want compromise, it tends to be the only way to get stuff done, and getting stuff done is what business is about. Of course the partisans would never allow it, they have far to much to loose to ever allow that.

____________

Profile soft^spirit
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 6374
Credit: 28,647,395
RAC: 516
United States
Message 1298307 - Posted: 24 Oct 2012, 2:49:42 UTC - in response to Message 1298306.

Excellent analysis. I suspect Romney being a business person would actually want compromise, it tends to be the only way to get stuff done, and getting stuff done is what business is about. Of course the partisans would never allow it, they have far to much to loose to ever allow that.


Romney owes too many favors and has too much money to make in getting ahead in favors. It would be the same as Bush 3.0 .

In the mean time.. the actual liberals are left out of the discussion.


____________

Janice

Profile Gary CharpentierProject donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 13187
Credit: 7,945,461
RAC: 15,452
United States
Message 1298312 - Posted: 24 Oct 2012, 3:11:18 UTC - in response to Message 1298307.

Excellent analysis. I suspect Romney being a business person would actually want compromise, it tends to be the only way to get stuff done, and getting stuff done is what business is about. Of course the partisans would never allow it, they have far to much to loose to ever allow that.


Romney owes too many favors and has too much money to make in getting ahead in favors. It would be the same as Bush 3.0 .

It has to be better than a Chicago Politician in Chicago bribery and nepotism mode. Besides, Romney has his money unless Obama taxes his IRA away ...

In the mean time.. the actual liberals are left out of the discussion.

As extremist fringes should be, er your idea of a liberal is an extremist fringe. I mean when it appears as if the ideals you want make Fidel Castro look like a teapublican ...


Took an online test for which presidential candidate I should support. Want to guess which two major party candidates came in at under 50% for me. Want to guess if anyone came in at over 90%?

____________

BarryAZ
Send message
Joined: 1 Apr 01
Posts: 2580
Credit: 12,446,204
RAC: 3,285
United States
Message 1298355 - Posted: 24 Oct 2012, 6:22:02 UTC - in response to Message 1298306.

If Romney the moderate is elected and isn't removed from office by Romney the Teapublican (concept of self-impeachment), then he just might accept a compromise that allows for increased taxes on the uber-wealthy in order to 'keep defense strong'.

It will be interesting to see what happens in the lame duck session -- absent compromise, with a Romney election, he's going to really have problems creating the 12.5 million jobs that he says his plan will create (notwithstanding that the other Romney maintains that government doesn't create jobs).

I hear some families are going to send their kids out in Romney costumes -- only large families though, too many different Romney's for smaller families.



Excellent analysis. I suspect Romney being a business person would actually want compromise, it tends to be the only way to get stuff done, and getting stuff done is what business is about. Of course the partisans would never allow it, they have far to much to loose to ever allow that.

BarryAZ
Send message
Joined: 1 Apr 01
Posts: 2580
Credit: 12,446,204
RAC: 3,285
United States
Message 1298356 - Posted: 24 Oct 2012, 6:25:48 UTC - in response to Message 1298312.

Well, there is liberal, and then there is what the Teapublicans call socialist. Then you have the 'moderate' Ryan plan which will eliminate funding for half of those on Medicaid.

Obamacare has real problems not because it went too far to the left, rather it has problems because it focused on paying off big insurance companies.




As extremist fringes should be, er your idea of a liberal is an extremist fringe. I mean when it appears as if the ideals you want make Fidel Castro look like a teapublican ...



Profile Gary CharpentierProject donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 13187
Credit: 7,945,461
RAC: 15,452
United States
Message 1298405 - Posted: 24 Oct 2012, 20:36:51 UTC - in response to Message 1298355.

There are only two Romneys. Primary Romney and Campaign Romney. Damn shame there are so many RINO tea idiots in the party of Goldwater that people have to cow tow to them.

If Romney the moderate is elected and isn't removed from office by Romney the Teapublican (concept of self-impeachment), then he just might accept a compromise that allows for increased taxes on the uber-wealthy in order to 'keep defense strong'.

It will be interesting to see what happens in the lame duck session -- absent compromise, with a Romney election, he's going to really have problems creating the 12.5 million jobs that he says his plan will create (notwithstanding that the other Romney maintains that government doesn't create jobs).

I hear some families are going to send their kids out in Romney costumes -- only large families though, too many different Romney's for smaller families.



Excellent analysis. I suspect Romney being a business person would actually want compromise, it tends to be the only way to get stuff done, and getting stuff done is what business is about. Of course the partisans would never allow it, they have far to much to loose to ever allow that.



____________

Profile Gary CharpentierProject donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 13187
Credit: 7,945,461
RAC: 15,452
United States
Message 1298407 - Posted: 24 Oct 2012, 20:39:32 UTC - in response to Message 1298356.

Obamacare has real problems not because it went too far to the left, rather it has problems because it focused on paying off big insurance companies

BTW anyone know how much health insurance companies are pouring into the campaign and for what candidate?

____________

Profile Sarge
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Aug 99
Posts: 9258
Credit: 1,557,097
RAC: 565
United States
Message 1298443 - Posted: 24 Oct 2012, 23:14:42 UTC

How's that creating severally multiply vitriolicy thready thingy workin' out for ya, Mark?

BarryAZ
Send message
Joined: 1 Apr 01
Posts: 2580
Credit: 12,446,204
RAC: 3,285
United States
Message 1298455 - Posted: 24 Oct 2012, 23:49:02 UTC - in response to Message 1298405.

Gary -- there was campaign Romney after the Teapublican nomination. Then there was debate Romney who moved so far to the center that his own talking heads were confused and back tracked him on some claim.

My own guess is that a President Romney would have to deal left and right, and that Moderate Romney might be self-impeached by Teapublican Romney. In doing so, he'd empower the Senate to play bill blockade mode.



There are only two Romneys. Primary Romney and Campaign Romney. Damn shame there are so many RINO tea idiots in the party of Goldwater that people have to cow tow to them.


1 · 2 · Next

Message boards : Politics : LOL.....discussing Obama's raping of our economy for his political means?????/

Copyright © 2014 University of California