VALIDATION INCONCLUSIVE

Message boards : Number crunching : VALIDATION INCONCLUSIVE
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

AuthorMessage
Profile shizaru
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Jun 04
Posts: 1130
Credit: 1,967,904
RAC: 0
Greece
Message 1298965 - Posted: 26 Oct 2012, 15:00:49 UTC - in response to Message 1298958.  

I thought it was the 290 series drivers that were bad.


Oh I'm not saying the 300 drivers are bad... if that were the case the NC forum would be on fire! Not to mention that none of the Top Computers would be using them:)

It could be a coincidence (sample size is too small to say for sure) but it looks like any problem card that isn't a 560Ti, is running the 300 series.
ID: 1298965 · Report as offensive
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2430
Credit: 926,046
RAC: 0
Message 1299039 - Posted: 26 Oct 2012, 18:28:00 UTC
Last modified: 26 Oct 2012, 18:31:26 UTC

The graphics card which comes with my motherboard is the one I chose to have among certain different vendors of such cards.

Because I am not too familar with how the other types of cards goes with particular motherboards/processors and their respective vendors, my best knowledge goes with what I am currently having.

Is it possible to create some kind of statistics of how many inconclusives goes with specific types of graphics cards (including drivers being used) against the number of tasks which have been returned from one or more host(s) in total in order to be able to make up any comparison?

In this way, the graphics cards showing the best performance should end up at the top of such a comparison list and the graphics card which are having the poorest performance (most inconclusives) should end up at the bottom of such a list (or maybe the opposite way).

Or will this only become prejudice?
ID: 1299039 · Report as offensive
David S
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 99
Posts: 18352
Credit: 27,761,924
RAC: 12
United States
Message 1299045 - Posted: 26 Oct 2012, 18:55:59 UTC - in response to Message 1298958.  

I have a ... relatively low number of inconclusives, no invalids, and only timeout errors.

And of course, no sooner do I say that than one of my inconclusives comes up as invalid. But why is my stderr_txt blank?

David
Sitting on my butt while others boldly go,
Waiting for a message from a small furry creature from Alpha Centauri.

ID: 1299045 · Report as offensive
Josef W. Segur
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 99
Posts: 4504
Credit: 1,414,761
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1299165 - Posted: 26 Oct 2012, 23:50:15 UTC - in response to Message 1299045.  

...
But why is my stderr_txt blank?

It happens, and not only here. Last January Matt Arsenault of MilkyWay@Home started a thread on the boinc_dev mailing list stderr returned unreliable. At the end of the thread he proposed a potential fix, but Dr. Anderson didn't accept the guess at what was causing the problem so didn't accept the fix.

The apps you're using already have a similar but different change by Jason. That's part of the

boinc_exit(): requesting safe worker shutdown ->
boinc_exit(): received safe worker shutdown acknowledge ->

seen at the end when stderr does get transferred properly. I'm pretty sure it helps, but as you've seen not always.
                                                                    Joe
ID: 1299165 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Message boards : Number crunching : VALIDATION INCONCLUSIVE


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.