Message boards :
Number crunching :
VALIDATION INCONCLUSIVE
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5
Author | Message |
---|---|
shizaru Send message Joined: 14 Jun 04 Posts: 1130 Credit: 1,967,904 RAC: 0 |
I thought it was the 290 series drivers that were bad. Oh I'm not saying the 300 drivers are bad... if that were the case the NC forum would be on fire! Not to mention that none of the Top Computers would be using them:) It could be a coincidence (sample size is too small to say for sure) but it looks like any problem card that isn't a 560Ti, is running the 300 series. |
musicplayer Send message Joined: 17 May 10 Posts: 2430 Credit: 926,046 RAC: 0 |
The graphics card which comes with my motherboard is the one I chose to have among certain different vendors of such cards. Because I am not too familar with how the other types of cards goes with particular motherboards/processors and their respective vendors, my best knowledge goes with what I am currently having. Is it possible to create some kind of statistics of how many inconclusives goes with specific types of graphics cards (including drivers being used) against the number of tasks which have been returned from one or more host(s) in total in order to be able to make up any comparison? In this way, the graphics cards showing the best performance should end up at the top of such a comparison list and the graphics card which are having the poorest performance (most inconclusives) should end up at the bottom of such a list (or maybe the opposite way). Or will this only become prejudice? |
David S Send message Joined: 4 Oct 99 Posts: 18352 Credit: 27,761,924 RAC: 12 |
I have a ... relatively low number of inconclusives, no invalids, and only timeout errors. And of course, no sooner do I say that than one of my inconclusives comes up as invalid. But why is my stderr_txt blank? David Sitting on my butt while others boldly go, Waiting for a message from a small furry creature from Alpha Centauri. |
Josef W. Segur Send message Joined: 30 Oct 99 Posts: 4504 Credit: 1,414,761 RAC: 0 |
... It happens, and not only here. Last January Matt Arsenault of MilkyWay@Home started a thread on the boinc_dev mailing list stderr returned unreliable. At the end of the thread he proposed a potential fix, but Dr. Anderson didn't accept the guess at what was causing the problem so didn't accept the fix. The apps you're using already have a similar but different change by Jason. That's part of the boinc_exit(): requesting safe worker shutdown -> seen at the end when stderr does get transferred properly. I'm pretty sure it helps, but as you've seen not always. Joe |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.