Message boards :
Politics :
Gary McKinnon
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
While I do not believe he should be punished in the same way as any other hardened criminal should be in the same situation, I have to agree with the American lawyer when he said: American lawyer, David Rivkin, a former White House adviser, said the decision was "laughable", adding "under that logic, anybody who claims some kind of physical or mental problem can commit crimes with impunity and get away with it". Even those with mental illness who commit crime need to be made responsible (assuming a certain level of lucidity in their decision making) for their actions. I don't know how I feel about extradition, but I do know that without some sort of punishment and/or counseling, a tiny slap on the wrists may not be enough to make him learn from his mistake. 60 years in a U.S. prison seems a bit excessive for someone hacking a U.S. military computer looking for proof of a hidden alien UFO cover-up. That $800,000 worth of damages also seems rather high and I'd like to know how they arrived at that number. |
Sirius B Send message Joined: 26 Dec 00 Posts: 24870 Credit: 3,081,182 RAC: 7 |
Personally, I always saw the US claims as totally laughable! As for punishment, I think he's been punished enough by going through this facade for a decade. At last, a home secretary with some balls! |
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
Based upon your views you've expressed in the past about the U.S., it's unsurprising that you find its claims laughable. While I agree that living that life of mental illness is certainly a form of punishment I would never want, I cannot agree that he shouldn't be held accountable for his actions in some way, if even through counseling or being prevented from using a computer or the internet. |
James Sotherden Send message Joined: 16 May 99 Posts: 10436 Credit: 110,373,059 RAC: 54 |
He should be held in a mental hospital then. Whos to say he wont try hacking another militarys computers? Maybe a UK army computer system. [/quote] Old James |
Sirius B Send message Joined: 26 Dec 00 Posts: 24870 Credit: 3,081,182 RAC: 7 |
Based upon your views you've expressed in the past about the U.S., it's unsurprising that you find its claims laughable. While I agree that living that life of mental illness is certainly a form of punishment I would never want, I cannot agree that he shouldn't be held accountable for his actions in some way, if even through counseling or being prevented from using a computer or the internet. You surprise me Oz. I think many here really ought to check up on a poster's post's before making comments like that. The man is autisic & has suffered enough over the past 10 years. That should be that. As for counselling, I agree, but that's where it should end. |
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
You surprise me Oz. I think many here really ought to check up on a poster's post's before making comments like that. I've been following the politics forum for many years now. Why else do you think I would have made that statement? I don't mean it as an attack, but I have only seen criticisms from you on many actions from the U.S. and the E.U. Perhaps I'm wrong about your opinions, but it would be easier to draw a different conclusion if I saw supportive comments too. The man is autisic & has suffered enough over the past 10 years. That should be that. As for counselling, I agree, but that's where it should end. Ok, so then what happens after he has completed his mandated counseling and a misfiring synapse tells him to look for something else on a private computer for which he does not have authorized access? Multiply that against every other mentally ill person who does the same (or claims mental instability as a motivation for breaking the law) and the large fees required to fix unauthorized access issues (even if each incident costs as little as $10,000), who pays for that? In some way or another we do. If it's through the government, then we pay for it in the form of taxes. If it's a private corporation, we pay for it through trickle-down expenses. I can forgive a first incident, but a second incident should never happen. |
Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30591 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 |
Personally, I always saw the US claims as totally laughable! As for punishment, I think he's been punished enough by going through this facade for a decade. Let him argue in a US court that he is insane or had temporary insanity. If not, don't do the crime if you can't do the time. What I find laughable is that just telling him he is going to be extradited with magically make him commit suicide. Hell, doesn't the UK watch potential suicide cases so they don't commit the act? Now explain that one! |
betreger Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 11354 Credit: 29,581,041 RAC: 66 |
IMO 10 years of house arrest is punishment enough. |
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
I found a better write-up about the situation, and ArsTechnica even quotes the U.S Government's stance and attempts to show where the $700,000 in damages comes from: Timothy B. Lee@ArsTechnica.com wrote: McKinnon's alleged crime is described in a 2008 court decision: Original article: UK halts extradition of accused hacker over suicide concerns It seems the hacker purposefully deleted important files, which goes far beyond the scope of simply looking for evidence of a US Government cover-up conspiracy. This was malicious intent to cause harm to government computers and despite being autistic, seemed to show some lucidity in his decision to gain illegal entry to systems he was not authorized to access. |
skildude Send message Joined: 4 Oct 00 Posts: 9541 Credit: 50,759,529 RAC: 60 |
autism aside he was coherent enough to hack computers. that takes a specific skill set and is considered a major problem. If they've Identified him as a hacker then he needs to be kept away from any form of internet connection. In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face. Diogenes Of Sinope |
Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30591 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 |
IMO 10 years of house arrest is punishment enough. What punishment? He could have waved his hearings, plead insanity and been back home free in less than a year. This is his choice. |
Uli Send message Joined: 6 Feb 00 Posts: 10923 Credit: 5,996,015 RAC: 1 |
autism aside he was coherent enough to hack computers. that takes a specific skill set and is considered a major problem. If they've Identified him as a hacker then he needs to be kept away from any form of internet connection. +1 Pluto will always be a planet to me. Seti Ambassador Not to late to order an Anni Shirt |
betreger Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 11354 Credit: 29,581,041 RAC: 66 |
IMO 10 years of house arrest is punishment enough. So he suffered a greater punishment, 10 years of house arrest, what's the big deal? |
Es99 Send message Joined: 23 Aug 05 Posts: 10874 Credit: 350,402 RAC: 0 |
IMO 10 years of house arrest is punishment enough. LOL. Do you think anyone outside of America believes that for a minute? No one in their right mind would allow themselves to be extradited to America. People outside of America don't trust America and most of us certainly don't think that the American justice system is fair. That doesn't even take into account the trauma inflicted on an Aspergers person but taking them away from their home, their family, everything they know to stand trial in a strange hostile place. I suggest people here read up a little about Aspergers and maybe they might understand why so many people in the UK think that America is being overbearing, bullyish and hysterical about this whole situation. Reality Internet Personality |
Sirius B Send message Joined: 26 Dec 00 Posts: 24870 Credit: 3,081,182 RAC: 7 |
@ Betreger & ES99 Excellent posts. @Oz I've defended the States when it was deserved. I've defended the UK when it was deserved & past posts prove that. What I do find laughable is the fact that an autisic person highlighted the "apparent" ease at which the mighty US Military was hacked & rather than get that secured ASAP, end up wasting 10 years & a lot of taxpayers money baying for blood. Would'nt it have been a lot more sensible to approach the man explaining what he did wrong & could he assist in hardening the systems? Many a black hat are now white hats working for the big security companies, so I can't see why this could'nt have been done. |
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
No one in their right mind would allow themselves to be extradited to America. People outside of America don't trust America and most of us certainly don't think that the American justice system is fair. That doesn't even take into account the trauma inflicted on an Aspergers person but taking them away from their home, their family, everything they know to stand trial in a strange hostile place. I suppose we would need to have a discussion on how we each define 'justice'. You can call me biased, but I believe that the American court system is the most just and fair compared to any other country. Comparatively, France and Germany openly ban their citizens from even denying the Holocost happened. Brazil and Italy have actually arrested Google executives because the search giant refuses to take down the controversial but legally protected anti-Muslim film that has outraged the Muslim community. I wouldn't call any of that justice. I suggest people here read up a little about Aspergers and maybe they might understand why so many people in the UK think that America is being overbearing, bullyish and hysterical about this whole situation. I'm quite aware of what Asperger's is. I know a few people who's kids/young adults have to deal with Autism daily, and I've spent some time with them (though that doesn't qualify me as an expert on the matter). Personally, I seriously doubt this guy has it. Even if the claim is true, I don't believe it to be just to allow someone to get away with hacking simply because they have issues. Though I will reiterate that I don't necessarily think he must be extradited and tried in the U.S., but I would like to know exactly what the U.K. plans to do with him. |
Sirius B Send message Joined: 26 Dec 00 Posts: 24870 Credit: 3,081,182 RAC: 7 |
Quite wrong on the last sentence. Excellent post. That would have been the sensible way to handle it, but who says those at the top are sensible! |
Nick Send message Joined: 11 Oct 11 Posts: 4344 Credit: 3,313,107 RAC: 0 |
Strange infliction is autism, and some of you will know that many sufferers from autism tend also to poses immense intelligence hence capabilities in certain fields where they apply an ability. With this chap in question there is every chance that he did not actually realise the actual severity of the crime he was committing. He is most probably totally incapable of being responsible nor rational and through the nature of his ailment liable to be irresponsible in most of what he does. He possess the ability of a computer scientist but unfortunately though this is combined with the mental age of a 10 year old. Sufferers of Asperger's Syndrome are totally incapable of facing up to what they have done wrong and certainly incapable of standing up in any court. The whole security breach here was totally miss-managed and most probably so by all parties concerned....both sides of the pond. Security was breached here by all and not just the appellant himself, remember, just by stating that your military security has been breach is a breach of military security in itself. Can't any military or government figures keep their gob's shut about anything these days. As regards actions to take on such breaches....put your brains into gear first, keep gobs shut until such time as it becomes evident that you will secure a prosecution. Then decide on how best to use the successful prosecution to dissuade others from trying to commit the same crime. One thing for sure, don't tell the world your system was breached......hackers will see this breakdown as a challenge to find even more potential holes in your system.... ....and why? because you've told them you have holes in your system. The Kite Fliers -------------------- Kite fliers: An imaginary club of solo members, those who don't yet belong to a formal team so "fly their own kites" - as the saying goes. |
Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30591 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 |
What should have happened is that as a matter of principle he should have stood trial in the USA, with certain safeguards. He should have been convicted of his crime and given a nominal sentence of say 5 years. And you believe that there are no safeguards in the US? (Texas excepted) And where did life sentence come from? I bet I know. Some muckraker in the press took all the charges with the nice short sentences and added them together and assumed that he would be sentenced to consecutive terms and not concurrent terms. But that is what muckrakers do, lie. They likely also ignored federal sentencing guidelines that call for sentence reduction in the case of mental illness. But that is what muckrakers do, lie. But the sentence should have been been suspended, and he should have been returned to the UK. I'm glad to know you are a psychiatric doctor and have examined him. It would then have been up to the UK authorities to have decided whether he should serve any or all of it in the UK, based upon humanitarian grounds. So, why isn't that in the extradition treaty? You are aware the US has signed such treaties allowing for the bilateral repatriation of foreign citizens aren't you? |
Nick Send message Joined: 11 Oct 11 Posts: 4344 Credit: 3,313,107 RAC: 0 |
According to paragraph 1, any sentenced person who may be eligible for transfer under the convention shall be informed, by the sentencing State, of the convention’s substance. This is to make the sentenced person aware of the possibilities for transfer offered by the convention and the legal consequences which a transfer to his home country would have. The information will enable him to decide whether he wishes to express an interest in being transferred. It is to be noted, however, that the sentenced person cannot himself make the formal request for transfer; it follows from Article 2.3 that transfer may be requested only by the sentencing or the administering State. Yes there is a bilateral agreement but only exercisable if the administering state wishes for this to happen. If you wish for repatriation not to occur then there's nothing in the treaty to force you to repatriate. So what the treaty worth? absolutely nothing!! The Kite Fliers -------------------- Kite fliers: An imaginary club of solo members, those who don't yet belong to a formal team so "fly their own kites" - as the saying goes. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.